is a developmental period during which young people transition from adolescence into adulthood. Arnett (2000Arnett ( , 2015) ) proposed that the primary goal of emerging adults is to establish their roles and responsibilities in the domains of love and work. Emerging adults thus strive to gain independence from their families of origin and behave autonomously, as well as create a coherent identity (Arnett, 2015). To add to this journey toward independence, emerging adults are also expected to establish long-term, committed romantic relationships. These tasks are not easy and can often be daunting for young people; indeed, novel experiences such as pursuing higher education, joining the military, joining the workforce, establishing a career, and forming intimate relationships are not small feats. Given the inherent stress of being in transition, it is important for researchers to better understand the factors that contribute to optimal health and well-being for emerging adults as they establish their roles in love and work. Relationship status (e.g., married, single) is linked to mental and physical health both among emerging adults and older adults with those in committed relationship experiencing improved health outcomes (e.g., Ditzen, Hoppmann, & Klumb, 2008; Kumar, Mohan, Ranjith, & Chandrasekaran, 2006). However, beyond this static, binary measure of relationship stability it is not known how different patterns of moving in and out of these static statuses effect outcomes. Specifically, for Emerging Adults, it appears that timing of transitioning into a committed may be liked to health outcomes (Roberson, Norona, Zorotovitch, & Dirnberger, in press) Therefore, using a nationally representative sample of emerging adults, the present longitudinal study examined patterns of relationship stability among emerging adults people between the ages of 17 and 27 and their links with mental and physical health outcomes. # II. Romantic Relationships in Emerging Adulthood Much empirical attention has been given to romantic relationships in emerging adulthood because they contribute greatly to physical and mental health across the life course (Davila, 2004). Unlike in other developmental stages, emerging adults can take various trajectories toward adulthood in terms of their romantic relationships (Roberson et al., in press); although getting married during this life stage is somewhat uncommon (especially compared to decades ago), emerging adults might choose to cohabitate with their committed romantic partners (Stanley, Whitton, & Markman, 2004). Emerging adults also engage in romantic experiences outside the context of romantic relationships, which can include casual sex (Claxton &van Dulmen, 2013). Although romantic experiences can take different forms in emerging adulthood, forming a long-term, committed romantic relationship is reportedly a common goal for emerging adults by the time they turn 30 years old (Arnett, 2015). What is unknown is how relationship stability or instability might impact later health. # a) Relationship Stability In investigating the factors that contribute to emerging adults' physical and mental health, it is important to consider the role of relationship stability. (Ditzen et al., 2008;Kumar et al., 2006). However, for emerging adults, consistent associations are less clear. For emerging adults, some studies show that being in a romantic relationships is related to an increase in symptoms of depression (Davila, Steinberg, Kachadourian, Cobb, &Fincham, 2004); in contrast, married and cohabiting emerging adults tend to exhibit fewer depressive symptoms compared to their single counterparts (Brainthwaite, Delevi, &Fincham, 2010; Galambos, Barker, &Krahn, 2006). When these relationships are formed during emerging adulthood is apparently important as those who experience romantic commitment early on during this life stage tend to show decreases in depressive symptoms as they age (Roberson et al., in press). These negative mental health outcomes can potentially affect other areas of life, including work and school (Mayseless & Keren, 2014). Because of the inconsistent findings on the association between romantic relationship status and mental and physical health outcomes in emerging adulthood, further research is needed to deepen our understanding of the factors that contribute to adaptive and maladaptive outcomes. Emerging adults have been described as shifting in and out of romantic relationships (Shulman & Connolly, 2013) and a handful of studies have found different patterns of relationship instability during late adolescents and early emerging adulthood (Bajoghli et al., 2017;Boisvert & Poulin, 2016; Rauer, Pettit, Lansford, Bates, & Dodge, 2013). While these studies confirm that different patterns of relationship stability exist they only examine precursors to these patterns. However, research has yet to examine how these shifts specifically affect physical