# Introduction he language which is learned after the learning of native language is called second language and the process of learning the second language is called second language acquisition (Gass & Selinker, 2008). The study of learning strategies has gained much importance in the field of second language acquisition during the past few decades (Koch, 2005). "Language learning strategies are operations employed by the learner to aid the acquisition, storage, retrieval, and use of information; specific actions taken by the learners to make learning easier, faster, more enjoyable, more selfdirected, more effective, and more transferable to new situations" (Oxford, 1990). Oxford(1990) provides six categories of learning strategies: cognitive, metacognitive, memory related, compensatory, affective and social strategies. Researches have shown that different factors like age, gender, motivation, learning styles, cultural differences, learning stage, learning experience, proficiency and aptitude directly influence the choice and use of learning strategies (Rubin, 1975, et al., cited by Lee, 2010). Good language learners use these strategies consciously or unconsciously to create successful learning experiences. In second language acquisition, the types of learning strategies and learning styles differ in different cultures (Oxford, 1996a). The purpose of this study is to explore the learning strategies used by the students of University of Sargodha by using quantitative method and to find out the relationship between the strategy use and the various factors. The researcher has chosen four independent variables to find their influence on strategy use: learning stage, self-choice of studying English, intrinsic motivation (liking of English language) and selfexamined proficiency. The results obtained from the data will fill the major research gap by providing information about the strategies used by the students of University of Sargodha. This study will explore the relationship among four independent variables and students' strategy use and will find the variable which best predicts the students' strategy use. This information will help the teachers in identifying students' needs according to their requirements and guiding them in using the strategies they are lacking in use. Author ? ? ? ? ¥ : Department of English University of Sargodha. # a) Aims of the Study The main aim of this study is to investigate the strategy use by the students of University of Sargodha. It will also explore the impact of four independent variables on students' strategy use. Following will be the research questions of this study. # b) Research Questions ? What is the mean of total strategy use for all the students? ? What is the mean of each of the strategy category for all the students? II. # Literature Review Currently emphasis is put on the active role of learners in learning process and the effective use of learning strategies shows learners' control over the learning process (Gewehr, 1998). Language learning strategies are conscious efforts of the learners to make their learning better and faster (Oxford, 1996a;Koch, 2005). Learning strategies impact the development of communicative competence (Oxford, 1996b). Students use strategies of advance planning, note taking, selfmanagement, self -encouragement, cooperation, inferring, and deduction etc. (Gewehr, 1998). But unfortunately all learners don't adopt the learning strategies (Gewehr, 1998). According to Graham (1997) successful and unsuccessful learners are differentiated on the basis of their strategy use. Learners can't achieve their goal without the use of learning strategies (Koch, 2005). Malley and Chamot (1990) give three strategy categories: metacognitive, cognitive and social/affective but Oxford (1990) gives six categories of learning strategies. Metacognitive strategies are used to plan, monitor and evaluate students' own learning process and are considered to be most effective in their learning (Gewher, 1998;Graham, 1997;Oxford, 1996b). Cognitive strategies manipulate incoming information in the form of summarizing, deduction, inference, note taking, induction and translation to make learning effective (Gewher, 1998;Graham, 1997;Oxford, 1996b). Compensatory strategies, like guessing and inferring are also used by good learners (Oxford, 1996b). When learners don't remember any appropriate word in the given situation, they use the words of same meaning to solve their problem (Littlewood, 1984). Most researchers reviewing as cognitive (Oxford, 1996b). Affective strategies, like self-encouragement and high motivation are used to control one's emotional state and anxiety level (Gewher, 1998;Graham, 1997;Oxford, 1996b). Social strategies, like asking for help, questioning and sharing worries show cooperative attitude of learners (Gewher, 1998;Graham, 1997;Oxford, 1996b). But many learners don't use social and affective strategies (Oxford, 1996b). Gujjar, Noareen and Aslam (2010) compared the learning strategies used by the Pakistani students of formal and non-formal education system and found that formal students use strategies of memorization and socialization while non-formal students use summarizing and compensatory strategies. Researches have shown that factors like