# Introduction hysics experiment class is an important link for students from studying physics theory to sublimation to social life. Familiar with the purpose of experiment, experiment principle, mastering the experiment process, and understanding the physical methods used are the main content of physics experiment teaching. It is for students to master physics knowledge and deepen Physical knowledge, an effective means of using physical knowledge. In our physics experiment teaching, on the basis of the traditional teaching method, we also adopt the current internationally popular "problem based learning" (problem based learning, PBL) method, which emphasizes the active learning of students. , Teachers carry out targeted enlightenment and guidance education, stimulate students' interest in learning, cultivate and improve students' ability to analyze and solve physical problems, and improve students' practical ability and innovation ability. # II. # Method a) Physics textbook of People's Education Press I selected 92 junior high school students from 2 classes in the ninth grade of junior high school I teach, and randomly selected 1 class as the control group (46 students) and 1 class as the control group (46 students). The control group uses traditional teaching methods At the same time, the "problem-based teaching method" was adopted on the basis, and the control group was taught according to the traditional teaching method. Before the experiment, there was no significant difference between the two groups of students in terms of age, grades, gender, course progress, class hours, teaching materials and other basic conditions (P>0.05). In the textbook, I chose the ninth grade junior middle school physics textbook published by the People's Education Press as the textbook. # b) Teaching process and Methods used teaching method. Control group: The traditional teaching method is adopted, that is, the teacher's teaching is the center. The teacher leads the classroom throughout the whole process and explains the entire physics experiment. The students listen carefully and take notes. After class, I organize the students to review and consolidate. Experimental group: Based on the traditional teaching method, the PBL teaching method is also adopted. The instructor compares the requirements of the syllabus, carefully consults the materials related to the teaching content, and prepares the lessons carefully, and finally draws up a teaching plan. One PBL class hour is one Experimental topic. Specific implementation methods: ? Based on the problems encountered in life or study, a problem is proposed, and the teacher compiles a PBL lesson example (highly related to the experimental content of the textbook), and formulates the problems that students need to solve during the experiment, Provide cases to students, determine clear learning goals, teach students how to analyze scenarios and solve problems before the experiment, and provide students with various learning paths (tablets, teaching reference, computers, library materials, teachers, Companions, etc.). ?Form a PBL teaching group with 5-6 people in each group. A suitable group leader shall be established, and the group leader shall carry out division of labor and cooperation. Each member needs to undertake corresponding tasks. ? In the self-study stage, leave 2-3 days for students to study independently, and finally write a good report and experience. ?In the communication and discussion stage, each group selects a representative to speak and explain the group's problem-solving plan; teachers participate in the discussion in a small amount, and guide and inspire students to analyze, think, and solve problems, aiming at the shortcomings of students in the process of problem-solving , Carry out a comprehensive and systematic explanation to each group, and fill in the knowledge loopholes. Finally, select the discovered problems again according to the needs, and once again combine the experimental requirements of the textbook with the reality of life, so that the students' knowledge can be consolidated. # c) Effect Evaluation After the end of the semester, the relevant staff of the teaching and research team will design the test papers and analyze the test scores. After the end of the semester, the team will design the corresponding test papers and analyze the test results. Finally, we will distribute to the experimental group. The PBL teaching questionnaire and the students in the experimental group conducted an anonymous questionnaire survey. A total of 46 questionnaires were distributed, and 45 valid questionnaires were returned, with an effective recovery rate of 100%. # d) Statistical Methods Used During the experiment, the author used SPSS22.0 statistical software to perform statistical analysis on the data. The measurement data is expressed by (x±s), and the analysis of variance is used. P<0.05 indicates that the difference is statistically