Furtive Role-Playing and Vulnerability in "Wakefield:" Nathanial Hawthorne and E. L. Doctorow

Authors

  • Jamal Assadi

Keywords:

american literature; short fiction; theatrical imagery; vulnerability; narrative point of view and critical theory

Abstract

In most of his novels Doctorow confirmed, "that the past is very much alive, but that it's not easily accessed," writes Jay Parini. "We tell and retell stories, and these stories illuminate our daily lives. He showed us again and again that our past is our present" (2015). Indeed, when Doctorow rewrote "Wakefield" in 2008, he proposed to fill in gaps unbridged by Hawthorne's "Wakefield" (1835).Doctorow gives his first-person narrator and protagonist the power to tell the story free from the load of Hawthorne's first person witness narrator who keeps the protagonist under his direct and strict observation. Through his protagonist, however, Doctorow lets us learn the psychological reasons why Wakefield decides to leave his home. Besides, Doctorow presents the events that happened to Wakefield during his absence in a more probable manner by creating a plot, with causative connections between the events. In so doing, Doctorow seeks to reconnect the past with the present in order to illuminate our present.

How to Cite

Furtive Role-Playing and Vulnerability in "Wakefield:" Nathanial Hawthorne and E. L. Doctorow. (2019). Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 19(A6), 15-25. https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/101889

References

Jeremy Bentham (1822) Codification Proposal, Addressed by Jeremy Bentham to All Nations Professing Liberal Opinions. 241-242.

Kate Brown (2014) Questioning the Vulnerability Zeitgeist: Care and Control Practices with 'Vulnerable' Young People. 13(3), 371-387.

Colin Counsell (1996) Signs of Performance: An Introduction to Twentieth-Century Theatre.

G Couser, Thomas (2004) Vulnerable Subjects: Ethics and Life Writing.

Janette Dillon (2006) The Cambridge Introduction to Early English Theatre.

E Doctorow (2008) Fallout. 313-326.

Keir Elam (1980) The Semiotics of Theatre and Drama by Keir Elam (review). 25(1), 182-184.

Stanley Fish (1980) Interpreting the Variorum. 392-408.

Michel Foucault (1995) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison.

Alexandra Georgakopoulou (2016) From Narrating the Self to Posting Self(ies): A Small Stories Approach to Selfies. 2(1), 300-317.

Erinn Gilson The Ethics of Vulnerability: A Feminist Analysis of Social Life and Practice. 214.

Erving Goffman (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life.

Stephen Greenblatt (1989) Shakespeare and the Exorcists. 428-446.

Nathanial Hawthorne Wakefield.

Wolfgang Iser (1974) The Reading Process: A Phenomenological Approach. 3(2), 279.

Shmuel Klitsner (2013) Victims, Victimizing and the Therapeutic Parable: A New Interpretation of II Samuel Chapter 12. 46(1), 25-42.

Kevin Macnish (2017) The Ethics of Surveillance.

Joseph Mascelli (2005) The Five C's of Cinematography.

Donald Mccloskey (1985) The Rhetoric of Economics.

G Orwell (1984) Nineteen Eighty-Four.

Jay Parini, " (2015) Doctorow's gift.

Viola Spolin (1999) Improvisation for the Theater Viola Spolin. 17(2), 58-59.

Dusya Vera, Mary Crossan (2004) Theatrical Improvisation: Lessons for Organizations. 25(5), 727-749.

Philip Wander (1984) The Third Persona: An Ideological Turn in Rhetorical Theory. 35, 197-216.

Furtive Role-Playing and Vulnerability in “Wakefield:” Nathanial Hawthorne and E. L. Doctorow

Published

2019-05-29

How to Cite

Furtive Role-Playing and Vulnerability in "Wakefield:" Nathanial Hawthorne and E. L. Doctorow. (2019). Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 19(A6), 15-25. https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/101889