and mental health outcomes for emerging adults. Because emerging adulthood is a stage during which young people are expected to explore and develop many types of romantic connections, relationship stability might not impact health in the same ways as it does among older adults. Further, because emerging adults are generally healthier due to their age, we might not see differences in the quality of their physical health. Rather, their health behaviors might be more accurate gauges of their health during this life stage and might predict health quality in middle and later life. # III. # The Current Study Using a recent sample of emerging adults, the present longitudinal study examined the link between relationship stability and emerging adults' mental health and physical health behaviors. This study extends previous research in a number of ways. The present study begins to fill the current gap in the literature regarding relationship instability and how it is related to health outcomes in emerging adulthood. Specifically, this study can shed light on either the utility or the detriment of relationship transitions over time and whether they contribute to mental health (aim 1) and physical health (aim 2). Further, emerging adults are younger than most samples for which relationship status has been linked to health outcomes (mental and physical) and health behaviors established in young adulthood tend to extend into later years. Therefore, we also examine health behaviors that may prevent future health problems (e.g., exercise, doctor visits; aim 3), or be problematic for future health quality (e.g., binge drinking, drug use, poor sleep pattern; aim 4). Importantly, this study is the first step in understanding the relationship among relationship stability and mental and physical health outcomes. # IV. # Method a) Participants Participants (N = 694) ranged in age from 17 to 19 in 2005 with an average age of 18 (SD = 0.79). 50% of the sample reported as men and 50% as women. Participants mostly identified as White (49%) or African-American (42%), and ?1% identified as American Indian, Asian, Pacific Islander, or Other. When considering self-reported relationship status, in 2005, the majority reported being Never Married, Not Cohabitating (90%), followed by Never Married, Cohabiting (5%), Married (3%), and then Separated< 1%. In contrast, the majority of relationship statuses at follow-up in 2013 were still Never Married, Not Cohabiting, although a substantially smaller proportion (53%), followed by Married (24%), Never Married, Cohabiting (18%), Separated (2%), Divorced, Not Cohabiting (2%), and then Divorced, Cohabiting (1%). # b) Procedures Data in the present study were part of the Transition to Adulthood project, which is part of the larger ongoing Panel Study of Income Dynamics (Dynamics, 2016); this secondary data study is exempt from IRB approval. The PSID is a nationally representative sample of Americans and the longest running household study survey in the world. The Transition to Adulthood project (the present sample) participants are the grandchildren of the original PSID participants and were contacted once they turned 18 for biannual phone interviews. For the Transition to Adulthood data set, participants were eligible if their parents were part of the larger study, but only one sibling from each family was selected to participate in the next generation of the ongoing study. The ii. Mental Health The mental health measure was developed by the PSID. This composite measure consisted of six items that assess psychological symptoms (e.g., "How often did you feel nervous in the past month?"), with responses ranging from 1 = all of the time to 5 = none of the time. Items were combined so that higher scores indicate more psychological distress (M 2005 = 5.33, SD 2005 = 3.58; M 2013 = 4.87; SD 2013 = 3.74). # iii. Physical Health Status Number of chronic illness was assessed by, "Has a doctor or other health professional ever told you that you have or had?" (a) asthma, (b) diabetes or high blood sugar, (c) cancer, (d) high blood pressure, (e) other chronic disease. Response options included (0) no, (1) yes, (8) don't know, or (9) not applicable. Response were summed into the used variable ranging from 0 to 5; don't know and not applicable were coded as missing. In 2005, 50% of participants reported having 0 chronic illnesses, followed by having 1 chronic illness (47%), 2 chronic illnesses (3%), and then 3 chronic illnesses (< 1%). In 2013, 54% of participants reported having 1 chronic illness, followed by having 0 chronic illnesses (42%), 2 chronic illnesses (4%), and then 3 chronic illnesses (1%). Self-reported physical health was assessed by, "Would you say your health in general is excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor?" with response options of 1 = excellent to 5 = poor (M 2005 = 1.17, SD 2005 = .92; M 2013 = 1.20, SD 2013 = .95). Body mass index (BMI) was calculated by the PSID. Participants were organized into 4 BMI groups (0) < 18.5, underweight; (1) 18.5 -24.9, Normal; (2) 25.0 -29.9, Overweight; (3) ? 