The Importance of Ethics and Morals: Their Foundations, their Differences, their Values and Applications within all Human Actions as a Necessity and Ideal, Despite Human Adversities and Limitations, in the Search for Hope for a Better Future

Authors

  • Dr. Saint-Luc FÉNÉLUS

Keywords:

Ethics, Morality, Human Dignity, Bioethics, Responsibility, Technoscience, Vulnerability, Human Acts.

Abstract

The distinction between ethics and morality constitutes one of the fundamental pillars for understanding human action in contexts of growing social, technological, and biopolitical complexity. Drawing on the classical tradition, Aristotle conceives of ethics as the rational pursuit of the good and excellence of character (areté), aimed at the full realization of the human being within the polis. Thomas Aquinas deepens this perspective by articulating morality as the realm of free human acts, ordered toward the good according to reason and the dignity of the person. In modernity, Kant introduces moral autonomy as the foundation of dignity, while Levinas shifts the focus toward responsibility in the face of the other. These traditions converge in the contemporary understanding that ethics and morality, though related, are not equivalent: ethics is critical reflection on the foundations of action, while morality is the set of norms, habits, and values that guide conduct. In the field of bioethics, the distinction between ethics and morality takes on special relevance in the face of the challenges posed by technoscience. Hans Jonas proposes the principle of responsibility as a criterion to guide human action in a technological civilization capable of affecting the very conditions of life. Ethics offers the critical framework for discerning the good in new and complex situations; morality, the concrete criteria for acting responsibly. Both converge in the construction of a praxis oriented toward justice, the protection of dignity, and the promotion of hope as a horizon of meaning. In a world marked by technological acceleration, inequality, and uncertainty, the articulation between ethics and morality proves indispensable for sustaining a humanity capable of responding to others, protecting life, and orienting technology toward the common good.

Downloads

How to Cite

The Importance of Ethics and Morals: Their Foundations, their Differences, their Values and Applications within all Human Actions as a Necessity and Ideal, Despite Human Adversities and Limitations, in the Search for Hope for a Better Future. (2026). Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 26(H1), 27-69. https://doi.org/10.34257/GJHSSH257765

Author Biography

Dr. Saint-Luc FÉNÉLUS

Saint-Luc Fénélus completed his primary and secondary education in Puilboreau, Ennery, and Gonaïves, Haiti (1984–2000). He earned a Bachelor's degree in Philosophy from Cessades, Haiti (2001–2004), affiliated with the Pontifical Salesian University in Rome, and a Bachelor's degree in Theology from CEIT, Dominican Convent, Santo Domingo, affiliated with the Angelicum, followed by a Licentiate in Theology from PUCE, Ecuador. He holds a Master's degree in Canon and Civil Law and is currently pursuing a Doctorate in Canon and Civil Law (Utroque Iure), both at the Pontifical Lateran University (PUL) in Rome. He is also pursuing a Master's in Bioethics at Anáhuac University, Mexico, and completed a course in Bioethics at the Pontifical Athenaeum Regina Apostolorum (PARA). His academic formation further includes specialization in Causes of Saints and Exorcism (PUL–APRA), and training in Child Protection and Leadership through CELAM and the Academy of Catholic Leaders. He completed programs at Faculdade São Basílio Magno (FASBAM) in Brazil covering formation for formators of priests and consecrated life, Mariology, and the role of philosophy in ecclesiastical formation, as well as seminars on Canon Law in 2020–2021. He received a certificate at the International Congress on the Protection of Minors and Vulnerable Persons at PUC Goiás in 2020, and participated in the Alumni Meeting of the Faculty of Law of Ribeirão Preto/USP at the University of São Paulo in 2020. In 2019, he received a certificate at the III Canonical Symposium of the Superior Institute of Canon Law of Santa Catarina on the Administration of Ecclesiastical Goods in Light of the Brazil–Holy See Agreement: Challenges and Perspectives. He also participated in the Brazilian Communication Workshop in 2021. Additional academic engagements include the congress on the Second Vatican Council and its challenges at PUCE in 2012, a UFFS seminar on international migration, the 1st UFFS Meeting of Institutional Commissions PROHAITI on the Historical and Political Dimensions of Recent Migration in Brazil in 2022, the XXXIII Meeting of the Brazilian Society of Canonists in 2018, and a symposium in Joinville on Matrimony, Theological, Canonical, Pastoral Updates, also in 2018.

References

(1949) Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland [Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany]. Art. 1.

Thomas Aquinas (1888) Sancti Thomae Aquinatis Doctoris Angelici Opera Omnia (ed. Leonina), vol. 4-12: Summa Theologiae. 4-12.

Thomas Aquinas (1950) Summa Theologiae.

Thomas Aquinas (1964) Summa Theologiae (60 vols.). 60.

Thomas Aquinas (2001) Summa Theologica (9 vols.). 9.

T. A. Araujo, D. D. Lima (2020) The principle of responsibility of Hans Jonas and the repercussions on bioethics. https://revista.uepb.edu.br/revistainstante/pt_BR/article/download/206/142/722

J. I. Arias-Krause (2021) Contributions to a critical bioethics. (53), 81-96. https://doi.org/10.1344/rbd2021.53.32833

Aristóteles (1831) Ethica Nicomachea.

