# Introduction ndian constitution is one of the fine legal documents of our country which covers all features to control the country and its society peacefully for social stability, human rights and protect humanity from serious crime. But when we analyse the international and national matter of security focusing north Indo-Pak border of Jammu and Kashmir then it can be seen as the world"s complex dangerous area have serious complex issues which can only be resolved by the implementation of new laws to maintain the security and peace. The interference from Pakistan in Jammu and Kashmir area and recently from China after the coronavirus situation, attack in the region of Ladakh, these serious issues are continuing which make the matter complex to solve. The hope is to make a future relationship in peace and prosperity. The folks of Jammu and Kashmir have faced an immense amount of terror and fear from decades consecutively and they have been fighting for their freedom against discomfort and discontent faced by them. India and Pakistan were divided into two countries after the Independence from the Britishers in 1947. There were almost 560 princely states situated in British India till that time Kashmir was also the part of it. The emperor Hari Singh of Kashmir instead of his kingship, has made many conflicts which were the most debated reasons to stabilize the conditions of Kashmir. Pakistan targeted India by making Kashmir as a weapon and attacked Kashmir by sending army troops. Maharaja of Kashmir was unable to defend Kashmir and sought for help and extend his hand towards India. After analyzing the position of the Kashmir and request made by Hari Singh, the viceroy Mountbatten was ready to help Kashmir but in exchange, he proposed an agreement to the Maharaja signed the "Letter of Instrument of Accession to India", since that time this agreement has become an irrevocable and unresolved issue for India. After the agreement between India and Kashmir on 2nd November 1947 Pandit Nehru proclaimed that "Kashmir's future will be decided by the means of the plebiscite", a plebiscite was never applied on Kashmir since then and it has become a vague promise made by the government of India. After such an incident, Kashmir people were protected and guaranteed their voting rights in general and local elections. Hence, there was no need for plebiscite in the state. Whereas on the other side of the coin Pakistan was always in the favor of conducting elections with the means of a plebiscite. They have always provoked Kashmiri Muslims to demand their rights and Plebiscite in their State. They were of the view that voting of Kashmiri people will hardly make any difference in the State because they only urge to get the basic amenities and resolved issues of Kashmir which they won"t get by the means of elections. As per the ground reality scenario, finally, The Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, Registered No. ID (N) 04/0007/2003, Published by the authority as Ministry of Law and Justice (legislative department), 2019, New Delhi, India 1 The serious complex issues of Kashmir (as a state of India equalize with other states) and the abrogation of article 370: peace can be conceivable, or stalemate endures to hamper India and Pakistan relation in future . 2 Focusing on Kashmir with its background, recent development and U.S. Policy as published by Congressional Research Services, the author highlights the issue with Indian government based on constitutional power to make changes in J&K state where the Muslim majority is existing. The author highlights the Article 370 which make the Jammu and Kashmir state as a "special status" and bifurcation of the state from the whole country as a "union territories" with the use of constitution came under "president rules" which in future makes serious issues as peace or war, religious stability, Indian military strong action, interference of Pakistan, disturbing national and international relation between UN, India, Pakistan and other neighbouring countries. UN said officially that Jammu and Kashmir consider as a disputed territory but India reacted with the recent constitutional surprised changes an "internal matter". UN policy"s main objective is to avert conflicts between India and Pakistan. He highlights the issues for the three decades of separatist conflicts and their countless death records as an outcome after 2013. The USA supports both sides of Indian and Pakistan partnership to make the peace and development continue to future from 2019 with the president Trump"s July "mediation" offer 3 background of this article 370 the case history of Jammu and Kashmir where Maharaja Hari Singh after Pakistani attack since the 26th of October 1947, on Jammu and Kashmir, after princely states merged with India Kashmir had its constitution since 17th of November 1956 under the constitution of India came into force with provision article 370, Maharaja Hari Singh signed the accession papers on October 26, 1947, under which the state acceded to India. Finally, Maharaja Hari Singh signed the official document (accession papers) on 26th of October 1947 in which the state assented to India. Most