\documentclass[11pt,twoside]{article}\makeatletter \IfFileExists{xcolor.sty}% {\RequirePackage{xcolor}}% {\RequirePackage{color}} \usepackage{colortbl} \usepackage{wrapfig} \usepackage{ifxetex} \ifxetex \usepackage{fontspec} \usepackage{xunicode} \catcode`⃥=\active \def⃥{\textbackslash} \catcode`❴=\active \def❴{\{} \catcode`❵=\active \def❵{\}} \def\textJapanese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK JP}} \def\textChinese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK SC}} \def\textKorean{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK KR}} \setmonofont{DejaVu Sans Mono} \else \IfFileExists{utf8x.def}% {\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc} \PrerenderUnicode{–} }% {\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}} \usepackage[english]{babel} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage{float} \usepackage[]{ucs} \uc@dclc{8421}{default}{\textbackslash } \uc@dclc{10100}{default}{\{} \uc@dclc{10101}{default}{\}} \uc@dclc{8491}{default}{\AA{}} \uc@dclc{8239}{default}{\,} \uc@dclc{20154}{default}{ } \uc@dclc{10148}{default}{>} \def\textschwa{\rotatebox{-90}{e}} \def\textJapanese{} \def\textChinese{} \IfFileExists{tipa.sty}{\usepackage{tipa}}{} \fi \def\exampleFont{\ttfamily\small} \DeclareTextSymbol{\textpi}{OML}{25} \usepackage{relsize} \RequirePackage{array} \def\@testpach{\@chclass \ifnum \@lastchclass=6 \@ne \@chnum \@ne \else \ifnum \@lastchclass=7 5 \else \ifnum \@lastchclass=8 \tw@ \else \ifnum \@lastchclass=9 \thr@@ \else \z@ \ifnum \@lastchclass = 10 \else \edef\@nextchar{\expandafter\string\@nextchar}% \@chnum \if \@nextchar c\z@ \else \if \@nextchar l\@ne \else \if \@nextchar r\tw@ \else \z@ \@chclass \if\@nextchar |\@ne \else \if \@nextchar !6 \else \if \@nextchar @7 \else \if \@nextchar (8 \else \if \@nextchar )9 \else 10 \@chnum \if \@nextchar m\thr@@\else \if \@nextchar p4 \else \if \@nextchar b5 \else \z@ \@chclass \z@ \@preamerr \z@ \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi} \gdef\arraybackslash{\let\\=\@arraycr} \def\@textsubscript#1{{\m@th\ensuremath{_{\mbox{\fontsize\sf@size\z@#1}}}}} \def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}} \def\abbr{} \def\corr{} \def\expan{} \def\gap{} \def\orig{} \def\reg{} \def\ref{} \def\sic{} \def\persName{}\def\name{} \def\placeName{} \def\orgName{} \def\textcal#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Calligraphy}#1}} \def\textgothic#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Blackletter}#1}} \def\textlarge#1{{\large #1}} \def\textoverbar#1{\ensuremath{\overline{#1}}} \def\textquoted#1{‘#1’} \def\textsmall#1{{\small #1}} \def\textsubscript#1{\@textsubscript{\selectfont#1}} \def\textxi{\ensuremath{\xi}} \def\titlem{\itshape} \newenvironment{biblfree}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{bibl}{}{} \newenvironment{byline}{\vskip6pt\itshape\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont}{\par } \newenvironment{citbibl}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docAuthor}{\ifvmode\vskip4pt\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont\fi\itshape}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docDate}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docImprint}{\vskip 6pt}{\ifvmode\par\fi } \newenvironment{docTitle}{\vskip6pt\bfseries\fontsize{22pt}{25pt}\selectfont}{\par } \newenvironment{msHead}{\vskip 6pt}{\par} \newenvironment{msItem}{\vskip 6pt}{\par} \newenvironment{rubric}{}{} \newenvironment{titlePart}{}{\par } \newcolumntype{L}[1]{){\raggedright\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{C}[1]{){\centering\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{R}[1]{){\raggedleft\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{P}[1]{){\arraybackslash}p{#1}} \newcolumntype{B}[1]{){\arraybackslash}b{#1}} \newcolumntype{M}[1]{){\arraybackslash}m{#1}} \definecolor{label}{gray}{0.75} \def\unusedattribute#1{\sout{\textcolor{label}{#1}}} \DeclareRobustCommand*{\xref}{\hyper@normalise\xref@} \def\xref@#1#2{\hyper@linkurl{#2}{#1}} \begingroup \catcode`\_=\active \gdef_#1{\ensuremath{\sb{\mathrm{#1}}}} \endgroup \mathcode`\_=\string"8000 \catcode`\_=12\relax \usepackage[a4paper,twoside,lmargin=1in,rmargin=1in,tmargin=1in,bmargin=1in,marginparwidth=0.75in]{geometry} \usepackage{framed} \definecolor{shadecolor}{gray}{0.95} \usepackage{longtable} \usepackage[normalem]{ulem} \usepackage{fancyvrb} \usepackage{fancyhdr} \usepackage{graphicx} \usepackage{marginnote} \renewcommand{\@cite}[1]{#1} \renewcommand*{\marginfont}{\itshape\footnotesize} \def\Gin@extensions{.pdf,.png,.jpg,.mps,.tif} \pagestyle{fancy} \usepackage[pdftitle={Using Data Envelope Analysis to Examine US State Health Efficiencies Over 2008-2015}, pdfauthor={}]{hyperref} \hyperbaseurl{} \paperwidth210mm \paperheight297mm \def\@pnumwidth{1.55em} \def\@tocrmarg {2.55em} \def\@dotsep{4.5} \setcounter{tocdepth}{3} \clubpenalty=8000 \emergencystretch 3em \hbadness=4000 \hyphenpenalty=400 \pretolerance=750 \tolerance=2000 \vbadness=4000 \widowpenalty=10000 \renewcommand\section{\@startsection {section}{1}{\z@}% {-1.75ex \@plus -0.5ex \@minus -.2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\Large\bfseries}} \renewcommand\subsection{\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\z@}% {-1.75ex\@plus -0.5ex \@minus- .2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\Large}} \renewcommand\subsubsection{\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\z@}% {-1.5ex\@plus -0.35ex \@minus -.2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\large}} \renewcommand\paragraph{\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\z@}% {-1ex \@plus-0.35ex \@minus -0.2ex}% {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}% {\reset@font\normalsize}} \renewcommand\subparagraph{\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\parindent}% {1.5ex \@plus1ex \@minus .2ex}% {-1em}% {\reset@font\normalsize\bfseries}} \def\l@section#1#2{\addpenalty{\@secpenalty} \addvspace{1.0em plus 1pt} \@tempdima 1.5em \begingroup \parindent \z@ \rightskip \@pnumwidth \parfillskip -\@pnumwidth \bfseries \leavevmode #1\hfil \hbox to\@pnumwidth{\hss #2}\par \endgroup} \def\l@subsection{\@dottedtocline{2}{1.5em}{2.3em}} \def\l@subsubsection{\@dottedtocline{3}{3.8em}{3.2em}} \def\l@paragraph{\@dottedtocline{4}{7.0em}{4.1em}} \def\l@subparagraph{\@dottedtocline{5}{10em}{5em}} \@ifundefined{c@section}{\newcounter{section}}{} \@ifundefined{c@chapter}{\newcounter{chapter}}{} \newif\if@mainmatter \@mainmattertrue \def\chaptername{Chapter} \def\frontmatter{% \pagenumbering{roman} \def\thechapter{\@roman\c@chapter} \def\theHchapter{\roman{chapter}} \def\thesection{\@roman\c@section} \def\theHsection{\roman{section}} \def\@chapapp{}% } \def\mainmatter{% \cleardoublepage \def\thechapter{\@arabic\c@chapter} \setcounter{chapter}{0} \setcounter{section}{0} \pagenumbering{arabic} \setcounter{secnumdepth}{6} \def\@chapapp{\chaptername}% \def\theHchapter{\arabic{chapter}} \def\thesection{\@arabic\c@section} \def\theHsection{\arabic{section}} } \def\backmatter{% \cleardoublepage \setcounter{chapter}{0} \setcounter{section}{0} \setcounter{secnumdepth}{2} \def\@chapapp{\appendixname}% \def\thechapter{\@Alph\c@chapter} \def\theHchapter{\Alph{chapter}} \appendix } \newenvironment{bibitemlist}[1]{% \list{\@biblabel{\@arabic\c@enumiv}}% {\settowidth\labelwidth{\@biblabel{#1}}% \leftmargin\labelwidth \advance\leftmargin\labelsep \@openbib@code \usecounter{enumiv}% \let\p@enumiv\@empty \renewcommand\theenumiv{\@arabic\c@enumiv}% }% \sloppy \clubpenalty4000 \@clubpenalty \clubpenalty \widowpenalty4000% \sfcode`\.