30.0, Obese. In 2005, most participants were coded as having a normal BMI (57%), followed by overweight (26%), obese (13%), and then underweight (4%). In 2013, a smaller proportion were coded as having a normal BMI (42%), followed by overweight (30%), obese (25%), then underweight (2%). Cigarette smoking was assessed by, "Do you smoke cigarettes"? with respondents reporting (0) no or (1) yes. Respondents reports of 'don't know' or 'refuse' were coded as missing. In 2005, 76.9% reported as nonsmokers and in 2013, 78.5% reported as non-smokers. Binge drinking was assessed by, "In the last year, on how many days have you had (if male then 'five' / if female then 'four') or more drinks on one occasion?" Total drug use was assessed by, "On how many occasions (if any) have you used __________ in the past 12 months": diet pills, amphetamines, marijuana, cocaine, barbiturates, tranquilizers, and steroids. We coded each as 0 (never used) or 1 (used at least once) then summed for a total number of drugs used which ranged from 0 to Stable, into relationship, out of relationship, in and out of relationship. Each participant's response across all time points was examined, and only those who responded to the question about relationship status at least three out of the five possible times received a code. In other words, some participants did not provide an answer about their relationship status at all five time points, but if they provided at least three answers, a pattern could be established and was coded. ii. Health Outcomes For the second research question, we sought to understand the effects of the relationship stability patterns on a number of outcomes relating to mental health, physical health, and health behaviors in 2013. For each of the outcome variables, we first examined bivariate association in SPSS. Depending on the type of variable (e.g., continuous, dichotomous, or count) we used different statistical tests. Namely, we used cross tabulations for the dichotomous outcomes and analysis of variance (ANOVA) for continuous or count outcomes. Next, we examined the same outcome variable in predictive regression models controlling for baseline levels of each variable, gender (male and female), age in 2005 (17, 18, and 19), and minority status (White and other). In the predictive models, the relationship stability patters were dummy coded so that the largest category was used as the reference group. For continuous outcomes variables, we use linear regression, for count outcome variables we used Poisson regression, and for dichotomous variables we used logistic regression. All predictive models were run in Mplus so that we could handle missing data using full information maximum likelihood. We examined the 95% confidence interval of each parameter and variance explained (R 2 ) of the predictive model, in addition to significance level, when evaluating the effect of the determined relationship stability patterns on health outcomes. V. # Results # a) Relationship stability patterns The patterns of relationships stability for each participant was coded according to the pre-determined patterns. However, during the coding process, we determined that stable had two sub-categories, stable committed and stable single. 2) indicated that only emerging adults who Move Out Of Commitment have 60% more chronic illnesses compared to Stable Single. # d) Self-reported physical health The ANOVA indicated mean differences among the relationship stability pattern, F( 4 # Discussion In this study, we sought to investigate different types of relationship stability patterns among emerging adults in the United States ages 17-29 [1] and how those stability patterns differed on health outcomes near the end of this period. After examining these results, four patterns emerged. First, emerging adults in the Moving out of Commitment pattern seemed to fair the worst compared to those in the Stable Single pattern. Namely, that the Moving Out of Commitment pattern tended to report higher psychological distress, a higher number of chronic diseases, worse self-reported physical health, and were more likely to smoke (although also less likely to binge drink alcohol) compared to those in the reference relationship stability pattern. All in all, it appears that young people who start emerging adulthood in a committed relationship and end it not in a relationship fair worse in terms of psychological and physical health. However, we do not know the direction of association among these variables as previous research has found a bi-directional association among adults (Torvik, Gustavson, Røysamb, & Tambs, 2015). Future research is needed to further disentangle the association between relationship quality, relationship stability, and health; however, the findings