\documentclass[11pt,twoside]{article}\makeatletter \IfFileExists{xcolor.sty}% {\RequirePackage{xcolor}}% {\RequirePackage{color}} \usepackage{colortbl} \usepackage{wrapfig} \usepackage{ifxetex} \ifxetex \usepackage{fontspec} \usepackage{xunicode} \catcode`⃥=\active \def⃥{\textbackslash} \catcode`❴=\active \def❴{\{} \catcode`❵=\active \def❵{\}} \def\textJapanese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK JP}} \def\textChinese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK SC}} \def\textKorean{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK KR}} \setmonofont{DejaVu Sans Mono} \else \IfFileExists{utf8x.def}% {\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc} \PrerenderUnicode{–} }% {\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}} \usepackage[english]{babel} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage{float} \usepackage[]{ucs} \uc@dclc{8421}{default}{\textbackslash } \uc@dclc{10100}{default}{\{} \uc@dclc{10101}{default}{\}} \uc@dclc{8491}{default}{\AA{}} \uc@dclc{8239}{default}{\,} \uc@dclc{20154}{default}{ } \uc@dclc{10148}{default}{>} \def\textschwa{\rotatebox{-90}{e}} \def\textJapanese{} \def\textChinese{} \IfFileExists{tipa.sty}{\usepackage{tipa}}{} \fi \def\exampleFont{\ttfamily\small} \DeclareTextSymbol{\textpi}{OML}{25} \usepackage{relsize} \RequirePackage{array} \def\@testpach{\@chclass \ifnum \@lastchclass=6 \@ne \@chnum \@ne \else \ifnum \@lastchclass=7 5 \else \ifnum \@lastchclass=8 \tw@ \else \ifnum \@lastchclass=9 \thr@@ \else \z@ \ifnum \@lastchclass = 10 \else \edef\@nextchar{\expandafter\string\@nextchar}% \@chnum \if \@nextchar c\z@ \else \if \@nextchar l\@ne \else \if \@nextchar r\tw@ \else \z@ \@chclass \if\@nextchar |\@ne \else \if \@nextchar !6 \else \if \@nextchar @7 \else \if \@nextchar (8 \else \if \@nextchar )9 \else 10 \@chnum \if \@nextchar m\thr@@\else \if \@nextchar p4 \else \if \@nextchar b5 \else \z@ \@chclass \z@ \@preamerr \z@ \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi} \gdef\arraybackslash{\let\\=\@arraycr} \def\@textsubscript#1{{\m@th\ensuremath{_{\mbox{\fontsize\sf@size\z@#1}}}}} \def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}} \def\abbr{} \def\corr{} \def\expan{} \def\gap{} \def\orig{} \def\reg{} \def\ref{} \def\sic{} \def\persName{}\def\name{} \def\placeName{} \def\orgName{} \def\textcal#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Calligraphy}#1}} \def\textgothic#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Blackletter}#1}} \def\textlarge#1{{\large #1}} \def\textoverbar#1{\ensuremath{\overline{#1}}} \def\textquoted#1{‘#1’} \def\textsmall#1{{\small #1}} \def\textsubscript#1{\@textsubscript{\selectfont#1}} \def\textxi{\ensuremath{\xi}} \def\titlem{\itshape} \newenvironment{biblfree}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{bibl}{}{} \newenvironment{byline}{\vskip6pt\itshape\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont}{\par } \newenvironment{citbibl}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docAuthor}{\ifvmode\vskip4pt\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont\fi\itshape}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docDate}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docImprint}{\vskip 6pt}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docTitle}{\vskip6pt\bfseries\fontsize{22pt}{25pt}\selectfont}{\par } \newenvironment{msHead}{\vskip 6pt}{\par} \newenvironment{msItem}{\vskip 6pt}{\par} \newenvironment{rubric}{}{} \newenvironment{titlePart}{}{\par } \newcolumntype{L}[1]{){\raggedright\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{C}[1]{){\centering\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{R}[1]{){\raggedleft\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{P}[1]{){\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{B}[1]{){\arraybackslash}b{#1}} \newcolumntype{M}[1]{){\arraybackslash}m{#1}} \definecolor{label}{gray}{0.75} \def\unusedattribute#1{\sout{\textcolor{label}{#1}}} \DeclareRobustCommand*{\xref}{\hyper@normalise\xref@} \def\xref@#1#2{\hyper@linkurl{#2}{#1}} \begingroup \catcode`\_=\active \gdef_#1{\ensuremath{\sb{\mathrm{#1}}}} \endgroup \mathcode`\_=\string"8000 \catcode`\_=12\relax \usepackage[a4paper,twoside,lmargin=1in,rmargin=1in,tmargin=1in,bmargin=1in,marginparwidth=0.75in]{geometry} \usepackage{framed} \definecolor{shadecolor}{gray}{0.95} \usepackage{longtable} \usepackage[normalem]{ulem} \usepackage{fancyvrb} \usepackage{fancyhdr} \usepackage{graphicx} \usepackage{marginnote} \renewcommand{\@cite}[1]{#1} \renewcommand*{\marginfont}{\itshape\footnotesize} \def\Gin@extensions{.pdf,.png,.jpg,.mps,.tif} \pagestyle{fancy} \usepackage[pdftitle={Learning Outcomes Acquisition in Second Language Tertiary Education Classroom Practices}, pdfauthor={}]{hyperref} \hyperbaseurl{} \paperwidth210mm \paperheight297mm \def\@pnumwidth{1.55em} \def\@tocrmarg {2.55em} \def\@dotsep{4.5} \setcounter{tocdepth}{3} \clubpenalty=8000 \emergencystretch 3em \hbadness=4000 \hyphenpenalty=400 \pretolerance=750 \tolerance=2000 \vbadness=4000 \widowpenalty=10000 \renewcommand\section{\@startsection {section}{1}{\z@}% {-1.75ex \@plus -0.5ex \@minus -.2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\Large\bfseries}} \renewcommand\subsection{\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\z@}% {-1.75ex\@plus -0.5ex \@minus- .2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\Large}} \renewcommand\subsubsection{\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\z@}% {-1.5ex\@plus -0.35ex \@minus -.2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\large}} \renewcommand\paragraph{\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\z@}% {-1ex \@plus-0.35ex \@minus -0.2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\normalsize}} \renewcommand\subparagraph{\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\parindent}% {1.5ex \@plus1ex \@minus .2ex}% {-1em}% {\reset@font\normalsize\bfseries}} \def\l@section#1#2{\addpenalty{\@secpenalty} \addvspace{1.0em plus 1pt} \@tempdima 1.5em \begingroup \parindent \z@ \rightskip \@pnumwidth \parfillskip -\@pnumwidth \bfseries \leavevmode #1\hfil \hbox to\@pnumwidth{\hss #2}\par \endgroup} \def\l@subsection{\@dottedtocline{2}{1.5em}{2.3em}} \def\l@subsubsection{\@dottedtocline{3}{3.8em}{3.2em}} \def\l@paragraph{\@dottedtocline{4}{7.0em}{4.1em}} \def\l@subparagraph{\@dottedtocline{5}{10em}{5em}} \@ifundefined{c@section}{\newcounter{section}}{} \@ifundefined{c@chapter}{\newcounter{chapter}}{} \newif\if@mainmatter \@mainmattertrue \def\chaptername{Chapter} \def\frontmatter{% \pagenumbering{roman} \def\thechapter{\@roman\c@chapter} \def\theHchapter{\roman{chapter}} \def\thesection{\@roman\c@section} \def\theHsection{\roman{section}} \def\@chapapp{}% } \def\mainmatter{% \cleardoublepage \def\thechapter{\@arabic\c@chapter} \setcounter{chapter}{0} \setcounter{section}{0} \pagenumbering{arabic} \setcounter{secnumdepth}{6} \def\@chapapp{\chaptername}% \def\theHchapter{\arabic{chapter}} \def\thesection{\@arabic\c@section} \def\theHsection{\arabic{section}} } \def\backmatter{% \cleardoublepage \setcounter{chapter}{0} \setcounter{section}{0} \setcounter{secnumdepth}{2} \def\@chapapp{\appendixname}% \def\thechapter{\@Alph\c@chapter} \def\theHchapter{\Alph{chapter}} \appendix } \newenvironment{bibitemlist}[1]{% \list{\@biblabel{\@arabic\c@enumiv}}% {\settowidth\labelwidth{\@biblabel{#1}}% \leftmargin\labelwidth \advance\leftmargin\labelsep \@openbib@code \usecounter{enumiv}% \let\p@enumiv\@empty \renewcommand\theenumiv{\@arabic\c@enumiv}% }% \sloppy \clubpenalty4000 \@clubpenalty \clubpenalty \widowpenalty4000% \sfcode`\.\@m}% {\def\@noitemerr {\@latex@warning{Empty `bibitemlist' environment}}% \endlist} \def\tableofcontents{\section*{\contentsname}\@starttoc{toc}} \parskip0pt \parindent1em \def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}} \newenvironment{reflist}{% \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{} {% \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}% \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}% \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}% \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}% \def\makelabel##1{\itshape ##1}}% } {\end{list}\end{raggedright}} \newenvironment{sansreflist}{% \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{} {% \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}% \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}% \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}% \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}% \def\makelabel##1{\upshape ##1}}% } {\end{list}\end{raggedright}} \newenvironment{specHead}[2]% {\vspace{20pt}\hrule\vspace{10pt}% \phantomsection\label{#1}\markright{#2}% \pdfbookmark[2]{#2}{#1}% \hspace{-0.75in}{\bfseries\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont#2}% }{} \def\TheFullDate{2021-10-15 (revised: 15 October 2021)} \def\TheID{10.34257/GJHSSGVOL21IS8PG7\makeatother } \def\TheDate{2021-10-15} \title{Learning Outcomes Acquisition in Second Language Tertiary Education Classroom Practices} \author{}\makeatletter \makeatletter \newcommand*{\cleartoleftpage}{% \clearpage \if@twoside \ifodd\c@page \hbox{}\newpage \if@twocolumn \hbox{}\newpage \fi \fi \fi } \makeatother \makeatletter \thispagestyle{empty} \markright{\@title}\markboth{\@title}{\@author} \renewcommand\small{\@setfontsize\small{9pt}{11pt}\abovedisplayskip 8.5\p@ plus3\p@ minus4\p@ \belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus2\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 4\p@ plus2\p@ minus2\p@ \def\@listi{\leftmargin\leftmargini \topsep 2\p@ plus1\p@ minus1\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep 1pt} } \makeatother \fvset{frame=single,numberblanklines=false,xleftmargin=5mm,xrightmargin=5mm} \fancyhf{} \setlength{\headheight}{14pt} \fancyhead[LE]{\bfseries\leftmark} \fancyhead[RO]{\bfseries\rightmark} \fancyfoot[RO]{} \fancyfoot[CO]{\thepage} \fancyfoot[LO]{\TheID} \fancyfoot[LE]{} \fancyfoot[CE]{\thepage} \fancyfoot[RE]{\TheID} \hypersetup{citebordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,linkbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,urlbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,bookmarksnumbered=true} \fancypagestyle{plain}{\fancyhead{}\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}} \date{} \usepackage{authblk} \providecommand{\keywords}[1] { \footnotesize \textbf{\textit{Index terms---}} #1 } \usepackage{graphicx,xcolor} \definecolor{GJBlue}{HTML}{273B81} \definecolor{GJLightBlue}{HTML}{0A9DD9} \definecolor{GJMediumGrey}{HTML}{6D6E70} \definecolor{GJLightGrey}{HTML}{929497} \renewenvironment{abstract}{% \setlength{\parindent}{0pt}\raggedright \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}} \vskip16pt \textcolor{GJBlue}{\large\bfseries\abstractname\space} }{% \vskip8pt \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}} \vskip16pt } \usepackage[absolute,overlay]{textpos} \makeatother \usepackage{lineno} \linenumbers \begin{document} \author[1]{Joel Laffita Rivera} \affil[1]{ European College for Liberal Studies (ECLS)} \renewcommand\Authands{ and } \date{\small \em Received: 15 September 2021 Accepted: 2 October 2021 Published: 15 October 2021} \maketitle \begin{abstract} Indeed, Learning Outcomes (LO) are vital components of a curriculum design. These themes are not only a reflex of Education academic, administrative standards but, more importantly, a prelude for lecturing?s guidance and learning comprehension. Although Learning Outcomes refer to those learning achievements that learners will be able to demonstrate once completing the learning process, fulfilling this wanted goal still represents an academic challenge for all kinds of teaching and learning disciplines, and language is not exempted from being a subject that requires especial scrutinizes when addressing Learning Outcomes. Herewith, the study aimed to analyze learning outcome aspects and implications in second language acquisition in Tertiary Education classroom practices. It also brings up a based prospect on language insights and curriculum settings. To accomplish this objective, various manuscripts and Internet accredited websites were searched. The outcome revealed that the idea of boosting second language learners? knowledge and skills cognition meaning, differentiation, and association to treat the acquisition of learning outcomes at Tertiary Education classroom practices might be assumed as an academic functional approach that helps academicians in handling the second language acquisition process, and therefore in producing university graduate?s skills. \end{abstract} \keywords{linguistics; learning outcomes; assignments; evaluation criteria.} \begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1cm,1cm) % {block width} (coords) \textcolor{GJBlue}{\LARGE Global Journals \LaTeX\ JournalKaleidoscope\texttrademark} \end{textblock*} \begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1.4cm,1.5cm) % {block width} (coords) \textcolor{GJBlue}{\footnotesize \\ Artificial Intelligence formulated this projection for compatibility purposes from the original article published at Global Journals. However, this technology is currently in beta. \emph{Therefore, kindly ignore odd layouts, missed formulae, text, tables, or figures.