\@m}% {\def\@noitemerr {\@latex@warning{Empty `bibitemlist' environment}}% \endlist} \def\tableofcontents{\section*{\contentsname}\@starttoc{toc}} \parskip0pt \parindent1em \def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}} \newenvironment{reflist}{% \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{} {% \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}% \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}% \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}% \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}% \def\makelabel##1{\itshape ##1}}% } {\end{list}\end{raggedright}} \newenvironment{sansreflist}{% \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{} {% \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}% \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}% \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}% \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}% \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}% \def\makelabel##1{\upshape ##1}}% } {\end{list}\end{raggedright}} \newenvironment{specHead}[2]% {\vspace{20pt}\hrule\vspace{10pt}% \phantomsection\label{#1}\markright{#2}% \pdfbookmark[2]{#2}{#1}% \hspace{-0.75in}{\bfseries\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont#2}% }{} \def\TheFullDate{2017-01-15 (revised: 15 January 2017)} \def\TheID{\makeatother } \def\TheDate{2017-01-15} \title{Using Data Envelope Analysis to Examine US State Health Efficiencies Over 2008-2015} \author{}\makeatletter \makeatletter \newcommand*{\cleartoleftpage}{% \clearpage \if@twoside \ifodd\c@page \hbox{}\newpage \if@twocolumn \hbox{}\newpage \fi \fi \fi } \makeatother \makeatletter \thispagestyle{empty} \markright{\@title}\markboth{\@title}{\@author} \renewcommand\small{\@setfontsize\small{9pt}{11pt}\abovedisplayskip 8.5\p@ plus3\p@ minus4\p@ \belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip \abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus2\p@ \belowdisplayshortskip 4\p@ plus2\p@ minus2\p@ \def\@listi{\leftmargin\leftmargini \topsep 2\p@ plus1\p@ minus1\p@ \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@ \itemsep 1pt} } \makeatother \fvset{frame=single,numberblanklines=false,xleftmargin=5mm,xrightmargin=5mm} \fancyhf{} \setlength{\headheight}{14pt} \fancyhead[LE]{\bfseries\leftmark} \fancyhead[RO]{\bfseries\rightmark} \fancyfoot[RO]{} \fancyfoot[CO]{\thepage} \fancyfoot[LO]{\TheID} \fancyfoot[LE]{} \fancyfoot[CE]{\thepage} \fancyfoot[RE]{\TheID} \hypersetup{citebordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,linkbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,urlbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,bookmarksnumbered=true} \fancypagestyle{plain}{\fancyhead{}\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}} \date{} \usepackage{authblk} \providecommand{\keywords}[1] { \footnotesize \textbf{\textit{Index terms---}} #1 } \usepackage{graphicx,xcolor} \definecolor{GJBlue}{HTML}{273B81} \definecolor{GJLightBlue}{HTML}{0A9DD9} \definecolor{GJMediumGrey}{HTML}{6D6E70} \definecolor{GJLightGrey}{HTML}{929497} \renewenvironment{abstract}{% \setlength{\parindent}{0pt}\raggedright \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}} \vskip16pt \textcolor{GJBlue}{\large\bfseries\abstractname\space} }{% \vskip8pt \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}} \vskip16pt } \usepackage[absolute,overlay]{textpos} \makeatother \usepackage{lineno} \linenumbers \begin{document} \author[1]{Dr. Gavin Putzer} \affil[1]{ Stetson University} \renewcommand\Authands{ and } \date{\small \em Received: 11 December 2016 Accepted: 1 January 2017 Published: 15 January 2017} \maketitle \begin{abstract} Health spending in the United States (US) has been steadily rising over the past several decades. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) became law in 2010, but was not operational until 2014. The principal intention of the legislation was to provide insurance coverage to millions of US citizens who previously did not possess health insurance to improve Americans? health. In our study, we compare the efficiency of health care resources on a state-by-state population basis in the US between the years of 2008-2015. Efficiencies are calculated using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). DEA can be defined as a non-parametric technique that uses linear programming (lp) to compare the relative efficiencies of homogenous Decision Making Units (DMU) in transforming inputs into outputs. In this case, the DMUs represent the states. DEA uses lp models to build an efficiency frontier. The efficiency frontier is