here make it clear that the patterns that exist in emerging adulthood are similar to those in middle and later adulthood. The second pattern found that those in the Moving In and Out of Commitment pattern did not have any physical or mental health differences compared to the reference group, they were more likely to smoke and binge drink alcohol, but reported using a fewer number of drugs. Therefore, relationship instability during emerging adulthood may be more related to health behaviors than mental and physical health status. However, these health behaviors might be indicative of poorer health in middle and later adulthood (BURNS et al., 2008), but they might also be a function of a lifestyle often reported during this developmental period (e.g., casual sex; (Claxton & van Dulmen, 2013)). If these health behaviors change as individuals move out of this developmental period, their physical health in later adulthood might not be negatively impacted. Future research should examine the long reaching impact of health behaviors during this developmental stage. The third pattern was that those in the Moving into Commitment pattern tended to fair better than the 2013). As to why this disparity occurs, some argue that the health disparity is partially because of a selection process, those who are healthier select into marriage/relationship commitment and those who are less healthy do not (Waldron, Hughes, & Brooks, 1996). This may be true as is evidenced by those who move out of commitment; however, this is a minority of individuals during emerging adulthood (3.4%). What we believe may explain the marital health disparity for a larger portion of the population is the reduction in problematic health behaviors for those choosing relationship commitment, which should be related to better physical health in middle and later adulthood. Therefore, it might be most effective to improve longterm relational and physical health by implementing brief prevention programs which focus on both characteristics of healthy relationships, as well as improvement of health behaviors during this emerging adulthood. # VII. # Limitations/Future Research This study is not without limitations. First, some of the outcome measures are limited in number of items measuring each construct and the variability of some measures. Therefore, results may not be generalizable to emerging adults with more problematic health and should be replicated with such a population. Second, some scholars point to emerging adulthood as lasting until the late 20s or early 30s. Therefore, the findings here may not be an accurate representation of all of emerging adulthood as they only extend to age 27. Third, we only include self-report measures of health and do not include biological measures such as all static load which is linked to future health problems. While those measures were not available to us, future research should include these to better predict long term effects of relationship stability. # VIII. # Conclusion The findings of this study suggest that there are multiple patterns of relationship stability (or instability during Emerging Adulthood and that these patterns differentially impact subsequent mental health, physical health, and health behaviors. Namely, "Moving out of Commitment" is most problematic for health outcomes while "Stable Single or Committed" are less problematic for health. These finding can inform future integrative health programs to target types of stability patterns (rather than divorce in general) and potentially reduce health problems from manifesting or becoming exacerbated. Introductionmerging adulthood (ages 18 to 29; Arnett, 2015) c) Measuresi. Romantic Relationship StatusRomantic relationship stability types werecoded from the marital/cohabitation status variable in2005, 2007, 2009, 2011, and 2013. At each time pointparticipants were coded by the PSID as (1) Nevermarried, cohabiting; (2) Never married, not cohabiting;(3) Married, spouse present; (4) Married, spouse notpresent; (5) Separated; (6) Divorced, cohabiting; (7)Divorced, not cohabiting; (8) Widowed; (9) Notapplicable, don't know. 1The 2BMI2.50002.00001.50001.00000.50000.0000 2Smoking Status: The bivariate association (Chi-squared)indicated that there was a difference across relationshipstability patterns. Post-hoc analysis of the adjustedresiduals indicates that a significantly smaller proportionof those Moving into Commitment smoked (14.4%; Z = -2.2), while those Moving Out of Commitment smokedmore (42.9%; Z = 2.2). The predictive model (logisticregression; Table 3) indicated that emerging adultsMoving In and Out of Commitment were 35% more likelyto smoke compared to those who were Stable Single(trending toward significance). Additionally, thoseMoving out of Commitment were 114% more likely tosmoke compared to those who were Stable Single.Binge Drinking: The bivariate association (ANOVA)indicated that there were no bivariate