Assessing Youth Response to Media and Information Literacy Competencies through an Online Course: An Empirical Study and Comparative Analysis - Part 2
Keywords:
media and information literacy; mil education; intercultural dialogue; interreligious dialogue; educational strategies; mil skills
Abstract
This article is Part 2 of the paper titles Assessing Youth Response to Media and Information Literacy Competencies through an online course: An Empirical Study and Comparative Analysis presented into articles. Part 1 offers a discourse on the urgency for MIL to empower youth, the context, and a suggested methodology. This second part shows the principal findings obtained with this research and some discussion. 1 Part 2 of the study is presented here. See Part 1 earlier in this Journal Volume. This study explores how best to disseminate media and information literacy (MIL) skills and inform goaloriented development of educational policies and strategies. Using the qualitative and quantitative method, the research, completed in 2018, investigated youth responses to online and offline personal, social, economic, political and cultural challenges and opportunities before and after acquiring MILrelated skills. It involved a sample of 1,735 14-to 30-year-olds who reflected on their knowledge of MIL and their attitudes toward social and democratic issues such as freedom of expression (FOE), freedom of information (FOI), intercultural dialogue (ICD) and interreligious dialogue (IRD).
Downloads
- Article PDF
- TEI XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- Lens* NISO JATS XML (Beta by AI)
- HTML Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- DBK XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX pdf Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- EPUB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- MD Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- FO Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- BIB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
How to Cite
References
R Balleste (2015) Internet Governance: Origins, Current Issues, and Future Possibilities.
J Beyers (2013) the Emergence of a Freedom of Information Movement: Anonymous, WikiLeaks, the Pirate Party, and Iceland. 19, 141-154.
(2017) Ulla Carlsson and Reeta Pöyhtäri (eds), The Assault on Journalism. 32(6), 632-632.
Erwin Chemerinsky, Howard Gillman (2016) Free Speech on Campus. 62(30).
A Grizzle (2018) Assessing Citizens' Responses to Media and Information Literacy Competencies through an online course: An Empirical Study and Critical Comparative Analysis of Experts' Views.
A Grizzle, M Hamada (2019) Media and Information Literacy Expansion (MILx) Reaching Citizens with MIL and other Social Competencies.
L Jennings, D Parra-Medina, D Messias, K Mcloughlin (2012) Toward a critical social theory of youth empowerment.
L Jennings, J Green (1999) Locating democratizing and transformative practices within classroom discourse. 34(2), 1-4.
L Jennings, D Parra-Medina, D Hilfinger-Messias, R Mcloughlin, K Mcloughlin (2006) Toward a Critical Social Theory of Youth Empowerment. 14, 31-55.
Jennifer Jerit, Jason Barabas, Toby Bolsen (2006) Citizens, Knowledge, and the Information Environment. 50(2), 266-282.
Jeong-Hee Kim, Jong-Youl Hong (2015) Intercultural Dialogue in the Media: Focused on (Welcome to South). 10(8), 115-124.
John Ungerleider (2012) Structured youth dialogue to empower peacebuilding and leadership. 29(4), 381-402.
J Varlejs, E Simpson (1986) Freedom of Information and Youth.
Emily Vraga, Melissa Tully (2015) Effectiveness of a Non-Classroom News Media Literacy Intervention Among Different Undergraduate Populations. 71(4), 440-452.
Emily Vraga, Melissa Tully (2015) Media Literacy Messages and Hostile Media Perceptions: Processing of Nonpartisan Versus Partisan Political Information. 18(4), 422-448.
Wan Sabri Wan, Y Arfah Ab, M (2012) Inter-Religious Dialogue Models in Malaysia. 2(1), 7-13.
Published
2021-07-27
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Authors and Global Journals Private Limited

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.