The Employment of Women in the Manufacturing Industry after NAFTA. Discrimination and Segregation
Keywords:
Abstract
Introduction-During the NAFTA negotiations, the impact that the execution of this Agreement would imply was comprehensively speculated and investigated. It was guaranteed, among other things, that Mexico would be the country with the greatest impact and a significant number of analysts pointed out that said impact would be positive (Lustig, 1992). While it was additionally mentioned that there would be some problems in sectors such as agriculture -where Mexico would be a losing country-, overall it was argued that there would be a greater growth for our country, that also the reforms initiated with the assumption of the Washington Consensus were going to be secured1 Since the early 1980s the country began to experience very important reforms regarding the previous growth model. Along with the accelerated openness that started in the mid-1980s with the entrance to the GATT, public companies began to be privatized (the government productive, financial and services capacity was reduced from 1090 entities, in the beginning of 1984, to 258 in 1994), the structure of public expenditure was modified, and the high public deficit became a surplus, fighting inflation and financial openness were prioritized and deregulation of the economy started., that the country would grow more, that most of the jobs would be created in Mexico and that there would even be a resource mobilization towards Mexico.
Downloads
- Article PDF
- TEI XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- Lens* NISO JATS XML (Beta by AI)
- HTML Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- DBK XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX pdf Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- EPUB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- MD Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- FO Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- BIB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
How to Cite
References
R Blecker (2006) San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Alan Blinder (1973) Wage Discrimination: Reduced Form and Structural Estimates. 8(4), 436.
E Casares, H Sobarzo (2004) Diez años del TLCAN en México. Una perspectiva analítica.
H.-J Chang (2002) Kicking Away the Ladder Development Strategy in Historical Perspective.
Olaf De Groot (2014) Integración productiva regional: Las cadenas regionales de valor.
Durán Lima, José, Dayna Zaclicever (2003) América Latina y el Caribe en las cadenas internacionales de valor.
Gary Hufbauer, Jeffrey Clyde, Schott (2005) NAFTA Revisited: Achievements and Challenges.
Lustig Nora (1993) El impacto del libre comercio en América del Norte.
J Moreno-Brid, P Ruiz-Nápoles, J Rivas-Valdivia (2005) NAFTA and the Mexican Economy: a look back on a ten year relation. 30(4), 997-1023.
J Moreno-Brid, E Caldentey, P Ruiz-Nápoles (2004) The Washington Consensus: A Latin American perspective fifteen years later. 27(2), 345-365.
Ronald Oaxaca (1973) Male-Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labor Markets. 14(3), 693.
Omc (2013) La participación de las economías en desarrollo en el sistema mundial de comercio.
(2011) La OMC y los acuerdos comerciales preferenciales: De la coexistencia a la coherencia.
Francisco Alba, Paula Leite (2005) Políticas migratorias después del 11 de septiembre: los casos del TLCAN y la UE. 02(02), 4-20.
Romero José (2009) Medición del impacto de los acuerdos de libre comercio en América Latina: el caso de México Serie Estudios y perspectivas CEPAL No 114.
(2014) Conferencia de las Naciones Unidas sobre Comercio y Desarrollo). 15.
(2013) Global value chains: Investment and trade for development. 121-202.
S Weintraub (2004) NAFTA's Impact on North America The Fist Decade, The Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Published
2015-03-19
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Authors and Global Journals Private Limited

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.