}} \end{textblock*} \begin{textblock*}{10cm}(1.05cm,3cm) {{\textit{CrossRef DOI of original article:}} \underline{10.34257/GJHSSGVOL21IS8PG7}} \end{textblock*}\let\tabcellsep& \section[{Introduction}]{Introduction}\par ndeed, Learning Outcomes (LO) are vital components of a curriculum design. These themes are not only a reflex of Education academic, administrative standards but, more importantly, a prelude for lecturing's guidance and learning comprehension. Although Learning Outcomes refer to those learning achievements that learners will be able to demonstrate once completing the learning process, fulfilling this wanted goal still represents an academic challenge for all kinds of teaching and learning disciplines, and language is not exempted from being a subject that requires especial scrutinizes when addressing Learning Outcomes. As the linguistic outputs from Learning Outcomes relate to learner's capabilities accomplishment, it is necessary to look at this purpose to discuss the fact that they must demonstrate based linguistic knowledge and skills a result of the learning process. Among many other educational challenges, this could be a complex task to manage from second language knowledge and skills acquisition. This sustained academia search observation led us to create the hypothesis that not only by designing appropriate learning outcomes, which is an academic requirement, we, as academicians, should assume that the second language learning acquisition is going to produce for itself that level of practical expertise that we want our university studs to do the show. Therefore, we perceive that one of the philosophical thinking that could help them to develop based knowledge and skills subject relates is by having a deep understanding about to what [Knowledge and Skills] mean, and how they can associate and differentiate them when it comes to applying linguistically. See diagram 1: Applied Linguistic Knowledge and Kills Association and Differentiation. According to (oxforddictionaries.com. 2012) the term "knowledge" can refer to a theoretical or practical understanding of a subject. It can be implicit (as with practical skill or expertise) or explicit (as with the theoretical understanding of a subject), formal or informal, systematic or particular. A skill, on the other hand, is the learned ability to act with determined results [assignment and examination performances] with good execution, often within a given amount of time \hyperref[b14]{(Rao, 2010)}. \section[{Literature Review}]{Literature Review}\par According to \hyperref[b1]{(Brain and Richard, 2003)}; \hyperref[b17]{(Weinreich \& Herzog, 1968)}, Linguistics is the scientific study of the structure and development of language in general or particular languages. The language study also involves analysis of Langue Form, Language Meaning, and Language in Context \hyperref[b10]{(Martinet, 1960)}. (Crystal \hyperref[b4]{David, 1990)} argues that Linguistics can be described as an academic discipline and, at least, its theoretical subfields, as a field of science, being a widely recognized category of specialized expertise. For (Behme, Christina; Neef, Martin, 2018), Linguistics is heterogeneous in its research methods. Based on these researchers view, we could affirm that having an understanding of language philosophy and language applications could help second language teachers to develop much better lecturing approaches, and in handling the learning outcomes acquisition of the language subject to be taught, which is an issue that requires the use of Linguistics. A clear example is the academic learning outcomes recommendation of using a verb that describes an observable action, a description of what the learner will be able to do and under which conditions. This is something that academicians can do by employing this equation {\ref [Do+What+how=Result]}. For instance, [Apply and infer] [grammatical functions] [in Spanish language contexts]. Of course, according to the language proficiency level and by thinking in mind Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. The