determined by the most efficient states (i.e., DMUs). Therefore the efficiency of each state can be compared against the frontier and therefore against the most efficient ones. \end{abstract} \keywords{} \begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1cm,1cm) % {block width} (coords) \textcolor{GJBlue}{\LARGE Global Journals \LaTeX\ JournalKaleidoscope\texttrademark} \end{textblock*} \begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1.4cm,1.5cm) % {block width} (coords) \textcolor{GJBlue}{\footnotesize \\ Artificial Intelligence formulated this projection for compatibility purposes from the original article published at Global Journals. However, this technology is currently in beta. \emph{Therefore, kindly ignore odd layouts, missed formulae, text, tables, or figures.}} \end{textblock*} \let\tabcellsep& \section[{Introduction}]{Introduction}\par ealth spending in the United States (US) has been steadily rising over the past several decades. According to the US Department of Labor in 2007, 5.8\% of Americans' household spending was devoted to healthcare, while in 2015; the number had risen to 8\%. Moreover, a recent study conducted by the Brookings Institution (2016) showed that middle-income households currently devote the largest share of their spending to healthcare (8.9\%).\par As of June of 2016, health spending reached 18.2\% of gross domestic product {\ref (Altarum Institute, 2016)}.\par Despite these large health expenditure metrics, there were several years of historically low increases in health inflation after the Great Recession of 2007-09 until 2014 and the implementation of the effects of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). The ACA became law in 2010; however, full implementation of many of the provisions including insurance coverage availability did not occur until January 1, 2014 \hyperref[b2]{(Rosenbaum, 2011)}. The principal intention of the legislation was to provide insurance coverage to millions of US citizens who previously did not possess health insurance to improve Americans' health. This led to the return of increased health spending and the consequent faster growth has been a result of coverage expansions under the Affordable Care Act \hyperref[b3]{(Martin, 2016)}. More specifically, this has been due to increased Medicaid coverage and private health insurance which contributed to an increase in the insured share of the population \hyperref[b3]{(Martin, 2016;}\hyperref[b4]{Collins, 2017)}. Many studies suggest the increased coverage has improved health and diminished disability \hyperref[b4]{(Collins, 2017;}\hyperref[b5]{D'Angelo, 2015;}\hyperref[b6]{Brown, 2016)}.\par There was a previous study conducted on the public health system efficiency of European countries {\ref (Asandului, 2010)}. Asandului shows that some of the developed European countries are efficient in output while using their healthcare inputs. Moreover, the study concluded that a dynamic approach using the Malmquist Index could be used to improve their study. To the best of our knowledge, few studies have examined the efficiency of resource utilization of the US health system comparing the 50 states using the Malmquist index. Thus, we published a paper \hyperref[b8]{(Putzer, 2016)} to compare each state vis-à-vis the other states to examine the efficiency of the use of health resources. This was accomplished through the application of a non-parametric method known as Data Envelope Analysis (DEA). We employed three input variables -the number of physicians per 100,000 residents per state, the number of hospital beds per 1000 inhabitants per state and the public health funding per capita per state and one output variable-disability adjusted life years -to reflect burden of disease. The study considered a multiyear duration from 2008-2014.