significant. # III. # Results # a) About the Comparison of Test Scores There was no statistically significant difference in the scores of basic physics knowledge between the two groups of students (P>0.05), and the test scores of experimental questions in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the traditional teaching group (P<0.05). It shows that the PBL teaching mode is significantly better than the traditional teaching mode in improving the ability of students to analyze, think and solve practical problems in physics in life, and it will not affect the students' mastery of the basic knowledge, key points and difficulties of physics. Results see More than 87% of the students in the control group believe that the PBL teaching method can stimulate their interest in physics learning, improve learning motivation, cultivate the ability to find, think, and solve problems, and enhance the connection and application of physics knowledge and real life. See The ability to find physics-related problems in life 38(82.6) 5(10.9) 3(6.5) The ability to analyze physics-related issues in life 35(76.1) 6(13.0) 5(10.9) The ability to solve physics-related problems in life 42(91. IV. # Discussion Traditional teaching pays more attention to the teaching of theory and the system of knowledge, and gradually forms a teaching model with teacher teaching as the main body, classroom professors as the center, and students' listening as the auxiliary. Teachers are responsible for teaching, while students passively participate in "cracking duck" teaching. This mode stifles students' interest in learning, hinders their motivation to learn, and is not conducive to cultivating students' innovative and practical abilities. In recent years, the use of PBL teaching mode has gradually become the trend of education and teaching reform in many disciplines in the world today, and more and more physics teachers and researchers have begun to accept and improve PBL teaching. Research shows that PBL can focus on students' learning, inspire the thinking of group members through group discussions, and put more emphasis on students' active learning and hands-on practice. Mainly, the teacher only guides and inspires at the critical moment, the whole learning activity becomes more interesting and vivid, and can easily grasp the key and difficult points of the experiment. Students have a deeper understanding of the experimental process, and their hands-on ability and ability to solve problems in real life have also been improved. The practice of applying the PBL teaching method in physics experiment teaching at this stage shows that the PBL teaching method applied to junior high school physics experiment teaching has achieved relatively good teaching effects. The scores of the control group are significantly higher than those of the traditional teaching method. Research shows that PBL teaching It is significantly better than the traditional teaching mode in improving students' ability to discover physical problems in life, analyze problems and solve problems by hand, and PBL teaching does not affect students' mastery of basic physics knowledge and key points and difficulties. According to the questionnaire survey, more than 86% of the students in the control group felt that adopting the PBL teaching method could stimulate their interest in physics learning and enhance their motivation in physics learning. PBL teaching can train them to discover physics problems in life, analyze and solve problems, and enhance the connection and application of physics knowledge and real life. The investigation shows that PBL also has some advantages in transferring physics knowledge and cultivating innovation ability in physics experiment teaching. From the perspective of teaching effect, PBL teaching method is superior to traditional teaching: First, PBL teaching adopts a student-centered discussion teaching model, students can devote themselves to learning in an environment where they want to be relaxed and autonomous, and can use the form Diversified resources (network, books, peers, teachers) to solve problems are conducive to the improvement of practical ability and coordination and cooperation ability. The second is to strengthen the connection between theoretical knowledge and real life, so that the physical theory and experiment are more closely connected with real life, and the form of learning is more interesting; the third is to enhance the initiative and enthusiasm of learning, and students will review related knowledge more actively. And to solve problems by consulting materials and the latest literature on the Internet and in the library; fourth is to strengthen students' understanding and operation of physics experiments, and to improve the learning effect; fifth, to improve their self-study ability, through independent learning and peer discussion, students The reliance on teachers has gradually weakened, and the ability of self-learning has been