\documentclass[11pt,twoside]{article}\makeatletter

\IfFileExists{xcolor.sty}%
  {\RequirePackage{xcolor}}%
  {\RequirePackage{color}}
\usepackage{colortbl}
\usepackage{wrapfig}
\usepackage{ifxetex}
\ifxetex
  \usepackage{fontspec}
  \usepackage{xunicode}
  \catcode`⃥=\active \def⃥{\textbackslash}
  \catcode`❴=\active \def❴{\{}
  \catcode`❵=\active \def❵{\}}
  \def\textJapanese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK JP}}
  \def\textChinese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK SC}}
  \def\textKorean{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK KR}}
  \setmonofont{DejaVu Sans Mono}
  
\else
  \IfFileExists{utf8x.def}%
   {\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc}
      \PrerenderUnicode{–}
    }%
   {\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}}
  \usepackage[english]{babel}
  \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
  \usepackage{float}
  \usepackage[]{ucs}
  \uc@dclc{8421}{default}{\textbackslash }
  \uc@dclc{10100}{default}{\{}
  \uc@dclc{10101}{default}{\}}
  \uc@dclc{8491}{default}{\AA{}}
  \uc@dclc{8239}{default}{\,}
  \uc@dclc{20154}{default}{ }
  \uc@dclc{10148}{default}{>}
  \def\textschwa{\rotatebox{-90}{e}}
  \def\textJapanese{}
  \def\textChinese{}
  \IfFileExists{tipa.sty}{\usepackage{tipa}}{}
\fi
\def\exampleFont{\ttfamily\small}
\DeclareTextSymbol{\textpi}{OML}{25}
\usepackage{relsize}
\RequirePackage{array}
\def\@testpach{\@chclass
 \ifnum \@lastchclass=6 \@ne \@chnum \@ne \else
  \ifnum \@lastchclass=7 5 \else
   \ifnum \@lastchclass=8 \tw@ \else
    \ifnum \@lastchclass=9 \thr@@
   \else \z@
   \ifnum \@lastchclass = 10 \else
   \edef\@nextchar{\expandafter\string\@nextchar}%
   \@chnum
   \if \@nextchar c\z@ \else
    \if \@nextchar l\@ne \else
     \if \@nextchar r\tw@ \else
   \z@ \@chclass
   \if\@nextchar |\@ne \else
    \if \@nextchar !6 \else
     \if \@nextchar @7 \else
      \if \@nextchar (8 \else
       \if \@nextchar )9 \else
  10
  \@chnum
  \if \@nextchar m\thr@@\else
   \if \@nextchar p4 \else
    \if \@nextchar b5 \else
   \z@ \@chclass \z@ \@preamerr \z@ \fi \fi \fi \fi
   \fi \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi}
\gdef\arraybackslash{\let\\=\@arraycr}
\def\@textsubscript#1{{\m@th\ensuremath{_{\mbox{\fontsize\sf@size\z@#1}}}}}
\def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}}
\def\abbr{}
\def\corr{}
\def\expan{}
\def\gap{}
\def\orig{}
\def\reg{}
\def\ref{}
\def\sic{}
\def\persName{}\def\name{}
\def\placeName{}
\def\orgName{}
\def\textcal#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Calligraphy}#1}}
\def\textgothic#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Blackletter}#1}}
\def\textlarge#1{{\large #1}}
\def\textoverbar#1{\ensuremath{\overline{#1}}}
\def\textquoted#1{‘#1’}
\def\textsmall#1{{\small #1}}
\def\textsubscript#1{\@textsubscript{\selectfont#1}}
\def\textxi{\ensuremath{\xi}}
\def\titlem{\itshape}
\newenvironment{biblfree}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{bibl}{}{}
\newenvironment{byline}{\vskip6pt\itshape\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont}{\par }
\newenvironment{citbibl}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docAuthor}{\ifvmode\vskip4pt\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont\fi\itshape}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docDate}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docImprint}{\vskip 6pt}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docTitle}{\vskip6pt\bfseries\fontsize{22pt}{25pt}\selectfont}{\par }
\newenvironment{msHead}{\vskip 6pt}{\par}
\newenvironment{msItem}{\vskip 6pt}{\par}
\newenvironment{rubric}{}{}
\newenvironment{titlePart}{}{\par }

\newcolumntype{L}[1]{){\raggedright\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{C}[1]{){\centering\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{R}[1]{){\raggedleft\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{P}[1]{){\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{B}[1]{){\arraybackslash}b{#1}}
\newcolumntype{M}[1]{){\arraybackslash}m{#1}}
\definecolor{label}{gray}{0.75}
\def\unusedattribute#1{\sout{\textcolor{label}{#1}}}
\DeclareRobustCommand*{\xref}{\hyper@normalise\xref@}
\def\xref@#1#2{\hyper@linkurl{#2}{#1}}
\begingroup
\catcode`\_=\active
\gdef_#1{\ensuremath{\sb{\mathrm{#1}}}}
\endgroup
\mathcode`\_=\string"8000
\catcode`\_=12\relax

\usepackage[a4paper,twoside,lmargin=1in,rmargin=1in,tmargin=1in,bmargin=1in,marginparwidth=0.75in]{geometry}
\usepackage{framed}

\definecolor{shadecolor}{gray}{0.95}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}
\usepackage{fancyvrb}
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{marginnote}

\renewcommand{\@cite}[1]{#1}


\renewcommand*{\marginfont}{\itshape\footnotesize}

\def\Gin@extensions{.pdf,.png,.jpg,.mps,.tif}

  \pagestyle{fancy}

\usepackage[pdftitle={Towards an Interdisciplinary Approach to Food Accessibility Research},
 pdfauthor={}]{hyperref}
\hyperbaseurl{}

	 \paperwidth210mm
	 \paperheight297mm
              
\def\@pnumwidth{1.55em}
\def\@tocrmarg {2.55em}
\def\@dotsep{4.5}
\setcounter{tocdepth}{3}
\clubpenalty=8000
\emergencystretch 3em
\hbadness=4000
\hyphenpenalty=400
\pretolerance=750
\tolerance=2000
\vbadness=4000
\widowpenalty=10000

\renewcommand\section{\@startsection {section}{1}{\z@}%
     {-1.75ex \@plus -0.5ex \@minus -.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\Large\bfseries}}
\renewcommand\subsection{\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\z@}%
     {-1.75ex\@plus -0.5ex \@minus- .2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\Large}}
\renewcommand\subsubsection{\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\z@}%
     {-1.5ex\@plus -0.35ex \@minus -.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\large}}
\renewcommand\paragraph{\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\z@}%
     {-1ex \@plus-0.35ex \@minus -0.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\normalsize}}
\renewcommand\subparagraph{\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\parindent}%
     {1.5ex \@plus1ex \@minus .2ex}%
     {-1em}%
     {\reset@font\normalsize\bfseries}}


\def\l@section#1#2{\addpenalty{\@secpenalty} \addvspace{1.0em plus 1pt}
 \@tempdima 1.5em \begingroup
 \parindent \z@ \rightskip \@pnumwidth 
 \parfillskip -\@pnumwidth 
 \bfseries \leavevmode #1\hfil \hbox to\@pnumwidth{\hss #2}\par
 \endgroup}
\def\l@subsection{\@dottedtocline{2}{1.5em}{2.3em}}
\def\l@subsubsection{\@dottedtocline{3}{3.8em}{3.2em}}
\def\l@paragraph{\@dottedtocline{4}{7.0em}{4.1em}}
\def\l@subparagraph{\@dottedtocline{5}{10em}{5em}}
\@ifundefined{c@section}{\newcounter{section}}{}
\@ifundefined{c@chapter}{\newcounter{chapter}}{}
\newif\if@mainmatter 
\@mainmattertrue
\def\chaptername{Chapter}
\def\frontmatter{%
  \pagenumbering{roman}
  \def\thechapter{\@roman\c@chapter}
  \def\theHchapter{\roman{chapter}}
  \def\thesection{\@roman\c@section}
  \def\theHsection{\roman{section}}
  \def\@chapapp{}%
}
\def\mainmatter{%
  \cleardoublepage
  \def\thechapter{\@arabic\c@chapter}
  \setcounter{chapter}{0}
  \setcounter{section}{0}
  \pagenumbering{arabic}
  \setcounter{secnumdepth}{6}
  \def\@chapapp{\chaptername}%
  \def\theHchapter{\arabic{chapter}}
  \def\thesection{\@arabic\c@section}
  \def\theHsection{\arabic{section}}
}
\def\backmatter{%
  \cleardoublepage
  \setcounter{chapter}{0}
  \setcounter{section}{0}
  \setcounter{secnumdepth}{2}
  \def\@chapapp{\appendixname}%
  \def\thechapter{\@Alph\c@chapter}
  \def\theHchapter{\Alph{chapter}}
  \appendix
}
\newenvironment{bibitemlist}[1]{%
   \list{\@biblabel{\@arabic\c@enumiv}}%
       {\settowidth\labelwidth{\@biblabel{#1}}%
        \leftmargin\labelwidth
        \advance\leftmargin\labelsep
        \@openbib@code
        \usecounter{enumiv}%
        \let\p@enumiv\@empty
        \renewcommand\theenumiv{\@arabic\c@enumiv}%
	}%
  \sloppy
  \clubpenalty4000
  \@clubpenalty \clubpenalty
  \widowpenalty4000%
  \sfcode`\.\@m}%
  {\def\@noitemerr
    {\@latex@warning{Empty `bibitemlist' environment}}%
    \endlist}

