Quantitative Research Study: Genetically Modified Organisms: A College Studentas Perspective
Keywords:
genetically modified organisms/gmos, perceptions, health, expectancy
Abstract
Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are those whose genetic material has been manipulated "artificially" in a laboratory through genetic engineering. This relatively new science creates unstable combinations of plant, animal, bacterial, and viral genes that do not occur in nature or through traditional crossbreeding methods (Non-GMO Project, 2015). With so many food options available, the aim of this study is to explore food purchasing trends of college students to determine how awareness of GMOs affects their likelihood of buying non-GMO products. Data were collected from 214 students at a southern university, using an electronic questionnaire. Results showed that even prior to survey completion; students had a relatively good knowledge of GMOs. They also felt this information would increase their likelihood of buying non-GMO products. In terms of cost, the majority agreed they would purchase non-GMO products if prices were lower. Additionally, most respondents disagreed when asked whether gender affected their perception of GMOs. Ideas for further research were also explored.
Downloads
- Article PDF
- TEI XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- Lens* NISO JATS XML (Beta by AI)
- HTML Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- DBK XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX pdf Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- EPUB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- MD Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- FO Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- BIB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
How to Cite
References
S Fromartz (2006) Organic, inc.: natural foods and how they grew. 44(02), 44-1025-44-1025.
Frank Fu (2009) Effects of Salesperson Experience, Age, and Goal Setting on New Product Performance Trajectory: A Growth Curve Modeling Approach. 17(1), 7-20.
A Geib (2012) Genetic Mechanisms and GMO Risk Assessment. 67-78.
Z Goktolga, K Esengun (2009) Determining the factors affecting the consumers' willingness to pay higher prices for genetically unmodified products: Tomato case study in Turkey. 111(11), 1188-1199.
L Harris, K Reynolds (2003) The consequences of dysfunctional customer behavior. 6(2), 144-161.
P Hemamalini, A Washington (2014) Employees' motivation and valued rewards as a key to effective QWL from the perspective of expectancy theory. 2(2), 45-54.
R Hughner, P Mcdonagh, A Prothero, I Shultz, C Stanton, J (2007) Who are organic food consumers? A compilation and review of why people purchase organic food. 6, 94-110.
P Jagadeesan (2011) Global consensus: Need of the hour for genetically modified organisms GMO labeling. 17(1), 37-44.
A Knight (2007) Intervening effects of knowledge, morality, trust, and benefits on support for animal and plant biotechnology applications. 27(6), 1553-1563.
C Lauk, G Mosher, S Freeman (2010) Factors affecting college students' knowledge and opinions of genetically modified foods. 36(2), 2-9.
Heejin Lim, Alan Dubinsky (2004) Consumers' perceptions of e‐shopping characteristics: an expectancy‐value approach. 18(7), 500-513.
K Manheim (1927) The problem of generations. 276-322.
M Mccrindle (2007) Understanding generation.
Susan Miles, Øydis Ueland, Lynn Frewer (2005) Public attitudes towards genetically‐modified food. 107(4), 246-262.
(2015) GMO facts: Frequently asked questions.
B Peterson (2011) The non-GMO labeling scam.
Natasa Renko, Vesna Brcic´‐stipcevic´ (2003) Attitudes of the Croatian population toward genetically modified food. 105(3), 148-161.
J Smith (2008) Spilling the beans. Organic Consumers Association.
M Squire (2015) The non-GMO project verified seal. Non-GMO Project.
I Stankovic (2013) Organizational behavior of employees in the manufacturing environment: An engineering perspective. 6(2), 49-53.
E Van Dijk, E Van Kleef, H Owen, L Frewer (2012) Consumer preferences regarding foodrelated risk-benefit messages. 114(3), 387-400.
V Vroom (1964) Work and motivation.
(2013) Antimicrobial resistance. 194.
Zhen Zhu, Cheryl Nakata, K Sivakumar, Dhruv Grewal (2013) Fix It or Leave It? Customer Recovery from Self-service Technology Failures. 89(1), 15-29.
Published
2016-12-07
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Authors and Global Journals Private Limited

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.