# Introduction The general objective of this study is to explore the difficulties encountered by the non-English department students in learning the English language at the tertiary level of education in Bangladesh. Based on the general objective, this research work has been designed to conduct on the following specific objectives: ecause of the fast-growing impact of globalization, people are becoming more receptive to use English language to communicate with one another. English has now become the language of global business, innovation, and technology (Alghail & Mahfoodh, 2016). To create skilled and potential candidates in this competitive world, most of the non-English departments at the tertiary level of education feel the urgency to make their students proficient in the English language (Gestanti, 2017). Besides, to gain access to the vast international literature of science, business and, technology, the non-English department students are very eager to learn the English language efficiently. Therefore, the importance of learning English skillfully for the non-English B department students at the tertiary level of education is increasing day by day. To comprehend the necessity of English language in international arena, the non-English departments at the tertiary level of education in Bangladesh are more receptive to the English language. Most of the non-English departments at the tertiary level of education in Bangladesh follow the English for Specific Purpose (ESP) (Afrin, 2016). Under this ESP program, the non-English departments incorporate the specific English language skills that are essential and relevant to the particular non English department while designing the syllabus and course contents for the English language course. Therefore, the primary target to conduct the English language course for the non-English department students at the tertiary level of education in Bangladesh is to make them skillful in using the English language. Although the non-English departments at the tertiary level of education in Bangladesh regards English as one of the important courses, it is surprising to notice that students of non-English departments face many difficulties in learning English effectively and successfully. In most cases, the non-English department students cannot communicate properly in English with others. They do not feel the confidence to use English in their real-life context. Besides, incapability to produce error-free and structured writing in English also reflect lack of writing skill of the non-English department students. Moreover, their receptive and productive skills in English do not develop such a standard as expected at the end of the course (Ali, 2020). Therefore, it is now indispensable to research to find out the factors that create the difficulties in English language learning of the non-English department students. a) To examine the existing situation of the English language courses of the non-English department students at the tertiary level of education in Bangladesh. b) To identify the factors that are associated with the problems in English language learning of the non-English department students at the tertiary level of education in Bangladesh. # II. # Literature Review Ali (2020), Rahmah (2019) and, Prastiyowati (2016) identified the problems associated with the English listening skills of the English department students. However, Rahmah (2019) tried to find out the difficulties in listening comprehension of TOEFL test specifically. Besides, Gilakjani and Sabouri (2016) investigated the listening comprehension difficulties of English language learners. On the other hand, Gestanti (2017) tried to explore the listening strategies used by the non-English department students to overcome the difficulties they faced in listening. Moreover, this paper sheds some light on the effectiveness of these strategies to minimize the difficulties in the listening of the non-English department students. Ibnian (2019) and Nakhalah (2016) investigated the problems associated with the English speaking skills of English language students. These studies revealed that students' lack of confidence, fear of mistakes, anxiety and, shyness are the important factors associated with the speaking problems of the students. On the other hand, Rahmaniah & Asbah (2018) and Sudjasmara (2013) tried to identify the speaking difficulties encountered by the non-English department students. These studies highlighted both the internal and external factors that influence non-English department students' speaking skills. Satriani (2018) and Kasim & Raisha (2017) explored the problems associated with the English reading skills of the English department students. These studies explained the linguistics and non-linguistic difficulties, which were very prominent in speaking skills among the English department students. Besides, Alghail and Mahfoodh (2016) identified the problems in the academic reading of the international graduate. On the other hand, Pudyastuti (2019) tried to identify the English reading complexities of the non-English department students. This study revealed that non-English department students encountered difficulties in reading due to a lack of proper reading strategies and stock vocabulary. Alghammas (2020) and Pratiwi (2016) identified the problems associated with the English writing skills of the English department students. Pratiwi (2016) found that linguistics and cognitive difficulties are important regarding students writing skills, while Pratiwi (2016) identified semantic and syntactic difficulties are paramount in regarding students writing skills. On the other hand, Widyan & Darwish (2019), Afrin (2016), and Lathif (2017) explored the writing difficulties encountered by the non-English department students. Widyan & Darwish (2019) identified internal factors like linguistics, syntactic and morphological competence, while Afrin (2016) and Lathif (2017) highlighted the external factors like motivation, practice, and cultural aspects are important in students' development of writing skills. Studies above, it is clear that there is an avalanche of literature available related to difficulties associated with the English language learning of the students. However, the literature on the English language learning difficulties encountered by the non-English department students at the tertiary level of education in Bangladesh