Mommas Boys and Natures Girls:  Explaining Differences in Risk Attitudes between Women and Men

Fred Fernatt Tax and Fin Sv

Authors

Fred Fernatt Tax and Fin Sv

Keywords:

risk attitudes, gender, power control theory, socialization

Abstract

Extensive research shows that men report greater enjoyment and excitement from taking risks than do women. What remains to be answered is why women seem to exhibit risk attitudes that are less aggressive than men. In this paper, we apply aspects of power-control theory (PCT) as a theoretical foundation for explaining generalized risk-taking attitudes among women and men. We investigate the role of socialization from mothers in shaping the risk attitudes of their children. Using data from the NLSY, mothers were found to have little influence on the risk attitudes on daughters, although mothers' SES may impart a profound influence on sons' risk tolerances. It was also noted that children's personality trait profiles were positively associated with their risk attitudes although the effects for boys differed from those of girls.

Downloads

How to Cite

Mommas Boys and Natures Girls: Explaining Differences in Risk Attitudes between Women and Men. (2013). Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 12(A15), 1-10. https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/100325

Download Citation

References

K Allison, E Adlaf, A Ialomiteanu, J Rehm (1999) Predictors of health risk behaviours among young adults: Analysis of the National Population Health Survey. 90, 85-89.

K Arano, C Parker, R Terry (2010) Genderbased risk aversion and retirement asset allocation. 48, 147-155.

Elizabeth Arch (1993) Risk-Taking: A Motivational Basis for Sex Differences. 73(1), 3-11.

V Bajtelsmit, A Bernasek (1996) Why do women invest differently than men?. 7(1), 1-10.

W Barratt (2011) The Barratt Simplified Measure of Social Status (BSMSS) Measuring SES.

R Barsky, F Juster, M Kimball, M Shapiro (1997) Preference Parameters and Behavioral Heterogeneity: An Experimental Approach in the Health and Retirement Study. 112(2), 537-579.

P Bentler, D Bonett (1980) Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. 88, 588-606.

N Blunch (2008) Introduction to structural equation modeling using SPSS and AMOS.

Berndt Brehmer (1994) Some Notes on Psychological Research Related to Risk. 79-91.

James Byrnes, David Miller, William Schafer (1999) Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis.. 125(3), 367-383.

C Castanier, C Le Scanff, T Woodman (2010) Who takes risks in high-risk sports? A typological personality approach. 81, 478-484.

Barbara Chaulk, Phyllis Johnson, Richard Bulcroft (2003) Effects of Marriage and Children on Financial Risk Tolerance: A Synthesis of Family Development and Prospect Theory. 24(3), 257-279.

W Chimich, C Nekolaichuk (2004) Exploring the links between depression, integrity, and hope in the elderly. 49, 428-433.

J Collett, O Lizardo (2009) A Power-Control Theory of gender and religiosity. 48, 213-231.

C Cross, L Copping, A Campbell (2011) Sex differences in impulsivity: A meta-analysis. 137, 97-130.

M Finke, S Huston (2003) The brighter side of financial risk: Financial risk tolerance and wealth. 24, 233-256.

Samuel Gosling, Peter Rentfrow, William Swann (2003) A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. 37(6), 504-528.

John Grable, Ruth Lytton (2008) Financial Risk Tolerance Assessment Instrument. 1-20.

Nilton Porto (2018) Xiao, J.J. (Ed.). (2016). Handbook of Consumer Finance Research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer Publishing. ISBN 978‐3‐319‐28885‐7. 424 pp. (hardcover).. 46(4), 425-427.

J Grable, S-H Joo (2004) Environmental and biopsychosocial factors associated with financial risk tolerance. 15(1), 73-88.

L Green (1970) Manual for scoring socioeconomic status for research on health behavior. 85, 815-827.

W Harlow, K Brown (1990) Understanding and assessing financial risk tolerance: A biological perspective. 50(62), 80.

C Irwin (1993) Adolescence and risk taking: How are they related.

Nancy Jianakoplos, Alexandra Bernasek (1998) ARE WOMEN MORE RISK AVERSE?. 36(4), 620-630.

Maxie Kohler (1996) Risk-Taking Behavior: A Cognitive Approach. 78(2), 489-490.

M Leiber, E Wacker (1997) A theoretical and empirical assessment of power-control theory and single-moth families. 28, 317-351.

B Mccarty, J Hagan, T Woodward (1999) In the company of women: Structure and agency in a revised power control theory of gender and delinquency. 37, 761-788.

Urvi Neelakantan (2010) ESTIMATION AND IMPACT OF GENDER DIFFERENCES IN RISK TOLERANCE. 48(1), 228-233.

N Nicholson, E Soane, M Fenton-O'creevy, P Willman (2005) Personality and domain-specific risk taking. 8, 157-176.

Susan Nolen-Hoeksema, Lort Hilt (2006) Possible Contributors to the Gender Differences in Alcohol Use and Problems. 133(4), 357-374.

J Norris, A Wylie (1995) Gender stereotyping of the managerial role among students in Canada and the United States. 20, 167-182.

D O'shea, M Kirrane (2008) The transmission of work-related attitudes: A social learning analysis. 23, 524-557.

Robert Olsen, Constance Cox (2001) The Influence of Gender on the Perception and Response to Investment Risk: The Case of Professional Investors. 2(1), 29-36.

Leonard Pearlin, Elizabeth Menaghan, Morton Lieberman, Joseph Mullan (1981) The Stress Process. 22(4), 337.

Stephen Pirog, James Roberts (2007) Personality and Credit Card Misuse Among College Students: The Mediating Role of Impulsiveness. 15(1), 65-77.

M Rosenberg (1965) Society and the Adolescent Self-Image.

Catherine Ross, John Mirowsky (1989) Explaining the Social Patterns of Depression: Control and Problem Solving--or Support and Talking?. 30(2), 206.

R Schumacker, R Lomax (2004) A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling.

Harish Sujan (2001) Book Review: The 3M Model of Motivation and Personality: Theory and Empirical Applications to Consumer Behavior. 38(3), 396-397.

S Wakita, V Fitzsimmons, T Liao (2000) Wealth: Determinants of savings net worth and housing net worth of pre-retired households. 21, 387-418.

R Yao, S Hanna (2005) The effect of gender and marital status on financial risk tolerance. 4(1), 66-85.