Law Beyond Doctrine: Socioemotional Learning as a Pedagogical Imperative

Authors

  • Dr. Katia Antunes

Keywords:

legal education reform, socioemotional learning, interdisciplinary pedagogy, human rights, active methodologies

Abstract

This article analyzes the imperative of integrating socioemotional competencies into legal education, in response to a global demand aligned with benchmarks such as UNESCO's 21st-century competencies and Sustainable Development Goal 4 (SDG 4). It critiques the limitations of traditional, technically focused legal pedagogy and advocates for transformative approaches that combine active methodologies with interdisciplinary rigor to better teach socioemotional competencies to law students. Through case studies from U.S. law schools, the study demonstrates how curricula emphasizing self-awareness, empathy, and strategic communication produces jurists capable of addressing contemporary legal challenges while upholding ethical and humanistic values. The analysis underscores the need for pedagogical reforms that align legal training with the socioemotional demands of modern practice, fostering professionals equipped to navigate complexity with both technical mastery and emotional intelligence.

Downloads

How to Cite

Law Beyond Doctrine: Socioemotional Learning as a Pedagogical Imperative. (2025). Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 25(G5), 27-37. https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/104406

References

J Adeodato (2019) Retórica como metódica para estudo do Direito.

T Almeida (2014) Caixa de Ferramentas em Mediação: aportes práticos e teóricos.

R Alves (2002) Por uma educação romântica.

J Applegate, B D´onofrio, A Holtzworth-Munroe (2009) Interdisciplinary psychology and law training in family and child mediation: an empirical study of the effects on law student mediators. 27(6), 1006-1025.

Aristotle (1985) Ética a Nicômacos.

E Bittar (2024) Metodologia da Pesquisa Jurídica.

Casel CASEL's SEL framework: what are the core competence areas and where are they promoted? Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning.

P Demo (1997) Pesquisa e construção do conhecimento.

R Dworkin (1986) Law's Empire.

R Dworkin (2006) Justice in Robes.

M Faria (2007) Direito e Ética: Aristóteles, Hobbes e Kant. 12.

M Feferbaum (2023) Transformative Legal Pedagogy: Integrating Socio-Emotional Learning in Law Schools.

M Feperbaum (2021) Metodologias ativas em Direito: guia prático para o ensino jurídico participativo e inovador.

J Finnis (1980) Natural Law and Natural Rights.

R Fisher, W Ury, B Patton (2005) Como chegar ao sim: como negociar acordos sem fazer concessões.

B Han, -C (2010) A sociedade do cansaço.

H Hart (1961) The Concept of Law.

(2023) Derek Bok Center for Teaching and Learning.

F Hernández (1998) Transgressão e Mudança na Educação.

A Machado, A Soares (2024) Revisão sistemática da literatura sobre intervenções de habilidades socioemocionais em estudantes universitários. 12(32).

Francis Mootz (2018) The Irrelevance of Contemporary Academic Philosophy for Law: Recovering the Rhetorical Tradition.

E Morin (2003) A cabeça bem-feita: repensar a reforma, reformar o pensamento.

R Nozick (1974) Anarchy, State, and Utopia.

Heloísa Oliveira, Tatiana Sanches, João Martins (2022) Problem-based learning in a flipped classroom: a case study for active learning in legal education in international law. 56(4), 435-451.

P Perrenoud (2000) Dez novas competências para ensinar.

J Rawls (1971) A Theory of Justice.

T Rios (2001) Compreender e Ensinar.

M Rosenberg (2006) Comunicação não-violenta: técnicas para aprimorar relacionamentos pessoais e profissionais.

C Steiner, P Perry (2001) Educação Emocional: um programa personalizado para desenvolver sua inteligência emocional.

(2015) Rethinking education: towards a global common good?.

(2015) Transforming governance for the 2030 agenda for sustainable development.

Thomas Powell (2025) Alien Land Cases in United States Supreme Court. 12(4), 259.

Tornetta Musk, C No (2018) Courts, Judges, and Lawyers. 103-115.

U (2022) Supreme Court of United States.

(2013) Members of the Supreme Court of the United States, 1789-2013. 570, 527-529.

W Ury (2015) Como chegar ao sim com vocês mesmo: o primeiro passo em qualquer negociação, conflito ou conversa difícil.

L Vygotsky (1989) Mind and Society. 209-232.

H Zehr (2008) Trocando as lentes: justiça restaurativa para o nosso tempo.

 Law Beyond Doctrine

Published

2025-10-22

How to Cite

Law Beyond Doctrine: Socioemotional Learning as a Pedagogical Imperative. (2025). Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 25(G5), 27-37. https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/104406