\par In this study, we compare the efficiency of health care resources on a state-by-state population basis in the US between the years of 2008-2015. This includes examining the 50 states through the application of a non-parametric method known as Data Envelope Analysis (DEA). DEA allows multi-input and multi-output analysis. DEA measures productivity efficiencies of Decision Making Units (DMUs). In our paper, DMUs represent the states. DEA creates an efficiency frontier and compares all DMUs against the frontier. In addition, DEA is used to obtain a Malmquist productivity change index, which is a flexible, mathematical programming approach for the assessment of productivity through input and output variables \hyperref[b9]{(Roh, 2011)}.We selected four input variables: insurance coverage of citizens; the number of physicians per 100,000 residents per state, the number of hospital beds per 1000 inhabitants per state, and public health funding per capita per state. We selected one output variable: years of life lost (YLL) to reflect the population burden \hyperref[b10]{(Burnet, 2005)}. Years of life lost are a population-based mortality indicator of the impact of a disease on society (CDC, 1993; \hyperref[b12]{Murray, 1996;}\hyperref[b13]{Murray 2002)}.The years of life lost metric was developed by the Global Burden of Disease Study \hyperref[b12]{(Murray, 1996)} to identify the burden of disease and premature death. Burden of disease studies have been implemented using indicators such as the years of lost life \hyperref[b14]{(Fontaine, 2003;}\hyperref[b10]{Burnet, 2005;}\hyperref[b15]{Kenney, 2008;}\hyperref[b16]{Putzer, 2015)}.We conducted analyses to evaluate the differences over 2008-2015 to compare each state vis-àvis the other states to examine the efficiency of the use of health resources on disease burdens. \section[{II.}]{II.} \section[{Methods}]{Methods}\par This work approaches the analysis in two steps. The first step is to obtain relative efficiencies for each one of the years included the time-period studied using DEA. The second step is to calculate Malmquist productivity indexes including the Efficiency Change and the Technological Change components. DEA \hyperref[b18]{(Charnes, 1978} based on {\ref Farrell,1957}) is a non-parametric methodology based on linear programming that allows a researcher to benchmark Decision Making Units (DMUs) when transforming inputs into outputs. In our work, DMUs represent US States.DEA uses a set of linear programs that generate a "best practice frontier". The "best practice frontier" is used to determine relative efficiencies for each DMU. Thus, DEA assigns efficiency values of 1 for DMUs in the frontier and lower values regarding other DMUs contingent on their distances from the frontier. In this paper, a Constant Rate of Returns to Scale (CRS) DEA model is used.\par Malmquist Productivity Index (MPI) can be estimated based on distance functions \hyperref[b17]{(Caves, 1982)}. Moreover, it is possible to obtain MPI and its main components, Malmquist Efficiency Change (MEC) and Malmquist Technical Change (MTC), using DEA output oriented models {\ref (Fare, 1994)}. Notice that the decomposition of MPI indicates that DMU growth is due to either a better use of resources (MEC) or due to innovative production technologies (MTC).Malmquist values above 1 indicate efficiency gains while inferior values suggest efficiency losses. For a detailed explanation on the use of DEA and Malmquist Indexes in this context, please refer to Putzer (2016). \section[{III.}]{III.} \section[{Results}]{Results}\par As mentioned previously, this study use four inputs: number of hospital beds per 1,000 inhabitants; number of physicians per 100,000 inhabitants; public health funding per capita (state funds directed to public health and federal funds provided to states by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Health Resources and Services Administration); and insurance coverage. The output variable is Years of Life Lost. The time-period included in this study is 2008-2015 and DMUs represent states. Data used in this work was obtained from the Kaiser Foundation and America's Health Ranking. \section[{Discussion}]{Discussion}\par There have been a few DEA studies to assess the different aspects of the medical field