The Analysis of Back-feeding Agricultural Legal Relationship

zhaoqian

Authors

zhaoqian

Keywords:

back-feeding agriculture; legal relationship; connotation; application

Abstract

Probing into the connotation as well as the application of the legal relationship can broaden the research category of legal relationship theory and provide the necessary specification guidelines for the evolvement of back-feeding agriculture activities. The formal logic method can successively be used to analyze definition, characteristics, composition of the backfeeding agriculture legal relationship, which is the basis of the applicable solutions for backfeeding agriculture legal relationship in aspect of value, system and content. Back-feeding agriculture legal relationship which has the common characteristics of legal relationship and unique ones based on back-feeding agricultural orientation is the combination of administrative relationship, collaborative relationship and autonomous relationship whose main content is rights and obligations. These unique features are emerged from the subjects and the content of backfeeding agriculture legal relationship, while these unique ones behave differently along with the different objects. Community theory and benefit allocation mechanism can be used to analyze its application in terms of legislative spirit. In a similar way, systematization of normative legal documents should be used to analyze its application regard to legislative form, while the design of legislative norms to analyze its application in the field of legislative content.

Downloads

How to Cite

The Analysis of Back-feeding Agricultural Legal Relationship. (2013). Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 13(H2), 45-53. https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/692

Download Citation

References

Zhang Wenxian (2008) Jurisprudence. 159.

Li Long, Wang Xigen (2010) Jurisprudence. People's Court Press, China. 258-260.

Jin Yuelin (2006) Formal Logic. 18, 22.

Zhang Wenxian (2001) Research of Legal Philosophy Category. 2.

Friedrich Carl, Von Savigny (2010) The Contemporary Roman law system, translated by Zhuhu. China's. 332.

(1984) G oldschmidt Law. 617-617.

(2004) II. Law dictionary and the language of the law. 3-80.

Zhang Wenxian (2001) Justice as a political and legal category. (96), 96.

Ma Junju, Yu Yanman (2010) Introduction. What are General Principles of EU Civil Law?. 1-16.

Zhu Cangbo (2005) On the Definition of the Concept of Criminal Legal Relationship.

Jianmiao Hu (1998) Administrative Law. 27.

Li Cangqi (2008) Economic Law. 87.

Zhang Wenxian (2001) Research of Legal Philosophy Category. 96, 98.

Zhao Qian (2012) Analysis of the Legal Concept of Backfeeding Agriculture. 5Reformation & Strategy.

E• Bodenheimer (2004) Jurisprudence: the Philosophy of Law and Legal Method, translated by Deng Zhenglai. 501.

Li Buyun (1997) The Ideal and Reality of Law. 5.

Ferdinand Tonnies (2010) Community and Social -the Basic Concepts of Pure Sociology, translated by Lin Rongyuan. 2.

Er Zhenhui (2005) Royalty Award Against Genentech Overturned. 24(2), 198-198.

Sun Guohua, Zhu Jingwen (2004) Jurisprudence. 278.

Shen Zonglin (2000) Jurisprudence. 422.

Zhuo Zeyuan (2004) Jurisprudence. 65.

Youqi Shi (2003) On the Conversion of the Public Administration and Administrative law paradigm. 86, 94.

Luo Haocai, Song Gongde (2009) Soft law Is Also Legal Norms -Public Governance Calls for Soft law Governance. 2, 3.

Sun Wenkai (2005) Sociological jurisprudence and sociology of law. 231-262.

Xu Aiguo (2005) Analyzing Jurisprudence. 61.