Specifics of Network Interaction Supporters of Radical Panturkism

Aminov Ildar Rinatovich

Authors

Aminov Ildar Rinatovich

Keywords:

panturkism, radical, russia, china, turkey, turan, iran, network community, social network

Abstract

The relevance of the article is due to the activation of radical nationalist trends under the influence of external actors in the streaming political space. Modern panturkism is a social trend that contributes to the strengthening of interethnic and international socio-cultural ties, but at the same time, panturkism is used by nationalist parties and organizations to exercise a destructive influence on society, attempts to interfere in the internal politics of sovereign states. Archaic symbols used by radical panturkists spread through modern communication channels of information exchange. The author presents the results of a comprehensive analysis of the network communities of radical panturkism of the social network Facebook. It is revealed that at present there is not only an increase in the spread of radical values, but also an increase in anti-Russian and anti-Chinese rhetoric.

Downloads

How to Cite

Specifics of Network Interaction Supporters of Radical Panturkism. (2020). Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 20(F7), 11-15. https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/3463

Download Citation

References

Ziya Gökalp TürkçülüğünEsasları (ZiyaGökalp.

S Vasilyeva (2011) panturkism at the present stage: theoretical base and practical activity // Society and power. 75-78.

(2012) Soyanmergenkystay-Oolovich Why do we need panturkism? // New research in Tuva. 115-120.

Khas Kerim (2013) Features of Turkey's foreign policy in Central Asia // Army and society. 16-20.

R Falyakhov (2018) Preface. 11-14.

Farkhadsharip (2018) Revival of Panturkism in Kazakhstan Threats Pillars of Eurasian Union//Eurasia Daily Monitor -The Jamestown foundation. 07, 104.

M Bresler (2017) Axial factor in social processes of information society: philosophical analysis// Economics and management: a scientific and practical journal. 105-109.

S Galliullina, A Suleymanov, M Bresler, A Chekryzhov, B Murzagaleev (2018) reasons for the spread of extremism on religious grounds in the countries of Central Asia and their impact on Bashkortostan : historical and political analysis // Eurasian legal journal. 386-388.

(2013) The Turkic peoples of. 53-357.

(null) Fig. 5. Married couple Riki and Hachiro Ohara. Borrowed from URL: https://habane8.com/y/193/f.htm.

M Bresler (2017) method for identifying instrumental network communities of the social network of political communications. 1(4), 39-49.

V Shnirelman (2003) wars of memory: myths, identity and politics in Transcaucasia. 524.

Emil Mustafiev (null) Examining the Role of UNESCO and Intangible Cultural Heritage. 89-107.

R Vakhitov (2017) Practical ethnogenesis. Why the Turks are more brothers to the Slavs than to the Turks.//SONAR. 2050 -analytical portal of the Union state of Russia and Belarus.