Classification of the Bulgarian-Tatar Epigraphic Monuments and Some Controversial Problems of their Study

Authors

  • Vener Usmanov

Keywords:

bulgarian-tatar epigraphy, bulgarian language, r-language, common turkic language, drawings

Abstract

Identification of some unsolved problems of studying and fixing the Bulgarian- Tatar epigraphic monuments Performing high-quality photographic documentation with accompanying drawings and partial reconstructions Complete or fragmentary restoration of damaged epitaphs becomes feasible only with a paleographic comparative analysis of calligraphic compositions At the same time the main carrier of information about the artifact in addition to the object under study is a full fledged high-quality photograph of the epigraphic monument from all sides where the necessary data are available - compositional solutions calligraphic decor ornamental motifs texts etc In the course of our scientific work local field studies were conducted on the ground museum and archival materials were studied and the necessary literature on this topic was reviewed In our opinion previous researchers analyzed these artifacts one-sidedly not comprehensively for example from the point of view of philologists only without taking into account paleographic or artistic characteristics or vice versa art historians did not particularly delve into the content of texts and writing features

Downloads

How to Cite

Vener Usmanov. (2024). Classification of the Bulgarian-Tatar Epigraphic Monuments and Some Controversial Problems of their Study. Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 24(F5), 59–79. Retrieved from https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/104264

Classification of the Bulgarian-Tatar Epigraphic Monuments and Some Controversial Problems of their Study

Published

2024-12-31