Local Democracy Revisited
Keywords:
Abstract
The reform of institutional arrangements at the local level especially the personalisation of executive power and the implementation of new options to participate was expected to reinforce local democracy However there were doubts from the start as to whether this goal could be achieved because institutional reforms were combined with the implementation of New Public Management After more than a decade an evaluation of the adopted measures in major western democracies seems appropriate The comparative analysis draws on empirical studies conducted over three decades Because of available data that is extremely difficult to compose for all western democracies decision making procedures have been neglected in comparative empirical research The evaluation presented here includes a puzzle of findings which underpin future prospects of continuing reforms The result is that a lack of accountability and control prevents democratization Furthermore measures taken to improve direct citizen participation have not achieved their goal
Downloads
- Article PDF
- TEI XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- Lens* NISO JATS XML (Beta by AI)
- HTML Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- DBK XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX pdf Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- EPUB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- MD Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- FO Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- BIB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
How to Cite
References
Published
2013-05-15
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Authors and Global Journals Private Limited

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.