# Introduction ndeed, Learning Outcomes (LO) are vital components of a curriculum design. These themes are not only a reflex of Education academic, administrative standards but, more importantly, a prelude for lecturing's guidance and learning comprehension. Although Learning Outcomes refer to those learning achievements that learners will be able to demonstrate once completing the learning process, fulfilling this wanted goal still represents an academic challenge for all kinds of teaching and learning disciplines, and language is not exempted from being a subject that requires especial scrutinizes when addressing Learning Outcomes. As the linguistic outputs from Learning Outcomes relate to learner's capabilities accomplishment, it is necessary to look at this purpose to discuss the fact that they must demonstrate based linguistic knowledge and skills a result of the learning process. Among many other educational challenges, this could be a complex task to manage from second language knowledge and skills acquisition. This sustained academia search observation led us to create the hypothesis that not only by designing appropriate learning outcomes, which is an academic requirement, we, as academicians, should assume that the second language learning acquisition is going to produce for itself that level of practical expertise that we want our university studs to do the show. Therefore, we perceive that one of the philosophical thinking that could help them to develop based knowledge and skills subject relates is by having a deep understanding about to what [Knowledge and Skills] mean, and how they can associate and differentiate them when it comes to applying linguistically. See diagram 1: Applied Linguistic Knowledge and Kills Association and Differentiation. According to (oxforddictionaries.com. 2012) the term "knowledge" can refer to a theoretical or practical understanding of a subject. It can be implicit (as with practical skill or expertise) or explicit (as with the theoretical understanding of a subject), formal or informal, systematic or particular. A skill, on the other hand, is the learned ability to act with determined results [assignment and examination performances] with good execution, often within a given amount of time (Rao, 2010). # Literature Review According to (Brain and Richard, 2003); (Weinreich & Herzog, 1968), Linguistics is the scientific study of the structure and development of language in general or particular languages. The language study also involves analysis of Langue Form, Language Meaning, and Language in Context (Martinet, 1960). (Crystal David, 1990) argues that Linguistics can be described as an academic discipline and, at least, its theoretical subfields, as a field of science, being a widely recognized category of specialized expertise. For (Behme, Christina; Neef, Martin, 2018), Linguistics is heterogeneous in its research methods. Based on these researchers view, we could affirm that having an understanding of language philosophy and language applications could help second language teachers to develop much better lecturing approaches, and in handling the learning outcomes acquisition of the language subject to be taught, which is an issue that requires the use of Linguistics. A clear example is the academic learning outcomes recommendation of using a verb that describes an observable action, a description of what the learner will be able to do and under which conditions. This is something that academicians can do by employing this equation [Do+What+how=Result]. For instance, [Apply and infer] [grammatical functions] [in Spanish language contexts]. Of course, according to the language proficiency level and by thinking in mind Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. The original taxonomy of the cognitive domain for categorizing the level of abstraction of questions that commonly occur in educational settings was created by (Longman, Engelhart, Furst, Hill, and Krathwohl, 1956), and time later revised by (Anderson & Krathwohl, 2001) to help teachers understand and implement a standards-based curriculum. Other significant linguistics issues when dealing with learning outcomes are the cognitive and affective domains learning approaches. (Iran, 1990) and (Zimmerman & Bandura) respectively, argue that the meta-cognitive component of learning is involved in the exertion of control and responsibility for one's cognitive and affective processes to understand the information provided. Pedagogically, this fact led (Boekaerts, 1995) to highlight the effectiveness of providing cognitive learning activities to students. Thus, considering [Knowledge and Skills Association and Differences] to get a better understanding about the Acquisition of Learning Outcomes in second language tertiary education classroom practices is also a valuable cognition approach scientific idea. However, being knowledgeable with the language subject knowledge and having the ability to use it appropriately in second language contexts are two different things. Furthermore, as second language teachers are required to make available their second language curriculum before imparting the subject, lecturing approaches have to be well-managed in these regards. See the example from table 2: Spanish Language Course Academic Inputs: # Academic Approach and Methodological Inputs As the present research study relates to experienced academic teaching and learning the second language at Higher Learning Education, the hypothesis presented is interpreted as a methodological tool for second language teachers to treat learning outcomes in a second language