original taxonomy of the cognitive domain for categorizing the level of abstraction of questions that commonly occur in educational settings was created by (Longman, \hyperref[b8]{Engelhart, Furst, Hill, and Krathwohl, 1956)}, and time later revised by {\ref (Anderson \& Krathwohl, 2001)} to help teachers understand and implement a standards-based curriculum. Other significant linguistics issues when dealing with learning outcomes are the cognitive and affective domains learning approaches. (Iran, 1990) and (Zimmerman \& Bandura) respectively, argue that the meta-cognitive component of learning is involved in the exertion of control and responsibility for one's cognitive and affective processes to understand the information provided. Pedagogically, this fact led \hyperref[b2]{(Boekaerts, 1995)} to highlight the effectiveness of providing cognitive learning activities to students. Thus, considering [Knowledge and Skills Association and Differences] to get a better understanding about the Acquisition of Learning Outcomes in second language tertiary education classroom practices is also a valuable cognition approach scientific idea. However, being knowledgeable with the language subject knowledge and having the ability to use it appropriately in second language contexts are two different things. Furthermore, as second language teachers are required to make available their second language curriculum before imparting the subject, lecturing approaches have to be well-managed in these regards. See the example from table 2: Spanish Language Course Academic Inputs: \section[{Academic Approach and Methodological Inputs}]{Academic Approach and Methodological Inputs}\par As the present research study relates to experienced academic teaching and learning the second language at Higher Learning Education, the hypothesis presented is interpreted as a methodological tool for second language teachers to treat learning outcomes in a second language classroom. At Tertiary Education, we do not teach knowledge. Instead, we use it to help university students develop practical skills. This theoretical thinking matches the philosophy of Education, which is the process of facilitating learning, According to a report from (The World Bank, 2019), the future of work and the increasing role of technology in value chains make tertiary education even more relevant for workers to compete in the labor market. Thus, it should be a concern for both teachers and learners to understand that the results from learning outcomes are based on courses' declarative statements. In other \section[{Methodology}]{Methodology}\par The methodological approach used revised various manuscripts and Internet accredited websites to conduct the present research study. Two fundamental questions were accountable to proceed with the investigation, which attempts to responding them has been contextualized and sustained by accomplishing the study objective, which analyses learning outcome aspects and implications in second language acquisition at Tertiary Education classroom practices, and bring up a based prospect on language insights and curriculum settings. This all to make up the literature framework of the research study, which is based on 1) Research methodology. 2) Subject matter domain.\par 3) Results and discussion.\par V. \section[{Fundamental Questions}]{Fundamental Questions}\par What if by boosting second language learners' knowledge and skills cognition meaning, differentiation, and association, we can obtain better learning outcomes at Tertiary Education? If producing graduates' skills at this educational level is vital, how well are we handling the second language acquisition process? VI. \section[{Result and Discussion}]{Result and Discussion}\par Although many researchers have addressed the same subject here discussed, there are always room for new ideas. And this is what the present research study has attempted by providing a literature framework through which the thoughts about acquiring Learning Outcomes in Second Language Classroom Practices at Tertiary Education can be well interpreted. Similar to what the objective of learning outcomes should be, the title of the paper is by far an eloquent abstract of what readers might expect. Thus, the study has featured various facets of the subject matter [Learning Outcomes] to