\def\tableofcontents{\section*{\contentsname}\@starttoc{toc}}
\parskip0pt
\parindent1em
\def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}}
\newenvironment{reflist}{%
  \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{}
  {%
   \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}%
   \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}%
   \def\makelabel##1{\itshape ##1}}%
  }
  {\end{list}\end{raggedright}}
\newenvironment{sansreflist}{%
  \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{}
  {%
   \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}%
   \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}%
   \def\makelabel##1{\upshape ##1}}%
  }
  {\end{list}\end{raggedright}}
\newenvironment{specHead}[2]%
 {\vspace{20pt}\hrule\vspace{10pt}%
  \phantomsection\label{#1}\markright{#2}%

  \pdfbookmark[2]{#2}{#1}%
  \hspace{-0.75in}{\bfseries\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont#2}%
  }{}
      \def\TheFullDate{2018-01-15 (revised: 15 January 2018)}
\def\TheID{\makeatother }
\def\TheDate{2018-01-15}
\title{Towards an Interdisciplinary Approach to Food Accessibility Research}
\author{}\makeatletter 
\makeatletter
\newcommand*{\cleartoleftpage}{%
  \clearpage
    \if@twoside
    \ifodd\c@page
      \hbox{}\newpage
      \if@twocolumn
        \hbox{}\newpage
      \fi
    \fi
  \fi
}
\makeatother
\makeatletter
\thispagestyle{empty}
\markright{\@title}\markboth{\@title}{\@author}
\renewcommand\small{\@setfontsize\small{9pt}{11pt}\abovedisplayskip 8.5\p@ plus3\p@ minus4\p@
\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip
\abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus2\p@
\belowdisplayshortskip 4\p@ plus2\p@ minus2\p@
\def\@listi{\leftmargin\leftmargini
               \topsep 2\p@ plus1\p@ minus1\p@
               \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@
               \itemsep 1pt}
}
\makeatother
\fvset{frame=single,numberblanklines=false,xleftmargin=5mm,xrightmargin=5mm}
\fancyhf{} 
\setlength{\headheight}{14pt}
\fancyhead[LE]{\bfseries\leftmark} 
\fancyhead[RO]{\bfseries\rightmark} 
\fancyfoot[RO]{}
\fancyfoot[CO]{\thepage}
\fancyfoot[LO]{\TheID}
\fancyfoot[LE]{}
\fancyfoot[CE]{\thepage}
\fancyfoot[RE]{\TheID}
\hypersetup{citebordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,linkbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,urlbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,bookmarksnumbered=true}
\fancypagestyle{plain}{\fancyhead{}\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}}

\date{}
\usepackage{authblk}

\providecommand{\keywords}[1]
{
\footnotesize
  \textbf{\textit{Index terms---}} #1
}

\usepackage{graphicx,xcolor}
\definecolor{GJBlue}{HTML}{273B81}
\definecolor{GJLightBlue}{HTML}{0A9DD9}
\definecolor{GJMediumGrey}{HTML}{6D6E70}
\definecolor{GJLightGrey}{HTML}{929497} 

\renewenvironment{abstract}{%
   \setlength{\parindent}{0pt}\raggedright
   \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}}
   \vskip16pt
   \textcolor{GJBlue}{\large\bfseries\abstractname\space}
}{%   
   \vskip8pt
   \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}}
   \vskip16pt
}

\usepackage[absolute,overlay]{textpos}

\makeatother 
      \usepackage{lineno}
      \linenumbers
      
\begin{document}

             \author[1]{M. R.  Abubakari}

             \affil[1]{  Binghamton University}

\renewcommand\Authands{ and }

\date{\small \em Received: 16 December 2017 Accepted: 5 January 2018 Published: 15 January 2018}

\maketitle


\begin{abstract}
        


An approximately 54.4 million people or 17.7% of the U.S population live in areas without nutritious food outlets, have low access to a vehicle and have challenges accessing a nutritious food outlet. The lack of access to nutritious food outlets mainly affects low-income residents of both urban and rural areas and remains a challenge because the deprived residents mostly depend on innutritious food outlets such as neighborhood convenience stores, which can be detrimental to their health. Researchers of varying disciplines have examined the problem of food access, however, in a piecemeal nature. This paper, therefore, critically examines research across two disciplines concerned with food accessibility - geography and public health to create a more comprehensive approach to food accessibility research based on their perspectives and approaches. Although some dissimilarities exist between the perspectives and approaches employed in food accessibility research by the two disciplines, common grounds are established via the identification of the concept of place and socio-economic characteristics of people as the main driving factors of food accessibility research among the disciplines. These perspectives are integrated along the common driving elements to form an interdisciplinary research approach and construct a comprehensive understanding of the problem of food accessibility.

\end{abstract}


\keywords{food desert, food accessibility, interdisciplinary research, food and health}

\begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1cm,1cm) % {block width} (coords) 
\textcolor{GJBlue}{\LARGE Global Journals \LaTeX\ JournalKaleidoscope\texttrademark}
\end{textblock*}

\begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1.4cm,1.5cm) % {block width} (coords) 
\textcolor{GJBlue}{\footnotesize \\ Artificial Intelligence formulated this projection for compatibility purposes from the original article published at Global Journals. However, this technology is currently in beta. \emph{Therefore, kindly ignore odd layouts, missed formulae, text, tables, or figures.}}
\end{textblock*}


