Organisation Theory: The Principal-Agent Perspective

Authors

  • Jan-Erik Lane

Keywords:

organisation theory, incentives, contracting, considerations in contracts, quid pro quo, cui bono, asymmetric information, simple contracts â€" comple, simple contracts - comple

Abstract

Today much relevant questions concern Who get what, when and how?, due to the incredible rise in the remuneration of the economic, cultural and political elites in the large organisations around the world. A suitable conceptual framework for the analysis of the fundamental question, namely Cui Bono?, is the principal-agent approach from recent advances in game theory. The skyrocketing of the salaries and bonuses of CEO:s in the private sector and the spreading out of corrupt practices in the public sector forces the social science to ask the quid pro quo question about the relationship between the remuneration of agents and their delivery of outputs to the principal. It is truly fruitful for the understanding of political organisation in whatever form it takes. Politics everywhere is about contracting, introducing a web of contracts between principal and agents. The shape of these contracts determines the real constitution of a country.

Downloads

How to Cite

Organisation Theory: The Principal-Agent Perspective. (2014). Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 14(55), 45-51. https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/

References

K. Arrow (1985) The economics of agency. 37-51.

Robert Barro (1973) The control of politicians: An economic model. 14-14(1), 19-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01718440

T. Besley (2006) Principled Agents? The Political Economy of Good Government.

Urs Birchler, Monika Bütler (2007) Information Economics. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203946558

R. Brazier (1990) Constitutional and Administrative Law.

N. Brunsson (1985) Nils BRUNSSON (1985), The Irrational Organization: Irrationality as a Basis for Organizational Action and Change.

John Ferejohn (1986) Incumbent performance and electoral control. 50(1-3), 5-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00124924

J. Ferejohn, C. Shipa (1990) Congressional Influence on Bureaucracy. 6(special), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/6.special_issue.1

E. Furubotn, R. Richter (2005) Institutions and Economic Theory: The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics.

Sanford Grossman, Oliver Hart (1983) An Analysis of the Principal-Agent Problem. 51(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912246

L. Helland, R. Sørensen (2009) Hvorfor overlever politisk korrupsjon i representative demokratier?. 25.

J. Jowell (1994) The Rule of Law Today. 57-78.

J. Jowell, D. Oliver (1994) The Changing Constitution. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780199579051.001.0001

I. Kant (1974) The Philosphy of Law.

E. Kantorovicz (1957) The King's Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology.

Hans Kelsen (1961) General Theory of Law & State. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203790960

H. Kelsen (1967) Pure Theory of Law.

J. Laffont, D. Martimort (2002) The theory of incentives: the principal-agent model.

D. Lloyd (1991) The Idea of Law.

H. Lloyd (1991) Constitutionalism. 254-297.

M. Meredith (1997) The State of Africa.

M. Meredith (2006) The Fate of Africa.

C. McIlwain (1958) Constitutionalism, Ancient and Modern.

R. Musgrave, P. Musgrave (1980) Public Finance in Theory and Practice.

F. Neumann (1986) The Rule of Law: political theory and the legal system in modern society.

S. Peltzman (1998) Political Participation and Government Regulation.

J. Pennock, Chapman, J. (eds.) (1979) Constitutionalism.

J. Olsen (2010) Governing through Institution Building. Institutional Theory and Recent European Experiments in Democratic Organization.

P. Rao (2002) The Economics of Transaction Costs.

E. Rasmusen (2006) Games and Information: An Introduction to Game Theory.

H. Reiss (1970) Kant's Political Writings.

Ray Rees (1985) THE THEORY OF PRINCIPAL AND AGENT PART I. 37(1), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8586.1985.tb00179.x

P. Riley (1983) Kant's Political Philosophy.

Steven Ross (1973) The economic theory of agency: The principal's problem. 63(2), 134-139.

David Sappington (1991) Incentives in Principal-Agent Relationships. 5(2), 45-66. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.2.45

C. Schwöbel (2011) Global Constitutionalism in International Legal Perspective.

J. Talmon (1952) The Origins of Totalitarian Democracy.

B. Tierney (1982) Religion, Law, and the Growth of Constitutional Thought. 1150-1650.

M. Weber (1970) Economy and Society.

B. Weingast (1989) The Political Institutions of Representative Government: Legislatures. 145, 693-703.

M. Vile (1967) Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers.

William White (1992) Information and the control of agents. 18(1), 111-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(92)90056-h

F. Wormuth (1949) The Origins of Modern Constitutionalism.

Organisation Theory: The Principal-Agent Perspective

Published

2014-10-23

How to Cite

Organisation Theory: The Principal-Agent Perspective. (2014). Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 14(55), 45-51. https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/