associations,F(4,412) = .86, p = .49. The predictive model (Poissonregression; Table 3) indicated that those MovingintoCommitment (80%) or Moving Out of Commitment (51%)were less likely to drink, but those Moving In and Out ofCommitment (122%) were more likely to drink comparedto emerging adults who were Stable Single.e) Health BehaviorsSleep: First the ANOVA indicated that there were no significant mean differences among the relationship stability patterns, F(4,419) = .55, p = .70. The predictive model (Table3) confirmed this. Number of drugs used: The ANOVA indicated that there were no bivariate associations, F(4,606) = 1.72, p = .14.Results of the predictive model (Poisson regression;Table 3) indicated that those Moving into Commitment (20%) and those Moving In and Out of Commitment used fewer drugs (19%; trending toward significant) compared to Stable Single. © 2017 Global Journals Inc. (US) s 3 The Influence of Relationship Stability Patterns in Emerging Adulthood on Chronic Illness and HealthBehaviorssignificantly different on any physical health measures,they were less likely to engage in problematic healthbehaviors. Because of the decreased problematicbehaviors, it is plausible to assume that those who moveM (SD)/ % into commitment during emerging adulthood may also B(SE) Model 1: Sleep 2013 a Stable Single 7.07(1.32) --report improved physical health in middle and later Into Commitment 6.96(7.29) -.12(.15) adulthood, provided their health behavior patterns Out Of Commitment 7.36(1.90) .26(.50) remain similar. We know that relationship distress In & Out Of Commitment 6.91(1.42) -.15(.19) across the life course causes a steeper decline inB e --------?(SE) -.04 -.04 -.0495% CI -.41,.17 -.72,1.24 .59,1.25R 2 2.7%? 2Test Statistic (7) = 5.69, p= .58Stable Committed physical health (Umberson, Williams, Powers, Liu, & 6.75(1.16) -.29(.40)---.03-1.07,.49Year 2017Stable Committed Sleep 2005 Needham, 2006), indicating that better relationship 2.4% .26(.49) 1.30 --.10(.05)* --Model 2: Smoking 2013 b In & Out Of Commitment 24.7% 1.35 .30(.17) ? Stable Single 40.0% ----quality and stability are linked to better health outcomes. Into Commitment 25.9% -.25(.72) .78 The fourth pattern was the disparity in health between Out Of Commitment 7.1% .76(.35)* 2.14 those--.13 --------.50, 3.39 .002,.20 .97, 1.88 .19, 3.19 1.08, 4.2537.6% 2 (8) = 122.86, p< .001 ?Smoking 2005--1.39(.14)**4.00--3.05, 5.288Model 3: Binge Drinking cStable Single1.21(1.40)------Volume XVII Issue VII Version IInto Commitment Out Of Commitment In & Out Of Commitment Stable Committed Binge Drinking 2005 Model 4: Number of drugs used c (N = 611) Stable Single Into Commitment Out Of Commitment In & Out Of Commitment Stable Committed Number of drugs used 2005.97(1.30) 1.46(1.44) 1.02(1.28) 1.47(1.50) --10.34(34.32) 5.68(13.25) 6.23(12.40) 9.38(25.84) 1.25(2.76) ---.69(.32)* -.71(.29)* .20(.36) -1.80(.60)* .02(.002)** ---.22(.10)* .13(.16) -.21(.12) ? -.06(.25) .11(.04)**.20 .49 1.22 .16 1.02 --.80 1.14 .81 .94 1.11----------------------.27, .94 .28, .87 .60, 2.47 .05, .54 1.02, 1.02 .66, .98 .83, 1.56 .64, 1.02 .58, 1.54 1.03, 1.21--Loglikelihood = -7785.30 --Loglikelihood = -1874.79( H )Global Journal of Human Social Science -© 2017 Global Journals Inc. (US) sreference group, Stable Single. Specifically, this group tended to engage in less binge drink and take a fewer number of drugs. Interestingly, while they were not © 2017 Global Journals Inc. (US) sThe Influence of Relationship Stability Patterns in Emerging Adulthood on Chronic Illness and Health Behaviors © 2017 Global Journals Inc. (US) s * Associations between mental disorders and the common cold in adults: A population-based crosssectional study YAdam GMeinlschmidt R&lieb Journal of psychosomatic research 74 2013 * Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties JJArnett American Psychologist 55 2000 * Introduction to the special section: Reflections on expanding the cultural scope of adolescent and emerging adult research JJArnett Journal of Adolescent Research 30 2015 * I love you forever (more or less)"-stability and change in adolescents' romantic love status and associations with mood states HBajoghli VFarnia NJoshaghani MHaghighi LJahangard MAhmadpanah DSBahmani EHoisboer-Trachsier SBrand RevistaBrasileira de Psiquiatria 2017 * Romantic relationship patterns for adolescence to emerging adulthood: Associations with family and peer experiences in early adolescence SBoisvert FPoulin 10.1007/s10964-016-0435-0 Journal of Youth Adolescence 45 5 2016 * Romantic relationships and the physical and mental health of college students SRBraithwaite RDelevi FD&fincham Personal Relationships 17 2010 * The Effect of Smoking in Midlife on Health-Related Quality of Life in Old Age: A 26-Year Prospective Study DMBurns AYStrabdberg TEStrandberg KPitkala VVSalomaa RSTilvis TAMiettinen Commentary. Archives of Internal Medicine 18 168 2008 * Casual sexual relationships