English for Specific Academic Purposes

Authors

  • Dkhissi Yahya

Keywords:

ESAP; ICT; linguistics; digital teaching; reconstructive model

Abstract

In most non-English speaking countries, the language is basically seen as an academic endeavour for some general or specific purposes. Teachers, academicians, syllabus designers, but not learners, are often involved in structuring, designing or promoting the curricula and teaching activities. The rationale of this paper is to integrate other contributing components to the teaching and learning of English for Specific Academic Purposes (ESAP). Authentic material, ICT, learners' communication, task based activities, the teacher's facilitator role, digital teaching, purpose oriented assessment, learner centred methods and project oriented curricula are the current needs of higher education in the Moroccan university. Thus, the objective of this paper is to give some new insights that might contribute in the digital change and the current needs of learning and teaching enterprise. For this purpose, a case study of teaching some linguistic and research methods courses has been conducted in the English department at Chouaib Doukkali University, El Jadida, Morocco, to evaluate to current situation, analyse the data and suggest a reconstructive model based on ICT and learners' integration.

How to Cite

English for Specific Academic Purposes. (2014). Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 14(G6), 7-14. https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/1176

References

O Alexander, S Argent, J Spencer (2008) EAP Essentials. A teacher's guide to principles and practice.

Olwyn Alexander (2012) Exploring teacher beliefs in teaching EAP at low proficiency levels. 11(2), 99-111.

Baleap (2008) Competency Framework for Teachers of English for Academic Purposes.

D Bell (2005) Storming the Ivory Tower. 163-178.

D Bell (2004) Moving Teachers from the General to the Academic: Challenges and Issues in Teacher Training for EAP.

L Braskamp (2000) Toward a more holistic approach to assessing faculty as teachers. 83, 109-123.

L Braskamp, J Ory (1994) Assessing faculty work: Enhancing individual and instructional performance.

J Centra (1993) Reflective faculty evaluat ion.

Cho Lee, Shang-Hsuan Shih, Yu-Chih Shen (2001) Successful Use of High-Dose Brexpiprazole for Psychosis in Lewy Body Dementia Without Adverse Effects. 34(1), 99-101.

K Chick (1996) Safe-talk: collusion in apartheid education.

Peter Cohen (1981) Student Ratings of Instruction and Student Achievement: A Meta-analysis of Multisection Validity Studies. 51(3), 281-309.

J Cuseo (2002) The case for student evaluation of college courses. Policy Center on the First Year of College.

T Dudley-Evans, St, M John (1998) Developments in English for Specific Purposes. A multi-disciplinary approach.

S Feez (1998) Text-based syllabus design. 14.

J Flowerdew, M Peacock (2001) Research Perspectives on English for Academic Purposes.

M Halliday (1994) An introduction to functional grammar.

T Hutchinson, A Waters (1987) English for Specific Purposes. A learning-centred approach.

Ken Hyland, Liz Hamp-Lyons (2002) EAP: issues and directions. 1(1), 1-12.

R Jordan (1997) English for Academic Purposes.

M Krzanowski (2001) S/he holds the Trinity/UCLES Diploma: Are they ready to teach EAP? Retrieved 26.

G Sharpling (2002) Learning to Teach English for Academic Purposes: Some current training and development issues. 6, 82-94.

P Strevens (1988) ESP after 20 years: A reappraisal. 1-13.

L Vygotsky (1978) Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes.

English for Specific Academic Purposes

Published

2014-10-04

How to Cite

English for Specific Academic Purposes. (2014). Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 14(G6), 7-14. https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/1176