\let\tabcellsep& 	 	 		 \par
in the United States, and about half of such residents (19million people) have difficulty in accessing nutritious food outlets within a range of 1 mile to 10 miles. At a reduced range of 0.5 to 10 miles, about 83.5 million people live in areas with low access to a vehicle and nutritious food outlets. Within the same range, 54.4million people or 17.7\% of the U.S population have challenges accessing nutritious food outlets and may rely on innutritious food outlets, which can be detrimental to their health \hyperref[b35]{(Lee, 2012;} {\ref USDA, 2017)}.\par
Studies that attempt to compare food accessibility between neighborhoods of different socioeconomic characteristics have varying conclusions. Whereas the majority of the studies suggest low-access to nutritious food outlets for low-income neighborhoods compared to high-income neighborhoods, some studies indicate inexistence of disparities in the level of access to nutritious food outlets between communities of different socio-economic characteristics.  {\ref (}  \hyperref[b44]{Duncan, 2011)}. Irrespective of the outcomes of such comparisons, the problem still exists for some residents and is notably worse for residents of minority concentrated inner-city neighborhoods and Native American communities because of segregation and economic forces that consider such neighborhoods detrimental to profit maximization \hyperref[b14]{(Dawson, 2012;}\hyperref[b41]{Meltzer \& Schuetz, 2012;}\hyperref[b44]{O'Connell et al., 2011;}\hyperref[b54]{Slocum \& Saldanha, 2016)}. Also, low-income residents of rural communities who do not have cars and grocery stores nearby, remain extremely challenged with the problem of food inaccessibility due to limited or inexistence of public transportation \hyperref[b29]{(Hubley, 2011;}\hyperref[b40]{McKenzie, 2014;}\hyperref[b57]{USDA, 2009)}. Furthermore, neighborhood food environments and food affordability influence peoples' choices of food; people may utilize food options closer to their residence instead of traveling long distances (Lin, Ver-Ploeg, Kasteridis, \& Yen, 2014; Rahkovsky \& Snyder, 2015; Vaughan, Cohen, Ghosh-Dastidar, Hunter, \& Dubowitz, 2016). Therefore, residents of food deserts who do not have adequate access to vehicles may rely on innutritious food outlets such as convenience stores and fast food chains or travel longer distances for nutritious food compared to residents with nutritious Background on Food Accessibility n recent years, there has been a rise in public and scholarly interest in food accessibility and food deserts in the United States. While food accessibility refers to the ability of individuals to access food stores physically, a food desert represents a low-income neighborhood where residents do not have access to nutritious food outlets within a walk able distance or over a mile to 10miles distances, and also, faced with inadequate access to vehicles \hyperref[b29]{(Hubley, 2011;}\hyperref[b40]{McKenzie, 2014}; USDA 2017). Residents of food deserts often rely on food outlets which do not offer healthy choices, (such as fresh fruits and vegetables), and may be at a higher risk of experiencing food-related health complications than high-income residents within the country  {\ref (Caspi,}  Whereas disciplinary studies view issues and inform research in a singular perspective or approach, multi-disciplinary research involves little interactions, contrasting or sharing of knowledge between two or more disciplines, or drawing insight from two or more disciplines without fully integrating them \hyperref[b10]{(Choi \& Pak, 2006;}\hyperref[b11]{CohenMiller et al., 2017;}\hyperref[b47]{Repko \& Szostak, 2017)}. The inadequate and piecemeal assessment of the problem of food accessibility limits the understanding of the causes and even the impacts of the problem as well as interventions to improve food access. An interdisciplinary approach, therefore, would help address the challenges associated with the disciplinary and multidisciplinary approaches by synthesizing and integrating existing knowledge to form a complete picture of food accessibility in the country. With an interdisciplinary approach, researchers and institutions would be able to probe this complex subject of a food desert and accessibility, draw and integrate insights from multiple disciplines to comprehensively understand and choose the best approach in solving the problem sustainably.\par
Therefore, this paper offers a critical review of research transcending two significant disciplines and provides an integrated understanding of the issue of food accessibility in the United States. Research from geography and public health are reviewed in this paper. These two fields are selected because they have taken center stages in the research and discussion of food deserts, food accessibility, and food-related health complications and remain the parent disciplines of most of the other disciplines that study and attempt to solve the problem of food accessibility. As a paradigm shift from the existing single disciplinary research, however, this paper provides a direction towards an interdisciplinary research approach that could expand perspectives and approaches in a food desert, food accessibility, or food-health related research. Specifically, the study integrates perspectives, theories and approaches to food accessibility research from the disciplines of geography and public health to form a new and more comprehensive perspective and approach for food accessibility research. 
\section[{II. A Comparison of Insights on Food Accessibility between Geography and Public Health}]{II. A Comparison of Insights on Food Accessibility between Geography and Public Health}\par
Geographers and public health researchers and practitioners view the problem of food accessibility in two distinct perspectives; whereas geographers mainly consider food access as a physical location issue, public health academics and professionals largely view it as a factor that can affect the health and well-being of individuals. These distinct views are implicated in the way the disciplines conceptualize and approach studies on food desert or food accessibility. Here, research from ( H ) Global Journal of Human Social Science -Not with standing research efforts by scholars of varying disciplines such as geography, planning, public health, community sustainability, social work, and sociology to unravel and surmount the challenge of food deserts or accessibility, the problem persists in several communities across the country \hyperref[b0]{(Abubakari, 2017;}\hyperref[b57]{USDA, 2009} {\ref USDA, , 2017))}. The attempts of planning authorities at local, regional and national levels to solve the problem have yielded modest successes as several neighborhoods remain classified as food deserts in the USDA food desert atlas. \hyperref[b0]{(Abubakari, 2017;}\hyperref[b57]{USDA, 2009} {\ref USDA, , 2015} {\ref USDA, , 2017))}. Efforts of public health and nutrition professionals in educating the public on food choices have proven futile due to lack of food options within some low-income neighborhoods. Specific interventions include the 2008 Farm Bill that aims at supporting the provision of nutritious food through rural farming with the leadership of the United States Department of Agriculture and food pantries by nonprofits across the country (Abubakari, 2017; USDA, 2009; Karpyn, Young, \& Weiss, 2012). Even politicians like the Former first lady, Michele Obama called for, and supported initiatives that provided grocery stores for some neighborhoods in the country through her non-profit focused on food accessibility \hyperref[b32]{(Karpyn et al., 2012)}. Apart, some investors still shy away from some communities because of high poverty rates and fear for recurrent supply cost, without inherent profit organization \hyperref[b14]{(Dawson, 2012;}\hyperref[b17]{Diao, 2015)}. In a nutshell, these interventions and research have been piecemeal and may partly contribute to the persistent existence of food deserts across the United States. When a complex problem such as food accessibility is studied in piecemeal function (disciplinary, or multidisciplinary), various components of the issues are left unaddressed (CohenMiller, Faucher, Hernández-Torrano, \& Brown-Hajdukova, 2017; \hyperref[b10]{Choi \& Pak, 2006)}.\par
Year 2018 geography and public health is reviewed. Specific emphasis is placed on the perspectives, fundamental theories, and approaches employed by the two disciplines in investigating the issue of food accessibility in the United States. 
\section[{III.}]{III.} 
\section[{Conceptualization of Food Accessibility Studies}]{Conceptualization of Food Accessibility Studies}\par
The term food desert by definition is devised from geographic perspectives and reflects some underlining themes of studies in geography such as location, place, human-environmental interaction and movement  {\ref (Chen,}  ). An absolute location, in this context, reflects the exact point on earth's surface where a place is positioned, and relative location defines the setting of a place relative to its surroundings (Dempsey Caitlin, 2017). Geographers view access to nutritious food as a matter of place and human-environment interaction, whereby the physical and socioeconomic characteristics of a place determines the kind of food stores available for the residents of that place. \hyperref[b0]{(Abubakari, 2017} Crucial to this perspective is the central place theory compounded by Walter Christaller in 1933. The theory assumes that the concept of a 'threshold' is the determinant of the location of services such as food stores. The threshold concept suggests that services such as grocery stores will be situated in neighborhoods with the local capacity to support profit maximization, hence the existence of food deserts  {\ref (Dawson,}   \hyperref[b52]{\& Shannon, 2014)}. The dynamics change when considering rural and urban communities in the country, although rural areas are predominantly White occupied, several studies have indicated that lowincome rural settlements have very restricted access to grocery stores compared to equally poor urban settlements \hyperref[b19]{(Dutko et al., 2012;}\hyperref[b56]{Thatcher et al., 2017;}\hyperref[b57]{USDA 2009} {\ref USDA ,2015))}.\par