classroom. At Tertiary Education, we do not teach knowledge. Instead, we use it to help university students develop practical skills. This theoretical thinking matches the philosophy of Education, which is the process of facilitating learning, According to a report from (The World Bank, 2019), the future of work and the increasing role of technology in value chains make tertiary education even more relevant for workers to compete in the labor market. Thus, it should be a concern for both teachers and learners to understand that the results from learning outcomes are based on courses' declarative statements. In other # Methodology The methodological approach used revised various manuscripts and Internet accredited websites to conduct the present research study. Two fundamental questions were accountable to proceed with the investigation, which attempts to responding them has been contextualized and sustained by accomplishing the study objective, which analyses learning outcome aspects and implications in second language acquisition at Tertiary Education classroom practices, and bring up a based prospect on language insights and curriculum settings. This all to make up the literature framework of the research study, which is based on 1) Research methodology. 2) Subject matter domain. 3) Results and discussion. V. # Fundamental Questions What if by boosting second language learners' knowledge and skills cognition meaning, differentiation, and association, we can obtain better learning outcomes at Tertiary Education? If producing graduates' skills at this educational level is vital, how well are we handling the second language acquisition process? VI. # Result and Discussion Although many researchers have addressed the same subject here discussed, there are always room for new ideas. And this is what the present research study has attempted by providing a literature framework through which the thoughts about acquiring Learning Outcomes in Second Language Classroom Practices at Tertiary Education can be well interpreted. Similar to what the objective of learning outcomes should be, the title of the paper is by far an eloquent abstract of what readers might expect. Thus, the study has featured various facets of the subject matter [Learning Outcomes] to analyze their linguistic role. To answer the research questions, and draw appropriate conclusions and recommendations, this analysis traces Learning Outcomes outputs to look into the learning accomplishment purposes. In other words, what else we, as university academicians, can do in order to get done those learning achievements wanted goal at the end of the language course taught, and which still represent an academic challenge for all kinds of teaching and learning disciplines. By logical appliance, we know that the linguistic outputs from Learning Outcomes relate to accomplish learner's capabilities. So, considering this fact, the study has produced an assumption and then has elaborated a subjective research methodological spectrum backed by sustained academic search observation. This hypothetical view perceives that one of the philosophical thinking that could help individuals to develop based knowledge and skills subject relates is by having a deep understanding about to what [Knowledge and Skills] mean, and how they can associate and differentiate them when it comes to applying linguistically. This result could lead us to consider adopting a different methodological position towards learning outcomes acquisition in second language classroom practices, mainly when working with university students. In supporting this view, other researcher's assessments (oxforddictionaries.com. 2012) and (Rao, 2010) (Shulman, Lee (1987); (Plotnik, Rod;Kouyomdijan, Haig, 2012). Thus, taking into account all this, the study highlights that a welldelivered learning outcome should focus on how the learner will be able to apply their new knowledge in a real-world context. It also underlines the methodological standpoint of managing this way the second language teaching and learning classroom, the preparation of assignments, and the evaluation of the knowledge and skills productivity. Consequently, diagram 1: Learning Outcomes T&L Tertiary Educational Model puts forward provided valuable methodological insights for lecturing guidance. Statistically speaking, Learning Outcomes are measured statements. When it comes to applying linguistics, second language teachers should consider the equation [Do+What+how=Result] and Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives for getting right this academic task. Both references have been cited for them to develop based course learning outcomes. Although for second language teachers and the learners accomplishing learning outcomes outputs may be challenging, the database presented in this research study has proved that it is possible to optimize second language learning outcomes acquisition and leaner' performance at Tertiary Education. # VII. # Conclusion Highlighting the fact that learning outcomes are statements based on learning course results, it could conclude that the idea of boosting second language learners' knowledge and skills cognition meaning, differentiation, and association to treat the acquisition of learning outcomes at Tertiary Education classroom practices is relevant and consistent with the hypothesis made and discussed. The output from this assumption might be assumed as an academic functional approach that helps academicians in handling the second language acquisition process, and therefore in producing learners' graduates' skills. This research output criterium is