Behaviourism, Innatism, Cognitivism: Considering the Dominance to Provide Theoretical Underpinning of Language Acquisition Conjecture

Authors

  • Tahmina Sultana

Keywords:

acquisition, innatism, behaviorism, cognitivism, nativism, empiricism

Abstract

The language specialists have discerned that language is a species-specific and a biologically determined scheme for the human beings. After a child is born, it goes under pre-linguistic and linguistic stages of language acquisition. Although there are many different approaches to learning, three basic kinds of learning theory are prominent, like Behaviourism, Innatism, and Cognitivism. All these theories centered around 'nature' and 'nurture' theories or on 'empiricism' and 'nativism' concepts. According to empirical research usually knowledge comes through experience from the environment. Nativism holds that at least some knowledge is not acquired from the environment but is genetically transmitted and innate. The theoreticians never agree or disagree with any of these theories, whether environmentalist or nativist. The principle focus of this study is to investigate the dominance among three main doctrines by delving into the fundamental differences among them. The specification of these theories is also given prominence in this article. Finally, in the findings session, it has been tried to trace the dominance of one particular theory, among others.

How to Cite

Behaviourism, Innatism, Cognitivism: Considering the Dominance to Provide Theoretical Underpinning of Language Acquisition Conjecture. (2019). Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 19(G10), 73-79. https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/3050

References

Bimal Matilal, Krishna (1990) Matilal, Prof. Bimal Krishna, (1 June 1935-8 June 1991), Spalding Professor of Eastern Religions and Ethics, University of Oxford, since 1976; Fellow, All Souls College, since 1976.

Dennis Fry (1977) Homo Ludens. Homo Loquens.

Kendra Palmer (2009) Human Language versus Animal Communication Systems.

Barman Dr, Binoy (2006) ELT-Theory And Practice, Friends' Book Corner.

Mecca Chiesa (1994) Radical Behaviorism: The Philosophy and the Science.

Karola Dillenburger, Mickey Keenan (2009) None of the As in ABA stand for autism: Dispelling the myths.

John Staddon (2014) The New Behaviorism.

John Staddon (2017) Philosophy of Behaviorism. 147-160.

B Skinner (1976) Andrews, Roy Chapman. All About Dinosaurs, New York (457 Madison Avenue): Random House, Inc. 146 P. $1.95. 41(4), 360-360.

Edward Zalta (2006) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: A university/library partnership in support of scholarly communication and open access. 67(8), 502-504.

(2015) Classical and Operant Conditioning -Behaviorist Theories. 6-19.

Ivan Pavlov (2012) Unknown Title.

Richard Gross (2010) Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behaviour.

Tad Schmaltz (2002) Radical Cartesianism.

S Stich (1975) Innate Ideas.

Dunlap Lehtila Archived 2013-11-13 at the Wayback Machine.

Chomsky; Noam, B Skinner (1959) A Review of B. F. Skinner's Verbal Behavior.

Trevor Harley (2010) Talking the Talk.

Margaret Harris (1992) Language Experience and Early Language Development: From Input to Uptake.

Jenny Saffran (2003) Statistical Language Learning. 12(4), 110-114.

Jenny Saffran, Richard Aslin, Elissa Newport (1996) Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants. 274(5294), 1926-1928.

Jill Lany, Jenny Saffran (2010) From Statistics to Meaning. 21(2), 284-291.

L Pousaz (2011) New evidence for innate knowledge.

Behaviourism, Innatism, Cognitivism: Considering the Dominance to Provide Theoretical Underpinning of Language Acquisition Conjecture

Published

2019-12-26

How to Cite

Behaviourism, Innatism, Cognitivism: Considering the Dominance to Provide Theoretical Underpinning of Language Acquisition Conjecture. (2019). Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 19(G10), 73-79. https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/3050