Resilience is at the core of western radicalism, allowing unrelated thoughts and practices to exist together calmly with each other. However, nothing challenges resistance like the act of female circumcision or genital mutilation. Even though that the UN General Assembly received a determination to boycott FGM endeavors to stop this type of victimization ladies are still a long way from widespread and number of ladies, and young girls concern is as yet rising. A test isn't just securing young girls who are as of now in danger additionally guaranteeing that those to be conceived later on will be free from the perils of the training. World Health Organization (WHO) defines Female Genital Mutilation as a process which refers to a multiple operations on the intimate parts of women and young girls which includes partial or total taking away of external genital organs or any other harm to female genital for a cultural or non-cultural reason. It is the removal of auxiliary sexual parts like Clitoris, labia minor-a, labia major-a. Female Genital Mutilation has a strong ancestral and socio-cultural roots.

How to Cite
YADAV, Kiran. The Politics of Excision: A Study of Ngugi Wa Thiong’O, Flora Nwapa, Jomo Kenyatta, Waris Dirie, Nawal-El-Saadawi, Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Alice Walker’s work. Global Journal of Human-Social Science Research, [S.l.], apr. 2019. ISSN 2249-460X. Available at: <https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/2810>. Date accessed: 19 jan. 2020.