age, motivation, goals, aptitude, language learning level, proficiency, learning style and learning field influence learning strategies choice (Oxford and Nyikos 1989). According to Gwehr (1998) factors like learning stage, age, learning style, context, experience, culture and teaching impact the strategy use. Research of Oxford and Nyikos (1989) finds motivation as the strongest predictor of strategy use and highly motivated learners use more cognitive and metacognitive strategies. According to Gardner's hypothesis highly motivated learners are active and successful learners (Oxford, 1996a). There is a strong relationship between strategy use and proficiency level of the students (Oxford, 1996b). More proficient learners consciously use more and organized strategies (Oxford, 1996a). The research on learning strategies helps students and teachers in improving the learning process (Gewehr, 1998). # III. # Learning Strategies Language learning Strategies (LLS) are seen as a shift from focusing on teacher and teaching to learners and learning. Cohen (1998) defined such as swift when he states that "one potentially beneficial shift in teachers roles in from that of being exclusive the manger, controller and instructor to that of being a change agenta facilitator of learning, whose role is to help their students to become more independent and more responsible for their own learning. In this role the teacher become partner in the learning process" Language Learning Strategies are different from teaching Strategies (the technique used by teachers to help learners learn) in that, the learners and not the teachers, is the one who exercises control or the operations of the designed activity (O ' Malley etal.1985). Weinstein and Mayer (1986) "behaviors and thoughts that a learners engages in during learning. Which are intended to influence the learners encoding process"? Mayer (1988) "behavior of a learner that are intended to influence how the learners process information" a) Characteristics of Language learning Strategies (LLS) # c) The Good Language Learner Strategies The good Language learning strategies that we observed are to find a learning style that suits you and involve yourself in the language learning process. To develop an awareness of language both as system and as communication, also pay constant attention to expanding your language. Teacher should develop the L2 as a separate system. IV. # Research Methodology The students of University of Sargodha will be taken as population. The sample will constitute the students from different departments. Oxford's (1989) Strategy Inventory for language learning version 7.0 average Cronbach alpha reliability of SILL version 5.1 is 0.91 and its validity ranges from 0.40 to 0.80. Yang's (1992) study shows that the SILL doesn't give fake results (Oxford, 1996a, p 110). The validity of SILL is proved when the research is conducted in relation to learning style, performance and settings (Oxford, 1996b). The SILL is divided into six language learning categories: cognitive, metacognitive, memory related, compensatory, affective and social strategies. Five Likert scale responses are included in the questionnaire (Oxford, 1990) V. # Data Analysis Oxford's (1990) key will be used to calculate the mean strategy score which has a scale range of 1-5. i. High use: 4.5 to 5.0 (almost always or always) and 3.5 to 4.4 (usually) ii. Medium use: 2.5 to 3.4 (sometimes) iii. Low use: 1.5 to 2.4 (usually not) and 1.0-1.4 (never or almost never) The frequency and percentage of students showing high, medium and low strategy use will be calculated. Then the means and standard deviations of all and each of strategy categories will be calculated which will indicate the strategy use of the whole sample. I # Volume XIII Issue IV Version I We have collected the Data from 30 students and out of these students 46.7% of students sometimes refresh their previous memory related to present learning tasks. We have collected the data from 30 students and out of these students 46.7% usually remember new English words by using them in sentence. We have collected the data from 30 students and out of these students 43.3% sometimes learn rhyming word together. I # IV Version I We have collected the data from 30 students and out of these students 56.7 usually memorize new English words and their meaning. We have collected data from 30 students out of these students 46.7 sometimes silently revise, what the teacher and other students say, in my mind. We have collected the Data from 30 students out of these students 40.0% sometimes practice new English sounds. We have collected the Data from 30 students out of these students 36. 7 Volume XIII Issue IV Version I We have collected the Data from 30 students out of these students 40.0% sometimes watch English movies and TV programmes. We have collected the Data from 30 students out of these students 40.0% sometimes listen English songs. We have collected the Data from 30 students out of these students 46.7 usually read English books and newspapers. We have collected the Data from 30 students out of these students 33. 