Drug Trade and Statistical Discrepancies in the U.S. Balance of Payments

Authors

  • Mehdi Hojjat

Keywords:

balance of payments, drug trade, statistical discrepancies, balance of payment accounting

Abstract

This paper tests the hypothesis that residual values in balance of payment accounting are a random variable. Previous research in this area has been satisfied with an explanation that these residual values are just statistical discrepancies and are random in nature. This paper reveals a structural problem with the way balance of payment accounting has been set up and data are collected. The research proves that there is a positive bias about these values. Moreover, the research shows that there is a positive relationship between the size of the illicit drug market and the statistical discrepancies in the U.S. balance of payments.

How to Cite

Drug Trade and Statistical Discrepancies in the U.S. Balance of Payments. (2014). Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 14(E4), 1-7. https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/1111

References

Robert Mazur (2013) How to Halt Terrorism Money Train.

N Pollard (2006) Addressing illicit trade in food and food fraud. 10-21.

U (2014) Bureau of the Census.

(2010) High-value MEMS are projected to reach US$1.6 billion in 2010, up 29.7 percent from US$1.2 billion in 2009. 28(1).

Joseph Daniels, Davis Vanhoose (1999) Unknown Title. 28.

A Sakyi & Kwesi (2013) Money Laundering, Drug Trafficking, Corruption.

D Morphy (2013) Money Laundering and the Drug Trade: The Role of the Banks.

(2011) World Drug Report 2011. 89-90.

Drug Trade and Statistical Discrepancies in the U.S. Balance of Payments

Published

2014-08-30

How to Cite

Drug Trade and Statistical Discrepancies in the U.S. Balance of Payments. (2014). Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 14(E4), 1-7. https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/1111