and experiences in emerging adulthood SEClaxton MH MVan Dulmen Emerging Adulthood 1 2013 * Adverse childhood experiences, allostasis, allostatic load, and age-related disease ADanese BSMcewen Physiology & Behavior 106 2012 * Romantic involvement and depressive symptoms in early and late adolescence: The role of a preoccupied relational style JDavila SJSteinberg LKachadourian RCobb FFincham Personal Relationships 11 2004 * Positive couple interactions and daily cortisol: On the stress-protecting role of intimacy BDitzen CHoppmann P&klumb Psychosomatic Medicine 70 2008 * Produced and distributed by the Survey Research Center PS O IDynamics 2016 Ann Arbor, MI Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan * Depression, self-esteem, and anger in emerging adulthood: seven-year trajectories NLGalambos ETBarker HJKrahn Developmental Psychology 42 350 2006 * AJHawkins SMStanley PACowan FDFincham SRBeach CPCowan * A more optimistic perspective on government-supported marriage and relationship education programs for lower income couples APDaire 2013 * Goal disengagement capacities and severity of disease across older adulthood: The sample case of the common cold JJobin CWrosch International Journal of Behavioral Development 40 2016 * Emerging and young adulthood: Multiple perspectives, diverse narratives VKonstam 2014 Springer New York, NY * Relationship status and relationship instability, but not dominance, predict individual differences in baseline cortisol levels DMaestripieri ACKlimczuk MSeneczko DMTraficonte MCWilson PloS one 8 12 e84003 2013 * Finding a meaningful life as a developmental task in emerging adulthood: The domains of love and work across cultures OMays Less EKeren Emerging Adulthood 2 1 2014 * Breaking Up in Emerging Adulthood A Developmental Perspective of Relationship Dissolution. Emerging Adulthood, Advance online publication JCNorona SBOlmstead DPWelsh doi:2167696816658585. 20 Panel Study of Income Dynamics, public use dataset Ann Arbor, MI 2016. 2016. 2016 Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan Produced and distributed by the Survey Research Center * under review) An application of the Bio behavioral Family Model for emerging adult health JPriest PN ERoberson AWojciak JWoods S Family Process * The biobehavioral family model: Close relationships and allostatic load JBPriest SBWoods CAMaier EOParker JABenoit TRRoush Social Science & Medicine 142 2015 * Romantic relationship patterns in young adults and their developmental antecedents Rauer Pettit Lansford Bates Dodge Developmental Psychology 49 2013 * Breaking up is hard to do: the impact of unmarried relationship dissolution on mental health and life satisfaction GKRhoades CMKamp Dush DCAtkins SMStanley HJMarkman Journal of Family Psychology 25 366 2011 * College adjustment, relationship satisfaction, and conflict management: A cross-lag assessment of developmental 'spillover'. Emerging Adulthood, online publication PN ERoberson JFish SBOlmstead FDFincham 10.1177/2167696815570710 2015 * Developmental trajectories and health outcomes among emerging adult women and men PN ERoberson JCNorona JZorotovich Z&dirnberger Emerging Adulthood in press * Marital quality and health: A meta-analytic review TFRobles RBSlatcher JMTrombello MMMcginn Psychological Bulletin 140 1 140 2014 * A meta-analysis of mental health treatments and cardiac rehabilitation for improving clinical outcomes and depression among patients with coronary heart disease TRutledge LSRedwine SELinke PJMills Psychosomatic Medicine 75 4 2013 * Healthrelated behaviors and the benefits of marriage for elderly persons BSSchone RMWeinick The Gerontologist 38 5 1998 * Maybe I do: Interpersonal commitment and premarital or no marital cohabitation SMStanley SWWhitton HJMarkman Journal of Family Issues 25 2004 * The effect of smoking in midlife on healthrelated quality of life AYStrand Berg TEStrand Berg KPitkälä VVSalomaa RSTilvis TAMiettinen 2008 in old age: A 26-year * Health, health behaviors, and health dissimilarities predict divorce: results from the HUNT study FATorvik KGustavson ERøysamb KTambs BMC Psychology 3 2015 * You make me sick: Marital quality and health over the life course DUmberson KWilliams DAPowers HLiu BNeedham Journal of Health and Social Behavior 47 2006 * Marriage protection and marriage selectionprospective evidence for reciprocal effects of marital status and health IWaldron MEHughes TLBrooks Social Science & Medicine 43 1996 * Beyond the "psychosomatic family": A bio behavioral family model of pediatric illness BLWood Family Process 32 3 1993 * Review of family relational stress and pediatric asthma: The value of bio psychosocial systemic Family Process BLWood BDMiller HKLehman 2015 54 * The bio behavioral family model as a framework for examining the connections between family relationships, mental, and physical health for adult primary care patients. Families, Systems, & Health SBWoods WHDenton 2014 32 235