Insights from using the Approaches to Studying as an Evaluation Tool for Educational Resource Development
Keywords:
assist, approaches to studying, student learning, distance education, resident education, life science teaching, higher education, classroom assessmen
Abstract
Over the past 12 years, an awareness of student characteristics has informed the design and interpretation of a series of research and evaluation studies in the Student Approaches to Learning (SAL) tradition. Instructors and developers of on-line learning objects have used the results to encourage active learning and implement better strategies. Addition of content learning items to the survey questions (along with evaluation questions and the 18-item ASSIST short form) made the questionnaire long enough to discourage completion. On some studies, two items ask about students' conceptions of-and motivations for learning have served as proxies for Approach scores, because they can be interpreted in the context of previous research. Non-conventional ways of analyzing the data have evolved because approaches are not evenly distributed. Significance tests based on assumptions of treatment groups, each randomly sampled from a population, are not always appropriate in real course settings.
Downloads
- Article PDF
- TEI XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- Lens* NISO JATS XML (Beta by AI)
- HTML Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- DBK XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX pdf Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- EPUB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- MD Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- FO Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- BIB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
How to Cite
References
John Biggs (1993) What do inventories of students' learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification. 63(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1993.tb01038.x
Centre for Research on Learning, Instruction (CRLI), University of Edinburgh (1997) Scoring Key for the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students. http://www.etl.tla.ed.ac.uk/questionnaires/ASSIST.pdf
N. Entwistle (2000) Promoting deep learning through teaching and assessment: Conceptual frameworks and educational contexts.
Noel Entwistle, Hilary Tait, Carol Speth (1996) Identifying and Advising Students with Deficient Study Skills: An Integrated Computer-Based Package for Staff and Students. 365-380. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0657-3_14
D. Hauk, J. Halle Rips Limbers, E. Pitter, S. Freeman (2011) Increased structure and active learning reduce the achievement gap in introductory biology. 332, 1213-1216.
P. Hain (1999) Designing and evaluating Internetbased lessons to teach crop genetic engineering.
P. Hain, R. Gaussoin (2005) Greening up the greens: Transpiration application scenario. http://passel.unl.edu/pages/informationmodule.php?idinformationmodule=1126892811
P. Ramsden, N. Entwistle (1981) EFFECTS OF ACADEMIC DEPARTMENTS ON STUDENTS' APPROACHES TO STUDYING. 51(3), 368-383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1981.tb02493.x
Carol Speth, Robert Brown (1990) Effects of college students' learning styles and gender on their test preparation strategies. 4(3), 189-202. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350040304
Carol Speth, Donald Lee, Patricia Hain (2006) Prioritizing Improvements in Internet Instruction Based on Learning Styles and Strategies. 35(1), 34-41. https://doi.org/10.2134/jnrlse2006.0034
C. Speth, D. Namath, D. Lee (2007) Using the ASSIST short form for evaluating and information technology application: Validity and reliability issues. 10, 107-119.
H. Tait, N. Entwistle, V. McCune (1998) ASSIST: A reconceptualization of the Approaches to Studying Inventory. 262-271.
Published
2013-06-06
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Authors and Global Journals Private Limited

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.