\documentclass[11pt,twoside]{article}\makeatletter \IfFileExists{xcolor.sty}% {\RequirePackage{xcolor}}% {\RequirePackage{color}} \usepackage{colortbl} \usepackage{wrapfig} \usepackage{ifxetex} \ifxetex \usepackage{fontspec} \usepackage{xunicode} \catcode`⃥=\active \def⃥{\textbackslash} \catcode`❴=\active \def❴{\{} \catcode`❵=\active \def❵{\}} \def\textJapanese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK JP}} \def\textChinese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK SC}} \def\textKorean{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK KR}} \setmonofont{DejaVu Sans Mono} \else \IfFileExists{utf8x.def}% {\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc} \PrerenderUnicode{–} }% {\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}} \usepackage[english]{babel} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage{float} \usepackage[]{ucs} \uc@dclc{8421}{default}{\textbackslash } \uc@dclc{10100}{default}{\{} \uc@dclc{10101}{default}{\}} \uc@dclc{8491}{default}{\AA{}} \uc@dclc{8239}{default}{\,} \uc@dclc{20154}{default}{ } \uc@dclc{10148}{default}{>} \def\textschwa{\rotatebox{-90}{e}} \def\textJapanese{} \def\textChinese{} \IfFileExists{tipa.sty}{\usepackage{tipa}}{} \fi \def\exampleFont{\ttfamily\small} \DeclareTextSymbol{\textpi}{OML}{25} \usepackage{relsize} \RequirePackage{array} \def\@testpach{\@chclass \ifnum \@lastchclass=6 \@ne \@chnum \@ne \else \ifnum \@lastchclass=7 5 \else \ifnum \@lastchclass=8 \tw@ \else \ifnum \@lastchclass=9 \thr@@ \else \z@ \ifnum \@lastchclass = 10 \else \edef\@nextchar{\expandafter\string\@nextchar}% \@chnum \if \@nextchar c\z@ \else \if \@nextchar l\@ne \else \if \@nextchar r\tw@ \else \z@ \@chclass \if\@nextchar |\@ne \else \if \@nextchar !6 \else \if \@nextchar @7 \else \if \@nextchar (8 \else \if \@nextchar )9 \else 10 \@chnum \if \@nextchar m\thr@@\else \if \@nextchar p4 \else \if \@nextchar b5 \else \z@ \@chclass \z@ \@preamerr \z@ \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi} \gdef\arraybackslash{\let\\=\@arraycr} \def\@textsubscript#1{{\m@th\ensuremath{_{\mbox{\fontsize\sf@size\z@#1}}}}} \def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}} \def\abbr{} \def\corr{} \def\expan{} \def\gap{} \def\orig{} \def\reg{} \def\ref{} \def\sic{} \def\persName{}\def\name{} \def\placeName{} \def\orgName{} \def\textcal#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Calligraphy}#1}} \def\textgothic#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Blackletter}#1}} \def\textlarge#1{{\large #1}} \def\textoverbar#1{\ensuremath{\overline{#1}}} \def\textquoted#1{‘#1’} \def\textsmall#1{{\small #1}} \def\textsubscript#1{\@textsubscript{\selectfont#1}} \def\textxi{\ensuremath{\xi}} \def\titlem{\itshape} \newenvironment{biblfree}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{bibl}{}{} \newenvironment{byline}{\vskip6pt\itshape\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont}{\par } \newenvironment{citbibl}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docAuthor}{\ifvmode\vskip4pt\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont\fi\itshape}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docDate}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docImprint}{\vskip 6pt}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docTitle}{\vskip6pt\bfseries\fontsize{22pt}{25pt}\selectfont}{\par } \newenvironment{msHead}{\vskip 6pt}{\par} \newenvironment{msItem}{\vskip 6pt}{\par} \newenvironment{rubric}{}{} \newenvironment{titlePart}{}{\par } \newcolumntype{L}[1]{){\raggedright\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{C}[1]{){\centering\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{R}[1]{){\raggedleft\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{P}[1]{){\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{B}[1]{){\arraybackslash}b{#1}} \newcolumntype{M}[1]{){\arraybackslash}m{#1}} \definecolor{label}{gray}{0.75} \def\unusedattribute#1{\sout{\textcolor{label}{#1}}} \DeclareRobustCommand*{\xref}{\hyper@normalise\xref@} \def\xref@#1#2{\hyper@linkurl{#2}{#1}} \begingroup \catcode`\_=\active \gdef_#1{\ensuremath{\sb{\mathrm{#1}}}} \endgroup \mathcode`\_=\string"8000 \catcode`\_=12\relax \usepackage[a4paper,twoside,lmargin=1in,rmargin=1in,tmargin=1in,bmargin=1in,marginparwidth=0.75in]{geometry} \usepackage{framed} \definecolor{shadecolor}{gray}{0.95} \usepackage{longtable} \usepackage[normalem]{ulem} \usepackage{fancyvrb} \usepackage{fancyhdr} \usepackage{graphicx} \usepackage{marginnote} \renewcommand{\@cite}[1]{#1} \renewcommand*{\marginfont}{\itshape\footnotesize} \def\Gin@extensions{.pdf,.png,.jpg,.mps,.tif} \pagestyle{fancy} \usepackage[pdftitle={Factors Associated with Breastfeeding Practice in Indonesia}, pdfauthor={}]{hyperref} \hyperbaseurl{} \paperwidth210mm \paperheight297mm \def\@pnumwidth{1.55em} \def\@tocrmarg {2.55em} \def\@dotsep{4.5} \setcounter{tocdepth}{3} \clubpenalty=8000 \emergencystretch 3em \hbadness=4000 \hyphenpenalty=400 \pretolerance=750 \tolerance=2000 \vbadness=4000 \widowpenalty=10000 \renewcommand\section{\@startsection {section}{1}{\z@}% {-1.75ex \@plus -0.5ex \@minus -.2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\Large\bfseries}} \renewcommand\subsection{\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\z@}% {-1.75ex\@plus -0.5ex \@minus- .2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\Large}} \renewcommand\subsubsection{\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\z@}% {-1.5ex\@plus -0.35ex \@minus -.2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\large}} \renewcommand\paragraph{\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\z@}% {-1ex \@plus-0.35ex \@minus -0.2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\normalsize}} \renewcommand\subparagraph{\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\parindent}% {1.5ex \@plus1ex \@minus .2ex}% {-1em}% {\reset@font\normalsize\bfseries}} \def\l@section#1#2{\addpenalty{\@secpenalty} \addvspace{1.0em plus 1pt} \@tempdima 1.5em \begingroup \parindent \z@ \rightskip \@pnumwidth \parfillskip -\@pnumwidth \bfseries \leavevmode #1\hfil \hbox to\@pnumwidth{\hss #2}\par \endgroup} \def\l@subsection{\@dottedtocline{2}{1.5em}{2.3em}} \def\l@subsubsection{\@dottedtocline{3}{3.8em}{3.2em}} \def\l@paragraph{\@dottedtocline{4}{7.0em}{4.1em}} \def\l@subparagraph{\@dottedtocline{5}{10em}{5em}} \@ifundefined{c@section}{\newcounter{section}}{} \@ifundefined{c@chapter}{\newcounter{chapter}}{} \newif\if@mainmatter \@mainmattertrue \def\chaptername{Chapter} \def\frontmatter{% \pagenumbering{roman} \def\thechapter{\@roman\c@chapter} \def\theHchapter{\roman{chapter}} \def\thesection{\@roman\c@section} \def\theHsection{\roman{section}} \def\@chapapp{}% } \def\mainmatter{% \cleardoublepage \def\thechapter{\@arabic\c@chapter} \setcounter{chapter}{0} \setcounter{section}{0} \pagenumbering{arabic} \setcounter{secnumdepth}{6} \def\@chapapp{\chaptername}% \def\theHchapter{\arabic{chapter}} \def\thesection{\@arabic\c@section} \def\theHsection{\arabic{section}} } \def\backmatter{% \cleardoublepage \setcounter{chapter}{0} \setcounter{section}{0} \setcounter{secnumdepth}{2} \def\@chapapp{\appendixname}% \def\thechapter{\@Alph\c@chapter} \def\theHchapter{\Alph{chapter}} \appendix } \newenvironment{bibitemlist}[1]{% \list{\@biblabel{\@arabic\c@enumiv}}% {\settowidth\labelwidth{\@biblabel{#1}}% \leftmargin\labelwidth \advance\leftmargin\labelsep \@openbib@code \usecounter{enumiv}% \let\p@enumiv\@empty \renewcommand\theenumiv{\@arabic\c@enumiv}% }% \sloppy \clubpenalty4000 \@clubpenalty \clubpenalty \widowpenalty4000% \sfcode`\.