such as hospital efficiency \hyperref[b23]{(Tambour, 1997;} {\ref Zhou 2003;}\hyperref[b25]{Nedelea 2010;}\hyperref[b26]{Mecineanu, 2012)}, public polices efficiency \hyperref[b27]{(Coppola 2003;}\hyperref[b28]{Miller 1996;}\hyperref[b29]{Sherman, 1984;} {\ref Rosko, 1984)}, or health facilities efficiency \hyperref[b31]{(Hollingsworth, 2008;}\hyperref[b32]{Ferrier 2006;}\hyperref[b33]{Ozcan, 2008)}.Our recent paper showed the varying levels of efficiency in the utilization of health resources among the 50 US states in affecting the output of disease burden \hyperref[b8]{(Putzer, 2016)}. We identified the most and least efficient states and the states demonstrating the most improvement. In this paper, we introduced a fourth input variable (insurance coverage) along with the previous three input variables (number of physicians, number of hospital beds and public health expenditures) to measure the output variable of disease burden reflected by Years of Life Lost due to Premature Mortality.\par There were some notable changes among the input variables during the study years of 2008-2015. The number of hospital beds diminished during the early years of the study and then were relatively constant over the past four years. The number of physicians remained relatively stable through 2013, followed by an increase thereafter. The public health funding remained relatively constant over the study period. As expected with the full implementation of the ACA, the fourth input variableinsurance coverage-increased appreciably in 2014 and 2015. The output variable -years of life lost -reflecting disease burden was trending downward from 2008-2013 and remained at a new low in 2014-15. The Malmquist Efficiency Index (MEC) was relatively stable during the study period. By contrast, the Malmquist Technology Change Index (MTC) was variable; it increased from 2008-2011; decreased substantially in 2012; increased in 2013; and decreased modestly 2014-15. The Malmquist Productivity Index (MPI) is the product of the MEC and MTC and varied like the MTC. One way to interpret these findings is as follows. More individuals were newly insured and consequently seeking services, but the health infrastructure (i.e., technology) may not have been adequately prepared for the vast increase in newly insured patients seeking health services. The expectation is that these newly insured US citizens would both need and receive significantly more services. Many of the newly insured plausibly accessed the health system for the first time or the first time in quite a while and may have possessed a large number of health morbidities which would impose a further burden on a system in the midst of a significant health policy change.\par This study has a few limitations. First, the selection of input and output variables affects the results. Consequently, the research should be extended by incorporating different variables and altering these variables to examine different efficiency outcomes. Second, there are several inherent methodological difficulties in assessing the efficiency of health systems using YLL {\ref (Aragon, 2008)}. A few examples include the fact that YLL does not measure certain conditions effectively such as disabling mental conditions. YLL also does not accurately measure chronic conditions that do not result in death such as osteoporosis.\begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{1}\includegraphics[]{image-2.png} \caption{\label{fig_0}Figure 1 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{10}\includegraphics[]{image-3.png} \caption{\label{fig_1}10}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{3}\includegraphics[]{image-4.png} \caption{\label{fig_2}Figure 3}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{3}\includegraphics[]{image-5.png} \caption{\label{fig_3}Figure 3 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{4}\includegraphics[]{image-6.png} \caption{\label{fig_4}Figure 4 :}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{}\includegraphics[]{image-7.png} \caption{\label{fig_5}}\end{figure} \begin{figure}[htbp] \noindent\textbf{56}\includegraphics[]{image-8.png} \caption{\label{fig_6}Figure 5 Figure 6}\end{figure} \footnote{Year 2017} \backmatter \begin{bibitemlist}{1} \bibitem[Altarum Institute (2016)]{b1}\label{b1} \url{http://altarum.org/sites/default/files/uploaded-related-files/CSHS-Spending-Brief\textunderscore September\textunderscore 2016.pdf} \textit{Altarum Institute}, September 9. 