Display of Counter Productive Work Behaviour in Relation to Person-Organization Fit
Keywords:
organizational counterproductive work behaviour (CWB-O), interpersonal counterproductive work behaviour (CWB-I) and person-organization fit (P-O Fit)
Abstract
The present study was aimed to investigate the relationship between counterproductive work behaviour (CWB) and person-organization fit (P-O Fit) within the context of manufacturing industry situated in Baddi, Himachal Pradesh. The sample comprised 300 employees of production department (150 male and 150 female respondents). The analysis revealed that for the total sample, Interpersonal Similarities (12%) and unique roles (4%) have contributed 16% of variance in totality for Organizational-Counterproductive Work Behaviour and for Interpersonal-Counterproductive Work Behaviour, Unique Roles (4%) and Value Congruence (2%) contributed for 6% variance in totality. In Males sample, Unique Roles explained maximum variance (12%) followed by Need Supplies (5%) and Interpersonal Similarities (3%) for Organizational-Counterproductive Work Behaviour. For Interpersonal-CWB only Unique Roles have turned out to be a significant predictor which accounted for 5% of variance. In Females sample, Interpersonal Similarities explained maximum variance (16%) followed by Demand Abilities (4%) in total these predictors accounted for 20% variance for Organizational-Counterproductive Work Behaviour.
Downloads
- Article PDF
- TEI XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- Lens* NISO JATS XML (Beta by AI)
- HTML Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- DBK XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX pdf Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- EPUB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- MD Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- FO Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- BIB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
How to Cite
References
S Applebaum, B Shapiro, J Molson (2007) Diagnosis and remedies for deviant workplace behaviors. 9(2), 14-20.
S Aryee, P Budhwar, Z Chen (2002) Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: Test of a Social Exchange Model. 23(3), 267-285.
K Aquino, B Galperin, R Bennett (2004) Social status and aggressiveness as moderator of the relationship between interactional justice and work place deviance. 34(5), 1001-1029.
Rebecca Bennett, Sandra Robinson (2000) Development of a measure of workplace deviance.. 85(3), 349-360.
P Blau (1964) Exchange and power in social life.
Geoffrey Borman, N Dowling (2008) Teacher Attrition and Retention: A Meta-Analytic and Narrative Review of the Research. 78(3), 367-409.
D Cable, T Judge (1994) Personorganization fit and theory of work adjustment: Implications for satisfaction, tenure, and career success. 44, 32-54.
Daniel Cable, Timothy Judge (1996) Person-Organization Fit, Job Choice Decisions, and Organizational Entry. 67(3), 294-311.
Daniel Cable, Timothy Judge (1997) Interviewers' perceptions of person-organization fit and organizational selection decisions.. 82(4), 546-561.
Daniel Cable, Jeffrey Edwards (2004) Complementary and Supplementary Fit: A Theoretical and Empirical Integration.. 89(5), 822-834.
D Caldwell, C O'reilly, Iii (1990) Measuring person-job fit with a profile-comparison process. 75(6), 648-657.
B Christopher, J Leonard, M Steven (2012) The general environment fit scale: A factor analysis and test of convergent construct validity.
C Henle (2005) Predicting workplace CWB from the interaction between organizational justice and personality. 17(2), 247-263.
Abid Hussain, Muhammad Rizwan-Ul-Haq, Hassan Al-Ayedh, Ahmed Al-Jabr (2014) Mycoinsecticides: Potential and Future Perspective. 6(1), 45-53.
J Hoffman, J Woehr (2006) A quantitative review of the relationship between personorganization Fit and behavioral outcomes. 68, 389-399.
A Kristof-Brown, R Zimmerman, E Johnson (2005) Consequences of individuals' fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, personorganization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. 58, 281-342.
Amy Kristof (1996) PERSON‐ORGANIZATION FIT: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW OF ITS CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND IMPLICATIONS. 49(1), 1-49.
A Kristof-Brown (2000) PERCEIVED APPLICANT FIT: DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN RECRUITERS' PERCEPTIONS OF PERSON‐JOB AND PERSON‐ORGANIZATION FIT. 53(3), 643-671.
Bangcheng Liu, Jianxin Liu, Jin Hu (2010) Person-Organization Fit, Job Satisfaction, and Turnover Intention: An Empirical Study in the Chinese Public Sector. 38(5), 615-625.
Mahmut Demir, Sirvan, Sen Demir, Kevin Nield (2015) The relationship between person-organization fit, organizational identification and work outcomes. 16(2), 369-386.
C O'reilly, J Chatman, D Caldwell (1991) People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. 34, 487-516.
C O'reilly, J Chatman (1986) Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. 71, 492-499.
Lisa Penney, Paul Spector (2002) Narcissism and Counterproductive Work Behavior: Do Bigger Egos Mean Bigger Problems?. 10(1-2), 126-134.
S, Jailap Deen, Ashok Bosley (2015) The effect of congruence between perceived personal and organizational values on organizational commitment.
Published
2016-02-06
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Authors and Global Journals Private Limited

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.