\@m}% {\def\@noitemerr {\@latex@warning{Empty `bibitemlist' environment}}% \endlist} \def\tableofcontents{\section*{\contentsname}\@starttoc{toc}} \parskip0pt \parindent1em \def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}} \newenvironment{reflist}{% \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{} {% \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}% \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}% \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}% \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}% \def\makelabel##1{\itshape ##1}}% } {\end{list}\end{raggedright}} \newenvironment{sansreflist}{% \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{} {% \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}% \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}% \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}% \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}% \def\makelabel##1{\upshape ##1}}% } {\end{list}\end{raggedright}} \newenvironment{specHead}[2]% {\vspace{20pt}\hrule\vspace{10pt}% \phantomsection\label{#1}\markright{#2}% \pdfbookmark[2]{#2}{#1}% \hspace{-0.75in}{\bfseries\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont#2}% }{} \def\TheFullDate{2020-01-15 (revised: 15 January 2020)} \def\TheID{\makeatother } \def\TheDate{2020-01-15} \title{Factors Associated with Breastfeeding Practice in Indonesia} \author{}\makeatletter \makeatletter \newcommand*{\cleartoleftpage}{% \clearpage \if@twoside \ifodd\c@page \hbox{}\newpage \if@twocolumn \hbox{}\newpage \fi \fi \fi } \makeatother \makeatletter \thispagestyle{empty} \markright{\@title}\markboth{\@title}{\@author} \renewcommand\small{\@setfontsize\small{9pt}{11pt}\abovedisplayskip 8.5\p@ plus3\p@ minus4\p@ \belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus2\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 4\p@ plus2\p@ minus2\p@ \def\@listi{\leftmargin\leftmargini \topsep 2\p@ plus1\p@ minus1\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep 1pt} } \makeatother \fvset{frame=single,numberblanklines=false,xleftmargin=5mm,xrightmargin=5mm} \fancyhf{} \setlength{\headheight}{14pt} \fancyhead[LE]{\bfseries\leftmark} \fancyhead[RO]{\bfseries\rightmark} \fancyfoot[RO]{} \fancyfoot[CO]{\thepage} \fancyfoot[LO]{\TheID} \fancyfoot[LE]{} \fancyfoot[CE]{\thepage} \fancyfoot[RE]{\TheID} \hypersetup{citebordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,linkbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,urlbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,bookmarksnumbered=true} \fancypagestyle{plain}{\fancyhead{}\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}} \date{} \usepackage{authblk} \providecommand{\keywords}[1] { \footnotesize \textbf{\textit{Index terms---}} #1 } \usepackage{graphicx,xcolor} \definecolor{GJBlue}{HTML}{273B81} \definecolor{GJLightBlue}{HTML}{0A9DD9} \definecolor{GJMediumGrey}{HTML}{6D6E70} \definecolor{GJLightGrey}{HTML}{929497} \renewenvironment{abstract}{% \setlength{\parindent}{0pt}\raggedright \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}} \vskip16pt \textcolor{GJBlue}{\large\bfseries\abstractname\space} }{% \vskip8pt \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}} \vskip16pt } \usepackage[absolute,overlay]{textpos} \makeatother \usepackage{lineno} \linenumbers \begin{document} \author[1]{Sindung Haryanto} \author[2]{Dominica Chyta Asthyka} \affil[1]{ University of Lampung, Indonesia} \renewcommand\Authands{ and } \date{\small \em Received: 9 December 2019 Accepted: 5 January 2020 Published: 15 January 2020} \maketitle \begin{abstract} The fact is that practice of giving exlusive breastfeeding has not reached favorable numberin some developing countries because of various factors. This study aims to determine the relationship between the level of education of mothers, the occupation of mothers, and social support for mothers and breastfeeding behavior. The important hypothesis of this study, therefore, is that aspects of economy, environment, social, culture, and politics can influence mothers to breastfeed their babies. Secondary data from the Indonesian Family Life Survey (IFLS) 5 in 2014was employed. The total sample in this study was 5,108 people. STATA software version 13.0 with a probity model was used to analyze the data. Statistical test technique usingChi-square (X2) and multiple linear regressions were conducted. Results of this study indicate that there is no relationship between the level of education of mothers, and the occupation of mothers and breastfeeding behavior. However, there is a strong relationship between social support and breastfeeding behavior. Therefore, this study suggests that there is a need to develop the capacity of traditional midwives in order to increase the prevalence of women for breastfeeding. \end{abstract} \keywords{level of education of mothers, the occupation of mothers, social support, breastfeeding behavior, indonesia.} \begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1cm,1cm) % {block width} (coords) \textcolor{GJBlue}{\LARGE Global Journals \LaTeX\ JournalKaleidoscope\texttrademark} \end{textblock*} \begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1.4cm,1.5cm) % {block width} (coords) \textcolor{GJBlue}{\footnotesize \\ Artificial Intelligence formulated this projection for compatibility purposes from the original article published at Global Journals. However, this technology is currently in beta. \emph{Therefore, kindly ignore odd layouts, missed formulae, text, tables, or figures.}} \end{textblock*} \let\tabcellsep& {\ref (Lisa, 2012)}\par , giving adequate physical growth of babies {\ref (Marques et al., 2015)}. Conversely, infants who do not receive exclusive breastfeeding are at a greater risk for morbidity and mortality {\ref (Tadesseet al., 2016)}. Exclusive breastfeeding during the first six months of the infants' life, combined with complementary foods and W old can reduce at least 20\% of deaths a low children under five years old \hyperref[b39]{(Roesli, 2008)}. Meanwhile, \hyperref[b22]{Edmond et al. (2006)} predicted that 16\% of neonatal deaths can be preventedif supposing the baby was breastfed from the first day of his/her life; the rate enhances to 22\% given that the baby was breastfed during the first hour of birth.\par However, the rate of exclusive breastfeedingshown in some developing countries has not reached optimum results. A number of studies show that the practice of breastfeeding is relatively low {\ref (Chandhiok et} {\ref (Mogreet al., 2016)}. Low number in giving exclusive breastfeeding also occurs among professional women workers (Dun-Dery and Laar, 2016). There are a number of obstacles and problems faced by mothers in breastfeeding their babies. According to \hyperref[b41]{Sharma and Byrne (2016)}, mothers in the South Asia region encounter several resembling obstacles. Those obstacles include unresolved feelings of insecurity \hyperref[b34]{(Palmér et al., 2015)}, cesarean delivery and infant's hospitalization along with maternal employment (Khasawneh and Khasawneh, 2017), mothers' income, antenatal and postnatal counseling and mode of delivery {\ref (Shifrawet al., 2015)}, as well as cultural and social barriers accompanied by low support from medical staff \hyperref[b19]{(Desmond and Meaney, 2016)}.\par Those obstacles indicate that there are various factors influencing exclusive breastfeeding practices. Based on previous researches, constrained factors in general can be categorized into three aspects: internal, cultural (social environment) and institutional. Internal factors include maternal socio-demographic status such as education, age, occupation, type of housing area {\ref (Adugna et} \hyperref[b40]{(Senghore et al., 2018)} and underutilization of maternal health services \hyperref[b12]{(Biks et al., 2015)}.