analyze their linguistic role. To answer the research questions, and draw appropriate conclusions and recommendations, this analysis traces Learning Outcomes outputs to look into the learning accomplishment purposes. In other words, what else we, as university academicians, can do in order to get done those learning achievements wanted goal at the end of the language course taught, and which still represent an academic challenge for all kinds of teaching and learning disciplines. By logical appliance, we know that the linguistic outputs from Learning Outcomes relate to accomplish learner's capabilities. So, considering this fact, the study has produced an assumption and then has elaborated a subjective research methodological spectrum backed by sustained academic search observation. This hypothetical view perceives that one of the philosophical thinking that could help individuals to develop based knowledge and skills subject relates is by having a deep understanding about to what [Knowledge and Skills] mean, and how they can associate and differentiate them when it comes to applying linguistically. This result could lead us to consider adopting a different methodological position towards learning outcomes acquisition in second language classroom practices, mainly when working with university students. In supporting this view, other researcher's assessments (oxforddictionaries.com. 2012) and \hyperref[b14]{(Rao, 2010)} \hyperref[b16]{(Shulman, Lee (1987)}; \hyperref[b12]{(Plotnik, Rod;}\hyperref[b12]{Kouyomdijan, Haig, 2012)}. Thus, taking into account all this, the study highlights that a welldelivered learning outcome should focus on how the learner will be able to apply their new knowledge in a real-world context. It also underlines the methodological standpoint of managing this way the second language teaching and learning classroom, the preparation of assignments, and the evaluation of the knowledge and skills productivity. Consequently, diagram 1: Learning Outcomes T\&L Tertiary Educational Model puts forward provided valuable methodological insights for lecturing guidance.\par Statistically speaking, Learning Outcomes are measured statements. When it comes to applying linguistics, second language teachers should consider the equation [Do+What+how=Result] and Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives for getting right this academic task. Both references have been cited for them to develop based course learning outcomes. Although for second language teachers and the learners accomplishing learning outcomes outputs may be challenging, the database presented in this research study has proved that it is possible to optimize second language learning outcomes acquisition and leaner' performance at Tertiary Education. \section[{VII.}]{VII.} \section[{Conclusion}]{Conclusion}\par Highlighting the fact that learning outcomes are statements based on learning course results, it could conclude that the idea of boosting second language learners' knowledge and skills cognition meaning, differentiation, and association to treat the acquisition of learning outcomes at Tertiary Education classroom practices is relevant and consistent with the hypothesis made and discussed. The output from this assumption might be assumed as an academic functional approach that helps academicians in handling the second language acquisition process, and therefore in producing learners' graduates' skills. This research output criterium is backed by the current global labor market demand for skills-work-force. Academically speaking, the learning outcomes approach presented is valuable, and it will be intelligent to evaluate its usefulness for teaching and learning languages and its implementation in all kinds of university subjects as well.