At the individual level, individual choices amidst transportation systems or travel distance as a factor of accessibility play a significant role in discussing the dynamics of food accessibility among geographers \hyperref[b52]{(Shannon, 2014}\hyperref[b53]{(Shannon, , 2016;;}\hyperref[b61]{Widener \& Shannon, 2014)}. Individuals with access to vehicles, and/or live within walkable distance to nutritious food outlets turn to have more access to fresh fruits and vegetables compared to individuals with limited access to healthy food outlets or vehicles  {\ref (Dutko et}  Furthermore, some indicate that gender plays an important role in health issues such as obesity as it relates to neighborhood context. Most of the studies suggests a higher prevalence of eating disorders and obesity among women compared to men and others suggest a high prevalence of obesity and eating disorders among men compared to women  {\ref (Chao et}   \hyperref[b34]{Ledikwe et al., 2005)}. Apart, sections of public health researchers also believe that peoples knowledge or perception about nutritious food as it relates to the environment in which they reside is a contributing factor to their food choices that could affect their body mass index. In this regard, individuals with adequate knowledge of the significance and availability of nutritious foods such as fruits and vegetables are most likely to consume them compared to individuals without a proper understanding of the existence of these nutritious food sources \hyperref[b18]{(Drewnowski \& Darmon, 2005;}\hyperref[b25]{Halpern et al., 2017;}\hyperref[b39]{MacNell et al., 2017;}\hyperref[b43]{Nutbeam, 2000)}.The consumption of fresh fruits and vegetables are considered highly relevant by public health researchers and practitioners because an increase in the consumption of fresh fruits and vegetables together with proper dieting may result to a reduction in body mass index among individuals (MacNell et al. IV. 
\section[{Approaches of Food Accessibility Research}]{Approaches of Food Accessibility Research}\par
There exist some differences between the approaches employed by public health scholars and geographers in studying food desert as a geographic issue or as a health concern. The geography-based research employs geographic information systems in measuring food accessibility. These approaches can be categorized into two types; individual-based and placebased approaches. Studies that apply the individualbased approach examine the relationship between socio-economic characteristics of persons such as income, vehicle ownership, race, etc. and distance or access to food stores \hyperref[b52]{(Shannon, 2014}\hyperref[b53]{(Shannon, , 2016))}. The place-based approach, which appears as the commonly used approach in measuring food accessibility among geographers focuses on neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics and how they are related to access to food for residents  {\ref (Abubakari,}   
\section[{V. Common Ground: Food Accessibility}]{V. Common Ground: Food Accessibility}\par
Research between Geography and Public Health\par
The fields of geography and public health have no specific counter-arguments regarding food accessibility and how it affects people across the country. The perspectives, theories, and approaches, however, that guide their studies on food accessibility demonstrate certain dissimilarities between the disciplines. Geographers mainly focus on travel distances, location characteristics, transportation options and other factors that define the level of accessibility to food stores  {\ref (Abubakari,}  difference in focus is explained by the theories guiding the studies.\par
Geographers primarily use retail geographical theories such as the central place theory and perspectives that mostly delve into understanding places and how they shape location of services or contribute to decisions on food store locations \hyperref[b14]{(Dawson, 2012;}\hyperref[b23]{Ghosh-Dastidar et al., 2017;}\hyperref[b49]{Johnson, 2016;}\hyperref[b61]{Widener \& Shannon, 2014)}. Such perspectives significantly inform their concentrations of studies on location and distance to food stores. In the same context, geographers concern has been on consumer travel origin and destinations, thus, where consumers shop, and how far they are willing to travel from their homes to access services such as fruits and vegetables. The focus on place and travel patterns mainly generate studies on proximities and densities of food stores within certain kinds of neighborhoods among geographers \hyperref[b0]{(Abubakari (2017;}\hyperref[b52]{Shannon, 2014}\hyperref[b53]{Shannon, ,2016;;}\hyperref[b61]{Widener \& Shannon, 2014)}.\par
Unlike geographers, public health researchers principally utilize ecological and behavioral theories and perspectives in understanding how individual circumstances and residential neighborhood environ-ments relate to health conditions  {\ref (Deller et}  Apart from the existing differences in perspectives and approaches, some researchers from geography and public health undertake to some extent, studies that transcend their main disciplines to incorporate some worldviews from the other discipline \hyperref[b0]{(Abubakari, 2017}  \hyperref[b10]{(Choi \& Pak, 2006)}. They are multidisciplinary because insights expended remain partial or unintegrated; they are often employed in providing an explanation or support for certain fragments of the problem or inquiry \hyperref[b10]{(Choi \& Pak, 2006;}\hyperref[b47]{Repko \& Szostak, 2017)}. For instance, geographers often feature research findings from public health studies that establish a link between access to nutritious food outlets to obesity, to purposively construct a background and rationale for measuring travel distances to food stores, and or densities of food stores within neighborhoods \hyperref[b0]{(Abubakari, 2017;}\hyperref[b9]{Chen, 2017} Furthermore, inferencing from the studies reviewed above, there exist some eminent mutual cognitive factors that drive food accessibility research between geographers and public health scholars or practitioners (Figure 1). Primarily, the concept of 'place' appears as a cross-cutting factor between both disciplines. Place is significant in ecological theories, and perspectives, thus, guide public health research. As stated in the earlier part of this inquiry, public health professionals view the etiology of health concerns such as obesity to contain both individual and environmental factors, and where (places) people live, and the kind of food they have access to within these spaces could have an effect on their health. Hence, the constant research on the link between food environment and obesity rates of neighborhoods among public health scholars and practitioners. Again, place is one of the fundamental themes of geography and virtually defines the perspectives and approaches of research in that field. Primary retail geographic theories such as the central place theory are place-based, and remain one of the guiding pillars of research into locations of food stores in relation to where people live and shop in food accessibility studies. Therefore, both geographic and public health perspectives, theories, and approaches of research expressively recognize the importance of place in people lives and agree on the importance of locating nutritious food outlets within places people live.\par
Entrenched in both public health and geography works on food accessibility and population health is socio-economic characteristic of individuals and neighborhoods (Figure 1). Both fields examine elements such as income, race, age, gender, etc., except that geographers mainly focus on physical access and density of food outlets and health researchers primarily focus on health concerns such as obesity. Specifically, both fields extensively attempt to examine disparities in food accessibility between individuals of lower socioeconomic status and individuals of higher socioeconomic status; the focus of both fields in that regard is on income and race. As examined earlier, both geographers and public health scholars and practitioners suggest that people of low socioeconomic characteristics are unduly disadvantaged when considering the location of nutritious food stores and distribution of health complications such as obesity. Hence, the existence of an additive inclusion of perspectives from each other on the issue of food access and obesity.\par
Moreover, per the literature, minorities, especially Blacks and Latinos remain the most disadvantaged regarding access to nutritious food outlets compared to White and non-Black/Latino populations. Similarly, obesity rates are higher among minorities (Blacks and Latinos) than among White and non-Black/Latino populations in the US. With regards to income, low-income residents of any type of settlement (rural/urban) have disproportionate lack of access to nutritious food outlets compared to high-income residents of any community (rural/urban). Underprivileged residents also have higher rates of obesity than high-income residents. Therefore, both geographers and public health researchers agree on an intersectionality of poverty and race when discussing food deserts or access to nutritious food and health complications such as obesity. These agreement forms the common grown between both disciplines in this paper, and stand as the bedrock for integration of the disciplinary perspectives and approaches in examining food accessibility.\par