\par Exclusive breastfeeding for infants is one of the most effective instruments and investments in improving the quality of human capital, yet this practice is anticipated to acquire serious challenges in the future. According to \hyperref[b8]{Atabay et al. (2014)}, currently around 54 countries in the world do not have legislations that guarantee breastfeeding practices. There are at least 50 countries which do not have rules regarding maternity leave or six months breastfeeding practices. Globally, it was estimated that the practice of exclusive breastfeeding in the first six months of infant's life only increased from 38\% to 41\% in the period of 2000 to 2012.\par Attempts to increase the rate of exclusive breastfeeding practice has been implemented in national, regional and global levels. UNICEF is a global institution taking parts in these initiatives. Based on UNICEF (2012) data, the organization emphasizes on strategies and actions that promote multi-sectorial approaches in order to improve health and nutrition as well as initiatives to support health systems for both local and national community levels such as on social change and behavior related to optimum breastfeeding practices to infants. WHO and UNICEF launched the Baby-friendly Hospital Initiative program in 2009as an effort to improve facilities and environment that support breastfeeding.\par Indonesia assigned the policy of Maternity and Newborn Hospital Services to carry out Early Breastfeeding Initiation, as an attempt to promote exclusive breastfeeding. However, only about 10\% of hospitals out of 1,293 hospitals in Indonesia can be categorized as such. Another policy issued by the government is Government Regulation Number 33 of 2012, concerning support for exclusive breastfeeding at the workplace. Nevertheless, according to the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia (2013), this policy is lacking support from companies/organizations either in the form of providing a reserved area or space for infant lactation or administering recess periods for women workers to breastfeed their infants at the workplace.\par In addition, further problem in promoting breastfeeding for babies in Indonesia isinadequate social support, especially comingfrom husbands whose wives are in breastfeeding period.The low level of support is partly due to men's lack of involvement in the breastfeeding campaigns. According to \hyperref[b21]{Destriatania et al., (2013)}, currently, husbands have not been fully involved in various initiatives, programs and campaigns of breastfeeding at national level, and they are not prepared to support and assist their wives in breastfeeding. With inadequate knowledge about breastfeeding, husbands tend to be ignorant on the positive impacts of breastfeeding practices, opting to feedtheir babies formula milk.\par Empirically, family support for mothers to give breastfeeding has an important role to succeed (Nuraeni, 2000; Proverawati and Rahmawati, 2010; \hyperref[b38]{Roesli, 2005;} {\ref Wahyuni, 2001)}. According to Friedman (2010), family support includes the informational support, reward support, instrumental support, and emotional support. Family support especially from husbands has an impact on increasing the confidence and motivation of mothers for breastfeeding their babies. However, a study conducted by \hyperref[b2]{Aini et al. (2014)} showed that husbands' supports for post-partum mothers only focus on providing facilities such as costs for the process of delivery baby and other facilities, while emotional support such as in changing diapers, bathing and carrying babies, giving massage to wives and providing more time to wives and babies are still limited.\par To increase the practice of breastfeeding in Indonesia, therefore, is an essential issue. Data from the Indonesian Demographic Health Survey in 2012 showed that the rate of exclusive breastfeeding practice in Indonesia was at 42\%. The number of giving exclusive breastfeeding is still far from the WHO's target. The decision of mothers to give breast milk to their babies is determined by several aspects such as economic, environment, social, culture and politics. The government in this case has the obligation to improve facilities, policies, rules and programs to support breastfeeding practices. Studies related to this issue are still relevant, especially those that play a large sharein determining factors associated with the practice of breastfeeding. Therefore, this study aims to determine the relationship between the level of education, occupation, and social support for breastfeeding practices. The Indonesia Family Life Survey is a longitudinal health and socio-economic survey. The first survey of IFSL (IFLS1) was carried out in 1993 with a sample size of 7,224 households. The second survey of IFSL (IFLS2 +) was conducted in 1998 with the same respondents, with the additional aim to know the impact of the economic and political crisis in Indonesia. Subsequently, the third survey of IFSL (IFLS3) was conducted in 2000. Furthermore, the IFLS4 was carried out at the end of 2007 until the beginning of 2008 and the IFLS5 was conducted at the end of 2014 until the beginning of 2015. Total samples of those surveys were 16,204 households and 50,148 people were interviewed (Straussat al., 2016). Thirteenout oftwenty-seven provinces wastaken as samples, representing 83\% of population. The provincial samples covered all provinces in Java (DKI Jakarta, West Java, Central Java, DI Yogyakarta, and East Java), the four largest provinces in Sumatra (North Sumatra, West Sumatra, South Sumatra, and Lampung) and four other provinces that are described as major island groups: Bali, West Nusa Tenggara, South Kalimantan, and South Sulawesi. \section[{II.}]{II.} \section[{Material and Method}]{Material and Method}\par This research used a secondary data obtained from the Indonesian Family Life Survey in 2014 (IFLS5). The unit of analysis was household level in Indonesia, consisting mothers who have children under five years old in the year of this study of 2014. IFLS5 was collected through questionnaire. STATA software version 13.0 with probit model was employed in the process of data analysis. Variables encompass in this study are: 1) the level of education, namely, the highest level of the mothers' formal education; 2) occupation of mothers which are jobs thewivespartake in order to receive salaries/wages; 3) social support for mothers from families in several ways such as informational, empathy, instrumental, and emotional supports; and 4) breastfeeding behavior, seen as the behavior of mothers in breastfeeding their babies. Total sample in this study was 5,108 respondents. The hypotheses tested in this study are as follows: H0 1 : There is no relationship between the level of education of mothers and breastfeeding behavior. Chi-square was used to determine the relationship between variables of educational level, and employment and social support for breastfeeding. Theoretically, chi-square was used to analyze whether there is a relationship between characteristics of respondents to breastfeeding behavior. In order to find out the relationship between all independent variables (level of education, work and social support) with breastfeeding, this research employed multiple linear regression analysis techniques. Below is the estimation of multiple linear regressions: = regression coefficient value (slope) The use of constant values is statistically done if units of X variable (independent variable) and Y variable (dependent variable) are not the same. Whereas, if the X variable and the Y variable, both simple and multiple linear, have the same unit, the constant value is ignored assuming the change in Y variable will be proportional to the value of the change in X variable. Two regression models were used; they are probit and logit. The probit model or normal distribution is one regression model that can be used to determine the effect of independent variables on binary dependent variables (0 and 1); while the logit model or logistic distribution is a non-linear regression model that produces an equation where the dependent variable is categorical. \section[{III.