importantly they highlighted "THE LEGAL ANALYSIS" focusing Article 370 in detailed research as Article 370 Clause (1)(a), (1)(b), (1)(c), (1)(d), ( 2) & (3) with the further current legal framework of article 370, issues, challenges and suggestions for India"s future peaceful scenarios 4 . After this lots of issues reflect from his research title as "the abrogation of article 370 can the president act without the official recommendation under constitutional rights of the constitute assembly?". With the in-depth framework, he focusing on the provision and its background history, the legal cases against article 370, characterization of the article 370 in judicial decision with proper details, basic structural doctrine and the parliament"s power to change article 370. This article under the Indian constitution and unequal federalism, bureaucratic limitation on amending power, ARTICLE 370, and provisional constitutionalism. The result shows that article 370 cannot be deleted by the presented without the official recommendation under the constitutional rights of the constituent assembly. Clause 3 of Article 370 of the Indian Constitution explains that the President has the power to abrogate or delete this Article by giving official notification in the Official Gazette. Provided that he shall take the consent of the State Governor before making such move. 5 As complex matter related to article 370 the petitions, claims and complaints are registered officially 6 . Jammu and Kashmir is the epicenter and the cause of burning issues due to the interference of both Pakistan and India. The author is disagreeing with the special status done under the new constitution as article 370. 7 This research Work Legal Analysis put a question on the article 370, and to recognize why the tenacious complex problems of communism, dynamics of separationist activates and moments which put the Indian government into serious trouble (in the present ground reality scenario and the future) the genesis and nature of this article under Indian constitution which should be understood in details 8 In the end, the article 370 and its further implementation makes development and peace in The Valley of Kashmir (Jammu-Kashmir, and Ladakh) towards country"s peace and international relations . 9 II. # Literature Review . From the past many years, it has been observed that Kashmir is facing an atmosphere of terror and struggle due to which lakhs of people were lost their lives and millions of the troops have been deployed in the valley due to uninvited events. On many occasions, there were a large number of bloodshed and terror like condition. Elections were conducted in Kashmir in the presence of military or Para-military force for their protection. There were more than six lakhs of armed forces deployed for the safety of Jammu and Kashmir which was an official statement proclaimed by the assembly of J & K. The ratio of locals and military personnel is 1:18, considering this it can be witnessed that a large number of troops were deployed in the valley for the protection and safety of the locals. In the country which has a total population of 130 crores and in comparison to that population of Jammu and Kashmir is 1.47 crore only. The quantum of military forces is quite large as compared to the population of the valley. There have been many wrongful acts and tragedies observed in consideration of Human rights violations by armed forces or army troops in the State. Cases of rapes, molestation, harassment, disappearances, etc. done by armed forces deployed in the valley. Such cases of violation of human rights were investigated by Amnesty International and other agencies but no such proof was found or proven against the Indian army. They always came out of such cases clean and clear. # The # Research Methodology The study is doctrinal in nature and analytical in approach. The research will depend on both primary and secondary sources. There are many other sources like political views, debates, commentaries of various authors, books, journals, websites on the internet, enactments, etc. 1. Primary Source: The primary sources used in this research include the Constitution of India, Precedents and Statutes. Various reports of Commission of India. 2. Secondary Source: The data will be gathered through different sources such as the internet, journals, Articles, Newspaper and Magazines. The abrogation of Article 370 of the Indian Constitution will improve the overall condition of society at large in Jammu and Kashmir if implemented effectively. # V. Research Objectives # RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS status under Article 370 of the Indian Constitution before its abrogation in 2019. Article 370 is also termed as the National Liability on the Government of India. This Article has vast literature and history which does not emerge from legal or constitutional dimensions but it has a deep-rooted political and religious dimension. All the facts and elements are entangled so abruptly with each other that one needs the extensive interest and keenness to understand the dimensions of the Article and its vast political background. Deeper incite of this Article