Even regarding the scope or scale of the studies, both geographers and public health researchers measure food accessibility; be it by distance, density, food contents, or health complications based on socio-economic characteristics at the individual and neighborhood levels. Essentially, geographic perspectives and approaches combined with that of public health will provide a complete framework of food accessibility research that will ensure a more comprehensive understanding of the problem spanning from place to health. Therefore, the proposal advanced further in the following sections of this paper and illustrated in Figure 1, is an interdisciplinary outlook that combines geographic theory and public health theories, or perspectives to form a new form of perspective that would implement both views in a complete study on food accessibility. In the context of this paper, as illustrated in Figure 1 below, central place theory and ecological model combined would provide a more comprehensive framework and understanding of food accessibility; spanning from individual and neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics, location, place, and movement, to food choices and health consequences. VI. An Interdisciplinary Approach in Examining Food Accessibility\par
The issue of inadequate access to nutritious food stores within neighborhoods affects several people in the US, and as indicated by both geographers and public health researchers, low-income residents in both urban and rural settlements are affected the most. There is also a common knowledge about research findings that indicate that low-income residents across the country often rely on food outlets without healthy options and that utilization of unhealthy food also relates to health concerns such as obesity. Therefore, Figure 1 defines the problem wholly, with all the components and perspectives such as place, socio-economic characteristics, and health included, it explicitly illustrates the complexities of food inaccessibility and the need to view it with interdisciplinary lenses. This approach will also mean integrating perspectives, and some fundamental theories and procedures of the disciplines of geography and public health to enable a comprehensive understanding and solution to the problem. In a more precise way; the following are suggestions regarding an integration between geography and public health for the interdisciplinary study of food accessibility expended in Figure 1.\par
The geographic central place theory and the ecological model that guides research in public health appear useful in fully understanding the problem of food accessibility as it relates to poverty and health. In combining those two perspectives, Figure 1 illustrates that food accessibility is an issue that includes business decisions with regards to the location of food stores, individual and neighborhoods socio-economic characteristics, transportation, personal food choices and a health factor.\par
Therefore, an individual's socioeconomic characteristics including income and race determine where the individual resides. People with low incomes are most likely to settle in areas with low housing values due to their inability to live in highincome areas. The neighborhood in which a person resides may play a significant role in determining the person's food-retail environment. The food-retail environments of poor residents are often without nutritious food options because retailers usually place grocery stores within neighborhoods or in proximity to communities, which can yield higher dividends or support profit maximization. As a consequence, lowincome residents with adequate access to a vehicle, and understanding of the importance of healthy eating can travel farther distances to access nutritious food. Residents unable to access nutritious food stores are most likely to rely on neighborhood convenience stores, which do not provide nutritious food like fresh fruits and vegetables, hence maybe at a higher risk of developing food-related health complications such as obesity and diabetes. Thus, a complete definition that mathe-matically incorporates all perspectives from geography and public health, and essential for researchers to consider it entirely when designing research on food accessibility.\par
Based on the comprehensive problem definition provided and illustrated in Figure 1, researchers should consider incorporating both geographic and public health perspectives more comprehensively when designing studies. That is, adopting the description of the problem provided and also integrating both aspects from the review of the literature, research questions, methods, results, and conclusions. For instance, instead of just asking a question that intends to measure only physical access to food stores by distance, researchers should have follow-up questions that probe the individual level factors that define accessibility, including transportation availability and shopping decisions as well as health conditions in relation to the eating choices. This approach will reveal the various facets of the problem defined above and would help researchers to unravel the issues bordering food accessibility completely. This approach also implies that researchers should go beyond using geographic information systems, statistics, or qualitative research to a more community-based interdisciplinary mixed method approach that will incorporate several of these methods. Whereas Geographic Information System technologies can measure the questions on physical distance, statistics will be useful in measuring availability and density, and qualitative methods such as focus group discussions are appropriate for gathering insights from individuals about health issues and food access. 
\section[{VII.}]{VII.} 
\section[{Discussion and Conclusion}]{Discussion and Conclusion}\par
The problem of food accessibility appears very complicated and attempts by various disciplines especially geography and public health to unravel it has been piecemeal. Despite growing public interest in food deserts, the fragmented approaches of research do not stimulate a complete assessment of, or even a holistic approach in solving the problem, hence the unending nature of the problem in the country. A geographic or public health based study with additive insights from other disciplines cannot fully unpack the issue, hence the need for an interdisciplinary approach. Synthesization and integration of knowledge from different disciplines, which forms the bedrock of an interdisciplinary study are essential for probing a convoluted issue such as food desert or food accessibility. This approach as shown in Figure 1, amalgamates the various perspectives of the problem of food access and helps to create a new and more comprehensive understanding of the problem.\par
The reviewed literature demonstrates that the lack of food accessibility indeed falls within the confines of research in geography and public health as it is both Year 2018\par
Although piecemeal multidisciplinary studies exist on food accessibility, they do not comprehensively unpack the issue, as several neighborhoods remain food deserts in the country. This interdisciplinary approach, therefore, is a complete system of merger where both disciplinary approaches stand utilized from conceptualization of the problem, literature review, methodologies, to interpretation and application of results of the study. An adoption of this approach will hopefully translate into viable information not just for academia but information that will be useful for decisionmaking bodies and institutions such as the United States Department of Agriculture. The information will also contribute to a full understanding of the complexities of the issue of food accessibility in a particular community and yield possible direction for sustainable solutions to surmount the problem in the United States and World Over.\par
Volume XVIII Issue I Version I a geographic concern and public health concern. Whereas geography is concerned with place and how people within such spaces live and move around their day to day activities, and for that matter grocery shopping, public health finds it essential that the food people eat affect their wellbeing. Studies by researchers from these distinct disciplines, however, barely take into consideration perspectives and even approaches from the other discipline when studying either part of the problem. Meanwhile, there is a common population of interest; low-income and minority residents who reside within food deserts. In order to comprehensively understand the problem and possibly identify solutions to solve the problem entirely, this study calls for an interdisciplinary approach in examining food accessibility. Here an amalgamation of geographic perspectives and approaches with public health perspectives and methods in studying food accessibility is encouraged. By so doing, researchers can comprehensively address the issue by using geographic theories in understanding location, places and how people circulate within places to access food, and extensively utilize public health perspectives and approaches in measuring people's decisions and eating habits and their health implications on the people.\begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{}\includegraphics[]{image-2.png}
