Socioeconomic and Political Development: Their Measurement and Connections

Authors

  • Kostas Rontos

  • Ioannis Vavouras

Keywords:

socioeconomic development, political development, corruption, human development, government effectiveness, political system, factor analysis, cluster

Abstract

The scope of the paper is to investigate the basic factors of development worldwide. By following factor analysis, six variables that we consider of high importance for the overall development of nations, namely the level of income per capita, the degree of human development, the extent of government effectiveness, the level of perceived corruption, the range of political rights and the extent of civil liberties are found to be integrated into two basic factors of development: the socioeconomic factor and the political factor. The socioeconomic factor comprises the level of income per capita, the degree of human development, the extent of government effectiveness and the level of perceived corruption, while the political factor comprises the range of political rights and the extent of civil liberties. Our analysis unveils that both these factors are of crucial importance for the overall development of countries. Based on these two factors or criteria of development, our empirical work in the form of cluster analysis distinguishes four groups of countries that we describe and discuss in length. The basic conclusion that emerges from our cluster analysis is that although an effective strategy towards overall development demands integrated policies that incorporate both the socioeconomic and the political dimensions of development, most countries worldwide have not achieve both of them.

How to Cite

Socioeconomic and Political Development: Their Measurement and Connections. (2013). Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 13(41), 51-65. https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/

References

A. Alesina, S. Özler, N. Roubini, P. Swayel (1992) Political instability and economic growth, NBER Working Paper No 4173, September.

Albert De Vaal, Wouter Ebben (2011) Institutions and the Relation between Corruption and Economic Growth. 15(1), 108-123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9361.2010.00596.x

Freedom House (2010) Freedom in the world 2010.

Freedom House (2013) Freedom in the world 2013.

S. Huntington (1968) Political order in changing societies.

M. Johnston (2001) The definitions debate: Old conflicts in new guises.

A. Jain (Ed.). 11-31.

Daniel Kaufmann, Aart Kraay, Massimo Mastruzzi (2010) The worldwide governance indicators : methodology and analytical issues. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5430

Daniel Kaufmann, Aart Kraay, Massimo Mastruzzi (2009) Governance Matters VIII: Aggregate And Individual Governance Indicators. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-4978

Dionisios Lalountas, George Manolas, Ioannis Vavouras (2011) Corruption, globalization and development: How are these three phenomena related?. 33(4), 636-648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2011.02.001

J. Lambsdorff (2007) The institutional economics of corruption and reform.

J. Lambsdorff (2006) Causes and consequences of corruption: What do we know from a cross-section of countries? Rose-Ackerman, S. (Ed.), International handbook on the economics of corruption. UK. 3-51.

Daniel Lederman, Norman Loayza, Rodrigo Soares (2005) ACCOUNTABILITY AND CORRUPTION: POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS MATTER. 17(1), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0343.2005.00145.x

Nathaniel Leff (1964) Economic Development Through Bureaucratic Corruption. 8(3), 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276426400800303

Jorge Martinez-Vazquez, Javier Arze del Granado, Jameson Boex (2007) Fighting Corruption in the Public Sector. v-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0573-8555(06)84001-0

Martin Needler (1968) Political Development and Socioeconomic Development: The Case of Latin America. 62(3), 889-897. https://doi.org/10.2307/1953438

OECD (1996) Ethics in the public service: Current issues and practice.

Martin Paldam (2002) The cross-country pattern of corruption. 18(2), 215-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0176-2680(02)00078-2

M. Paldam (1998) Does economic growth lead to political stability? in Borner, S. and Paldam, M. (eds), The political dimensions of growth: IEA Conference Volume 119. 171-190.

John Roemer (1994) On the relationship between economic development and political democracy. 1(1), 15-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02716612

K. Rontos, L. Salvati, I. Vavouras (2013) Corruption in the world: Its economic, political and geographic determinants and their interactions. 3.

Kostas Rontos, Luca Salvati (2013) Socioeconomic and Political Dimensions of Development Worldwide. 01(01).

S. (1999) Corruption and government: causes, consequences, and reform.

V. Tanzi (1998) Corruption around the world: Causes, consequences, scope and cures. 1.

Transparency International (2011) Frequently asked questions about corruption, transparency. http://www.transparency.org/news_room/faq/corruption_faq#faqcorr1

Transparency International (2010) Corruption perceptions index.

Transparency International (2008) Working Paper 5: Poverty and corruption.

Daniel Treisman (2000) The causes of corruption: a cross-national study. 76(3), 399-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0047-2727(99)00092-4

UNDP (2002) Arab human development report.

UNDP (2008) A user's guide to measuring corruption.

UNDP (2009) Human development report 2009: Overcoming barriers: Human mobility and development.

UNDP (2010) Human development report 2010: The real wealth of nations: Pathways to human development.

M. Warren (2004) What Does Corruption Mean in a Democracy?. 48(2), 328-343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00073.x

World Bank (2010) World development indicators database, 15 December.

World Bank (2010) The worldwide governance indicators, 2009 update. http://www.govindicators.org

World Bank (1997) World Development Report 1997. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-1952-1114-6

Yan Zhang, Liqun Cao, Michael Vaughn (2009) Social Support and Corruption: Structural Determinants of Corruption in the World. 42(2), 204-217. https://doi.org/10.1375/acri.42.2.204

Socioeconomic And Political Development: Their Measurement and Connections

Published

2013-09-19

How to Cite

Socioeconomic and Political Development: Their Measurement and Connections. (2013). Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 13(41), 51-65. https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/