Aristotle (1994) Nicomachean Ethics.

Aristotle (1894) Ethica Nicomachea.

World Medical Association (1964) Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research on Human Subjects.

T. L. Beauchamp, J. F. Childress (2019) Principles of biomedical ethics. (8th ed.).

Brazil (1988) Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil. Art. 1, III.

J. Choza (2016) Manual of Philosophical Anthropology. (2nd ed.). https://elibro-net.eu1.proxy.openathens.net/es/lc/anahuac/titulos/59912

Concilio Vaticano II (1966) Constitutio pastoralis de Ecclesia in mundo huius temporis: Gaudium et spes. 58, 1025-1120.

Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (1987) Donum vitae.

Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (1988) Donum vitae: Instruction on respect for human life in its origin and on the dignity of procreation. 80, 70-102.

Inter-American Court of Human Rights (2006) Case of Ximenes Lopes v. Brazil. Judgment of July 4, 2006. Series C No. 149.

Inter-American Court of Human Rights (2009) Case of González et al. ("Campo Algodonero") v. Mexico. Judgment of November 16, 2009. Series C No. 205.

N. Daniels (2008) Just health: Meeting health needs fairly.

Spain (1978) Spanish Constitution. Art. 10. (Official State Gazette No. 311).

(2009) Ethics and Morals [video]. https://youtu.be/dm3WCZud0UQ

(2014) What Ethics Is Really For. Part 1 [video]. https://youtu.be/F3LXHC6CMyc

Francisco (2019) Litterae apostolicae motu proprio datae Vos estis lux mundi. 111, 757-770.

C. Gilligan (1982) In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development.

J. Habermas (2003) The future of human nature.

(2020) What is ethics and morals? [video]. https://youtu.be/dH8zoyLMlRk

Italy (1947) Constitution of the Italian Republic. Art. 2. (Official Gazette no. 298).

Hans Jonas (1995) The Principle of Responsibility: An Essay on an Ethics for Technological Civilization.

Paul II John (1995) Litterae encyclicae Evangelium vitae. 87, 401-522.

Paul II John (1983) Codex Iuris Canonici auctoritate Ioannis Pauli PP. II promulgatus. 75.

I. Kant (1785) Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten.

E. Levinas (1961) Totality and infinity.

A. MacIntyre (1981) After virtue: A study in moral theory.

N. Noddings (1984) Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education.

United Nations Organization (1948) Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

United Nations Organization (1989) Convention on the Rights of the Child.

United Nations Organization (2003) United Nations Convention against Corruption.

United Nations Organization (2006) Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

United Nations Organization (1966) International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.

G. Ortiz Millán (2016) On the distinction between ethics and morality. (45), 113-139.

V. R. Potter (1971) Bioethics: Bridge to the future.

J. Rawls (1971) A theory of justice.

P. Ricoeur (1990) Yourself as another.

L. Rosa (2011) Bioethics: Singer's critique of the traditional ethics approach. 10(1), 1-15.

J. Second (2023) Ethics and morals: What they are, their similarities and differences. https://humanidades.com/etica-y-moral/

A. Sen (1999) Development as freedom.

P. Singer (2011) Practical ethics. (3rd ed.).

E. V. Souza-Junior, R. S. Rosa, T. P. Guedes, C. S. Silva, D. B. Ribeiro, F. S. Balbinote, D. F. Souza, R. B. Teixeira, B. F. Silva-Filho, N. O. Sawada (2020) Ethics and bioethics in the scientific world: an integrative review. 24(2), 151-165. https://doi.org/10.5294/pebi.2020.24.2.3

V. B. Souza-Junior, R. P. Silva, L. M. Santos (2020) Dehumanization and ethics in scientific practice: tensions between technical efficiency and human dignity. 28(3), 412-420. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-80422020283440

R. Spaemann, D. Gracia (2011) Ethics: Fundamental issues.

UNESCO (2005) Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights.

European Union (2016) Regulation (EU) 2016/679 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. L 119, 1-88.

(2014) Pilar Calva. Acts of man and humans [video]. https://youtu.be/FrRHelu-AzM

G. Varela Fregoso (2010) Ethics. https://elibro-net.eu1.proxy.openathens.net/es/lc/anahuac/titulos/74754

C. H. Vieira Nina, M. M. Costa Macêdo (2020) Ethics, bioethics and technology: The risks of dehumanization. 4, 1-15.

The Importance of Ethics and Morals: Their Foundations, their Differences, their Values and Applications within all Human Actions as a Necessity and Ideal, Despite Human Adversities and Limitations, in the Search for Hope for a Better Future

Published

2026-02-17

How to Cite

The Importance of Ethics and Morals: Their Foundations, their Differences, their Values and Applications within all Human Actions as a Necessity and Ideal, Despite Human Adversities and Limitations, in the Search for Hope for a Better Future. (2026). Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 26(H1), 27-69. https://doi.org/10.34257/GJHSSH257765