is important as it replicates the deep understanding of the unilateral and bilateral type of government in a single country. Let"s study the dimensions of the framer of this Article which tried to fulfill the hopes and aspiration of justice to the citizens of India and also residents of Jammu and Kashmir. # a) Background Not many people know the reason behind the formulation of Article 370 in the Constitution of India and it has played a vital role for Jammu and Kashmir to become an integral part of the Indian Constitution. It was despite the political apprehension of the Sardar Patel, Political Parties and Constituent Assembly. When the B.R Ambedkar refused to frame this Article, Jawaharlal Nehru appointed his most trusted Cabinet Member N. Gopalaswami Ayyangar to draft Article 370 of the Constitution of India. Earlier Sheikh Abdullah was directed to accompany B. R Ambedkar for framing Article 370 but he was strictly against the formation of this Article. In 1950, the Indian Constitution came into force, Article 1 of the Constitution defined Jammu and Kashmir has a special status. Inequality in India begun from here. Jawaharlal Nehru and Sheikh Abdullah signed an agreement known as the "Delhi Agreement" to improve relations between the state and the union. Jawaharlal Nehru promised the citizen of India that Article 370 is just a temporary provision and it will be deleted over time. Framers of Article did not mention the period replicate the word temporary in the provision. Does it mean one week, one month, one year, or a decade? Because it took almost half a century to justify and abrogate these words like "temporary, translational and special provision" which is contained in part XXI of our Constitution. As per the Instrument of Accession signed by the State, Maharaja provided specifically that dominion of India on the State of Jammu and Kashmir will be limited to the matters related to defence, external affairs and communication and other matters will be decided by the Maharaja or government itself. Moreover, Clause 7 of the Instrument of Accession also defines that no further laws provided in the Constitution of India # d) Nature of Article 370 To understand the question of the basic principle of the constitution of India one should study the nature of this Article first. So in many Supreme Court decisions, it has been decided that it is the temporary provision of the Constitution but happened to be the permanent provision from the past half-decade. This Article was the political venture and used as a weapon by the politicians of Jammu and Kashmir. It has few of the fiscal implications: # f) Effects of Article 370 on Human Rights Under the cover of Article 370 many human rights are being trashed and tampered. Human rights are for the welfare of the society and should be awarded to every citizen of India irrespective of their caste, colour, race, gender or creed. Under the ambit of Article 370 state govt. of the valley failed to protect the basic rights of the residents of Jammu and Kashmir. discrimination with backward people, women who cannot marry outside the state to protect their property rights, right to education of children etc. are not protected under the constitution of Jammu and Kashmir. The consequences of the Art. 370 in the purview of Human Rights are as follows: 1. Gender Biases: Article 370 cries loud the gender biases in the Jammu and Kashmir. Article 35A speaks about the rights of women who are deprived of property rights if they marry outside the state. This discriminatory behavior against the women of Jammu and Kashmir is solely unacceptable and demands the call for justice. There is sheer backwardness in the state of Jammu and Kashmir. Basic Fundamental rights are not provided to women and children. The Right to education from the age of 8 to 14 is not compulsory and strictly followed by the people of the valley. Child marriage is still prominent and such act which opposes such # g) Disadvantages of Article 370 There is no private hospital in the vicinity of the adjoining district of Jammu and Kashmir. Lack of essentials in the state such as water supply, electricity supply, or fast speed internets. There is no competition among students who lacks their mental growth and development. This lacks the progress of the youth mentally. The Youth of Jammu and Kashmir do not have the right to crack other state exams. There is no industrial growth or development because no company has the right to buy land in the valley. The permanent residents of the state have property rights only. Shariah laws are profiling to the women of the state. The Indian government cannot access its powers without the concurrence of the state government. Hence, they cannot implement any law or policy on the state. # What Is Article 35a Inculcated in the Legal Provisions of J & K? This Article was inserted for providing the special status to the residents of the Jammu and Kashmir. This Article was inserted on the recommendation of President Rajendra Prasad with the concurrence of Jawaharlal Nehru. Article 35 A is a blessing to the people of Jammu and Kashmir and can only be enjoyed by residents of the valley. Legal Implications of