Between Accessibility and Algorithmic Exclusion: Artificial Intelligence, Disability, and Inclusion in Higher Education - A Narrative Review of Evidence from 2020 to 2026

Authors

Keywords:

algorithmic bias, Artificial intelligence, deaf education, disability, Higher Education, inclusion, Libras, Universal Design for Learning.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping higher education and raising urgent questions about whether emerging technologies will advance or undermine inclusive participation. This narrative review synthesizes a purposive body of evidence published between 2020 and 2026 on the intersection of AI and inclusion in higher education. It examines three interconnected dimensions: AI-powered assistive technologies for students with disabilities; AI-driven personalization and its alignment with Universal Design for Learning (UDL); and the risks of algorithmic bias for students who have historically been marginalized in educational systems. The review draws on peer-reviewed studies, systematic and scoping reviews, policy documents, and Brazil-based studies focusing on deaf inclusion and Brazilian Sign Language (Libras) technologies. Findings indicate that AI can reduce barriers for students with physical, sensory, cognitive, and learning disabilities when it is implemented through accessible design, institutional support, and participatory governance. However, the evidence also shows that AI systems trained on non-representative data can replicate or amplify inequities, particularly when disability, linguistic diversity, race, income, and digital access are treated as secondary concerns. The article concludes that inclusive AI in higher education requires a rights-based approach grounded in UDL, co-design with affected communities, transparent governance, and continuous evaluation of access, bias, privacy, and learning outcomes.

Downloads

How to Cite

Between Accessibility and Algorithmic Exclusion: Artificial Intelligence, Disability, and Inclusion in Higher Education - A Narrative Review of Evidence from 2020 to 2026. (2026). Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 26(5), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.34257/GJHSSG258605

Author Biographies

Israel Bispo dos Santos Ph.D.

Israel Bispo dos Santos is a researcher affiliated with Federal Institute of Paraná (IFPR), Brazil.

Ringo Bez de Jesus Ph.D.

Ringo Bez de Jesus is a researcher affiliated with Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), Brazil.

Jéssica Raignieri

Jéssica Raignieri is a researcher affiliated with Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP), Brazil.

Danielly Berneck Côas Ribeiro Ph.D.

Danielly Berneck Côas Ribeiro is a researcher affiliated with her institution.

Silvana Elisa de Morais Schubert Ph.D. and M.A.

Silvana Elisa de Morais Schubert is a researcher affiliated with Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná, Brazil.

Luiz André Brito Coelho M.Sc.

Luiz André Brito Coelho is a researcher affiliated with Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR), Brazil.

Neiva Terezinha da Rosa Eduardo Ph.D.

Neiva Terezinha da Rosa Eduardo is a researcher affiliated with her institution.

Eugenio da Silva Lima

Eugenio da Silva Lima is a researcher affiliated with Instituto Federal do Paraná (IFPR), Brazil.

References

S. Ayala (2024) ChatGPT as a Universal Design for Learning tool: Supporting college students with disabilities. 12(1), 23-41. https://doi.org/10.46787/edren.v12i1.3866

R. S. Baker, A. Hawn (2022) Algorithmic bias in education. 32, 1052-1092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00285-9

H. D. Belay, S. Alamneh (2026) The inclusive algorithm: A systematic review of AI and machine learning in supporting learners with disabilities. 2(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.mededu.20260201.11

O. Boateng, B. Boateng (2025) Algorithmic bias in educational systems: Examining the impact of AI-driven decision making in modern education. 25(1), 2012-2017. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2025.25.1.0253

Brasil (2002) Lei n. 10.436, de 24 de abril de 2002. Dispõe sobre a Língua Brasileira de Sinais - Libras e dá outras providências.

Brasil (2005) Decreto n. 5.626, de 22 de dezembro de 2005. Regulamenta a Lei n. 10.436/2002.

Brasil (2015) Lei n. 13.146, de 6 de julho de 2015. Lei Brasileira de Inclusão da Pessoa com Deficiência.

Brasil (2018) Lei n. 13.709, de 14 de agosto de 2018. Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais.

Brasil. Senado Federal (2023) Projeto de Lei n. 2.338, de 2023. Dispõe sobre o uso da inteligência artificial.

J. M. Cotilla Conceição, E. van der Stappen (2025) The impact of AI on inclusivity in higher education: A rapid review. 15(9), 1255. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15091255

(2013) The disability studies reader.

I. B. Dos Santos, E. Morais, S. E. M. Schubert, E. S. Lima, R. B. Jesus, A. Monteiro Magrini, J. Raignieri, A. C. Oliveira Garcia, G. Massi, A. Lacerda (2026) AI and the inclusion of deaf people in Brazil: A qualitative study. 25(H5), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.34257/GJHSSAVOL25IS7PG51

C. Dumitru, G. M. Abdulsahib, O. I. Khalaf, A. Bennour (2026) Integrating artificial intelligence in supporting students with disabilities in higher education: An integrative review. 38(1), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/10554181251355428

European Parliament & Council of the European Union (2024) Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act).

R. Gibson (2024) The impact of AI in advancing accessibility for learners with disabilities.

S. E. Hyatt, M. B. Owenz (2024) Using Universal Design for Learning and artificial intelligence to support students with disabilities. (Advance online publication). https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2024.2313468

J. Mallary (2025) Artificial intelligence and Universal Design for Learning: Transforming teaching and learning in adult and continuing higher education. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.70016

OECD (2024) The potential impact of artificial intelligence on equity and inclusion in education. https://doi.org/10.1787/15df715b-en

A. Paglialunga, S. Melogno (2025) The effectiveness of artificial intelligence-based interventions for students with learning disabilities: A systematic review. 15(8), 806. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15080806

S. M. Pagliara, G. Bonavolontà, M. Pia, S. Falchi, A. L. Zurru, G. Fenu, A. Mura (2024) The integration of artificial intelligence in inclusive education: A scoping review. 15(12), 774. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15120774

O. Pierrès, M. Christen, F. M. Schmitt-Koopmann, A. Darvishy (2024) Could the use of AI in higher education hinder students with disabilities? A scoping review. 12, 27810-27828. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3365368

I. B. Santos, S. E. M. Schubert, E. S. Lima, R. Jesus, J. da Silva Richter, E. R. Fonseca, G. Massi, A. B. M. Lacerda (2025) Língua Brasileira de Sinais (LIBRAS) e Inteligência Artificial (I.A): revisão da produção científica (2019-2025). 18(74), e7331. https://doi.org/10.55905/rdelosv18.n74-045

Teach Access & Every Learner Everywhere (2025) Where AI meets accessibility: Considerations for higher education.

R. Tishcoff, J. Kerr, V. Lopes (2024) Using generative AI to make learning more accessible.

UNESCO (2021) Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence.

United Nations (2006) Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

X. Zhao, A. Cox, X. Chen (2025) The use of generative AI by students with disabilities in higher education. 66, Article 101014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.101014

Between Accessibility and Algorithmic Exclusion: Artificial Intelligence, Disability, and Inclusion in Higher Education - A Narrative Review of Evidence from 2020 to 2026

Published

2026-09-29

How to Cite

Between Accessibility and Algorithmic Exclusion: Artificial Intelligence, Disability, and Inclusion in Higher Education - A Narrative Review of Evidence from 2020 to 2026. (2026). Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 26(5), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.34257/GJHSSG258605