Intensive Interaction and Alternative Communication Interventions: A Comparative Literature Review in Autism Spectrum Disorder
Keywords:
autism spectrum disorder, intensive interaction, communication interventions, ABA, TEACCH, SCRETS
Abstract
This article reviews and compares key intervention methods for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), including Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), TEACCH, SCERTS, and Intensive Interaction. The purpose of the study is to examine the theoretical foundations, methods of implementation, and document advantages and limitations of each approach, with particular emphasis on the unique contribution of Intensive Interaction. A narrative review of the literature highlights that while ABA, TEACCH, and SCERTS have strong applications in skill development, structured teaching, and emotional regulation, Intensive Interaction stands out for its highly person-centered and relational focus. Findings indicate that no single intervention can meet the diverse needs of all individuals with ASD. Instead, combining methods according to developmental profiles, communication abilities, and family contexts may provide the most beneficial outcomes.
Downloads
How to Cite
References
American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.
Donald Baer, Montrose Wolf, Todd Risley (1968) SOME CURRENT DIMENSIONS OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS1. 1(1), 91-97.
(2022) Professional and Ethical Compliance Code for Behavior Analysts.
Scerts® Model description and SCERTS & Evidence-Based Practice briefs.
Mehtap Eroglu, Birim Kilic (2020) Peer bullying among children with autism spectrum disorder in formal education settings: Data from Turkey. 75, 101572.
John Cooper, Timothy Heron, William Heward (2020) Conceptos básicos. 30-55.
G Davies, R Jenkins (2014) Is Intensive Interaction effective? Developing a rigorous evidence base. 42(3), 196-202.
M Dawson (2004) Letter from Autism Speaks. 1(1), 3-3.
G Firth (2011) Background to Intensive Interaction. 9-20.
Graham Firth, Megan Glyde, Gemma Denby (2020) A qualitative study of the practice‐related decision‐making of Intensive Interaction Practitioners. 49(2), 117-128.
G Firth, D Virella, D Sutherland (2020) The Impact of Intensive Interaction on the Social Isolation of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders in a Special Education Context. 50(4), 1423-1436.
Dave Hewett, Melanie Nind (2013) Interaction in Action.
Jane Howard, Coleen Sparkman, Howard Cohen, Gina Green, Harold Stanislaw (2005) A comparison of intensive behavior analytic and eclectic treatments for young children with autism. 26(4), 359-383.
M Kellett, K Guldberg, C Withey (2019) Intensive Interaction, autism and adaptive functioning: a systematic literature review. 34(4), 494-512.
R Landa, L Kalb (2012) Long-term outcomes of toddlers with autism spectrum disorders exposed to short-term intervention. 130(Supplement 2), 186-S190.
Justin Leaf, Alyne Kassardjian, Misty Oppenheim-Leaf, Joseph Cihon, Mitchell Taubman, Ronald Leaf, John Mceachin (2016) Social Thinking®: Science, Pseudoscience, or Antiscience?. 9(2), 152-157.
O Lovaas (1987) Behavioral treatment and normal educational and intellectual functioning in young autistic children.. 55(1), 3-9.
Gary Mesibov, Victoria Shea (2010) The TEACCH Program in the Era of Evidence-Based Practice. 40(5), 570-579.
Gary Mesibov, Victoria Shea, Eric Schopler, Lynn Adams, Elif Merkler, Sloane Burgess, Matt Mosconi, S Chapman, Christine Tanner, Mary Van Bourgondien (2005) The Teacch Approach to Autism Spectrum Disorders.
D Milton (2012) On the ontological status of autism: The 'double empathy problem. 27(6), 883-887.
Lindee Morgan, Jessica Hooker, Nicole Sparapani, Vanessa Reinhardt, Chris Schatschneider, Amy Wetherby (2018) Cluster randomized trial of the classroom SCERTS intervention for elementary students with autism spectrum disorder.. 86(7), 631-644.
M Nind, D Hewett (2010) Εντατική Αλληλεπίδραση (Intensive Interaction) ένας πρακτικός οδηγός για άτομα με επικοινωνιακές διαταραχές.
M Nind, D Hewett (2012) Access to communication: Developing the basics of communication with people with severe learning difficulties through intensive interaction.
Sally Ozonoff, Kristina Cathcart (1998) Effectiveness of a Home Program Intervention for Young Children with Autism. 28(1), 25-32.
S Panerai, L Ferrante, M Zingale (2002) Benefits of the Treatment and Education of Autistic and Communication Handicapped Children (TEACCH) programme as compared with a non‐specific approach. 46(4), 318-327.
B Prizant, A Wetherby, E Rubin, A Laurent, P Rydell (2006) The SCERTS Model: A Comprehensive Educational Approach for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders (Vols. I-II).
B Reichow (2012) Overview of meta-analyses on early intensive behavioral intervention for young children with autism spectrum disorders. 42(4), 512-520.
Sven Sandin, Paul Lichtenstein, Ralf Kuja-Halkola, Christina Hultman, Henrik Larsson, Abraham Reichenberg (2017) The Heritability of Autism Spectrum Disorder. 318(12), 1182.
Eric Schopler, Gary Mesibov, Kathy Hearsey (1995) Structured Teaching in the TEACCH System. 243-268.
Tristram Smith, Suzannah Iadarola (2015) Evidence Base Update for Autism Spectrum Disorder. 44(6), 897-922.
Abi Tee, Phil Reed (2016) Controlled study of the impact on child behaviour problems of intensive interaction for children with ASD. 17(3), 179-186.
Javier Virues-Ortega, Flávia Julio, Roberto Pastor-Barriuso (2013) The TEACCH program for children and adults with autism: A meta-analysis of intervention studies. 33(8), 940-953.
Juhee Yi, Whasoo Kim, Jiwoo Lee (2022) Effectiveness of the SCERTS Model-Based Interventions for Autistic Children: A Systematic Review. 65(7), 2662-2676.
Lu Yu, Xiaoqin Zhu (2018) Effectiveness of a SCERTS Model-Based Intervention for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in Hong Kong: A Pilot Study. 48(11), 3794-3807.
Style (2018) Style.
Published
2025-11-11
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Authors and Global Journals Private Limited
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.