}]{III.} \section[{Results}]{Results} \section[{a) The Relationship between the Level Education of Mothers and Breastfeeding}]{a) The Relationship between the Level Education of Mothers and Breastfeeding}\par The variable of educational level of mothers represents the highest level of education of mothers practicing breastfeed. This variable was measured using three questions: a) are you attending school (DL04), b) what is the highest level of your education or what current educational level are you attending ( {\ref DL06), c}) what highest educational level has you completed (DL07). The variable of breastfeeding behavior was the behavior of children formed from habits or experience. This variable was measured with one question which is whether mothers have experience in breastfeeding of their babies. Table \hyperref[tab_4]{2} shows that there is no significant relationship between the level of education of mothers and breastfeeding behavior. Thus, the hypothesis or Ho 1 is accepted. \section[{b) The Relationship between the Occupation of Mothers and Breastfeeding Behavior}]{b) The Relationship between the Occupation of Mothers and Breastfeeding Behavior}\par The variable of the occupation of mothers in this study was defined as jobs which mothers involve in order to receive wages at the workplace. This variable was measured using the question of, "what is your job or occupation" (TK24a). This variable is categorized into: formal job, informal job and unemployed. Table \hyperref[tab_5]{3} shows that there is no significant relationship between the occupation of mothers and breastfeeding behavior. Thus, the hypothesis or Ho 2 is accepted. \section[{c) The Relationship between Social Support and Breastfeeding Behavior}]{c) The Relationship between Social Support and Breastfeeding Behavior}\par The social support variable in this study was defined as all forms of material and non-material assistance received by mothers from other people to breastfeed their babies during the first period of birth (40 days). This variable was measured using one question, "within the first days (40 days) after delivering baby, did you (mother) receive treatment from someone who helped you in the process of delivering your baby?" (CH20h). This variable was categorized into: low and high options. Table \hyperref[tab_6]{4} shows that there is a significant relationship between social support and breastfeeding behavior. Thus, the hypothesis/Ho3 is rejected. Overall, the three variables of X (Social Support, Level of Education of Mothers and the Occupation of Mothers) are related to variable Y (Breastfeeding). As explained in the following results, Prob > chi2 = 0.0000 shows that the relationship between social support, level of education of mothers, and the occupation of mothers and breastfeeding behavior is significant.\par Pseudo R2 = 0.0676 means that the three independent variables used in this model explain that 6.76\% of mothers decided to breastfeed and 93.24\% was influenced by other factors. The results of multiple linear regression show that the intercept is at0.9669102 and the regression weight values for each independent variable are: 0.8256466, -0.0291597 and 0.0656583. ?? = ??+ ??1??1+ ??2??2 +??3??3 ?? = .9669102 + .8256466 ??1 + -.0291597 ??2 + .0656583 ??3\par IV. \section[{Discussion}]{Discussion}\par The results of this study indicate that there is no relationship between the level of education of mothers and breastfeeding behavior. In the group of mothers with no formal education, the percentage of mothers who have never breastfed their babies is at 14.3\%. Meanwhile, the percentage of mothers who had never breastfed was at 11.8\% among the group of mothers who attend university, and 9.9\% in the group of mothers who finished primary and secondary schools. This result is different from previous studies where there is a significant relationship between the level of education of mothers and breastfeeding behavior (see \hyperref[b5]{Arora et al., 2017;}\hyperref[b7]{Asemahagn, 2016;} {\ref Jatmikaet al., 2014;} {\ref Lakewet al., 2015;} {\ref Liben et al., 2016;}\hyperref[b29]{Nguyen et al., 2018;}\hyperref[b48]{Tiruye et al., 2018;}\hyperref[b53]{Widiyanto et al.,2012;}\hyperref[b54]{Wilopo, 2009)}. On the other hand, the results of this study are in line with the results of previous studies which showed no relationship between the level of education of mothers and breastfeeding behavior {\ref (Hastutiet al., 2015;} {\ref Kasahun et al., 2017)}. A study by {\ref Kasahun et al. (2017)} found that the higher of the level of mothers' education, the lower of the practice of breastfeeding. Specifically, knowledge about the importance of breast milk does not affect breastfeeding practices \hyperref[b18]{(Dachew and Bifftu, 2014)}.\par Therefore, the variable of education is not correct variable of predictor for breastfeeding practices.\par The professional of occupation either formal or informal of mothers who are breastfeeding their babies tend to be a barrier or obstacle in the breastfeeding practices. The problem is because the practice is not supported by the administration of any policy providing mothers with sufficient time of exemption for mothers to breastfeed their babies. In addition, there are no sufficient facilities of lactation rooms in public sphere either in government and private institutions. In this study, the higest percentage of mothers who have never breastfed is privilege to the group of mothers who work in formal sectors (11.5\%), followed by mothers who work in informal sector (10\%) and mothers who do not work (9.5\%). Even so, this difference is not statistically significant, it can thus be said that there is no relationship between the occupation and breastfeeding behavior. Therefore, the results of this study are different from previous studies (e.g. \hyperref[b7]{Asemahagn, 2016;} {\ref Juliastuti, 2011;} {\ref Khasawneh and Khasawneh, 2017;} {\ref Lakewet al., 2015)}, showing that there is a relationship between working mothers and breastfeeding behavior.\par Social support obtained by mothers in shaping breastfeeding behavior can be received from various parties, such as a support of baby care. Social support can also come from midwives who have long been known, especially in rural areas, as traditional birth assistant who assists in the delivery process, as well as assisting mothers in raising their offsprings until the they are at the age of two years old. However, routine assistance is doneat around seven to ten days after giving birth. The study conducted by \hyperref[b43]{Sopiyani (2014)} shows that support for breastfeeding mothers are including thesupports from their husbands (93\%), supports from parents (79\%), supports from parent inlaws (79\%), supports from friends (72\%) and supports from the community leaders such as midwives, doctors, village officials and clerics (72\%).