Abrogation of Article 370 of the Indian Constitution Article 370 was inserted during the political turmoil and the war between Kashmir and Pakistan. Initiation of the Article was when the Instrument of Accession was signed between Kashmir and the government of India. As per this Article special provision was promised to be given to Jammu and Kashmir. To fulfil such agreement Article 370 came into existence and the drafting of this Article was initiated. The rights provided to women differ as compared to the rights of the men in the state of Jammu and Kashmir. In the case, the State of Jammu and Kashmir and Sheela Shawney women raised her voice against the provision given in the Constitution of the Jammu and Kashmir that if a woman marries outside the state she will lose her property rights. It was settled in the full bench of Jammu and Kashmir High court that its provision will be struck down as discriminatory and bias. This provision also does not have any legal basis. Later this bill was moved forward and the bill named Permanent Resident (disqualification) Bill 2004 was passed with the efforts of Mehbooba Mufti and PDP Government which says that the women will lose their legal status as a permanent resident if she marries anyone outside India. Such a bill was also supported by Omar Abdullah and his party. And at present Governor rule was proficient. The Government defense was that Governor is accomplished with all the powers including the Legislative Assembly so he can give his consent for ceasing Article and to make it inoperative. The government tricked and did what they cannot do by the shortest route. The governor of the Jammu and Kashmir can vouchsafe the authorization to delete Article 370. Section 92 of the J & K Constitution declares that during the governor rule it is the liability of the governor to pin the announcement before the State Assembly. Governor can make provisional decisions but the final is made by the State Assembly only. After offering all the powers to the Governor of the state government made their move and thrown their ax by deleting Article 370 of the Indian Constitution. This has become the history and the government made this gesture without any debate or discussion and finally pronounced their decision to the nation. Finally, On August 5, 2019, The Indian Government abrogated the Special Status of the Jammu and Kashmir protected under Article 370 and Article 35 A. The other way around to this gesticulation would require the consent of the elected representative of the J & K or the majority votes of the members of Parliament which might have taken another half a century to happen. The never ending provision which was temporary was abolished. It was promised by the Jawaharlal Nehru that this Article is just a temporary provision and it will be deleted over time but it took almost decades to ran into the conclusion. The long lasting promise was finally fulfilled in the dimension of the legal perspective. # h) Overview of ? Aftermath of Striking Out Article 370 Overruling the Presidential Orders of 1956, President of India announced the order of eradicating Article 370. The Home Minister introduced and implemented the new bill named "Reorganisation Bill" throughout India. As per this bill, Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh were fractioned into two UT"s. Both the UT"s will be governed by the unilateral Governments. This decision was passed by the upper house and later was challenged by the lower house of the parliament. # i) Latest Bill: Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Bill 2019 This act has been passed after the Presidential Order of deleting Article 370. This bill was passed to divide the Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh into two separate Union Territories. The region Jammu and Kashmir are always at target whenever there is any insurgency situation between India and Pakistan. This Act will come into effect from the date 31st October 2019. This Act was inaugurated by the Minister of Home Affairs Amit Shah on 5th August 2019. The bill was passed with the help of the majority voting in both the houses of Parliament. In the Rajya Sabha when this bill was presented and ouns of voting were in the hands of members of the house, 125members were in the favor. The president of India also gave his prestigious consensus on 9th August 2019 in the favor of passing such a bill. The bill was set in motion through Presidential Order and with the effect of which Article 370 was eradicated from the Indian Constitution. As Article 370 was depleted Union Government passed the Reorganization bill which helped them to pave the way to alter with the boundaries of the Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Features: As per this Act Jammu and Kashmir will have a legislative Assembly. Ladakh will not have any Legislative assembly and will be governed by lieutenant Governor only. 1. Leh and Kargil will not be the part of Jammu and Kashmir anymore and will be merged with Ladakh territory. 2. All the other districts, villages or states will remain inculcated in Jammu and Kashmir. 