Comparative Study of Impact Online and Offline Marketing Among Residents of Ungwan Dosa in Kaduna State

Authors

  • Aleyomi Timileyin Paul

  • Muhammad Bashir Ali

Keywords:

comparative, online advertising, offline advertising, marketing, consumers, costumers

Abstract

This study examines the comparative analysis of impact online advertising and offline advertising among residents of Ungwan Dosa in Kaduna State. The objectives this study is to find out the merit preferred type of advertisement among the residents. To examine the types of advertising that the people of Ungwan Dosa react to the most and to know the factors behind the preferred types of advertising among the residents of Ungwan Dosa in Kaduna State. The theory used for this study is Technological Determinism Theory. The study makes use of in-depth interview method in order to elicit the opinions of residents of Ungwan Dosa in Kaduna State. Four in-depth interview was conducted using an interview guide. The method of data analysis used was thematic analysis. The findings of the study reveals that online advertising influences my decision on what to buy on a particular product. Online advertising to gain more insight into consumers' response and perception of the Internet as an advertising medium. Online advertising influences my choice on what to buy more often and it has effect on my in the buying behaviour.

How to Cite

Comparative Study of Impact Online and Offline Marketing Among Residents of Ungwan Dosa in Kaduna State. (2022). Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 22(H1), 45-52. https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/3970

References

T Accone (1998) How Big Data Can Make (or Break) Your Online Shopping.

D Bonello (2000) New media goes old-fashioned; In an attempt to raise brand awareness among those who may not ordinarily go online, dotcoms are spending more and more of their ad revenue on traditional media, such as TV and outdoor.

L Boone, D Kurtz (1999) Contemporary marketing.

K Chaing, R Dholakia (2018) Factors Driving Consumer Intention to Shop Online: An Empirical Investigation. 13(1), 177-183.

Micael Dahlén, Malcolm Murray, Sven Nordenstam (2004) An empirical study of perceptions of implicit meanings in World Wide Web advertisements versus print advertisements. 10(1), 35-47.

Peter Danaher, Isaac Wilson, Robert Davis (2020) A Comparison of Online and Offline Consumer Brand Loyalty. 22(4), 461-476.

S Devaraj, M Fan, R Kohli (2016) Antecedents of B2C channel satisfaction and preference: validating e-commerce metrics. 13(3), 316-333.

J Godoy (2012) Mind Your social media.

E Goldsmith, B Lafferty (2019) Consumer response to Web sites and their influence on advertising effectiveness. 12(4), 318-328.

S Gunelius (2011) 30 Minute Social Media Marketing: Step by Step Techniques To Spread The Word About Your Business Fast And Free.

D Hoffman, T Novak (2000) May the Vendor of the Goodwill of a Business Solicit His Old Customers?. 9(7), 479.

Hye-Ran Kim (2018) Developing an index of online customer satisfaction. 10(1), 49-64.

Y Kimefield, J Watt (2001) The Pragmatic Value of Online Transactional Advertising" a predictor of purchase intention. 7(3), 137-157.

P Kitchen (1999) Marketing Communications: Principles and Practice.

R Lyke (2000) CAEP Annual Scientific Assembly Calgary, Alberta March 21-24, 2001 Abstract Submission Information. 2(04), 280-281.

E Marlow (1997) Web visions. An inside look at successful business strategies on the Net.

S Sundar, Jinhee Kim (2005) Interactivity and Persuasion. 5(2), 5-18.

M Tabatabaei (2019) Online Shopping Perception of Offline Shoppers. X(2).

L Tan, Y Rashad (2014) The Review of the Most Effective of Online Advertisement Techniques to Affect Online Customer buying Decision. 14(2).

Comparative Study of Impact Online and Offline Marketing Among Residents of Ungwan Dosa in Kaduna State

Published

2022-02-18

How to Cite

Comparative Study of Impact Online and Offline Marketing Among Residents of Ungwan Dosa in Kaduna State. (2022). Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 22(H1), 45-52. https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/3970