\caption{\label{fig_0}}\end{figure}
  \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.761341059602649\textwidth}P{0.059105960264900656\textwidth}P{0.012665562913907285\textwidth}P{0.002814569536423841\textwidth}P{0.014072847682119206\textwidth}}
\multicolumn{5}{l}{Indeed, health issues such as obesity are more}\\
prevalent\tabcellsep among\tabcellsep residents\tabcellsep of\tabcellsep low-income\\
\multicolumn{5}{l}{neighborhoods, Black people, and Latinos with poor}\\
\multicolumn{5}{l}{access to grocery stores compared to Whites and}\\
\multicolumn{5}{l}{residents of high-income areas with adequate access to}\\
\multicolumn{5}{l}{grocery stores. (Auchincloss et al., 2011; Inagami et al.,}\\
\multicolumn{5}{l}{2006; Caspi et al., 2012; Rutten, Yaroch, Patrick, \&}\\
Story, 2012).\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
I\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \multicolumn{4}{l}{Kawachi, Subramanian, Adamkiewicz, \&}\\
\multicolumn{5}{l}{Sorensen, 2012; Eckert\& Shetty, 2011; Hubley, 2011;}\\
\multicolumn{5}{l}{Inagami, Cohen, Finch, \& Asch, 2006;Lee, 2012;}\\
\multicolumn{5}{l}{Morland, Diez Roux, \& Wing, 2006). Approximately 39.4}\\
\multicolumn{5}{l}{million people reside in areas classified as food deserts}\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_1}}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{} \par 
\begin{longtable}{}
\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_4}}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.7749157113958193\textwidth}P{0.004585300067430883\textwidth}P{0.017768037761294674\textwidth}P{0.0017194875252865812\textwidth}P{0.05101146325016857\textwidth}}
\multicolumn{2}{l}{Towards an Interdisciplinary Approach to Food Accessibility Research}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Year 2018\\
Kolodinsky et al., 2017).Also, extensively studied is the food-retail environment of neighborhoods and how they might influence peoples' decisions on nutrition, with emphasis consigned on the availability of fruits and vegetables in the food outlets within the neighborhoods (Campbell et al., 2017; Kolodinsky et al., 2017; Leung et al., 2017; MacNell, Elliott, Hardison-Moody, \& Bowen, 2017). Public health studies suggest a relationship between health issues (obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease) and individual socioeconomic characteristics (such as income, race, educational level, age, and sex), which stand influenced by the individual's food environment(Deller et al., 2017; Drewnowski \& Darmon, 2005; Heval et al., 2016).Underprivileged persons have a higher risk of being overweight or obese compared to persons of high-income status due to lesser consumption of nutritious food among the disadvantaged (Halpern et al., 2017; Heval et al., 2016; Drewnowski \& Darmon, 2005). Individuals of minority racial/ethnic categories such as Blacks and Hispanics have lower access to nutritious food and also have a higher probability of being obese compared to other races, especially White(Halpern et al., 2017; Drewnowski \& Darmon, 2005; Public confounding nature of health\tabcellsep scholars\tabcellsep recognize\tabcellsep the\tabcellsep Volume XVIII Issue I Version I 11 ( H ) Global Journal of Human Social Science -\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{© 2018 Global Journals}\tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_5}}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.7158687943262412\textwidth}P{0.13413120567375886\textwidth}}
2017; Chen, 2017; Shannon, 2016; Slocum \& Saldanha, 2016; Parece et al., 2017; Widener \& Shannon, 2014; Widener et al., 2017).One the other hand, Public health professionals pay more attention to the content of food stores (fresh fruits and vegetables), individual diet choices and how they relate to obesity and other health concerns among people in a place (Bonica \& Story, 2017; Towards an Interdisciplinary Approach to Food Accessibility Research\tabcellsep Volume XVIII Issue I Version I 13 ( H ) Global Journal of Human Social Science -Year 2018\\
© 2018 Global Journals\tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_8}}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{} \par 
\begin{longtable}{}
\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_9}}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{} \par 
\begin{longtable}{}
\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_10}}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{} \par 
\begin{longtable}{}
\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_11}}\end{figure}
 		 		\backmatter   			 
\subsection[{Acknowledgement}]{Acknowledgement}\par
I wish to thank Professor Elizabeth Mellin, Director, Community Research and Action Phd Program for her guidance and input in understanding interdisciplinary and integration of different perspectives in research. 			  			  				\begin{bibitemlist}{1}
\bibitem[Dempsey Caitlin ()]{b16}\label{b16} 	 		\textit{Absolute and relative location},  		 			Dempsey Caitlin 		.  		 \url{https://www.geolounge.com/absolute-relative-location/}  		2017.  	 
\bibitem[Usda ()]{b57}\label{b57} 	 		\textit{Access to affordable and nutritious food: Measuring and understanding food deserts and their consequences},  		 			Usda 		.  		 ASI 1508-138. (.  		 \url{https://statistical.proquest}  		2009. 2009.  	 
\bibitem[Mckenzie ()]{b40}\label{b40} 	 		‘Access to supermarkets among poorer neighborhoods: A comparison of time and distance measures’.  		 			B S Mckenzie 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2013.856195}{10.1080/02723638.2013.856195}.  	 	 		\textit{Urban Geography}  		2014. 35  (1)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Auchincloss et al. ()]{b2}\label{b2} 	 		‘An agent-based model of income inequalities in diet in the context of residential segregation’.  		 			A H Auchincloss 		,  		 			R L Riolo 		,  		 			D G Brown 		,  		 			J Cook 		,  		 			A V Diez Roux 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2010.10.033}{10.1016/j.amepre.2010.10.033}.  	 	 		\textit{American Journal of Preventive Medicine}  		2011. 40  (3)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Diao ()]{b17}\label{b17} 	 		‘Are inner-city neighborhoods underserved? an empirical analysis of food markets in a U.S. metropolitan area’.  		 			M Diao 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0739456X14562283}{10.1177/0739456X14562283}.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Planning Education and Research}  		2015. 35  (1)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Hubley ()]{b29}\label{b29} 	 		‘Assessing the proximity of healthy food options and food deserts in a rural area in maine’.  		 			T A Hubley 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.09.004}{10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.09.004}.  	 	 		\textit{Applied Geography}  		2011. 31  (4)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Rummo et al. ()]{b50}\label{b50} 	 		‘Beyond supermarkets: Food outlet location selection in four U.S. cities over time’.  		 			P E Rummo 		,  		 			D K Guilkey 		,  		 			S W Ng 		,  		 			B M Popkin 		,  		 			K R Evenson 		,  		 			P Gordon-Larsen 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.08.042}{10.1016/j.amepre.2016.08.042}.  	 	 		\textit{American Journal of Preventive Medicine}  		2017. 52  (3)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Shannon ()]{b53}\label{b53} 	 		‘Beyond the supermarket solution: Linking food deserts, neighborhood context, and everyday mobility’.  		 			J Shannon 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2015.1095059}{10.1080/00045608.2015.1095059}.  	 	 		\textit{Annals of the American Association of Geographers}  		2016. 106  (1)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Macnell et al. ()]{b39}\label{b39} 	 		‘Black and latino urban food desert residents' perceptions of their food environment and factors that influence food shopping decisions’.  		 			L Macnell 		,  		 			S Elliott 		,  		 			A Hardison -Moody 		,  		 			S Bowen 		.  		 doi:10.1080 /19320248.2017.1284025.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Hunger \& Environmental Nutrition}  		2017. 12  (3)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Meltzer and Schuetz ()]{b41}\label{b41} 	 		‘Bodegas or bagel shops? neighborhood differences in retail and household services’.  		 			R Meltzer 		,  		 			J Schuetz 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08912424-11430328}{10.1177/08912424-11430328}.  	 	 		\textit{Economic Development Quarterly}  		2012. 26  (1)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Dutko et al. ()]{b19}\label{b19} 	 		‘Characteristics and infuential factors of food deserts’.  		 			P Dutko 		,  		 			M Ploeg 		,  		 			T Farigan 		.  		 \url{fromhttps://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/45014/30940\textunderscore err140.pdf?v=41156}  	 	 		\textit{Economic Research Report}  		2012.  (140)  p. .  		 			United States Department of Agriculture 		 	 