backed by the current global labor market demand for skills-work-force. Academically speaking, the learning outcomes approach presented is valuable, and it will be intelligent to evaluate its usefulness for teaching and learning languages and its implementation in all kinds of university subjects as well. VIII. # Recommendation Currently, there are many movements for education reforms, and teaching and learning at Tertiary Education are not exempt for being subject to these approaches. However, for improving university student's learning quality and efficiency towards the production of a well-qualified and competitive skills labor market forces, the learning process should be treated as the students' learning center and efficient problem-solving at this educational level. Generally, we see learning outcomes as academic curriculum statements on which we relate to teach, set assignments and examinations, and evaluate learning performances. Although it is not inappropriate to do so, this perception has led many of us to become more driven [administrative policies makers] than [lecturing intellectual producers]. But unlike prior educational levels [primary and secondary schools] where the learning process is driven by knowledge -methodology -practices, at Tertiary Education, we have the duty to reverse this process to obtain a materialized learning outcome proficiency level of competent performances towards the current and future business development. Thus, future researchers should be done to deep escalating into learning outcomes acquisition in second language tertiary education classroom practices. 1SubjectAssociationExampleDifferentiationExampleKnowledgePronunciationListeningLexiSpeakingCompetencesGrammarCompetencesReadingSourceDevelopmentWritingSkillsAuthor: European College for Liberal Studies (ECLS) Branch Campus Madrid, Spain. e-mail: joel.globaljournals@gmail.com II. 2Subject NameCourse ObjectiveLearning OutcomesAssign ModeSpanish for beginnersTo equip studsTo apply questions andIndividual speakingwith basic Spanishresponses in conversationalassignlanguageSpanishcommunicationskills 3Level And as ithas prior pointed, this theorical thinking also matchesthe philosophy of Education, and the learningacquisition process, pedagogy, and psychology viewfrom other researchers (Richard, 2010); (Scott, 2012);(Li, 2012); (Merriam, 2019); (Department of Educationand Training Victoria, 2017); ## Acknowledgement The author is very thankful to all the associated personnel in any reference that contributed to this research study. The research study holds no conflict of interest. It is not funded through any local or foreign monetary source other than being sponsored by the professional interest of its author. * A taxonomy for Learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives Anderson, L.W. & Krathwohl, D.R. 2001 Addison Wesley New York * The Handbook of Historical Linguistics DBrain RichardDJoseph Janda 10.1002/9781405166201.fmatter 2003 Blackwell Publishing Pvt. Ltd * Self-regulated learning: Bridging the gap between metacognitive and metamotivation theories MBoekaerts Educational Psychologist 30 4 1995 * Essays on Linguistic Realism Christina;Behme MartinNeef 2018 John Benjamins Publishing Company Amsterdam * Linguistics. Penguin Books CrystalDavid 1990 * Flagship strategy 1: Student Learning. The Principles of Learning and Teaching P-12 Background Paper Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 February 2017. June 2017 Blueprint for government schools * Active and dynamic self-regulation of learning processes AIran-Nejad Review of Educational Research 60 4 1990 * Culturally contested Pedagogy: Battles of literacy and schooling between mainstream teachers and Asian immigrant parents GLi 2012 Suny Press * Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook I: Cognitive domain MDEngelhart EJFurst WHHill DRKrathwohl Longman. Bloom, B.S. 1956 David McKay New York * Definition of PEDAGOGY Merriam-Webster 9 January 2019 * Elements of General Linguistics AndréMartinet Studies in General Linguistics Elisabeth Palmer Rubbert. London: Faber 15 1960 * knowledge: definition of knowledge in Oxford dictionary Oxforddictionaries Com July 2010 US Archived from the original on 14 * Discovery Series: Introduction to Psychology Rod;Plotnik Kouyomdijan Haig 2012 Wadsworth Cengage Learning 208 Belmont, CA * Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behaviour 6E RichardGross Hachette UK * Soft Skills -Enhancing Employ ability: Connecting Campus with Corporate. New Delhi: I. K. International Publishing House Pvt Ltd MSRao 2010 9789380578385 225 * Natural Learning in Higher Education ScottArmstrong Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning 2012 * Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform" (PDF) LeeShulman Harvard Educational Review 15 2 1987. June 2017 * Empirical foundations for a theory of language change UWeinreich WLabov MHerzog Directions for historical linguistics: A symposium WPLehmann & YMalkiel Austin: Univ. of Texas Press 1968 * World Bank 9 December 2017 * Impact of selfregulatory influences on writing course attainment BJZimmerman ABandura American Educational Research Journal 4 1994 * Internet Acreditated Web-Sites * aning&ei=w_aZYN2_KYbE4-EPgI6nuAM&oq= knowl+meaning&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAEYADI GCAAQBxAeMgYIABAHEB4yBggAEAcQHjIGCAAQ BxAeMgYIABAHEB4yBggAEAcQHjIGCAAQBxAeMg YIABAHEB4yBggAEAcQHjIGCAAQBxAeOgcIABBH ELADOgcIABCwAxBDOgoIABCRAhBGEPkBOgUIA BCRAjoECAAQQzoICAAQsQMQkQI6BwgAELEDEE NQwoQgWJGaIGCesCBoAnACeACAAe4BiAHnCJI BBTguMy4xmAEAoAEBqgEHZ3dzLXdpesgBCsABA Q&sclient=gws-wiz