The Resolution of the Cornucopian-Ecologist Issue

Authors

  • Jan-Erik Lane

Keywords:

greenhouse gases, global temperature, energy consumption, GDP per capita, cornucopians, ecologists, simon, wildavsky, lomborg, lovelock,

Abstract

Cornucopians and ecologists have debated the hypotheses of global warming as a result of the emission of greenhouse gases for several decades, focusing upon different interpretations of risk: resilience against precaution. One can now employ recently available data on GDP, energy consumption, emissions and global average temperature to decide between these two positions. The cornucopian position is wrong, the evidence strongly indicates.

How to Cite

The Resolution of the Cornucopian-Ecologist Issue. (2014). Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 14(B4), 19-23. https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/1031

References

R Axelrod (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation.

Robert Keohane, Elinor Ostrom (1994) Local Commons and Global Interdependence: Heterogeneity and Cooperation in Two Domains. 6(4).

B Lomborg (2001) The Sceptical Environmentalist.

B Lomborg (2007) Cool It: The Sceptical Environmentalist Guide to Global Warming.

(2009) Global Crises, Global Solution: Costs and benefits.

(2010) Smart Solutions to Climate Change.

B Lomborg (2013) How Much have Global Problems Cost the World?: A Scorecard from 1900 to 2050.

J Lovelock (2000) Homage to Gaia: The Life of an Independent Scientist.

E Ostrom (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action.

E Ostrom (1992) Institutions and Common Pool Resources. 4(3), 243-245.

Julian Simon (2003) A Life Against the Grain.

N Stern (2007) The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review.

A Wildavsky (1988) Searching for Safety.

A Wildavsky (1997) But is it really true?.

The Resolution of the Cornucopian-Ecologist Issue

Published

2014-07-12

How to Cite

The Resolution of the Cornucopian-Ecologist Issue. (2014). Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 14(B4), 19-23. https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/1031