\bibitem[Williamson et al. ()]{b62}\label{b62} 	 		‘Deprivation and healthy food access, cost and availability: A crosssectional study’.  		 			S Williamson 		,  		 			M Mcgregor-Shenton 		,  		 			B Brumble 		,  		 			B Wright 		,  		 			C Pettinger 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jhn.12489}{10.1111/jhn.12489}.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics}  		2017. 30  (6)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Ledikwe et al. ()]{b34}\label{b34} 	 		‘Dietary energy density determined by eight calculation methods in a nationally representative united states population’.  		 			J H Ledikwe 		,  		 			H M Blanck 		,  		 			L K Khan 		,  		 			M K Serdula 		,  		 			J D Seymour 		,  		 			B C Tohill 		,  		 			B J Rolls 		.  	 	 		\textit{The Journal of Nutrition}  		2018. 2005. 135  (2)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Wright et al. ()]{b63}\label{b63} 	 		‘Dietary factors and cognitive function in poor urban settings’.  		 			R S Wright 		,  		 			C Gerassimakis 		,  		 			D Bygrave 		,  		 			S R Waldstein 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13668-017-0186-x}{10.1007/s13668-017-0186-x}.  	 	 		\textit{Current Nutrition Reports}  		2017. 6  (1)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Black et al. ()]{b3}\label{b3} 	 		‘Dietary inequalities: What is the evidence for the effect of the neighborhood food environment?’.  		 			C Black 		,  		 			G Moon 		,  		 			J Baird 		.  		 doi:10.1016/ j.healthplace.2013.09.015.  	 	 		\textit{Health \& Place}  		2014. 27 p. .  	 	 (Supplement C) 
\bibitem[Sohi et al. ()]{b55}\label{b55} 	 		‘Differences in food environment perceptions and spatial attributes of food shopping between residents of low and high food access areas’.  		 			I Sohi 		,  		 			B A Bell 		,  		 			J Liu 		,  		 			S E Battersby 		,  		 			A D Liese 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2013.12.006}{10.1016/j.jneb.2013.12.006}.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior}  		2014. 46  (4)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Ghosh-Dastidar et al. ()]{b23}\label{b23} 	 		‘Does opening a supermarket in a food desert change the food environment?’.  		 			M Ghosh-Dastidar 		,  		 			G Hunter 		,  		 			R L Collins 		,  		 			S N Zenk 		,  		 			S Cummins 		,  		 			R Beckman 		,  		 			T Dubowitz 		.  		 doi:10.1016/ j.healthplace.2017.06.002.  	 	 		\textit{Health \& Place}  		2017. 46 p. .  	 	 (Supplement C) 
\bibitem[Kolodinsky et al. ()]{b33}\label{b33} 	 		‘Estimating the effect of mobility and food choice on obesity in a rural, northern environment’.  		 			J M Kolodinsky 		,  		 			G Battista 		,  		 			E Roche 		,  		 			B H Y Lee 		,  		 			R K Johnson 		.  		 doi:10.1016/ j.jtrangeo.2017.04.003.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Transport Geography}  		2017. p. .  	 	 (Supplement C) 
\bibitem[O'connell et al. ()]{b44}\label{b44} 	 		‘Food access and cost in american indian communities in washington state’.  		 			M O'connell 		,  		 			D S Buchwald 		,  		 			G E Duncan 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2011.06.002}{10.1016/j.jada.2011.06.002}.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of the American Dietetic Association}  		2011. 111  (9)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Deller et al. ()]{b15}\label{b15} 	 		‘Food access, local foods, and community health’.  		 			S Deller 		,  		 			A Canto 		,  		 			L Brown 		.  		 doi:10. 1080/15575330.2017.1358197.  	 	 		\textit{Community Development}  		2017. 48  (5)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Abubakari ()]{b0}\label{b0} 	 		\textit{Food accessibility: The proximity of food sources to neighborhoods in the triple cities of broome county, new york Available from ProQuest Dissertations \& Theses: Open},  		 			M R Abubakari 		.  		 \url{https://search.proquest.com/docview/1934380863}  		2017.  	 
\bibitem[Adeigbe et al. ()]{b1}\label{b1} 	 		\textit{Food and beverage marketing to latinos},  		 			R T Adeigbe 		,  		 			S Baldwin 		,  		 			K Gallion 		,  		 			S Grier 		,  		 			A G Ramirez 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1090198114557122}{10.1177/1090198114557122}.  		2015. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.  	 
\bibitem[Drewnowski and Darmon ()]{b18}\label{b18} 	 		‘Food choices and diet costs: An economic Analysis1,2’.  		 			A Drewnowski 		,  		 			M Darmon 		.  		 \url{https://search.proquest.com/docview/197458381}  	 	 		\textit{The Journal of Nutrition}  		2005. 135  (4) .  	 
\bibitem[Rahkovsky and Snyder ()]{b46}\label{b46} 	 		\textit{Food choices and store proximity},  		 			I Rahkovsky 		,  		 			S Snyder 		.  		2015. Washington, D.C..  		 			United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service 		 	 
\bibitem[Liese ()]{b37}\label{b37} 	 		‘Food store types, availability, and cost of foods in a rural environment’.  		 			A D Liese 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2007.08.012}{10.1016/j.jada.2007.08.012}.  	 	 		\textit{J Am Diet Assoc}  		2007. 107  (11)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Cooksey-Stowers et al. ()]{b12}\label{b12} 	 		‘Food swamps predict obesity rates better than food deserts in the united states’.  		 			K Cooksey-Stowers 		,  		 			B M Schwartz 		,  		 			K D Brownell 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14111366}{10.3390/ijerph14111366}.  	 	 		\textit{International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health}  		2017. 14  (11)  p. 1366.  	 
\bibitem[Eckert and Shetty ()]{b20}\label{b20} 	 		‘Food systems, planning and quantifying access: Using GIS to plan for food retail’.  		 			J Eckert 		,  		 			S Shetty 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.01.011}{10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.01.011}.  	 	 		\textit{Applied Geography}  		2011a. 31  (4)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Eckert and Shetty ()]{b21}\label{b21} 	 		‘Food systems, planning and quantifying access: Using GIS to plan for food retail’.  		 			J Eckert 		,  		 			S Shetty 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.01.011}{10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.01.011}.  	 	 		\textit{Applied Geography}  		2011b. 31  (4)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Dai and Wang ()]{b13}\label{b13} 	 		\textit{Geographic disparities in accessibility to food stores in southwest mississippi. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design},  		 			D Dai 		,  		 			F Wang 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/b36149}{10.1068/b36149}.  		2011. 38 p. .  	 
\bibitem[
			RonJohnson
		 ()]{b49}\label{b49} 	 		\textit{Geography -human geography as locational analysis},  		 			RonJohnson 		.  		 \url{https://www.britannica.com/science/geography/Human-geography-as-locational-analysis}  		2016.  	 
\bibitem[Nutbeam ()]{b43}\label{b43} 	 		‘Health literacy as a public health goal: A challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century’.  		 			D Nutbeam 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapro/15.3.259}{10.1093/heapro/15.3.259}.  	 	 		\textit{Health Promotion International}  		2000. 15  (3)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Campbell et al. ()]{b5}\label{b5} 	 		‘Healthy food availability among food sources in rural maryland counties’.  		 			E A Campbell 		,  		 			M J Shapiro 		,  		 			C Welsh 		,  		 			S N Bleich 		,  		 			L K Cobb 		,  		 			J Gittelsohn 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19320248.2017.1315328}{10.1080/19320248.2017.1315328}.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Hunger \& Environmental Nutrition}  		2017. 12  (3)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Leung et al. ()]{b36}\label{b36} 	 		‘Healthy food availability and marketing in san francisco small food stores -differences by SNAP vendor status’.  		 			C W Leung 		,  		 			B A Laraia 		,  		 			J M Tester 		,  		 			I H Yen 		.  		 45.1.  		 \url{http://www.fasebj.org/content/31/1\textunderscore Supplement/45.1}  	 	 		\textit{The FASEB Journal}  		2017. 31  (1) .  	 	 (Supplement) 
\bibitem[Widener et al. ()]{b60}\label{b60} 	 		‘How do changes in the daily food and transportation environments affect grocery store accessibility?’.  		 			M J Widener 		,  		 			L Minaker 		,  		 			S Farber 		,  		 			J Allen 		,  		 			B Vitali 		,  		 			P C Coleman 		,  		 			B Cook 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.03.018}{10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.03.018}.  	 	 		\textit{Applied Geography}  		2017. 83 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Romano et al. ()]{b48}\label{b48} 	 		‘Identifying corners stores as the future of healthy food access in african american communities’.  		 			V Romano 		,  		 			J Lee 		,  		 			E Royal 		,  		 			K Metzo 		,  		 			W Ruth 		,  		 			T Hartsook 		.  		 \url{https://digitals-cholarship.unlv.edu/jhdrp/vol10/iss1/12}  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Health Disparities Research and Practice}  		2017. 10  (1) .  	 
\bibitem[Bonica and Story ()]{b4}\label{b4} 	 		‘Into the (food) desert: A food desert simulation’.  		 			M J Bonica 		,  		 			K L Story 		.  		 \url{https://medicalresearchjournal.org/index.php/GJMR/article/view/1253}  	 	 		\textit{Global Journal of Medical Research}  		2017.  	 
\bibitem[Low-income and low-supermarketaccess census tracts ()]{b58}\label{b58} 	 		\textit{Low-income and low-supermarketaccess census tracts},  		 \url{https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/food-access-research-atlas/go-to-the-atlas.aspx60.USDA}  		2015. 2017. 2010-2015. Washington, D.C..  		 			United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service 		 	 	 (Food desert -go to the atlas<br>) 
\bibitem[Choi and Pak ()]{b10}\label{b10} 	 		‘Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveeness. Clinical and Investigative Medicine’.  		 			B C K Choi 		,  		 			A W P Pak 		.  		 \url{http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17330451}  	 	 		\textit{Médecine Clinique Et Experimentale}  		2006. 29  (6)  p. 351.  	 