3. Allocation of Lok Sabha seats is also decided in this Act which specifies that five seats out six will be allotted to Jammu and Kashmir and one to Ladakh for the representation of Lok Sabha in the house of Parliament. 4. The Election process will be the same as prescribed in the delimitation Act. 5. Legislative Assembly of Jammu and Kashmir will last for 5 years. 6. Article 239a will be enforceable on Jammu and Kashmir as Puducherry. 7. Legislative Assembly seats are also escalated from 107 to 111, 37 of Jammu and 46 of Kashmir and 4 of Ladakh. 8. SC/ST will get a reservation. 9. The High Court of both UTs will be the same. # VII. Results Completely New Unfolded Opportunities for J&K Present Situation: the right to information has acted as the primary object to eradicate corruption from the grass-root level. Now people of Jammu and Kashmir will also be delighted with this fundamental right. Several acts that contribute to liquidate corruption will be operative in the State. Agencies or Investigation teams can invade the state matters of the Jammu and Kashmir which will reduce corruption to some dimension. 10. Modifications or policies: Earlier: Any new redrafting, alteration or revision in the provisions of the laws were not operative in Jammu and Kashmir until State government passes such amendment. Due to these reasons there were many Acts, bills, or legislation that were binding on other states that did not apply to Jammu and Kashmir. Present Situation: all the enactments, bills, policies or amendments will be binding and implementable on the Jammu and Kashmir as other States of the nation. Many laws that will bring growth and development in the state are all applicable and operative. None of the sections of the state will be deprived of any fundamental right, directive principles, or human rights. This new era of equality and diversity will change the dimension and vision of people to look at Jammu and Kashmir as separate Union Territories. There is a new hope of revolution, development, and financial stability. There will be only one official language, one flag, and one constitution. This decision has rubbed off the segment of discrimination, inequality, and separatism in India. All the faith of people for justice and human rights is gained back by such an epic decision. Jammu and Kashmir will be new hubs for education, job opportunities, tourism, industrialization, and employment. It will soon turn into a new world of hope and success for the people of Jammu and Kashmir. The hope is that the fine combination of Muslims (Kashmiris -One Divine Wisdom) and Buddhists (Ladakh from Tibet University -Lhasa) gives us a unique culture and scope of advanced future enhancements to reshape the unstable country"s situations in peaceful, enlightened and advanced development under the umbrella of Indian Constitution. VIII. # Conclusion 1. This decision was declared in such a short period that it was like flash news for the Nation. The people of Kashmir were in shock. No doubt it is for the development of peace and order in Jammu and Kashmir but the government should have taken such big move slowly and gradually. 2. They should have educated the locals about their decisions and the disadvantages of Article 370 as it hinders the growth and development of their State. The confidence of the people should be gained first. 3. The government has imposed the barriers for the Media which was a violation of Article 19 i.e. Right to speech and expression. This has hindered media to represent the true side of the story. 4. There are many concerns of the locals which should be resolved like high-speed internet facilities which are becoming a hurdle to get healthcare prerequisites and online education from their respective educational institutions. 5. The involvement of the media would have to enlighten the issue in a positive direction when the locals have seen the love and support they would get from outside their state. ![Abrogation of Article 370 of the Indian Constitution: An Analytical Study IV.](image-2.png "F") ? To review and compare the legal status of the Stateof Jammu and Kashmir in the light of the scrappingof Article 370.? To analyze the legal implication of the abolition ofArticle 370 and Article 35A.? To find out THE MIDDLE PATH SOLUTIONS withNew Constitutional Embedments Or Basic LawStructural Change to satisfied the both side ofgovernment and the people of Valley of Kashmir(Jammu -Kashmir and Ladakh) in peaceful way.VI. Article 370 of Indian Constitution:An OverviewArticle 370 of the Indian Constitution is the mostcontroversial and contentious. It has a profound historywith immeasurable and temporary. This Article wasoutlined as a "temporary provision" of the IndianConstitution.