\par Based on the results of the product moment analysis, the correlation coefficient value (r) is at 0.522; p = 0,000 (p <0.01), meaning that there is a very significant or positive relationship between social support and motivation to provide exclusive breastfeeding. Most social supports come from midwives and traditional birth assistants who encourage mothers for breastfeeding their babies. If mothers do not behavior will be at low level resulting to the uncared behavior for the importance of breastfeeding, especially the practice of prolong breastfeeding pass the first six months of birth. The case is vice versa,the larger number of mothers receiving umteen social support from various parties; the larger number of mothers provide breast milk to their babies.\par Number of studies show that social support from various parties has an important role for breastfeeding practices {\ref (Ayton and} \hyperref[b54]{Wilopo (2009)} found that mothers who received postnatal care by doctors or specialists had a shorter time to breastfeed their babies rather than mothers who were treated by midwives. Meanwhile, mothers who are treated by traditional midwives have a higher probability of breastfeeding. From sociological perspectives, this study argues social distance and intensive communication have a role in shaping perceptions, attitudes, and behaviors among actors. In rural areas of Indonesia, the role of traditional midwives in helping delivery babies is still dominant. A traditional midwife usually helps mothers in the delivery process of giving birth, especially those giving birth for the first time (primipara), and continue to assist them for 40 days after deliveryor until mothers can independently take care for their babies. These facts indicate that in this study, the variable of social support is the most important variable that influences breastfeeding behaviour.\par V. \section[{Conclusion}]{Conclusion}\par This study provides a large number of samples in order to determine the relationship among variables which are often predicted to be predictors of breastfeeding behavior. Three important predictors in this study are the level of education of mothers, the occupation of mothers and social support. Mothers' level of educationand theiroccupation possesses no relationship with breastfeeding behavior. Meanwhile, the variable of social support has a strong relationship to breastfeeding behavior. Social support in this study mainly comes from traditional birth assistants who still play an important role in helping the process of delivery babies and post-birth in rural areas. Therefore, an intensive communication between mothers and traditional birth assistants who helped delivering their babiescan increase mothers' confidence to breastfeed their children. Thus, the development of the capacity of traditional health assistants needs to be done consistently to increase the prevalence of mothers for breastfeeding.\par Volume XX Issue I Version I 31 ( C ) \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{} \par \begin{longtable}{} \end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_0}}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{} \par \begin{longtable}{} \end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_1}}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.7863526570048309\textwidth}P{0.012318840579710146\textwidth}P{0.014371980676328501\textwidth}P{0.008212560386473429\textwidth}P{0.028743961352657003\textwidth}} \multicolumn{5}{l}{Widiyantoat al., 2012;), support from husbands (Annisa}\\ \multicolumn{5}{l}{and Swastiningsih, 2015; Destriataniaat al., 2013;}\\ \multicolumn{5}{l}{Wattimena et al., 2015), the parity (Khoiriyah and}\\ Prihatini,\tabcellsep 2011),\tabcellsep support\tabcellsep from\tabcellsep mothers-in-law\\ \multicolumn{5}{l}{(Purnamasari and Rahmatika, 2016), counseling}\\ \multicolumn{5}{l}{process on lactation (Vidayanti and Wahyuningsih,}\\ \multicolumn{5}{l}{2017), experience on the practice of breastfeeding}\\ \multicolumn{5}{l}{(Hastutiat al., 2015) and support from medical staff}\\ \multicolumn{2}{l}{(Jatmika et al., 2014).}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_2}}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{1} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.14442896935933147\textwidth}P{0.04025069637883008\textwidth}P{0.023676880222841225\textwidth}P{0.0947075208913649\textwidth}P{0.213091922005571\textwidth}P{0.3338440111420613\textwidth}} Variables\tabcellsep Book Code\tabcellsep Book\tabcellsep Variable Code\tabcellsep Data\tabcellsep Category\\ Breastfeeding\tabcellsep CH\tabcellsep 4\tabcellsep CH24a\tabcellsep b4\textunderscore ch1\tabcellsep Dummy:\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 1. High\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 2. Low\\ Social Support\tabcellsep CH\tabcellsep 4\tabcellsep CH20h\tabcellsep b4\textunderscore ch1\tabcellsep Dummy:\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 1. High\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 2. Low\\ Education Level\tabcellsep DL\tabcellsep 3A\tabcellsep DL04\tabcellsep b3a\textunderscore d11\tabcellsep 1. No-Formal education\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep DL06\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 2. Elementary\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep DL07\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 3. Secondary\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 4. University\\ Occupation\tabcellsep TK\tabcellsep 3A\tabcellsep TK24a\tabcellsep B3a\textunderscore tk2\tabcellsep 1. Formal\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 2. Informal\\ \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep 3. Unemployment\end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_3}Table 1 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{2} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.37941176470588234\textwidth}P{0.041176470588235294\textwidth}P{0.07647058823529412\textwidth}P{0.052941176470588235\textwidth}P{0.06470588235294117\textwidth}P{0.049999999999999996\textwidth}P{0.041176470588235294\textwidth}P{0.07941176470588235\textwidth}P{0.06470588235294117\textwidth}} \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{4}{l}{Breastfeeding Experience}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Total\tabcellsep \\ Level of Education\tabcellsep fo\tabcellsep No\tabcellsep fe\tabcellsep fo\tabcellsep Yes\tabcellsep fe\tabcellsep fo\tabcellsep fe\\ No -formal education\tabcellsep 7\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep 42\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 44\tabcellsep 49\tabcellsep 49\\ Primary School (1-6)\tabcellsep 114\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 117.8\tabcellsep 1,034\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{1,030.2}\tabcellsep 1,148\tabcellsep 1,148\\ Secondary School (7-12)\tabcellsep 313\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 323\tabcellsep 2,836\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{2,826.0}\tabcellsep 3,149\tabcellsep 3,149\\ University (>12)\tabcellsep 90\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 78.2\tabcellsep 672\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 683.8\tabcellsep 762\tabcellsep 762\\ Total\tabcellsep 524\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 524\tabcellsep 4,584\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 