Ecocritical Analysis of R. K. Narayan's The Man-eater of Malgudi

Authors

  • Md. Ali Rayhun Sarker

Keywords:

Abstract

In the 20 th as well as in the 21 st century, it has already been witnessed by human beings that the earth is going to encounter environmental change, and this change is directing us to a disastrous future. All the branches of human knowledge are concerned about this. In this respect, literature is not silent and plays a significant role. Ecocriticism analyses the representation of nature in literature, it traces the process of environmental disruption and comments on the overall situation for a solution. In this research article, R K Narayan's novel The Man-eater of Malgudi is seen from an ecocritical perspective. This article considers the issue of abusing animals by Vasu, the most enigmatic character in the novel, and shows how different characters react in different ways about this abuse. As it is related to environment, probable suggestion for saving the environment is expected. This article also highlights this issue.

How to Cite

Ecocritical Analysis of R. K. Narayan’s The Man-eater of Malgudi. (2019). Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 19(A11), 45-50. https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/101973

References

(null) Works Cited.

Sunaura Taylor (2015) Interdependent Animals: A Feminist Disability Ethic-of-Care.

Joseph Conrad (2008) Joseph Conrad and the Rhetoric of Enigma (Heart of Darkness). 245-256.

Franz Kafka (1996) "The Judgment" and "The Metamorphosis". 98-130.

R Narayan (1959) The Financial Expert.

(2000) The Man-eater of Malgudi.

Matthew Cartmill (1993) A View to a Death in the Morning: Hunting and Nature throughout History.

Graham Huggan, Helen Tiffin (2010) Postcolonial Ecocriticism: Literature, Animals, Environment.

Ecocritical Analysis of R. K. Narayan’s The Man-eater of Malgudi

Published

2019-10-04

How to Cite

Ecocritical Analysis of R. K. Narayan’s The Man-eater of Malgudi. (2019). Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 19(A11), 45-50. https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/101973