© 2021 Global Journals e) Provisions of Article 370 of the Indian ConstitutionPart XXI of the Indian Constitution includesArticle 370 which represents all its provision to be"temporary, transitional and special"1. The initial words are "notwithstanding anything in theconstitution anything in this constitution".6. Paragraph (ii) of sub-clause (b) of clause (1) or inthe second provision to sub-clause (d) of that clause says that with the consent of the Governor of the Jammu and Kashmir it must be placed in front of the Constituent Assembly. Government can be brought to a standstill by aprovince not carrying out the directions and theGovernment of India not having any power to enforcethose directions".2. Jammu and Kashmir lies with India because of thecommon ideals that we share?.it will be myconstant endeavor to ensure that the State of Jammuand Kashmir continues to make its contribution tothe sovereignty, integrity, and progress of thenation?. the country is passing through a criticalYear 2021period and it is all the more necessary for all of us who cherish the ideals of democracy, secularism and socialism, to strengthen your hands as the leader of the Nation and it is in this spirit that I amGovernment Officials 1. Dr. B.R Ambedkar (Bharat Rattan) From the beginning of this matter of article 370 Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, the father of the Indian constitution was disagreeing in introducing this article in our constitution. 28 ( ) Global Journal of Human Social Science -F offering my whole hearted co-operation" How Was Article 370 Wiped Off?"Article 365 is required because we all know those of us who were Ministers during the time of the war-how these mere powers of giving directions turned out to be infructuous when the Punjab Government would not carry out the food policy of the Government of India. The whole Volume XXI Issue III Version I applicable. In the election, they will get thereservation to contest elections in regionalParliament. Working conditions and better jobopportunities will be provided to them. Properreservation rights will be provided in the field ofeducation and employment.6. Property Rights: Earlier: Only permanent residentscould avail of property or land ownership rights. Dueto this reason, there was no hike in the prices of theland in the State as compared to other states. Non-residents cannot claim for any land or property inthe valley. Present Situation: land ownership will varyafter the abrogation of Article 370. No one will beforced to part their land after this event of deletingthe special status of Jammu and Kashmir. butlandowners who wish to buy or sell land are free todo so.307. WPRs Earlier: No citizenship rights, property rights,Volume XXI Issue III Version I ( )Total revolution or transformation in the Jammu and Kashmir witnessed after the extermination of Article 370: 1. More Development and investment Earlier: Curtailment inflicted on land transfer due to applicability of Article 370 and Article 35 A. There were obligations which stop industrial growth and setting up large industries. The areas of education, tourism, and health were completely ignored by the government. There was curtailment on educational growth or job facilities. Large industries were banned as they were not allowed to buy or sell land in the state. Present Situation: elimination of such provisions will hike the private and industrial sectors. There will be magnification and prosperity among the state if industrialization enters. Revolutionary change can be seen by increasing trade and commerce, tourism, and educational opportunities. Local farmers can learn new cultivation techniques and women can learn to run small scale businesses at home which will boost up their confidence and enthusiasm. or democratic rights applied to the refugees from West Pakistan. Present Situation: All such rights like citizenship, property rights, or democratic rights will apply to WPRs. 8. Panchayati Raj Earlier: Panchayats do not have any right to decide or finalise anything without the concurrence or consent of the State Government. There were no elections held for the post of selecting members of panchayat. Present Situation: Indian government reinstated the rights of the Panchayat and 73th and 74th Constitutional amendments will be operative on local bodies of the State. Direct funds will be allocated to the Panchayats that will enhance the development in the whole state including the rural areas or at the lowest level of democracy. 2. Tourism Earlier: Women were no more authorized to property rights if she marries other men outside State. Women were not given any right to fight against domestic violence. Juvenile Justice or Rights were far away forgotten concept in the State. Present situation: Women can reap the benefit of property rights irrespective of the places where they marry. Children which provides free education to children from the age of 8 to 14 years. Juvenile Justice Act will apply to the residents of the State. All the acts that shield the dignity of the women and innocence of the children will be implemented in the valley as well. 5. Backward Groups: Earlier: Discrimination with the SC/ST classes was common in the Jammu and Kashmir from the long back history. They are not allowed to contest elections and are mistreated by the permanent residents. They are not allowed to do any other job except as sweepers. They were not awarded with the proper promotion rights. Citizenship was not given to the people who were working in the sanitation commission. They were forcefully making them work in the sanitation department. Many backward classes are forced to can avail themselves of the Right to Education 9.resides