3 # IV Version I We have collected the Data from 30 students out of these students 36.7% usually try themselves to interpret any English text. We have collected the Data from 30 students out of these students 30.0 % usually or sometimes use gesture and pauses to express themselves, when they don't remember any English word during conversation. We have collected the Data from 30 students out of these students 40.0% always or almost always don't remember any English word, I use any word or phrase having the same meaning. We have collected the Data from 30 students out of these students 26. 7 # Volume XIII Issue IV Version I We have collected the data from 30 students out of these students 46.7 usually try to find opportunities to participate in the class in English. We have collected the data from 30 students out of these students 33.3% usually prepare themselves for presentations and discussions. We have collected the data from 30 students out of these students 43.3% usually or sometimes ask questions in English in my class. We have collected the Data from 30 students out of these students 40.0% sometimes do study discussions with their group mates in English. # IV Version I We have collected the data from 30 students out of these students 56.7% sometimes talk in English with their teachers, friends and family members. # VI. # Conclusion Learning Strategies are very important for Language Acquisition. There are different Learning Strategies used to learn the second language. For this purpose we selected 20 main Strategies for knowing which Strategies are more popular in the students of University of Sargodha. By the results we concluded that the following two Strategies are more popular. ? Talk in English with my friends and teachers. (56.7%) ? I memorize new English words. (56.7%) # VII. Proposed Implications of the Study This study will also help the teachers to instruct students about strategy use and to allow them to practice their strategies in the classrooms. The results of this study will make students aware of their learning strategies use and will help Lectures integrated with strategy instruction can be conducted by the teachers. # VIII. # Appendices ? LLS allow learners to become more self directed(oxfor,1906)? Only conscious strategies are LLS, these are mustbe a choice involved on the part of learners (Cohen,1990)? They may be visible as they are ( specific actions fortechniques) (Green and oxford,1995) or invisible asthey can involve mental processing (Williams andBurden,1997)? Learning Strategies use is determined at ametacognitive level (Garner,1988)? LLS can be thought to students (oxford,1906)? Learning Strategies are under the active, strategiccontrol of the student while in use (garner,1988)b) Can Strategies be Taught to Students? Teachers who experimented and investigatedlearning strategies in their teaching are convincedthat strategies can be taught through directinstruction and overtime students will maintain andtransfer them into new task when necessary.? Strategies teaching should start at the beginninglevels by providing them in the student's firstlanguage.? Strategies should be integrated with in thecurriculum rather than taught as separate entity.? Teacher should identify strategies by name,describe them and model them.? Students needs to have experience with variety ofstrategies by name to be able to use the one thatworks with them well.? In this case of failure in language learning, students need to be assured that work with them well. 2013Year43FrequencyPercentValid Percent Cumulative PercentValidnever310.010.010.0usually not310.010.020.0sometimes1446.746.766.7usually1033.333.3100.0Total30100.0100.0I remember new English words by using them in sentencesValidNever usually not sometimes Usually always or almost always TotalFrequency Percent 2 6.7 5 16.7 8 26.7 14 46.7 1 3.3 30 100.06.7 16.7 26.7 46.7 3.3 100.0 Valid Percent Cumulative Percent 6.7 23.3 50.0 100.0 96.7Human Social Science ( D D D D ) GFrequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative PercentJournal ofValidNever usually not3 810.0 26.710.0 26.710.0 36.7Globalsometimes1343.343.380.0Usually516.716.796.7always or almost always13.33.3100.0Total30100.0100.0© 2013 Global Journals Inc. (US) I memorize new English words and their meaningsFrequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative PercentValidusually not310.010.010.0sometimes413.313.323.3Usually1756.756.780.0always or almost always620.020.0100.0Total30100.0100.0Year 20132 20 2 44Frequency PercentValid PercentCumulative PercentValidnever310.010.010.0sometimes1446.746.756.7usually826.726.783.3Volume XIII Issue Walways or almost always Total5 3016.7 100.016.7 100.0100.0D D D D )FrequencyPercentValid Percent Cumulative Percent(Validnever13.33.33.3Global Journal of Human Social ScienceValidusually not sometimes usually always or almost always Total Never5 12 9 3 30 Frequency 216.7 40.0 30.0 10.0 100.0 Percent 6.716.7 40.0 30.0 10.0 100.0 Valid Percent Cumulative Percent 20.0 60.0 90.0 100.0 6.7 6.7usually not13.33.310.0Sometimes1033.333.343.3Usually620.020.063.3always or almost always1136.736.7100.0Total30100.0100.0G© 2013 Global Journals Inc. (US) I watch English movies and TV programmesFrequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative PercentValidusually not516.716.716.7Sometimes1240.040.056.7Usually826.726.783.3always or almost always516.716.7100.0Total30100.0100.02013I