Challenging Traditional Ways of Thinking: An Examination of the Role of Dichotomous Social Boundaries in a Greek Tragedy

Authors

  • Dr. Michael Jessee Adkins

Keywords:

Abstract

Abstract not found

How to Cite

Challenging Traditional Ways of Thinking: An Examination of the Role of Dichotomous Social Boundaries in a Greek Tragedy. (2016). Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 16(A4), 29-31. https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/1824

References

Organization (2005) Unknown Title. 11, 139-151.

P Easterling (2004) A show for Dionysus. 36-53.

Euripides (1992) THE BACCHAE Greek Tragedies. 3.

Rachael Gross, Dale Grote (1997) Dionysus. 8.

Edith Hall (2004) The Sociology of Athenian Tragedy. The Cambridge Companion to Greek Tragedy.

Edith Hamilton (1942) Mythology.

(2010) irrationalism.

Alexander Liberman (1968) Greece Gods and Art.

Carlos Parada (1999) A Brief History of Greek Myths: from the Beginnings to the End of the Middle Ages.

Barry Powell (1998) Classical Mythology. 2 nd Edition.

Leona Macleod (2006) Marauding Maenads: The First Messenger Speech in the Bacchae. 59(4), 578-584.

Friedrich Nietzsche, Wilhelm (1967) The Birth of Tragedy, and the Case of Wagner.

Challenging Traditional Ways of Thinking: An Examination of the Role of Dichotomous Social Boundaries in a Greek Tragedy

Published

2016-09-20

How to Cite

Challenging Traditional Ways of Thinking: An Examination of the Role of Dichotomous Social Boundaries in a Greek Tragedy. (2016). Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 16(A4), 29-31. https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/1824