The Challenges of Democracy and Neo-Liberalism and its Implications to the Politico - Economic Development of Developing Countries
Keywords:
authoritarianism, Democracy, Development, Liberalization, Poverty
Abstract
This paper examines the nature, content, democratization process and challenges of the practice and institutionalization of democracy and its relationship to the political development of Africa. The paper also takes a cursory insight into how the transition process and the misapplication of democratic values have escalated the degree of poverty in African states. The greatest challenge to development in Africa is the ascendency of economic liberalization development option prescribed by World Bank and IMF to complement the consolidation of democracy in Africa, creating complex web of poverty and erosion of citizens' confidence in democracy. We discovered that in Africa, there are political institutions and elections but no democracy. The institutions of government are democratically organized, oligarchically controlled and authoritarianly enforced, creating the dynamics of sham democracy that stifles political and economic development. Also, the paper shows that the characterization of political development is often fused with the politics of modernist economic development strategy leading to the triumph of authoritarian methods of political control over democratic process. This paper concludes that the practice of democracy in Africa has led to the emergence of a new class of political elites who use state power for the actualization of self interests rather than for consolidation of the institutions and virtues of democracy. Therefore, we recommend that political leader should be educated on the virtues of democracy and the dangers of authoritarianism primarily to develop in them strong morals and habit of the heart with which to govern their countries democratically, so as to produce the instituitonal frameworks necesssary for the political and economic development of Third World countries.
Downloads
How to Cite
References
Sadeeque Abba (2006) Democracy in Nigeria. 83.
Aristotle (1984) Politics, Ed Carnes Lord, Chicago.
Dahl Robert, A. (1971) Polyachy: Participation and Opposition, New Haven. 1-2.
Hood Steve (2004) Political Development and Democratic Theory, New Delhi Asoke Gosh PHI Learning, Page 4.
Harvey David (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism, Oxford.
Hayek Friedrich (1973) Law, Legislation and Liberty: A New Statement of the Liberal Priciples and Political Economy. 34.
Thomas Jefferson (1975) " Letter to Thomas Law, June 13 1814" in The Portable Thomas Jeferson, Ed.
Kaoke Bold (1996) New World: The Essential Road Map to the Twenty-first Century, Kondarsha.
Linz Juan, Alfred Stepan (1996) Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: southern Europe, South America and Post-Communist Europe, Baltimore. 45.
Locke John (1988) 4.
Micheal etal (2008) Political Science: An Introduction, New York, Pearson Prentice Hall, Page 89.
Norris Pippa (1998) Critical Citizens: Globalized Support for Democratic Governance. 269-270.
Osterud Oyvind, Friedrick Engelstad, Per Selle (2003) Makten og demokratiet: En sluttbok fra Makt-og demokratiutredningen, Oslo, Gyldendal.
David Parker, Colin Kirkpatrick (2005) Privatisation in Developing Countries: A Review of the Evidence and the Policy Lessons. 41(4), 513-541. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380500092499
Prezeworsky Adam, Micheal Alvarez, Jose Chiebub, Fernando Cimonji (1996) What Makes Democracies Endure. 39-55.
Sbine George, Thorson Thomas (1973) A History of Political Theory, New Delhi. 114-115.
Andreas Schedler (1998) What is Democratic Consolidation?. 9(2), 91-107.
Schumpeter A (1942) Joseph A. Schumpeter, Capitalism, Socialism, Democracy, New York 1942.
Published
2013-07-25
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Authors and Global Journals Private Limited

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.