Life-Changing Decisions: Exploring Proximal and Distal Motivations Behind Why American Parents Adopt Domestically or Internationally
Keywords:
parents, adoption motivations, domestic adoption, international adoption
Abstract
The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore American parents' proximal and distal motivations for choosing domestic and international adoption from the distinctive viewpoint of adoptive parents own words and perspectives using the lenses of culture and social exchange theory. The findings from this study revealed three primary factors that were found to influence adoptive parents' motivations to choose domestic or international adoption: (1) unique cultural influences on domestic and international adoptive parents' adoption motivations; (2) shared similarities and discrepant differences between adoptive parents' motivations who adopted domestically or internationally; and, (3) perceived intrinsic and extrinsic costs and rewards that influenced parents' adoption motivations. A conceptual decision-making model is introduced to illustrate the complicated calculus behind American parents' motivations to choose either domestic or international adoption. Suggestions for adoption regulation, adoption process, and recruitment efforts for both domestic and international adoptions are discussed.
Downloads
- Article PDF
- TEI XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- Lens* NISO JATS XML (Beta by AI)
- HTML Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- DBK XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX pdf Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- EPUB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- MD Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- FO Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- BIB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
How to Cite
References
R Bandler, J Grinder (1975) The Structure of Magic. 1.
Robert Bausch (2006) Predicting Willingness to Adopt a Child: A Consideration of Demographic and Attitudinal Factors. 49(1), 47-65.
H Bernard, G Ryan (2009) Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches.
(2008) Rural Child Welfare Practice.
J Defrain, S Asay (2007) Epilogue: A strengths-based conceptual framework for understanding families world-wide. 41(3-4), 447-466.
M De Genova (1997) Families in cultural context. Strengths and challenges in diversity.
Satu Elo, Helvi Kyngäs (2008) The qualitative content analysis process. 62(1), 107-115.
Wendy Hellerstedt, Nikki Madsen, Megan Gunnar, Harold Grotevant, Richard Lee, Dana Johnson (2008) The International Adoption Project: Population-based Surveillance of Minnesota Parents Who Adopted Children Internationally. 12(2), 162-171.
E Herman (2012) The adoption history project.
Leslie Hollingsworth, Verlie Ruffm (2002) Why Are So Many U.S. Families Adopting Internationally?. 6(1), 81-97.
(2017) Adoption statistics.
H Ishizawa, C Kenney, K Kubo, G Stevens (2006) Constructing Interracial Families through Intercountry Adoption. 87(5), 1207-1224.
V Jones (2002) Up for adoption. 119(14), 22.
D Kirton (2000) Race, ethnicity and adoption.
Rose Kreider, Elizabeth Raleigh (2011) Residential Racial Diversity: Are Transracial Adoptive Families More Like Multiracial or White Families?*. 97(5), 1189-1207.
Richard Lee (2003) The Transracial Adoption Paradox. 31(6), 711-744.
Kirsten Lovelock (2000) Intercountry Adoption as a Migratory Practice: A Comparative Analysis of Intercountry Adoption and Immigration Policy and Practice in the United States, Canada and New Zealand in the Post W.W. II Period. 34(3), 907-949.
Karin Malm, Kate Welti (2010) Exploring Motivations to Adopt. 13(3-4), 185-208.
Maurer School, Law (1953) APPENDIX 2. 28, 169-171.
B Melosh (2009) Strangers and kin: The American way of adoption.
Pitiporn Asvapathanagul, Simone Galano, Andrea Calabrese, Mehran Rahmani, Maggie Ly, Daniela Flores, Michael Hernandez, Nicholas Banuelos (1999) Experimental Investigation of the Self-Healing Potential of Bacteria for Sustainable Concrete Structures.
P Placek (2007) National adoption data. 3-69.
P Placek (2011) National adoption data assembled by the national council for adoption. 3-68.
L Ries (1994) Social exchange theory. 430-432.
Nancy Riley (1997) American adoptions of Chinese girls: The socio-political matrices of individual decisions. 20(1), 87-102.
Nancy Riley, Krista Van Vleet (2011) Making Families Through Adoption.
R Simon, H Altstein (2000) Adoption across borders: Serving the children in transracial and intercountry adoptions.
D Sue, D Sue, Microtraining Associates (2003) Racial-cultural identity development.
T Tyebjee (2002) Foster Care and Adoption in Child Welfare Practice. 82, 685-706.
Michael Serzan, Michael Atkins (2008) Lymphocyte-activation Gene 3 and Programmed Cell Death 1 Checkpoint Inhibition as a Novel Combination in Advanced Melanoma. 17(2), 58.
S Vandivere, K Malm, L Radel (2009) Physical Activity Fundamental To Preventing Disease.
K Westerlund (2012) Adoption as Spiritual Praxis in Individualized Times. 51(4), 323-329.
Tracey Williams (2012) Examine your LENS: A Tool for Interpreting Cultural Differences. 22(1), 148-165.
Y Zhang, G Lee (2010) Intercountry versus transracial adoption: Analysis of adoptive parents' motivations and preferences in adoption. 32(1), 75-98.
Published
2018-11-06
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Authors and Global Journals Private Limited
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.