Social Knowledge and the Role of Inductive Inference: An Appraisal of Two Contemporary Approaches
Keywords:
Appraisal, Contemporary, legacy
Abstract
Part of the intellectual legacy left behind by David Hume is a powerful skeptical argument which casts doubts on the validity or more appropriately justification of a basic form of inductive inference Brian Skyrms and Laurence Bonjour have outlined several possible defenses of what they call the inductive principle IP in response to the broader Humean challenge In this paper I elaborate Skyrms inductive justification and pragmatic defense of IP as well as Bonjour s novel a priori argument for IP In the course of critically assessing the cogency of these three strategies I argue that each one is problematic and fails to provide an adequate defense of IP I conclude by briefly considering what would be minimally required for a serious rebuttal to the skeptical argument
Downloads
- Article PDF
- TEI XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- Lens* NISO JATS XML (Beta by AI)
- HTML Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- DBK XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX pdf Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- EPUB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- MD Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- FO Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- BIB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
How to Cite
Published
2012-03-15
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2012 Authors and Global Journals Private Limited
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.