greatly improved. In the process of analyzing and solving problems, I learned to integrate physics experiments with real life, and cultivated hands-on ability, which is beneficial to the cultivation of creative ability and the development of cooperation ability. The sixth is to improve the comprehensive literacy of junior high school students, strengthen students' ability to look up information and document retrieval, summarize the laws of physics, comprehensively understand the experimental process, logical reasoning, language expression, independent learning, and cooperative learning. Ability, etc., lay a solid foundation for physics experiment learning in high schools and universities focusing on physics experiment problems. The research at this stage also shows that there are deficiencies in PBL teaching, including the lack of depth and breadth of physics experiment problems; teachers are in the exploration stage and lack of experience; students need to completely change their original learning habits, and the need for coherence of knowledge Reconstruction; insufficient ability to analyze and solve problems, etc. In the physics experiment teaching, PBL also needs to improve more scientific consideration methods to comprehensively examine the teaching effect of PBL teaching. Finally, teachers need to guide students to take the student as the center, realize role switching, and transform from duck-filling learning to autonomous learning. In short, the introduction of PBL teaching into junior high school physics experiment teaching has obvious teaching effects. Teachers can integrate PBL teaching concepts, advantages, and essence into traditional teaching, overcome shortcomings, teach flexibly, and give full play to their advantages. 1 1Groupn Basic knowledge questions Experimental questionsTraditional teaching group 4645.6±5.1143.09±3.57?PBL teaching group4646.4±6.0646.78±3.51Note: ? Comparison of the two groups P <0.05 b) Questionnaire Survey Content and Results 2Survey OptionsSignificant GeneralInvalidStimulate interest in physics learning40(87.0) 4(8.7)2(4.3) * Peer discussions in lecture-based tutorials in introductory physics Risto Leinonen AMervi PekkaEAsikainen Hirvonen Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res 13 10114 2017 * Study on the Effect of "Lecture in Large Class and Seminar in Small Class ZhuHong MaLiping XiongYu China Higher Education Research 01 2016 * Online PBL: A route to sustainability education? Campus-Wide Inform Syst BTomkinson IHutt https://www.tandfonline.com/servlet/linkout?suffix=CIT0022&dbid=16&doi=10.1080/0142159X.2016.1248915&key=10.1108/10650741211253886 2012 29 Google Scholar * Internet -based problem -based learning: international collaborative learning experiences YSuzuki MNiwa TShibata YTakahashi KChirasak AAriyawardana JCRamesh PEvans Oon-Seng T 2007 Seng Lee Press Singapore Problem-based learning in eLearning breakthroughs * A practical guide to problembased learning online MSavin-Baden 2007 Routledge London * Design ing, implementing and evaluating an online problem-based learning (PBL) environment -a pilot study MLNg SBridges SPLaw TWhitehill Clin Linguist Phonet 28 2014 * Tracing the tutor role in problem-based learning and PBL online KHofgaard Lycke HIStrømsø PGrøttum Problem-based learning online. Maisenhead MSavin-Baden KWilkie Open University Press 2006 * Problem-based learning: future challenges for educational practice and research DhjmDolmans WDe Grave IhapWolfhagen CpmVan Der Vleuten Med Educ 39 2005 * The problem-based learning process DDolmans HSchmidt Lessons from problem-based learning HVan Berkel Oxford University Press 2010 * Profiles of effective tutors in problem-based learning: scaffolding student learning WSE Grave DHDolmans Med Educ 33 1999 Van der Vleuten CP * Problem-based learning in continuing medical education: review of randomized controlled trials HAl-Azri SRatnapalan Can Fam Phys 60 2014 * Effects of tutorrelated behaviours on the process of problembased learning EChng EYew HSchmidt Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 16 2011 * Portraits of PBL: Students' experiences of the characteristics of problem-based learning in physiotherapy, computer engineering and psychology MAbrandt-Dahlgren DahlgrenLo Instr Sci 30 2 2002 * Problem-based learning: Where are we now? Guide supplement 36.1-Viewpoint SAAzer Med Teach 33 2011 * Problem-based learning: Where are we now? Guide supplement 36.2-Viewpoint RWBeri Med Teach 33 2011 * Using problem-based learning in the clinical setting to improve nursing student's critical thinking: An evidence review KJOja J Nurs Educ 30 2010 * Advantages of video trigger in problembased learning KiChan LPatil NGChen JYLam JcmLau CS Ipmsm Med Teach 32 9 2010 * Problem-based learning in pre-clinical medical education: 22 years outcome research LHartling CSpooner LTjosvold AOswald Mede Teach 32 1 2010 * Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions MKSmith Science 2 2009