2016. \bibitem[America's Health Ranking (2017)]{b22}\label{b22} \textit{America's Health Ranking}, \url{http://www.americashealthrankins.org/} Accessed March 10, 2017. \bibitem[Ferrier et al. ()]{b32}\label{b32} ‘Analysis of uncompensated hospital care using a DEA model of output congestion’. G Ferrier , M Rosko , V Valdmanis . \textit{Healthcare Management Science} 2006. 9 p. . \bibitem[Nedelea et al. (2010)]{b25}\label{b25} ‘Analyzing differences in rural hospital efficiency: a data envelope analysis approach’. I C Nedelea , J M Fannin , J N Barnes . \textit{annual meeting}, (Denver, Colorado) 2010. 2010. July 25-27, 2010. 61391. \bibitem[Aragon et al.]{b34}\label{b34} ‘Calculating expected years of life lost for assessing local ethnic disparities in causes of premature death’. T J Aragon , D Y Lichtensztajn , B S Katcher . \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-116.}{10.1186/1471-2458-8-116.}. \textit{BMC Public Health} 8. \bibitem[Roh et al. (2011)]{b9}\label{b9} ‘Economic performances of US non-profit hospitals using the Malmquist productivity change index’. C Y Roh , C Park , M J Moon . \textit{Journal of Management and Marketing Research} September 2011. 8 p. . \bibitem[Mecineanu and Soltan ()]{b26}\label{b26} \textit{Eficienta spitalelor publice din Republica Moldova. Monitorul Sanatatii}, A Mecineanu , V Soltan . 2012. 2012. Chisinau. \bibitem[Coppola et al. ()]{b27}\label{b27} ‘Evaluation of performance of dental providers on posterior restorations: does experience matter? A Data Envelope Analysis (DEA) Approach’. M Coppola , Y Ozcan , R Bogacki . \textit{Journal of Medical Systems} 2003. 27 (5) p. . \bibitem[Ozcan ()]{b33}\label{b33} \textit{Health care benchmarking and performance evaluation: An assessment using Data Envelope Analysis}, Y A Ozcan . 2008. Norwell, Massachusetts: Springer. \bibitem[Brown et al. ()]{b6}\label{b6} ‘Health Insurance, Alcohol and Tobacco Use among Pregnant and Non-pregnant Women of Reproductive Age’. Q L Brown , D S Hasin , K M Keyes . \textit{Drug Alcohol Dependence} 2016. 166 p. . \bibitem[Sherman ()]{b29}\label{b29} ‘Hospital efficiency measurement and evaluation: empirical test of a new technique’. H Sherman . \textit{Medical Care} 1984. 22 (10) p. . \bibitem[Collins et al. ()]{b4}\label{b4} ‘How the Affordable Care Act has improved Americans' Ability to buy Health Insurance on their own: Findings from the Commonwealth Fund Biennial Health Insurance Survey’. S R Collins , M Z Gunja , M M Doty . \textit{Issue Brief Commonwealth Fund} 2017. 2016. p. . \bibitem[Tambour and Rehnberg ()]{b23}\label{b23} ‘Internal markets and performance in Swedish Health care. Working Paper in Economics and Finance’. M Tambour , C Rehnberg . \textit{Stockholm School of Economics} 1997. 161. \bibitem[Kaiser Family Foundation (2017)]{b21}\label{b21} \textit{Kaiser Family Foundation}, \url{http://www.kff.org/} Accessed March 1, 2017. \bibitem[Rosko ()]{b30}\label{b30} ‘Measuring technical efficiency in health care organizations’. M Rosko . \textit{Journal of Medical Systems} 1990. 5 (14) p. . \bibitem[Charnes et al. ()]{b18}\label{b18} ‘Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units’. A Charnes , W W Cooper , E Rhodes . \textit{European Journal of Operational Research} 1978. 1 p. . \bibitem[Martin et al. (2016)]{b3}\label{b3} \textit{National Health Spending in 2014: Faster Growth Driven by Coverage Expansion and Prescription Drug Spending}, A B Martin , M Hartman , J Benson . January 2016. Health Affairs. 