\par VIII. \section[{Recommendation}]{Recommendation}\par Currently, there are many movements for education reforms, and teaching and learning at Tertiary Education are not exempt for being subject to these approaches. However, for improving university student's learning quality and efficiency towards the production of a well-qualified and competitive skills labor market forces, the learning process should be treated as the students' learning center and efficient problem-solving at this educational level. Generally, we see learning outcomes as academic curriculum statements on which we relate to teach, set assignments and examinations, and evaluate learning performances. Although it is not inappropriate to do so, this perception has led many of us to become more driven [administrative policies makers] than [lecturing intellectual producers]. But unlike prior educational levels [primary and secondary schools] where the learning process is driven by knowledge -methodology -practices, at Tertiary Education, we have the duty to reverse this process to obtain a materialized learning outcome proficiency level of competent performances towards the current and future business development. Thus, future researchers should be done to deep escalating into learning outcomes acquisition in second language tertiary education classroom practices. \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{1} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.11987179487179486\textwidth}P{0.15256410256410255\textwidth}P{0.1689102564102564\textwidth}P{0.20160256410256408\textwidth}P{0.20705128205128204\textwidth}} Subject\tabcellsep Association\tabcellsep Example\tabcellsep Differentiation\tabcellsep Example\\ Knowledge\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Pronunciation\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Listening\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Lexi\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Speaking\\ \tabcellsep Competences\tabcellsep Grammar\tabcellsep Competences\tabcellsep Reading\\ \tabcellsep Source\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Development\tabcellsep Writing\\ Skills\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par {\small\itshape [Note: Author: European College for Liberal Studies (ECLS) Branch Campus Madrid, Spain. e-mail: joel.globaljournals@gmail.com II.]} \caption{\label{tab_0}Table 1 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{2} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.1292626728110599\textwidth}P{0.29377880184331795\textwidth}P{0.2859447004608295\textwidth}P{0.14101382488479264\textwidth}} Subject Name\tabcellsep Course Objective\tabcellsep Learning Outcomes\tabcellsep Assign Mode\\ Spanish for beginners\tabcellsep To equip studs\tabcellsep To apply questions and\tabcellsep Individual speaking\\ \tabcellsep with basic Spanish\tabcellsep responses in conversational\tabcellsep assign\\ \tabcellsep language\tabcellsep Spanish\tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep communication\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\ \tabcellsep skills\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_1}Table 2 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{3} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.85\textwidth}} Level\end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_2}Table 3 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.85\textwidth}} And as it\\ has prior pointed, this theorical thinking also matches\\ the philosophy of Education, and the learning\\ acquisition process, pedagogy, and psychology view\\ from other researchers (Richard, 2010); (Scott, 2012);\\ (Li, 2012); (Merriam, 2019); (Department of Education\\ and Training Victoria, 2017);\end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_3}}\end{figure} \backmatter \subsection[{Acknowledgement}]{Acknowledgement}\par The author is very thankful to all the associated personnel in any reference that contributed to this research study. The research study holds no conflict of interest. It is not funded through any local or foreign monetary source other than being sponsored by the professional interest of its author. \begin{bibitemlist}{1} \bibitem[ Internet Acreditated Web-Sites]{b20}\label{b20} \textit{}, \textit{Internet Acreditated Web-Sites} \bibitem[Anderson, L.W. & Krathwohl, D.R. (ed.) ()]{b0}\label{b0} \textit{A taxonomy for Learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives}, Anderson, L.W. \& Krathwohl, D.R. (ed.) 2001. New York: Addison Wesley. \bibitem[Iran-Nejad ()]{b6}\label{b6} ‘Active and dynamic self-regulation of learning processes’. A Iran-Nejad . \textit{Review of Educational Research} 1990. 