4,584\tabcellsep 5,108\tabcellsep 5,108\\ Pearson Chi=3.3403 Pr=0.342\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_4}Table 2 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{3} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.2217391304347826\textwidth}P{0.05173913043478261\textwidth}P{0.09608695652173913\textwidth}P{0.07391304347826086\textwidth}P{0.08130434782608696\textwidth}P{0.01108695652173913\textwidth}P{0.10347826086956521\textwidth}P{0.1108695652173913\textwidth}P{0.09978260869565217\textwidth}} \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{4}{l}{Breastfeeding Experience}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Total\\ Occupation\tabcellsep fo\tabcellsep No\tabcellsep fe\tabcellsep fo\tabcellsep Yes\tabcellsep fe\tabcellsep fo\tabcellsep fe\\ Formal\tabcellsep 132\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 118.1\tabcellsep 1,019\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 1,032.9\tabcellsep 1,151\tabcellsep 1,151\\ Informal\tabcellsep 166\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 168.3\tabcellsep 1,475\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 1,472.7\tabcellsep 1,641\tabcellsep 1,641\\ Unemployed\tabcellsep 226\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 237.6\tabcellsep 2,078\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 2,078.4\tabcellsep 2,316\tabcellsep 2,316\\ Total\tabcellsep 524\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 524\tabcellsep 4,584\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 4,584\tabcellsep 5,108\tabcellsep 5,108\\ \multicolumn{2}{l}{Pearson Chi 2 =2.4959}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Pr=0.287}\end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_5}Table 3 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{4} \par \begin{longtable}{P{0.22154255319148936\textwidth}P{0.045212765957446804\textwidth}P{0.1175531914893617\textwidth}P{0.06781914893617022\textwidth}P{0.07686170212765958\textwidth}P{0.013563829787234041\textwidth}P{0.09494680851063829\textwidth}P{0.13563829787234044\textwidth}P{0.07686170212765958\textwidth}} \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{Breastfeeding Experience}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Total\tabcellsep \\ Social Support\tabcellsep Fo\tabcellsep No\tabcellsep fe\tabcellsep fo\tabcellsep Yes\tabcellsep fe\tabcellsep fo\tabcellsep fe\\ Low\tabcellsep 456\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 308.6\tabcellsep 2,552\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 2,699.4\tabcellsep 3,008\tabcellsep 3,008\\ High\tabcellsep 68\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 215.4\tabcellsep 2,032\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 1,884.6\tabcellsep 2,100\tabcellsep 2,100\\ Total\tabcellsep 524\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 524\tabcellsep 4,584\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 4,584\tabcellsep 5,108\tabcellsep 5,108\\ \multicolumn{3}{l}{Pearson Chi 2 =190.9116}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Pr=0.000\tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_6}Table 4 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{} \par \begin{longtable}{} \end{longtable} \par \caption{\label{tab_7}}\end{figure} \footnote{© 2020 Global Journals} \backmatter \begin{bibitemlist}{1} \bibitem[Yogyakarta]{b35}\label{b35} \textit{}, Yogyakarta . \textit{Nuha Medika} \bibitem[Desmond and Meaney ()]{b19}\label{b19} ‘A qualitative study investigating the barriers to returning to work for breastfeeding mothers in Ireland’. Deirdre Desmond , Sarah Meaney . \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13006-016-0075-8}{10.1186/s13006-016-0075-8}. \textit{International Breastfeeding Journal} 2016. 11 p. . \bibitem[Nnebe-Agumadu et al. ()]{b30}\label{b30} ‘Associations between perceived value of exclusive breastfeeding among pregnant women in the United States and exclusive breastfeeding to three and six months postpartum: a prospective study’. Nnebe-Agumadu , H Uche , F Elizabeth , Sarah B Racine , Maren J Laditka , Coffman . \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13006-016-0065-x}{10.1186/s13006-016-0065-x}. \textit{International Breastfeeding Journal} 2016. 11 p. . \bibitem[Atabay et al. ()]{b8}\label{b8} Efe Atabay , Gonzalo Moreno , Arijit Nandi , Gabriella Kranz , Ilona Vincent , Tina-Marie Assi , Elise Vaughan Heymann . \textit{Global findings on breastfeeding breaks at work. Los Angeles and Montreal: WORLD Policy Analysis Center and MACHEquity}, 2014. \bibitem[Amir ()]{b3}\label{b3} ‘Breastfeeding in public’. Lisa H Amir . \textit{International Breastfeeding} 2014. 9 p. . (You can do it?) \bibitem[Dachew et al. ()]{b18}\label{b18} ‘Breastfeeding practice and associated factors among female nurses and midwives at North Gondar Zone, Northwest Ethiopia: a crosssectional institution based study’. Berihun Dachew , Assefa , Berhanu Boru , Bifftu . \textit{International Breastfeeding Journal} 2014. 9 p. . \bibitem[Asare et al. ()]{b6}\label{b6} ‘Breastfeeding practices and determinants of exclusive breastfeeding in a cross sectional study at a child welfare clinic in Tema Manhean, Ghana’. Bernard Asare , Joyce Veronica Yeboah-Asiamah , Diana Preko , Bismark Baafi , Dwumfour-Asare . \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13006-018-0156-y}{10.1186/s13006-018-0156-y}. \url{https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-018-0156-y} \textit{International Breastfeeding} 2018. 13 p. . \bibitem[Tiruye et al. ()]{b48}\label{b48} ‘Breastfeeding technique and associated factors among breastfeeding mothers in Harar city, Eastern Ethiopia’. Getahun Tiruye , Firehiwot Mesfin , Biftu Geda , Kasiye Shiferaw . \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13006-018-0147-z}{10.1186/s13006-018-0147-z}. \textit{International Breastfeeding Journal} 2018. 13 p. . \bibitem[Thomson et al. ()]{b47}\label{b47} ‘Building social capital through breastfeeding peer support: insights from an evaluation of a voluntary breastfeeding peer support service in North-West England’. Gill Thomson , Marie-Clare Balaam , Kirsty Hymers . \textit{International Breastfeeding Journal} 2015. 10 p. . \bibitem[Chandhiok et al. ()]{b16}\label{b16} ‘Changes in exclusive breastfeeding practices and its determinants in India, 1992-2006: analysis of national survey data Changes in exclusive breastfeeding practices and its determinants in India, 1992-2006: analysis of national survey data’. Nomita Chandhiok , Kh Jitenkumar Singh , Damodar Sahu , Lucky Singh , Arvind Pandey . \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13006-015-0059-0}{10.1186/s13006-015-0059-0}. \textit{International Breastfeeding Journal} 2015. 10 p. . \bibitem[Zheng et al. ()]{b55}\label{b55} ‘Changes in maternal self-efficacy, postnatal depression symptoms and social support among Chinese primiparous women during the initial postpartum period: A longitudinal study’. Xujuan Zheng , Jane Morell , Kim Watts . \textit{Midwifery} 2018. 62 p. . \bibitem[Ayton and Hansen ()]{b9}\label{b9} ‘Complex young lives: a collective qualitative case study analysis of young fatherhood and breastfeeding’. Jennifer Ayton , Emily Hansen . \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13006-016-0066-9}{10.1186/s13006-016-0066-9}. \textit{International Breastfeeding} 2016. 11 p. . \bibitem[Edmond et al. ()]{b22}\label{b22} ‘Delayed Breastfeeding Initiation Increases Risk of Neonatal Mortalty’. Karen M Edmond , Charles Zandoh , Maria A Quigley , M Seeba Amenga-Etego , Seth Owusu-Agyei , Betty R Kirkwood . \textit{Pediatrics} 2006. 