35 p. . \bibitem[D'angelo et al. ()]{b5}\label{b5} ‘Patterns of Health Insurance Coverage around the Time of Pregnancy among Women with Live-Born Infants-Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, 29 states’. D V D'angelo , B Le , O Neill , ME . \textit{MMWR Surveillance Summary} 2015. 2009. 64 (4) p. . \bibitem[Kenney ()]{b15}\label{b15} ‘Personal Decisions are the Leading Cause of Death’. R Kenney . \textit{Operations Research} 2008. 56 p. . \bibitem[Putzer and Jaramillo ()]{b16}\label{b16} ‘Premature Mortality Costs Associated with Lifestyle Factors among US Citizens’. G Putzer , J Jaramillo . \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2315-7844.1000177}{10.4172/2315-7844.1000177}. \textit{Review Pub Administration Management} 2015. 3 (1) . \bibitem[Färe et al. ()]{b20}\label{b20} \textit{Production Frontiers}, R Färe , S Grosskopf , Cak Lovell . 1994. Cambridge University Press. \bibitem[Zhu ()]{b24}\label{b24} \textit{Quantitative models of performance evaluation and benchmarking: Data Envelope Analysis with spreadsheets and DEA Excel Solver}, J Zhu . 2002. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. \bibitem[Miller and Adam ()]{b28}\label{b28} ‘Slack and performance in health care delivery’. J L Miller , E E Adam . \textit{International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management} 1996. 13 (8) p. . \bibitem[Murray et al. ()]{b13}\label{b13} ‘Summary Measures of population health’. Cjl Murray , J A Salomon , C D Mathers . \textit{World Health Organization} 2002. \bibitem[Caves et al. ()]{b17}\label{b17} ‘The Economic Theory of Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output, and Productivity’. D Caves , L Christensen , W Diewert . \textit{Econometrica} 1982. 50 (6) p. . \bibitem[Asandului et al. (2014)]{b7}\label{b7} ‘The Efficiency of Healthcare Systems in Europe: a Data Envelope Analysis Approach’. L Asandului , M Roman , P Fatulescu . \textit{Procedia Economics and Finance} September 2014. 10 p. . \bibitem[Murray and Lopez ()]{b12}\label{b12} \textit{The global burden of disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020}, C J Murray , A Lopez . 1996. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. \bibitem[Hollingsworth ()]{b31}\label{b31} ‘The measurement of efficiency and productivity of health care delivery’. B Hollingsworth . \textit{Health Economics} 2008. 17 (10) p. . \bibitem[Farrell ()]{b19}\label{b19} ‘The Measurement of Productive Efficiency’. M J Farrell . \textit{Journal of the Royal Statistical Society} 1957. 2343100. JSTOR. 120 p. . \bibitem[Rosenbaum ()]{b2}\label{b2} ‘The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Implications for Public Health Policy and Practice’. S Rosenbaum . \textit{Public Health Reports} 2011. 126 (1) p. . \bibitem[Putzer and Jaramillo ()]{b8}\label{b8} ‘Using Data Envelope Analysis to Assess the Efficiency of the US Health System’. G J Putzer , J Jaramillo . \textit{Journal of Socialomics} 2016. 5 (4) p. . \bibitem[Schanzenbach et al. (2016)]{b0}\label{b0} \textit{Where does all the Money Go: Shifts in Household Spending over the Past 30 Years. The Brookings Institution}, D W Schanzenbach , R Nunn , L Bauer . \url{https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/where\textunderscore does\textunderscore all\textunderscore the\textunderscore money\textunderscore go.pdf} January 26. August 2016. p. . US Department of Labor. Accessed \bibitem[Burnet et al. ()]{b10}\label{b10} ‘Years of Life Lost (YLL) from cancer is an important measure of population burden -and should be considered when allocating research funds’. N G Burnet , S J Jefferies , R J Benson . \textit{British Journal of Cancer} 2005. 92 p. . \bibitem[Fontaine et al. ()]{b14}\label{b14} ‘Years of life lost due to obesity’. K R Fontaine , D T Redden , C Wang . \textit{Journal of the American Medical Association} 2003. 289 (2) p. . \bibitem[Years of potential life lost before age 65-United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ()]{b11}\label{b11} ‘Years of potential life lost before age 65-United States’. \textit{Centers for Disease Control and Prevention} 1993. 1990 and 1991. MMWR. 42 (13) p. . \end{bibitemlist} \end{document}