silently revise, what the teacher and other students say, in my mindYearFrequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent45ValidNever26.76.76.7usually not516.716.723.3Sometimes1240.040.063.3Usually1033.333.396.7always or almost always13.33.3100.0Total30100.0100.0I practice new English soundsFrequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative PercentD D D D ) G1 3 10 14 2 303.3 10.0 33.3 46.7 6.7 100.03.3 10.0 33.3 46.7 6.7 100.03.3 13.3 93.3 100.0 46.7Human Social Science (I take notes in English in the class I write text messages in English, not in RomanJournal ofValidusually not6 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent 20.0 20.0 20.0Globalsometimes1033.333.353.3usually1033.333.386.7always or almost always413.313.3100.0Total30100.0100.0© 2013 Global Journals Inc. (US) I try myself to interpret any English textFrequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative PercentValidnever13.33.33.3usually not413.313.316.7sometimes620.020.036.7usually1136.736.773.3always or almost always826.726.7100.0Year 2013 2 20 2 46Total I use gestures and pauses to express myself, when I don't remember any English word 30 100.0 100.0 I listen to English songs during conversation.FrequencyPercentValid Percent Cumulative PercentValidnever516.716.716.7usually not413.313.330.0sometimes930.030.060.0Volume XIII Issue WI read English books and newspapers 9 30.0 30.0 always or almost always usually 3 10.0 10.0 Total 30 100.0 100.090.0 100.0D D D D )G(Global Journal of Human Social ScienceValid ValidNever usually not Sometimes Usually always or almost always Total Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent never 2 6.7 6.7 6.7 usually not 3 10.0 10.0 16.7 sometimes 6 20.0 20.0 36.7 usually 7 23.3 23.3 60.0 always or almost always 12 40.0 40.0 100.0 Total 30 100.0 100.0 I review what to be discussed in the class before going into the class Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative PercentValidnever413.313.313.3usually not826.726.740.0sometimes723.323.363.3usually516.716.780.0always or almost always620.020.0100.0Total30100.0100.0© 2013 Global Journals Inc. (US) FrequencyPercentValid PercentCumulative PercentValidNever413.313.313.3usually not26.76.720.0sometimes413.313.333.3Usually1446.746.780.0always or almost always620.020.0100.0Total30100.0100.02013YearI prepare myself for presentations and discussionsFrequencyPercentValid PercentPercent Cumulative47ValidNever310.010.010.0usually not413.313.323.3Sometimes516.716.740.0Usually1033.333.373.3always or almost always826.726.7100.0Total30100.0100.0If I don't remember any English word, I use any other word or phrase having thesame meaningD D D D ) GValidNeverFrequency 1Percent 3.3Valid Percent 3.3Cumulative Percent 3.3Science (usually not sometimes Usually always or almost always1 13 13 23.3 43.3 43.3 6.73.3 43.3 43.3 6.76.7 50.0 93.3 100.0Human SocialTotal30100.0100.0Journal ofI do study discussions with my group mates in English Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative PercentGlobalValid Never26.76.76.7usually not516.716.723.3Sometimes1240.040.063.3Usually826.726.790.0always or almost always310.010.0100.0Total30100.0100.0© 2013 Global Journals Inc. (US) FrequencyPercentValid PercentCumulative PercentValidNever310.010.010.0usually not413.313.323.3sometimes1756.756.780.0Usually413.313.393.3always or almost always26.76.7100.0Year 2013Total30100.0100.02 20 2 48Volume XIII Issue W D D D D)G(Global Journal of Human Social Science © 2013 Global Journals Inc. (US) ## Dear All, We are the students of BS English, 6 th semester conducting a questionnaire to know the learning strategies used by the University students. * Second Learning Strategies used by Pakistani ESL Students in University of Sargodha © SMGass MSelinker Global Journals Inc 2008. 2013 US * Aspects of Modern Language Teaching WGewehr 1998 Routledge London & New York * Effective Language Learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd SGraham 1997 * A Formal Systems of Education in Pakistan AAGujjar BNaoreen SAslam Language in India 10 2010. April 18, 2011 * What are Language Learning Strategies and how can they contribute to a better learning? Seminar Paper AKoch 2005 Grin Verlag Germany * An overview of language learning strategies CKLee Arecls 7 2010 * Foreign and Second Language Learning WLittlewood 1984 Cambridge University Press London & New York * Comparative Study of the Language Learning Strategies Used by the Students of Formal and Non * Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition JMalley AUChamot 1990 Cambridge University Press New York * The Good Language Learner NNaiman MFrohlich HHStern ATodesco 1978 Toronto, OISE * Learning Strategies J &Nisbet JShucksmith 1986 Routledge London * Variables Affecting Choice of Language Learning Strategies by University Students R &Oxford MNyikos The Modern Language Journal 73 1989 Blackwell Publishing * Language learning strategies: What teacher should know RLOxford 1990 Heinle & Heinle Boston * Language learning strategies around the world: Cross cultural perspectives RLOxford 1996b University of Hawaii Press Honolulu, Hawaii * Volume XIII Issue IV Version I * Language Learning Motivation: Pathways to the new century RLOxford 1996a University of Hawaii Press Honolulu