Ownership Trends in BSE 100-Index Companies from 2000 a 2014: Evidence and Implications
Keywords:
corporate governance, ownership structure, BSE, trend analysis
Abstract
Ownership and control of corporations under the watchful stewardship and surveillance of their boards have a significant influence in shaping corporate behavior and the equitable management of relationships between and among themselves, the society and communities they serve, and the governments of the countries they operate in. This paper tracks the movements in corporate ownership in India among its top companies indexed in BSE-100 in the first decade of the new millennium and moving forward in to the second. The paper is organized as follows: section I provides a brief overview of the development of the corporate format of business organizations; section II provides literature related to the topic and describes the sample and its categorization for analysis,; section III methodology; and section IV sets out the findings, interpretation and conclusions.
Downloads
- Article PDF
- TEI XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- Lens* NISO JATS XML (Beta by AI)
- HTML Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- DBK XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX pdf Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- EPUB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- MD Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- FO Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- BIB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
How to Cite
References
R Aguilera, L Kabbach De Castro, J Lee, J You (2011) Corporate Governance in Emerging Markets.
Stephen Bainbridge (2002) Director Primacy: the Means and Ends of Corporate Governance. 251-310.
Stephen Bainbridge (2005) Director Primacy and Shareholder Disempowerment, University of California.
N Balasubramanian, S Barua, D Karthik (2013) Corporate Governance Issues in Executive Compensation -The Indian Experience: 2008 -2012.
B Baysinger, R Kosnik, T Turk (1991) EFFECTS OF BOARD AND OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE ON CORPORATE R&D STRATEGY.. 34(1), 205-214.
Lucian Bebchuk (2005) The Case for Increasing Shareholder Power. 118, 833-917.
L Bebchuk (2006) Letting Shareholders Set the Rules. 119, 1784-1181.
A Berle, G Means (1932) The Modern Corporation and Private Property: the 1967 revision.
Stijn Claessens, Joseph Fan (2002) Corporate Governance in Asia: A Survey. 3(2), 71-103.
P David, R Kochhar, E Levitas (1998) Research Notes-The Effect of Institutional Investors on the Level and Mix of CEO Compensation. 41(2), 200-208.
E Dodd (1932) For Whom Are Corporate Managers Trustees?. 45(7), 1145.
J Goodstein, W Boeker (1991) Turbulence at the Top: A New Perspective on Governance Structure Changes and Strategic Change. 34(2), 306-330.
S Grossman, H Oliver (1988) One share-one vote and the market for corporate control. 20, 175-202.
M Jensen, M William (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. 3, 305-360.
La Porta, R Lopez-De-Silanes, F Shleifer, A (1999) Corporate Ownership around the World. 54(2), 471-517.
Lynn Stout (2002) Bad and Not-So-Bad Arguments For Shareholder Primacy. 75, 1189-1209.
Strine, E Leo (2006) Towards a True Corporate Republic: A Traditionalist Response to Lucian's Solution for Improving Corporate America. 541.
P Wright, S Ferris, A Sarin, V Awasthi (1996) IMPACT OF CORPORATE INSIDER, BLOCKHOLDER, AND INSTITUTIONAL EQUITY OWNERSHIP ON FIRM RISK TAKING.. 39(2), 441-458.
Published
2016-07-01
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Authors and Global Journals Private Limited

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.