Feminist Conceptualisations of the State: One Major Critical Paradigm

Authors

  • Elcin Kurbanoglu

Keywords:

Nation-state, feminist theories, gender inequality, the market/the (civil) society

Abstract

This paper presents a literature review of liberal feminist, Marxist feminist, radical feminist, socialist feminist, all the "other", i.e. lesbian feminist, ecofeminist, race and ethnicity based feminist and Third World feminist, and postmodern feminist accounts of the state. Keeping in mind the fact that feminism, as listed under the contemporary Western critical paradigm, carries the potential to transform the state, the paper ends with a brief overview of the possible inheritances of the above mentioned feminisms. Choosing to use gender inequality rather than patriarchy as an all-encompassing phrase, the paper concludes that in order to develop a common sense on the relationship between the state(s), the market and the (civil) society, finding historical data that are not contaminated by malestream knowledge remains at the top of the agenda of the feminist political struggle.

How to Cite

Feminist Conceptualisations of the State: One Major Critical Paradigm. (2012). Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 12(C10), 1-10. https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/100228

References

J Acker (1999) Rewriting Class, Race and Gender: Problems in Feminist Thinking.

M Ferree, J Lorber, B Hess Thousand Oaks. 44-69.

Robert Anchor (1967) The Enlightenment Tradition.

E Akal (2003) Hasmet Akal.

A Bora, A Günal (2007) Önsöz" in 90'larda Türkiye'de Feminizm. 87-108.

V Bryson (1992) Feminist Political Theory: An Introduction.

N Charles (2000) Feminism, the State and Social Policy.

Constantia (1790) On the Equality of the Sexes. 601-609.

J Donovan (2006) Feminist Theory: The Intellectual Traditions.

Z Eisenstein (1990) Constructing a Theory of Capitalist Patriarchy and Socialist Feminism. 114-145.

F Engels (1972) The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State.

Jane Flax (1990) Postmodernism and Gender Relations in Feminist Theory. 170-178.

L Gordon (1990) Women, the State and Welfare.

J Grandt (2005) Gender and Marx's radical humanism inthe economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844. 17(1), 59-77.

L Haney (2000) Feminist State Theory: Application to Jurisprudence, Criminology, and the Welfare State. 26, 641-666.

Heidi Hartmann (1976) Capitalism, Patriarchy, and Job Segregation by Sex. 1(3, Part 2), 137-169.

H Hartmann (1979) The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Towards a More Progressive Union. 8, 1-33.

John Hoffman (2001) Gender, Realism and International Relations. 111-128.

J Kantola (2006) Feminists Theorize the State.

C Mackinnon (1989) Toward a Feminist Theory of the State.

K Millet (2000) Sexual Politics, Illinois: First Illinois Paperback.

R Pringle, S Watson (1998) Women's Interest' and the Poststructuralist State. 203-223.

H Radtke, H Stam (1994) Power/gender: Social Relations in Theory and Practice.

V Randall, G Waylen (1998) Gender, Politics and the State.

A Rich (1980) Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence. 5, 631-660.

S Walby (1992) Post-post Modernism: Theorising Social Complexity. 31-52.

C Weedon (1987) FEMINIST POSTSTRUCTURALIST PERSPECTIVES ON THE LANGUAGE OF READING ASSESSMENT. 64-74.

Mary Wollstonecraft (1792) Text: A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (London, second edition, 1792). 19-226.

Feminist Conceptualisations of the State: One Major Critical Paradigm

Published

2012-08-04

How to Cite

Feminist Conceptualisations of the State: One Major Critical Paradigm. (2012). Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 12(C10), 1-10. https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/100228