Rethinking Prebendialism in Nigeria's Socio-Political Process: The Implication for Democratisation of South-South Region

Authors

  • Dr. Harrison Otuekong Ataide

  • Dr. Martins Tom Enebong

Keywords:

politics, godfatherism, democracy, democratic governance

Abstract

This study examines Godfathers' impacts in the Nigerian socio-political process and the implication on the nascent democracy in the South-South Region. The design was exploratory, and the study was descriptive, combining secondary data from books and the internet. The study uncovered that godfathers were patron-occupying state offices as "pre-bends." They became the "gate-keeper"; determines the development initiative to be followed, and employed benefactors of privileges. This study's findings also indicated that the state's character and the natures of politics in Nigeria had impacted negative values, which now threatens the very foundation of the country's blossoming democracy, leading to unhealthy rivalry and competition among godfathers to have control over state powers using their favoured political godsons and denies the electorates of their right to elect a generally acceptable candidate. This act renders no free and fair elections. Also, the struggle for control of state powers has resulted in electoral violence in Nigeria, either before, or during, or after elections.

How to Cite

Rethinking Prebendialism in Nigeria’s Socio-Political Process: The Implication for Democratisation of South-South Region. (2021). Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 21(F4), 37-45. https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/102438

References

O Adeoye (2009) Godfatherism and the future of Nigerian Democracy. 3(6).

Michael Agba, Hassan Achimugu, Chukwurah, D.C. J., Joy Agboni (2012) Reward System in the Nigerian Political and Public Sector: The Call for a Paradigm Shift in the 21st Century. 2(5), 77.

Isaac Albert, Olawale (2005) Explaining 'godfatherism in Nigerian Politics' in African Sociological Review. 9, 79-105.

Isaac Albert, Olawale (2007) The 2003 Gubernatorial Campaign Advertorial. 41-58.

C Aurel (2006) Political Violence, Terrorism, and Transformation to Democracy and Market Economy: Findings of the Bertelsmann Transformation Index 2006. 4(12), 142-150.

A Agbaje (1999) Political Parties and Pressure Group.

F Ajayi (2014) Nigerian Political Godfatherism in the World of Baale Molete.

O Chukwuma (2008) Political Godfatherism in Nigeria: Benevolent or Malevolent Factors. 5(2), 86-93.

O Chibuzo (2006) Godfatherism" in Nigerian politics.

Emma Chukwuemeka, Hope Nzewi (2011) empirical study of World Bank agricultural development programme in Nigeria. 2(1), 176-187.

L Edigin (2010) Political conflicts and godfatherism in Nigeria: a focus on the fourth republic. 4(17), 174-186.

A Fawole (2001) Godfatherism: Menace to Democracy. 10(6), 113-128.

W Goode, P Hatt (1952) Methods in Social Research.

Joseph Ibeogu, A Nwankwo, O (2014) Political Godfatherism and Governance in a Developing Democracy: Insight from Nigeria. 3(4), 137-243.

K Ohiole, S Ojo (2016) Political Godfatherism and Democratic Consolidation in Nigeria: Empirical Evidence from Oyo State and Kwara State. 5(8), 1-12.

A Okolie (2006) Prebendal Politics and Democratic Practices in Nigeria, 1999-2004. 1(1).

A Olawale (2005) Explaining Godfatherism in Nigeria Politics. 9(2), 79-105.

Ezekiel Rose, M Isyaka (2006) EFFECT OF ELECTRONIC HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE IN DEPOSIT MONEY BANKS IN NIGERIA. 3(2), 161-174.

A Onubi (2002) Godfatherism in Nigerian Politics: Essence. 2(2), 120-132.

V Pareto (1935) The Mind and Society.

James Scott (1972) Patron-Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast Asia. 66(1), 91-113.

E Ukhun (2004) Godfatherism, The Scourge of Democracy in Nigeria. 1.

I Williams (2004) Citizenship Godfatherism and Democracy. 1(1).

Rethinking Prebendialism in Nigeria’s Socio-Political Process: The Implication for Democratisation of South-South Region

Published

2021-08-31

How to Cite

Rethinking Prebendialism in Nigeria’s Socio-Political Process: The Implication for Democratisation of South-South Region. (2021). Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 21(F4), 37-45. https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/102438