in the forest areas. Present Situation:protection to the rights of ST/SC will be availed. Allthe Acts that protect the human rights situation anddignity of the backward group residents will be now The Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, Registered No. ID (N) 04/0007/2003, Published by the authority as Ministry of Law and Justice (legislative department)( 2019). . As per old 2 Dr. Tehseen Nisar, "Kashmir and the abrogation of article 370: can peace be possible, or stalemate continue to hamper India and Pakistan relation in future?" SADF FOCUS, issue number 45, ISSN 2406-5633, 2016, www.sadf.eu. 3 K. Alan kronstadt, "Kashmir: background, recent developments and U.S Policy", Congressional Research Services, 2019, https:// crsreports.congress.gov . Aasth Mehta, "Genesis and the nature of article 370 of the constitution of India", International journal of law and legal jurisprudence studies, ISSN-2348-8212, 2019.9 Aditya Jain, "Article 370-A critical analysis", Journal of legal study and research, Volume -2, Issue -1, 2019.10 The Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, Registered No. ID (N) 04/0007/2003, Published by the authority as Ministry of Law and Justice (legislative department), 2019, New Delhi, India. © 2021 Global JournalsAbrogation of Article 370 of the Indian Constitution: An Analytical Study 6. The Panchayati Raj is the new festival for Jammu and Kashmir but this will only strengthen the democracy at a lower level. 7. Jammu and Kashmir should not be given the status of Union territories instead should be made a single state. 8. Diplomats are only using this issue for their benefits. They belong to the organization which should only think of the nation"s betterment and development instead of their revenge or profits. ## Disclaimer In this research work title Abrogation of Article 370 of the Indian constitution: An analytical study is based on the available international research work published literature reviews, website articles, website URL, Books, articles and other facts and figures, as a undergraduate student I am nothing modified or change the reference matter or thesis matter in negative or misuses way and end the research with positive conclusion under ethics for the peace and harmony for India and its international relation under our Indian constitution. * Kashmir and the abrogation of article 370: can peace be possible, or stalemate continue to hamper India and Pakistan relation in future TehseenDr Nisar SADF FOCUS, issue number 45 2016 * Kashmir: background, recent developments and U.S Policy K AlanKronstadt Congressional Research Services 2019 * A comparative study on article 370 SonaDr FirdoosShukla Ahmed IJESC 3221 3361 9 11 2019 * Abrogation of article 370: can the president act without the recommendation of the constituent assembly GBalu Nair 2473-0599, 2019 Taylor and Francis * Article 370 -a permanently temporary provision AkashdeepDr Singh ISSN 2349-5138 IJRAR 2348-1269 6 2019 Print * Article 370 and its implementation TawheedaNabi SubaiyaNazir ShahidHussain Wani IJCERT -2320-2882 6 2018 * Integration of Kashmir for peace and prosperity MahaveerGolechha Correspondence 19. 32077-X, 2019 * Abrogation of article 370 -A look back at its origin and aftermath RinashreeKhound International journal of scientific & technology research 2277-8616 8 12 2019 * Art. 370 and Art. 35A -The impending question of their legal validity IraSinghal 2018 1 * Article 370 of the Indian constitution -A study in specific reference to legal dimensions and implication SurbhiGupta Shashi Bhushan Ojha International journal of law -2455-2194 4 3 * Genesis and the nature of article 370 of the constitution of India AasthMehta International journal of law and legal jurisprudence studies -2348- 8212 2019 * Article 370-A critical analysis AdityaJain Journal of legal study and research 2 Issue-1, 2019 * Article 35 A and its implementation-A quest of stability in Jammu and Kashmir PreetiDr Dr. SheilaSharma Rai 2019 JETIR 6 Research paper is based on research project granted by ICSSR * A J&K PRIMER from myth to reality BGVerghese 2019 * Kashmir in the Balance RADavis International Defence Review 24 4 301 April 1993 * ?Robert GWirsing PakistanIndia The Kashmir Dispute 1994 Palgrave Macmillan US * VSchofield Conflict: India, Pakistan and the Unending War Bloomsbury 1996 * The national in Kashmir PChandra JSTOR (1985) Ganguly S. Will Kashmir stop India's Rise? Foreign AfISI rs 2006 * ?JSri Raman Can Democracy End Kashmir Dispute? Truth out September 2008 * ?Joshi HJammu Kashmir Aakrosh: Asian journal on Terrorism and Internal conflicts 12 2009 * Losing Control HBaweja India Today 25 May 31. 1993 * Partition of Kashmir, Economic and political weekly ?Noorani AG 1996 * YYadev Reconfiguration in Indian Politics: State Assembly Elections 1993-95. 1996 * ?India KashmirPakistan A good vote in the angry valley 2008 * RChandidas Economic and Political Weekly 1968 Quick but Not Accurate Enough * Url Websites * Musharraf's four-stage Kashmir peace plan: We can make borders irrelevant: India Naqvi? Jawed Dawn December 06, 2006 * India, Pakistan had a solution for Kashmir in 2007: Kasuri The? Nirupama Subramanian Hindu