Testing the Inter-Temporal Relationship between Government Spending and Revenue: Evidence from Sri Lanka

Authors

  • Navoda Edirisinghe

  • Selliah Sivarajasingham

Keywords:

government expenditure, government revenue, vector error correction model, granger causality test. sri lanka.

Abstract

In order to achieve and sustain fiscal discipline, a proper understanding about the budgetary movements and causal relationship between government revenue and government expenditure have become a vital requirement. Therefore, this paper examines the causal relationship between government expenditure and government revenue in Sri Lanka for the period of 1960-2013. In the process of achieving the main objective, the study uses annual data of government revenue, government expenditure and GDP deflator, and utilizes cointegration and error correction modeling framework, and Granger causality tests. In addition, it presents impulse responses to shed light on the dynamic relation of revenue to a expenditure shock. The results confirm spending-revenue hypothesis both in short run and long run. Considering the above empirical findings the study suggests that, in order to achieve and sustain fiscal discipline, Sri Lankan government should adopt selective expenditure framework.

Downloads

How to Cite

Testing the Inter-Temporal Relationship between Government Spending and Revenue: Evidence from Sri Lanka. (2015). Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 15(46), 1-12. https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/104797

References

Abdulla Al-Khulaifi (2012) The Relationship between Government Revenue and Expenditure in Qatar: A Cointegration and Causality Investigation. 4(9). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v4n9p142

M. Aslan, M. Taşdemir (2009) Is Fiscal Synchronization Hypothesis Relevant for Turkey? Evidence from Cointegration and Causality Tests with Endogenous Structural Breaks. Journal of Money. 12, 14-25.

Hamid Baghestani, Robert McNown (1994) Do Revenues or Expenditures Respond to Budgetary Disequilibria?. 61(2), 311. https://doi.org/10.2307/1059979

J. Buchanan, R. Wagner (1977) Democracy in Deficit.

James Buchanan, Richard Wagner (1978) Dialogues concerning fiscal religion. 4(3), 627-636. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(78)90056-9

G. Elliot, T. Rothenberg, J. Stock (1996) Efficient Tests for an Autoregressive Unit Root. 64(4), 813. https://doi.org/10.2307/2171846

Yousef Elyasi, Mohammad Rahimi (2012) The Causality between Government Revenue and Government Expenditure in Iran. 5(1), 129-145. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1977987

M. Friedman (1982) Supply-Side Policies: Where Do We Go from Here in Supply-Side Economics in the 1980s.

M. Friedman (1978) The Limitations of Tax Limitation. 5(78), 7-14.

D. Gujarati (2003) Basic econometrics (4th ed.).

Q. Hye, M. Jalil (2010) Revenue and Expenditure Nexus: A Case Study of Romania. 1(1), 22-28.

A. Kaya, H. Sen (2013) How to Achieve and Sustain Fiscal Discipline in Turkey: Rising Taxes, Reducing Government Spending or A Combination of Both?. 4(1), 1-26.

Denis Kwiatkowski, Peter Phillips, Peter Schmidt, Yongcheol Shin (1992) Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root. 54(1-3), 159-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-y

James MacKinnon (1996) Numerical distribution functions for unit root and cointegration tests. 11(6), 601-618. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1255(199611)11:6

Mohsen Mehrara, Abbas Rezaei (2014) The Relationship between Government Revenue and Government Expenditure in Iran. 4(3). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v4-i3/687

M. Mehrara, M. Pahlavani, Y. Elyasi (2011) Government Revenue and Government Expenditure Nexus in Asian Countries:Panel Cointegration and Causality. 2(7).

Allan Meltzer, Scott Richard (1981) A Rational Theory of the Size of Government. 89(5), 914-927. https://doi.org/10.1086/261013

R. Musgrave (1966) Priciples of Budget Determination.

L. Nanthakumar, M. Kogid (2011) Tax Revenue and Government Spending Constraints: Empirical Evidence From Malaysia.

Paresh Narayan (2005) The government revenue and government expenditure nexus: empirical evidence from nine Asian countries. 15(6), 1203-1216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2004.11.007

E. Obioma, U. Ozughalu (2010) An examination of the Relationship between Government Revenue and Government Expenditure in Nigeria: Cointegration and Causality Approach.

Kanayo Ogujiuba, Terfa Abraham (2012) Testing the Relationship between Government Revenue and Expenditure: Evidence from Nigeria. 4(11). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v4n11p172

Alan Peacock, Jack Wiseman (1979) Approaches To the Analysis of Government Expenditure Growth. 7(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/109114217900700101

A. Peacock, J. Wiseman (1961) The Growth of Public Expenditure in the.

K. Ravinthirakumaran (2011) The Relationship between Government Revenue and Expenditure in Sri Lanka.

J. Saunoris, J. Payne (2010) Tax more or spend less? Asymmetries in the UK revenue-expenditure nexus. 32, 478-487.

S. Sikdar, C. Mukhopadhyay (2011) Central Government Revenue and Spending Relationship in the Economy of India: An Econometric Study. 9(3), 41-57.

M. Subhani, S. Hasan, A. Osman, T. Rafıq (2012) An Investigation of Granger Causality between Tax Revenues and Government Spendings.

E. Syczewska (2010) Empirical power of the Kwiatkowski-Phillips-Schmidt-Shin test. 3-10.

W. Takumah (2014) The Dynamic Causal Relationship between Government Revenue and Government Expenditure Nexus in Ghana. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/58579/

The Central Bank of Sri Lanka (2014) Annual Report.

Verite Research (2013) Either/or: Exploring Sri Lanka's budget deficit.

(2015) from Sunday Island:. http://www.island.lk/index.php?page_cat=article-details&page=article-etails&code_title=94227

Testing the Inter-Temporal Relationship between Government Spending and Revenue: Evidence from Sri Lanka

Published

2015-09-07

How to Cite

Testing the Inter-Temporal Relationship between Government Spending and Revenue: Evidence from Sri Lanka. (2015). Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 15(46), 1-12. https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/104797