is quite inadequate. Therefore, there remains a research gap in this field. The purpose of this study is to fulfill the gap with a critical approach. # III. # Methodology a) Research Design This research followed a quantitative approach. The quantitative research approach chose due to the effectiveness in evaluating the subject matter more accurately. The primary sources of data used to carry out this research. Data collected through a survey questionnaire and semi-structured interview. The response of a respondent has been cross-checked with other respondents to ensure the validity of the information. The target population of the study was the students who belonged to different departments (except the Department of English) at the tertiary level of education in Bangladesh. This study followed the Stratified Random sampling method. Therefore, the students at the tertiary level of education in Bangladesh divided into subgroups or strata based on their departments like Sociology, Political Science, History and Archeology, Physics, Chemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computer Science Engineering, etc. Samples then selected randomly from each subgroup or stratum. # c) Data Collection and Analysis Data collected from 100 students of different departments, both from public and private universities in Bangladesh, through questionnaires. A five-point Likert scale used to measure the responses. Additionally, semi-structured interviews conducted with 30 students of different departments. Data were analyzed by using IBM SPSS Statistics. The statistical measurements used were Mean and Standard Deviation to analyze and interpret the collected data. By using a five-point Likert scale, items were scored as Always= 5, "Often= 4, "Sometimes= 3, Rarely=2, Never=1; Very Difficult=5 IV. The results in Table-1 show that among the four language skills, writing skill has the highest mean (4.51) while speaking skill has the lowest mean (2.82). The results indicate that students practiced the writing skill most where they practiced the speaking skill least during their school and college levels of education. The results in Table-2 show that among the four language skills, speaking skill has the highest mean (4.40) while reading skill has the lowest mean (3.19). # Results and Discussions The results reveal that students face the most difficulty in speaking where they face least difficulty in reading. The results in Table-3 show most of the students were disagreed that the duration of the English language course is fair enough for the non-English department students. The results in Table-5 show that among the problems regarding listening skills, 'Listening and comprehending speaker's attitude and purpose' has the highest mean (4.14) while 'Listening and understanding specific information in a topic' has the lowest mean (3.39). The results reveal that students face the most difficulty in listening and comprehending the speaker's attitude and purpose, where they face the least problem in listening and understanding specific information in a topic. The results in Table-6 show that among the problems regarding speaking skills, 'Talking in English with classmates outside class' has the highest mean (4.56) while 'Organizing and presenting oral reports' has the lowest mean (3.10). The results reveal that students face the most difficulty in talking in English with classmates outside the class where they face the least problem in organizing and presenting oral reports. The results in Table-8 show that among the problems regarding writing skills, 'Writing at an efficient rate' has the highest mean (4.60) while 'Using proper punctuation' has the lowest mean (3.13). The results reveal that students face the most difficulty in writing at an efficient rate where they face the least problem in using proper punctuation. # V. Conclusions and Recommendations Although most of the non-English departments, both in public and private universities in Bangladesh, conduct the English language course to improve the English language skills of the students, the usefulness of these English courses hinders due to several factors. This study tries to find out these factors which create obstacle in learning the English language skills properly of the non-English department students. Moreover, the results and recommendations of this study will assist the teachers to guide the students in a proper engaging way as well as the syllabus design and assessment committees will be benefited to form an effective and practical syllabus for the students of non-English departments by evaluating this paper. Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations have been made: Firstly, the students of the non-English departments face the most difficulty in productive skills (Speaking and Writing) compared to receptive skills (Listening and Reading). Due to lack of practice and opportunity, non-English department students feel less enthusiasm to develop their productive skills. Therefore, it is much needed to create more opportunities inside and outside the classroom to develop productive skills along with the receptive skills of the non-English department students. Secondly, most of the English language courses offered to the non-English department students are for the only a semester (which is 4 to 6 months). This Volume XXI Issue IV Version I duration of time is quite inadequate for the proper English language learning of the non-English department students. Moreover, the class duration of the English language courses offered to the non-English departments is insufficient enough. Therefore, the number of semesters and duration of the class time need to extend for the non-English department students. Thirdly, the present English language syllabus of the non-English department students is not good enough to provide the English language skills that the non-English department students need much. Most of the English language syllabuses of the non-English department students are based on only grammatical competence. The communicative aspect of language can hardly find in the English language syllabuses of the Non-English department students. Therefore, both the notional and functional aspects of the syllabus need to incorporate in designing the English language syllabuses for the non-English departments. Fourthly, students' active involvement is important for the English language learning process. However, teachers play an active role while students remain passive learners in most of the English language classes for the non-English department students. Therefore, it is essential to create a learner-centered classroom instead of a teacher-centered classroom to foster the learning process of the non-English department students. Finally, students of different departments have different English language needs. For example, the English language needs of the students of BBA departments are not the same as the English language needs of the students of engineering departments. Therefore, needs analysis should carry out before, in the middle, and after the language course to find out the appropriate English language needs of the particular department students. Moreover, this will also fulfill the gaps in English language learning of the non-English department students. 