117 (3) p. . \bibitem[Arora et al. ()]{b5}\label{b5} ‘Determinants of breastfeeding initiation among mothers in Sydney, Australia: findings from a birth cohort study’. Amit Arora , Narendar Manohar , Andrew Hayen , Sameer Bhole , John Eastwood , Steven Levy , Jane Anne Scott . \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13006-017-0130-0}{10.1186/s13006-017-0130-0}. \textit{International Breastfeeding Journal} 2017. 12 p. . \bibitem[Adugna et al. ()]{b0}\label{b0} ‘Determinants of exclusive breastfeeding in infants less than six months of age in Hawassa, an urban setting, Ethiopia’. Bethlihem Adugna , Henok Tadele , Fekadu Reta , Yifru Berhantadele . \textit{International Breastfeeding Journal} 2017. 12 p. . \bibitem[Asemahagn and Andualem ()]{b7}\label{b7} ‘Determinants of exclusive breastfeeding practices among mothers in Azezo district, northwest Ethiopia’. Mulusew Asemahagn , Andualem . \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13006-016-0081-x}{10.1186/s13006-016-0081-x}. \textit{International Breastfeeding} 2016. 11 p. . \bibitem[Annisa and Swastiningsih ()]{b4}\label{b4} ‘Dukungan Sosial dan Dampak yang Dirasakan oleh Ibu Menyusui dari Suami [Social support from husbands and impacts the supports for mothers who breastfeed their babies’. Luluand Nurfitria Annisa , Swastiningsih . \textit{Jurnal Fakultas Psikologi} 2015. 3 (1) p. . \bibitem[Wattimena and Minarti ()]{b52}\label{b52} ‘Dukungan Suami dengan Keberhasilan Isteri untuk Menyusui’. Yesiana Wattimena , Nainggolan Minarti , Somarwain . \textit{Jurnal Ners LENTERA} 2015. 3 (1) p. . (Support from husbands in the succeed of wives for breastfeeding) \bibitem[Beyene et al. ()]{b11}\label{b11} ‘Early initiation of breastfeeding among mothers of children under the age of 24 months in Southern Ethiopia’. Misrak Beyene , Getnet , Nigatu Regassa Geda , Zuriash Tesfa Dejenie Habtewold , Mengistu Assen . \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13006-016-0096-3}{10.1186/s13006-016-0096-3}. \textit{International Breastfeeding Journal} 2017. 12 p. . \bibitem[Sharma and Byrne ()]{b41}\label{b41} ‘Early initiation of breastfeeding: a systematic literature review of factors and barriers in South Asia’. Indu K Sharma , Abbey Byrne . \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13006-016-0076-7}{10.1186/s13006-016-0076-7}. \textit{International Breastfeeding Journal} 2016. 11 p. . \bibitem[Bootsri and Taneepanichskul ()]{b15}\label{b15} ‘Effectiveness of experiential learning with empowerment strategies and social support from grandmothers on breastfeeding among Thai adolescent mothers’. Wilasinee Bootsri , Surasak Taneepanichskul . \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13006-017}{10.1186/s13006-017}. \textit{International Breastfeeding Journal} 2017. 12 p. . \bibitem[Biks et al. ()]{b12}\label{b12} ‘Effects of antenatal care and institutional delivery on exclusive breastfeeding practice in northwest Ethiopia: a nested case-control study’. Gashaw Biks , Amare Andargie , Gizachew Assefa Tariku , Tessema . \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13006-015-0055-4}{10.1186/s13006-015-0055-4}. \textit{International Breastfeeding Journal} 2015. 10 p. . \bibitem[Dun-Dery and Laar ()]{b20}\label{b20} ‘Exclusive breastfeeding among city-dwelling professional working mothers in Ghana’. Elvis J Dun-Dery , K Laar . \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13006-016-0083-8}{10.1186/s13006-016-0083-8}. \textit{International Breastfeeding Journal} 2016. 11 p. . \bibitem[Velusamy et al. ()]{b51}\label{b51} ‘Exclusive breastfeeding practices among mothers in urban slum settlements: pooled analysis from three prospective birth cohort studies in South India’. Velusamy , Prasanna S Vasanthakumar , Gagandeep Premkumar , Kang . \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13006-017-0127-8}{10.1186/s13006-017-0127-8}. \textit{International Breastfeeding} 2017. 12 p. . \bibitem[Palmér et al. ()]{b34}\label{b34} ‘Existential security is a necessary condition for continued breastfeeding despite severe initial difficulties: a life world hermeneutical study’. Lina Palmér , Gunilla Carlsson , David Brunt , Maria Nyström , M . \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13006-015}{10.1186/s13006-015}. \textit{Atikah. and Eni Rahmawati. 2010. Kapita selekta ASI and Menyusui}, 2015. 10 p. . (Selecta capita of exclusive breast milk and breastfeeding) \bibitem[Shifraw et al. ()]{b42}\label{b42} ‘Factors associated exclusive breastfeeding practices of urban women in Addis Ababa public health centers, Ethiopia: a cross sectional study’. Tigest Shifraw , Amare Worku , Yemane Berhane . \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13006-015-0047-4}{10.1186/s13006-015-0047-4}. \textit{International Breastfeeding Journal} 2015. 10 p. . \bibitem[Nguyen et al. ()]{b29}\label{b29} ‘Factors associated with breastfeeding intent among mothers of newborn babies in Da Nang, Viet Nam’. Phuong Thi Nguyen , Ben J Kim , Marais , Thuy Thi Hoang Thi Tran , Thanh Thai , Kirsty Foster , Christine L Roberts . \textit{International Breastfeeding Journal} 2018. 13 p. . \bibitem[Bililign et al. ()]{b13}\label{b13} ‘Factors associated with prelacteal feeding in North Eastern Ethiopia: A community based cross-sectional study’. Nigus Bililign , Henok Kumsa , Mussie Mulugeta , Yetnayet Sisa . \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13006-016-0073-x}{10.1186/s13006-016-0073-x}. \textit{International Breastfeeding} 2016. 11 p. . \bibitem[Friedman and Marliyan ()]{b26}\label{b26} M Friedman , Marliyan . \textit{Buku Ajar Keperawatan Keluarga: Riset, Teori and Praktik [Teaching book on family nursing: Research, Theory and Practice}, (Jakarta) 2010. EGC. \bibitem[Oliveira et al. ()]{b32}\label{b32} ‘Gestational, perinatal, and postnatal factors that interfere with practice of exclusive breastfeeding by six months after birth’. Mariana Oliveira , José Moraes , Simon CameloJr . \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13006-017-0132-y}{10.1186/s13006-017-0132-y}. \textit{International Breastfeeding Journal} 2017. 12 p. . \bibitem[Gao et al. ()]{b27}\label{b27} ‘Hans Konrad breastfeeding in the first six months of life: a comparison with reference standards NCHS, 1977 and WHO’. Haoyue Gao , Qi Wang , Elizabeth Hormann , Wolfgang Stuetz , Caroline Stiller . \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13006-015-0045-6}{10.1186/s13006-015-0045-6}. \textit{International Breastfeeding Journal} 2006. 10 p. . \bibitem[Sopiyani ()]{b43}\label{b43} \textit{Hubungan antara dukungan sosial (suami) dengan motivasi memberikan ASI eksklusif pada ibu-ibu di Kabupaten Klaten [The relationship between the support from husbands and motivation of wives to breastfeed their babies in Klaten Regency}, Lia Sopiyani . 2014. Universitas Muhammadiyah (Surakarta: Fakultas Psikologi) \bibitem[Aini ()]{b2}\label{b2} \textit{Hubungan dukungan suami dengan produksi ASI pada ibu post partum diwilayah kerja Puskesmas Senor Kabupaten Tuban}, Nur Aini , Yusnitasari , Armini . 2014. Surabaya. Fakultas Keperawatan Universitas Airlangga (The relationship) \bibitem[Widiyanto et al. ()]{b53}\label{b53} ‘Hubungan Pendidikan dan Pengetahuan Ibu tentang ASI Eksklusif dengan Sikap terhadap Pemberian ASI Eksklusif [The relationship between education and knowledge of mothers on exclusive breast milk and exclusive breastfeeding’. Subur Widiyanto , Dian Aviyanti , Merry Tyas , A . \textit{Jurnal Kedokteran Muhammadiyah} 2012. 