60 (4) p. . \bibitem[aning&ei=w_aZYN2_KYbE4-EPgI6nuAM&oq= knowl+meaning&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAEYADI GCAAQBxAeMgYIABAHEB4yBggAEAcQHjIGCAAQ BxAeMgYIABAHEB4yBggAEAcQHjIGCAAQBxAeMg YIABAHEB4yBggAEAcQHjIGCAAQBxAeOgcIABBH ELADOgcIABCwAxBDOgoIABCRAhBGEPkBOgUIA BCRAjoECAAQQzoICAAQsQMQkQI6BwgAELEDEE NQwoQgWJGaIGCesCBoAnACeACAAe4BiAHnCJI BBTguMy4xmAEAoAEBqgEHZ3dzLXdpesgBCsABA Q&sclient=gws-wiz]{b21}\label{b21} \url{https://www.google.com/search?q=knowledge+me} \textit{aning\&ei=w\textunderscore aZYN2\textunderscore KYbE4-EPgI6nuAM\&oq= knowl+meaning\&gs\textunderscore lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAEYADI GCAAQBxAeMgYIABAHEB4yBggAEAcQHjIGCAAQ BxAeMgYIABAHEB4yBggAEAcQHjIGCAAQBxAeMg YIABAHEB4yBggAEAcQHjIGCAAQBxAeOgcIABBH ELADOgcIABCwAxBDOgoIABCRAhBGEPkBOgUIA BCRAjoECAAQQzoICAAQsQMQkQI6BwgAELEDEE NQwoQgWJGaIGCesCBoAnACeACAAe4BiAHnCJI BBTguMy4xmAEAoAEBqgEHZ3dzLXdpesgBCsABA Q\&sclient=gws-wiz}, \bibitem[Li ()]{b7}\label{b7} \textit{Culturally contested Pedagogy: Battles of literacy and schooling between mainstream teachers and Asian immigrant parents}, G Li . 2012. Suny Press. \bibitem[Merriam-Webster (2019)]{b9}\label{b9} \textit{Definition of PEDAGOGY}, Merriam-Webster . 9 January 2019. \bibitem[Plotnik et al. ()]{b12}\label{b12} \textit{Discovery Series: Introduction to Psychology}, Rod ; Plotnik , Kouyomdijan , Haig . 2012. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning. p. 208. \bibitem[Martinet ()]{b10}\label{b10} ‘Elements of General Linguistics’. André Martinet . \textit{Studies in General Linguistics} Elisabeth Palmer Rubbert. London: Faber (ed.) 1960. p. 15. \bibitem[Weinreich et al. ()]{b17}\label{b17} ‘Empirical foundations for a theory of language change’. U Weinreich , W Labov , M Herzog . \textit{Directions for historical linguistics: A symposium}, W P Lehmann, \& Y Malkiel (ed.) 1968. Austin: Univ. of Texas Press. p. . \bibitem[Behme and Neef ()]{b3}\label{b3} \textit{Essays on Linguistic Realism}, Christina ; Behme , Martin Neef . 2018. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. p. . \bibitem[Flagship strategy 1: Student Learning. The Principles of Learning and Teaching P-12 Background Paper Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 (2017)]{b5}\label{b5} ‘Flagship strategy 1: Student Learning. The Principles of Learning and Teaching P-12 Background Paper’. \textit{Archived from the original (PDF) on 15}, February 2017. June 2017. (Blueprint for government schools) \bibitem[Zimmerman and Bandura ()]{b19}\label{b19} ‘Impact of selfregulatory influences on writing course attainment’. B J Zimmerman , A Bandura . \textit{American Educational Research Journal} 1994. (4) p. . \bibitem[Shulman (1987)]{b16}\label{b16} ‘Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform" (PDF)’. Lee Shulman . \textit{Harvard Educational Review} 1987. June 2017. 15 (2) p. . \bibitem[Oxforddictionaries and Com (2010)]{b11}\label{b11} \textit{knowledge: definition of knowledge in Oxford dictionary}, Oxforddictionaries , Com . July 2010. US. (Archived from the original on 14) \bibitem[David ()]{b4}\label{b4} \textit{Linguistics. Penguin Books}, Crystal David . 1990. \bibitem[Armstrong ()]{b15}\label{b15} ‘Natural Learning in Higher Education’. Scott Armstrong . \textit{Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning}, 2012. p. . \bibitem[Gross]{b13}\label{b13} \textit{Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behaviour 6E}, Richard Gross . Hachette UK. \bibitem[Boekaerts ()]{b2}\label{b2} ‘Self-regulated learning: Bridging the gap between metacognitive and metamotivation theories’. M Boekaerts . \textit{Educational Psychologist} 1995. 30 (4) p. . \bibitem[Rao ()]{b14}\label{b14} \textit{Soft Skills -Enhancing Employ ability: Connecting Campus with Corporate. New Delhi: I. K. International Publishing House Pvt Ltd}, M S Rao . 2010. 9789380578385 p. 225. \bibitem[Engelhart et al. (ed.) ()]{b8}\label{b8} \textit{Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook I: Cognitive domain}, M D Engelhart , E J Furst , W H Hill , D R Krathwohl . Longman. Bloom, B.S. (ed.) 1956. New York: David McKay. \bibitem[Brain et al. ()]{b1}\label{b1} \textit{The Handbook of Historical Linguistics}, D Brain , Richard D Joseph , Janda . \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781405166201.fmatter}{10.1002/9781405166201.fmatter}. 2003. Blackwell Publishing Pvt. Ltd. \bibitem[World Bank (2017)]{b18}\label{b18} \textit{World Bank}, 9 December 2017. \end{bibitemlist} \end{document}