\bibitem[Handbury et al. ()]{b26}\label{b26} 	 		\textit{NBER working paper series},  		 			J Handbury 		,  		 			I Rahkovsky 		,  		 			M Schnell 		.  		 \url{http://www.nber.org/papers/w21126}  		2015. Cambridge, MA.  	 
\bibitem[Halpern et al. ()]{b25}\label{b25} 	 		‘Neighborhood and individual sociodemo graphic characteristics associated with disparities in adult obesity and perceptions of the home food environment’.  		 			M T Halpern 		,  		 			L C Arena 		,  		 			R A Royce 		,  		 			R E Soler 		,  		 			B Munoz 		,  		 			C M Hennessy 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/heq.2017.0010}{10.1089/heq.2017.0010}.  	 	 		\textit{Health Equity}  		2017. 1  (1)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Hilmers et al. ()]{b28}\label{b28} 	 		‘Neighborhood disparities in access to healthy foods and their effects on environmental justice’.  		 			A Hilmers 		,  		 			D C Hilmers 		,  		 			J Dave 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300865}{10.2105/AJPH.2012.300865}.  	 	 		\textit{American Journal of Public Health}  		2012. 102  (9)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Rutten et al. ()]{b51}\label{b51} 	 		\textit{Obesity prevention and national food security: A food systems approach},  		 			L F Rutten 		,  		 			A L Yaroch 		,  		 			H Patrick 		,  		 			M Story 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/539764}{10.5402/2012/539764}.  		2012. 2012. ISRN Public Health. p. .  	 
\bibitem[Cohenmiller et al. ()]{b11}\label{b11} 	 		‘Practical steps for using interdisciplinary educational research to enhance cultural awareness’.  		 			A S Cohenmiller 		,  		 			C Faucher 		,  		 			D Hernández-Torrano 		,  		 			E Brown Hajdukova 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2017.1310834}{10.1080/1743727X.2017.1310834}.  	 	 		\textit{Towards an Interdisciplinary Approach to Food Accessibility Research 12},  				2017. 40 p. 288.  	 
\bibitem[Karpyn et al. ()]{b32}\label{b32} 	 		‘Reestablishing healthy food retail: Changing the landscape of food deserts’.  		 			A Karpyn 		,  		 			C Young 		,  		 			S Weiss 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/chi.2011.0113}{10.1089/chi.2011.0113}.  	 	 		\textit{Childhood Obesity (Formerly Obesity and Weight Management)}  		2012. 8  (1)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Repko and Szostak ()]{b47}\label{b47} 	 		 			A F Repko 		,  		 			R Szostak 		.  		 \url{http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=none\&isbn=9781506330471\&uid=none}  		\textit{Interdisciplinary research: Process and theory},  				2017. Sage Publications.  	 	 (3rd ed.) 
\bibitem[Thatcher et al. ()]{b56}\label{b56} 	 		‘Retail food store access in rural appalachia: A mixed methods study’.  		 			E Thatcher 		,  		 			C Johnson 		,  		 			S N Zenk 		,  		 			P Kulbok 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/phn.12302}{10.1111/phn.12302}.  	 	 		\textit{Public Health Nursing}  		2017. 34  (3)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Dawson ()]{b14}\label{b14} 	 		\textit{Retail geography (RLE retailing and distribution) Routledge},  		 			J Dawson 		.  		2012.  	 
\bibitem[Chao et al. ()]{b8}\label{b8} 	 		‘Sex/gender differences in neural correlates of food stimuli: A systematic review of functional neuroimaging studies’.  		 			A M Chao 		,  		 			J Loughead 		,  		 			Z M Bakizada 		,  		 			C M Hopkins 		,  		 			A Geliebter 		,  		 			R C Gur 		,  		 			T A Wadden 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/obr.12527}{10.1111/obr.12527}.  	 	 		\textit{Obesity Reviews}  		2017. 18  (6)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Slocum and Saldanha ()]{b54}\label{b54} 	 		 			R Slocum 		,  		 			A Saldanha 		.  		\textit{Geographies of race and food: Fields, bodies, markets Routledge},  				2016.  	 
\bibitem[Parece et al. ()]{b45}\label{b45} 	 		\textit{Strategically siting urban agriculture: A socioeconomic analysis of roanoke, virginia. The Professional Geographer},  		 			T E Parece 		,  		 			E L Serrano 		,  		 			J B Campbell 		.  		 doi:10.1080/ 00330124.2016.1157496.  		2017. 69 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Morland et al. ()]{b42}\label{b42} 	 		‘Supermarkets, other food stores, and obesity’.  		 			K Morland 		,  		 			A V Diez Roux 		,  		 			S Wing 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2005.11.003}{10.1016/j.amepre.2005.11.003}.  	 	 		\textit{American Journal of Preventive Medicine}  		2006. 30  (4)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Chen ()]{b9}\label{b9} 	 		\textit{Take the edge off: A hybrid geographic food access measure},  		 			X Chen 		.  		 doi:10.1016/ j.apgeog.2017.07.013.  		2017. 87 p. .  	 	 (Applied Geography. Supplement C) 
\bibitem[Heval et al. ()]{b27}\label{b27} 	 		‘The association of living in food deserts with cardiovascular risk factors and subclinical vascular disease’.  		 			M K Heval 		,  		 			A Hina 		,  		 			H Muhammad 		,  		 			T Matthew 		,  		 			H Salim 		,  		 			A Mosaab 		,  		 			Q Arshed 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097}{10.1016/S0735-1097}.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of the American College of Cardiology}  		2016. 67  (13)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Hudson et al. ()]{b30}\label{b30} 	 		‘The prevalence and correlates of eating disorders in the national comorbidity survey replication’.  		 			J I Hudson 		,  		 			E Hiripi 		,  		 			H G Pope 		,  		 			R C Kessler 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.03.040}{10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.03.040}.  	 	 		\textit{Biological Psychiatry}  		2007. 61  (3)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Caspi et al. ()]{b7}\label{b7} 	 		‘The relationship between diet and perceived and objective access to supermarkets among lowincome housing residents.(report)(survey)’.  		 			C E Caspi 		,  		 			I Kawachi 		,  		 			S V Subramanian 		,  		 			G Adamkiewicz 		,  		 			G Sorensen 		.  		 doi:10.1016/ j.socscimed.2012.05.014.  	 	 		\textit{Social Science \& Medicine}  		2012. 75  (7)  p. 1254.  	 
\bibitem[Lee ()]{b35}\label{b35} 	 		‘The role of local food availability in explaining obesity risk among young school-aged children’.  		 			H Lee 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.12.036}{10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.12.036}.  	 	 		\textit{Social Science \& Medicine}  		2012. 74  (8)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Lin et al. ()]{b38}\label{b38} 	 		‘The roles of food prices and food access in determining food purchases of low-income households’.  		 			B Lin 		,  		 			M Ver Ploeg 		,  		 			P Kasteridis 		,  		 			S T Yen 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2014.07.002}{10.1016/j.jpolmod.2014.07.002}.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Policy Modeling}  		2014. 36  (5)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Flegal et al. ()]{b22}\label{b22} 	 		‘Trends in obesity among adults in the united states’.  		 			K M Flegal 		,  		 			D Kruszon-Moran 		,  		 			M D Carroll 		,  		 			C D Fryar 		,  		 			C L Ogden 		.  		 doi:10.1001 /jama.2016.6458.  	 	 		\textit{Jama}  		2016. 2005 to 2014.  (21)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Cannuscio et al. ()]{b6}\label{b6} 	 		‘Urban food environments and residents' shopping behaviors’.  		 			C C Cannuscio 		,  		 			K Tappe 		,  		 			A Hillier 		,  		 			A Buttenheim 		,  		 			A Karpyn 		,  		 			K Glanz 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2013.06.021}{10.1016/j.amepre.2013.06.021}.  	 	 		\textit{American Journal of Preventive Medicine}  		2013. 45  (5)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Gustafson et al. ()]{b24}\label{b24} 	 		‘Validation of food store environment secondary data source and the role of neighborhood deprivation in appalachia, kentucky’.  		 			A A Gustafson 		,  		 			S Lewis 		,  		 			C Wilson 		,  		 			S Jilcott-Pitts 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-688}{10.1186/1471-2458-12-688}.  	 	 		\textit{BMC Public Health}  		2012. 12  (1)  p. 688.  	 
\bibitem[Shannon ()]{b52}\label{b52} 	 		‘What does SNAP benefit usage tell us about food access in low-income neighborhoods?’.  		 			J Shannon 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.02.021}{10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.02.021}.  	 	 		\textit{Social Science \& Medicine}  		2014. 107 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Widener and Shannon ()]{b61}\label{b61} 	 		\textit{When are food deserts? integrating time into research on food accessibility. Health \& Place, 30},  		 			M J Widener 		,  		 			J Shannon 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.07.011}{10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.07.011}.  		2014. p. .  	 	 (Supplement C) 
\bibitem[Vaughan et al. ()]{b59}\label{b59} 	 		‘Where do food desert residents buy most of their junk food? supermarkets’.  		 			C A Vaughan 		,  		 			D A Cohen 		,  		 			M Ghosh-Dastidar 		,  		 			G P Hunter 		,  		 			T Dubowitz 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S136898001600269X}{10.1017/S136898001600269X}.  	 	 		\textit{Public Health Nutrition}  		2016. 20  (14)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Inagami et al. ()]{b31}\label{b31} 	 		‘You are where you shop: Grocery store locations, weight, and neighborhoods’.  		 			S Inagami 		,  		 			D A Cohen 		,  		 			B K Finch 		,  		 			S M Asch 		.  		 \url{fromhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16777537}  	 	 		\textit{American Journal of Preventive Medicine}  		2006. 31  (1) .  	 
\end{bibitemlist}
 			 		 	 
\end{document}