1 (1) p. . \bibitem[Infant and young child feeding-UNICEF response ()]{b49}\label{b49} \textit{Infant and young child feeding-UNICEF response}, \url{http://www.unicef.org/nutrition/index\textunderscore 24819.html} 2012. \bibitem[Ekubay et al. ()]{b23}\label{b23} ‘Initiation of breastfeeding within one hour of birth among mothers with infants younger than or equal to 6 months of age attending public health institutions in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia’. Meseret Ekubay , Aster Berhe , Engida Yisma . DOI:10.1186/s 13006-018-0146-0. \textit{International Breastfeeding Journal} 2018. 13 p. . \bibitem[Ahmadi et al. ()]{b1}\label{b1} ‘Intervention based on BASNEF model increases exclusive breastfeeding in preterm infants in Iran: a randomized controlled trial’. Sheler Ahmadi , Farideh Kazemi , Parisa Seyedeh Zahra Masoumi , Ghodratollah Parsa , Roshanaei . \textit{International Breastfeeding Journal} 2016. 11 p. . \bibitem[Mogre et al. ()]{b28}\label{b28} ‘Knowledge, attitudes and determinants of exclusive breastfeeding practice among Ghanaian rural lactating mothers’. Victor Mogre , Michael Dery , Patience K Gaa . \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13006-016-0071-z}{10.1186/s13006-016-0071-z}. \textit{International Breastfeeding Journal} 2016. 11 p. . \bibitem[Ericson et al. ()]{b25}\label{b25} ‘Mothers' experiences of a telephone based breastfeeding support intervention after discharge from neonatal intensive care units: a mixed-method study’. Jenny Ericson , Renée Flacking , R , Camilla Udo . \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13006-017-0142-9}{10.1186/s13006-017-0142-9}. \textit{International Breastfeeding Journal} 2017. 12 p. . \bibitem[Nolan et al. ()]{b31}\label{b31} ‘Mothers' voices: results of a survey of public health nurse-led breastfeeding support groups’. Angela Nolan , Sylvia Kennedy , Anne O' Malley , Marie Kirwan , Ann Hughes , Anita Barry , Vivienne Goodwin , Anne Marie Cunningham . \textit{Primary Health Care} 2015. 25 (7) p. . \bibitem[Purnamasari and Rahmatika ()]{b37}\label{b37} ‘Perbedaan dukungan sosial dari ibu mertua pada ibu menyusui yang bekerja aan tidak bekerja[The difference of social support from mother in law to breastfeeding mothers who work and does not work’. Ayu Rahmi Prisand Rina Purnamasari , Rahmatika . \textit{Jurnal Psikologi UNDIP} 2016. 15 (1) p. . \bibitem[Coomson et al. ()]{b17}\label{b17} ‘Perception and practice of breastfeeding in public in an urban community in Accra, Ghana’. Justine Coomson , Richmond Boatemaa , Aryeetey . \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13006-018}{10.1186/s13006-018}. \url{https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-018} \textit{International Breastfeeding Journal} 2018. 13 p. . \bibitem[Padovani et al. ()]{b33}\label{b33} ‘Perceptions of breastfeeding in mothers of babies born preterm in comparison to mothers of full-term babies’. Flávia Helena Padovani , Geraldo Pereira , Eulógio Duarte , Maria Beatriz Martins Martinez , Linhares . \textit{The Spainish Journal of Psychology} 2011. 14 (2) p. . \bibitem[Puput et al. ()]{b36}\label{b36} ‘Perilaku Pemberian ASI terhadap Frekuensi Diare pada Anak Usia 6-24 Bulan di Ruang Anak Rumah Sakit Baptis Kediri [The behavior of exclusive breastfeeding to the frequency of diarrhea of children at the age of 6 -24 months in the Children room at the Baptis Hospital’. Stefanny Puput , Fitri Suli Victoria , Yoyok Febrijanto . \textit{Jurnal STIKES RS} 2011. 4 (2) p. . (Baptis Kediri) \bibitem[Wilopo and Agus ()]{b54}\label{b54} ‘Pola, tren, dan perbedaan praktik menyusui di Indonesia: analisis deskriptif peran modernisasi dan budaya tradisional dari data Survai Demografi Kesehatan Indonesia [Pattern, trend and difference practices for breastfeeding in Indonesia: descriptive analysis of the role of modernization and traditional culture from demographic survey of health in Indonesia’. Siswanto Wilopo , Agus . \textit{Jurnal Gizi Klinik Indonesia} 2009. 6 (1) p. . \bibitem[Emmot and Mace (2015)]{b24}\label{b24} ‘Practical Support from Fathers and Grandmothers Is Associated with Lower Levels of Breastfeeding in the UK Millennium Cohort Study’. Emily H Emmot , Ruth Mace . \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133547}{10.1371/journal.pone.0133547}. \textit{Plos One} 2015. July 20. 2015. \bibitem[Babakazo et al. ()]{b10}\label{b10} ‘Predictors of discontinuing exclusive breastfeeding before six months among mothers in Kinshasa: a prospective study’. Pélagie Babakazo , Philippe Donnen , Pierre Akilimali , Nathalis Mapatano Mala Ali , Emile Okitolond . \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13006-015-0044-7}{10.1186/s13006-015-0044-7}. \textit{International Breastfeeding Journal} 2015. 10 p. . \bibitem[Senghore et al. ()]{b40}\label{b40} ‘Predictors of exclusive breastfeeding knowledge and intention to or practice of exclusive breastfeeding among antenatal and postnatal women receiving routine care: a cross-sectional study’. Thomas Senghore , Tobiloba Alex Omotosho , Omar Ceesay , Clara H Williams , DC H . \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13006-018-0154-0}{10.1186/s13006-018-0154-0}. \url{https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-018-0154-0} \textit{International Breastfeeding Journal} 2018. 13 p. . \bibitem[Tadesse et al. ()]{b46}\label{b46} ‘Prevalence and associated factors of Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study’. Tegegn Tadesse , Firehiwot Mesfin , Tefera Chane . DOI: 10.1186/s 13006-016-0085-6. \textit{International Breastfeeding Journal} 2016. 11 p. . \bibitem[Bimerew et al. ()]{b14}\label{b14} ‘Prevalence of timely breastfeeding initiation and associated factors in Dembecha district, North West Ethiopia: a crosssectional study’. Abebe Bimerew , Muluken Teshome , Getachew Mullu Kassa . \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13006-016-0087-4}{10.1186/s13006-016-0087-4}. \textit{International Breastfeeding Journal} 2016. 11 p. . \bibitem[Roesli ()]{b38}\label{b38} Roesli . \textit{Mengenal ASI Eksklusif}, (Jakarta) 2005. Trubus Agriwidya. (Understanding exclusive breast milk) \bibitem[Roesli ()]{b39}\label{b39} Roesli . \textit{Manajemen Laktasi}, (Jakarta) 2008. Ikatan Dokter Indonesia. (Management on lactation) \bibitem[Destriatania and Februhartanty ()]{b21}\label{b21} ‘Sikap Ayah dan Jumlah Anak serta Praktik Air Susu Ibu Eksklusif [The attitude of fathers, number of children and the practice of exclusive breastfeeding’. Suci Destriatania , Judhiastuty Februhartanty , Fatmah . \textit{Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Nasional} 2013. 8 (5) p. . (Kesmas) \bibitem[Strauss et al. ()]{b44}\label{b44} John Strauss , Firman Witoelar , Bondan Sikoki . \textit{The Fifth Wave of the Indonesia Family Life Survey (IFLS5): Overview and Field Report}, (California) 2016. RAND Corporation. \bibitem[Sulistyowati and Siswantara ()]{b45}\label{b45} ‘The behavior of working mothers in giving exclusive breast milk in Japanan village, in the area of community health service of Kemlagi’. Tutukand Pulung Sulistyowati , Siswantara . \textit{Jurnal Promkes} 2014. 2 (1) p. . (Perilaku Ibu Bekerja dalam Memberikan ASI Eksklusif di Kelurahan Japanan, Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Kemlagi, Mojokerto) \bibitem[Vidayanti and Wahyuningsih ()]{b50}\label{b50} ‘The effectiveness of counselling of lactation toward self-awareness and skills for breastfeeding of women after caesar surgery’. Venny Vidayanti , Melania Wahyuningsih . \textit{Jurnal Keperawatan Respati} 2017. 4 (2) p. . \end{bibitemlist} \end{document}