1SkillsNumber Valid MissingMeanStd. DeviationListening10003.250.91Speaking10002.820.92Reading10004.280.93Writing10004.510.95 2SkillsValidNumber MissingMeanStd. DeviationListening10003.970.97Speaking10004.400.91Reading10003.190.94Writing10004.090.93 3Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative PercentAgree11111111Disagree333360.044Strongly Disagree565656100Total100100100 4Difficult=4,ModeratelyDifficult=3,SlightlyAgree=4,Undecided=3,Disagree=2,StronglyDifficult=2Not Difficult=1 and Strongly Agree=5,Disagree=1.Year 202149Volume XXI Issue IV Version IG )(Global Journal of Human Social Science -Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative PercentAgree76767676Disagree20202096Strongly Disagree444100Total100100100© 2021 Global Journals 5Sub skillsValidNumber MissingMeanStd. DeviationListening and comprehending the class lectures10003.520.89Listening and comprehending the materials presented in the class10003.600.91Listening and understanding main idea of a topic10003.870.98Listening and understanding specific information in a topic10003.190.91Listening and comprehending speaker's attitude and purpose10004.140.95Listening and understanding Radio program/TV program/Seminar/Conference/Workshop10003.650.96 6Sub skillsNumber Valid MissingMean Std. DeviationParticipating in class discussions10003.920.94Asking questions to the instructor10004.100.91Organizing and presenting oral reports10003.100.95Pronouncing words clearly10003.800.92Talking in English with the instructor outside of the class10003.630.90Talking in English with classmates outside class10004.560.91 7Sub skillsValidNumber MissingMeanStd. DeviationUnderstanding the main idea of a context10003.760.95Comprehending the purpose and attitude of the writer10003.700.91Transforming information to graphs/charts/pictures/ maps/tables/diagram10003.830.89Summarizing a text10003.350.90Predicting a text10004.240.95Skimming & Scanning a text10003.900.97Ability to read quickly10003.740.93The results in Table-7 show that among theface the most difficulty in talking in predicting a textproblems regarding reading skills, 'Predicting a text' haswhere they face the least problem in summarizing athe highest mean (4.24) while 'Summarizing a text' hastext.the lowest mean (3.35). The results reveal that students 8Sub skillsNumber Valid MissingMean Std. DeviationSpelling correctly10004.120.91Using appropriate word order10003.700.89Using proper punctuation10003.130.93Using correct vocabulary and grammar10004.440.97Writing thesis statement, topic sentence, supporting details10004.210.95Developing ideas and Joining sentences10003.510.91Using cohesion and coherence10003.550.88Writing at an efficient rate10004.600.95 ## Appendix Students' Questionnaire Dear Respondent, Greetings! Please be assured that your responses will be kept confidential and will be used for research purposes only. Global Journal of Human Social Science * Writing Problems of Non-English Major Undergraduate Students in Bangladesh: An Observation SAfrin 10.4236/jss.2016.43016 Open Journal of Social Sciences 03 2016 * The Weaknesses of English Writing Skills among Undergraduate Saudi Students Majoring in English at Qassim University: A Perspective of English Faculty AAlghammas 10.2139/ssrn.3621267 SSRN Electronic Journal 2020 * Academic Reading Difficulties Encountered by International Graduate Students in a Malaysian University Alghail OMahfoodh Issues in Educational Research 26 3 2016 * Difficulties Faced By Tertiary Level EFL Learners in Listening SAli British Journal of English Linguistics 8 2 2020 * Listening Strategies Employed by Non-English Department Students RAGestanti 10.23971/jefl.v7i1.485 Journal on English as a Foreign Language 7 1 35 2017 * Learners' Listening Comprehension Difficulties in English Language Learning: A Literature Review APGilakjani NBSabouri 10.5539/elt.v9n6p123 2016 English Language Teaching 9 123 * EFL Students' Reading Comprehension Problems: Linguistic and Non-Linguistic Complexities U &Kasim SRaisha English Education Journal 8 3 2017 * Investigating Non-English Department Students' Motivation in EFL Writing MLathif 10.24071/ijiet.2017.010104 International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching 1 1 2017 * Problems and Difficulties of Speaking That Encounter English Language Students at Al Quds Open University DA M M ANakhalah International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention 5 12 2016 * Students' Difficulties in Writing English (A Study at the Third Semester Students of English Education Program at University of Bengkulu Academic Year 2011-2012) KDPratiwi Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching 3 1 2016 * Difficulties in Listening Comprehension Encountered by SPrastiyowati 2016 Students of English Department University of Muhammadiyah Malang * Reading Strategies for Non-English Department Students: How Important Is It ZPudyastuti 10.21107/prosodi.v13i1.5348 2019 * The Speaking Difficulties Encountered by Non-English Students in Language Classroom SRahmah RRahmaniah AAsbah 10.31764/leltj.v12i2.749 Linguistics and ELT Journal 5 1 22 2019. 2019 The Students' Problems in Listening Comprehension of TOEFL Test * Reading Comprehension Difficulties Encountered by English Students of Islamic University of Riau ESatriani Journal of English for Academic 5 2 2018 * The Difficulties Encountered by Non-English Department Students in Speaking English DBSudjasmara 2013 * Writing Problems of Non-English Students MAWidyan MADarwish Canadian Social Science 15 8 2019