\documentclass[11pt,twoside]{article}\makeatletter

\IfFileExists{xcolor.sty}%
  {\RequirePackage{xcolor}}%
  {\RequirePackage{color}}
\usepackage{colortbl}
\usepackage{wrapfig}
\usepackage{ifxetex}
\ifxetex
  \usepackage{fontspec}
  \usepackage{xunicode}
  \catcode`⃥=\active \def⃥{\textbackslash}
  \catcode`❴=\active \def❴{\{}
  \catcode`❵=\active \def❵{\}}
  \def\textJapanese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK JP}}
  \def\textChinese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK SC}}
  \def\textKorean{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK KR}}
  \setmonofont{DejaVu Sans Mono}
  
\else
  \IfFileExists{utf8x.def}%
   {\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc}
      \PrerenderUnicode{–}
    }%
   {\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}}
  \usepackage[english]{babel}
  \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
  \usepackage{float}
  \usepackage[]{ucs}
  \uc@dclc{8421}{default}{\textbackslash }
  \uc@dclc{10100}{default}{\{}
  \uc@dclc{10101}{default}{\}}
  \uc@dclc{8491}{default}{\AA{}}
  \uc@dclc{8239}{default}{\,}
  \uc@dclc{20154}{default}{ }
  \uc@dclc{10148}{default}{>}
  \def\textschwa{\rotatebox{-90}{e}}
  \def\textJapanese{}
  \def\textChinese{}
  \IfFileExists{tipa.sty}{\usepackage{tipa}}{}
\fi
\def\exampleFont{\ttfamily\small}
\DeclareTextSymbol{\textpi}{OML}{25}
\usepackage{relsize}
\RequirePackage{array}
\def\@testpach{\@chclass
 \ifnum \@lastchclass=6 \@ne \@chnum \@ne \else
  \ifnum \@lastchclass=7 5 \else
   \ifnum \@lastchclass=8 \tw@ \else
    \ifnum \@lastchclass=9 \thr@@
   \else \z@
   \ifnum \@lastchclass = 10 \else
   \edef\@nextchar{\expandafter\string\@nextchar}%
   \@chnum
   \if \@nextchar c\z@ \else
    \if \@nextchar l\@ne \else
     \if \@nextchar r\tw@ \else
   \z@ \@chclass
   \if\@nextchar |\@ne \else
    \if \@nextchar !6 \else
     \if \@nextchar @7 \else
      \if \@nextchar (8 \else
       \if \@nextchar )9 \else
  10
  \@chnum
  \if \@nextchar m\thr@@\else
   \if \@nextchar p4 \else
    \if \@nextchar b5 \else
   \z@ \@chclass \z@ \@preamerr \z@ \fi \fi \fi \fi
   \fi \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi}
\gdef\arraybackslash{\let\\=\@arraycr}
\def\@textsubscript#1{{\m@th\ensuremath{_{\mbox{\fontsize\sf@size\z@#1}}}}}
\def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}}
\def\abbr{}
\def\corr{}
\def\expan{}
\def\gap{}
\def\orig{}
\def\reg{}
\def\ref{}
\def\sic{}
\def\persName{}\def\name{}
\def\placeName{}
\def\orgName{}
\def\textcal#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Calligraphy}#1}}
\def\textgothic#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Blackletter}#1}}
\def\textlarge#1{{\large #1}}
\def\textoverbar#1{\ensuremath{\overline{#1}}}
\def\textquoted#1{‘#1’}
\def\textsmall#1{{\small #1}}
\def\textsubscript#1{\@textsubscript{\selectfont#1}}
\def\textxi{\ensuremath{\xi}}
\def\titlem{\itshape}
\newenvironment{biblfree}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{bibl}{}{}
\newenvironment{byline}{\vskip6pt\itshape\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont}{\par }
\newenvironment{citbibl}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docAuthor}{\ifvmode\vskip4pt\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont\fi\itshape}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docDate}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docImprint}{\vskip 6pt}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docTitle}{\vskip6pt\bfseries\fontsize{22pt}{25pt}\selectfont}{\par }
\newenvironment{msHead}{\vskip 6pt}{\par}
\newenvironment{msItem}{\vskip 6pt}{\par}
\newenvironment{rubric}{}{}
\newenvironment{titlePart}{}{\par }

\newcolumntype{L}[1]{){\raggedright\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{C}[1]{){\centering\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{R}[1]{){\raggedleft\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{P}[1]{){\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{B}[1]{){\arraybackslash}b{#1}}
\newcolumntype{M}[1]{){\arraybackslash}m{#1}}
\definecolor{label}{gray}{0.75}
\def\unusedattribute#1{\sout{\textcolor{label}{#1}}}
\DeclareRobustCommand*{\xref}{\hyper@normalise\xref@}
\def\xref@#1#2{\hyper@linkurl{#2}{#1}}
\begingroup
\catcode`\_=\active
\gdef_#1{\ensuremath{\sb{\mathrm{#1}}}}
\endgroup
\mathcode`\_=\string"8000
\catcode`\_=12\relax

\usepackage[a4paper,twoside,lmargin=1in,rmargin=1in,tmargin=1in,bmargin=1in,marginparwidth=0.75in]{geometry}
\usepackage{framed}

\definecolor{shadecolor}{gray}{0.95}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}
\usepackage{fancyvrb}
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{marginnote}

\renewcommand{\@cite}[1]{#1}


\renewcommand*{\marginfont}{\itshape\footnotesize}

\def\Gin@extensions{.pdf,.png,.jpg,.mps,.tif}

  \pagestyle{fancy}

\usepackage[pdftitle={Marital Dissatisfaction, Coping Mechanisms, and the Likelihood of Divorce among Selected Districts of Jimma Zone, South Western Ethiopia},
 pdfauthor={}]{hyperref}
\hyperbaseurl{}

	 \paperwidth210mm
	 \paperheight297mm
              
\def\@pnumwidth{1.55em}
\def\@tocrmarg {2.55em}
\def\@dotsep{4.5}
\setcounter{tocdepth}{3}
\clubpenalty=8000
\emergencystretch 3em
\hbadness=4000
\hyphenpenalty=400
\pretolerance=750
\tolerance=2000
\vbadness=4000
\widowpenalty=10000

\renewcommand\section{\@startsection {section}{1}{\z@}%
     {-1.75ex \@plus -0.5ex \@minus -.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\Large\bfseries}}
\renewcommand\subsection{\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\z@}%
     {-1.75ex\@plus -0.5ex \@minus- .2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\Large}}
\renewcommand\subsubsection{\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\z@}%
     {-1.5ex\@plus -0.35ex \@minus -.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\large}}
\renewcommand\paragraph{\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\z@}%
     {-1ex \@plus-0.35ex \@minus -0.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\normalsize}}
\renewcommand\subparagraph{\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\parindent}%
     {1.5ex \@plus1ex \@minus .2ex}%
     {-1em}%
     {\reset@font\normalsize\bfseries}}


\def\l@section#1#2{\addpenalty{\@secpenalty} \addvspace{1.0em plus 1pt}
 \@tempdima 1.5em \begingroup
 \parindent \z@ \rightskip \@pnumwidth 
 \parfillskip -\@pnumwidth 
 \bfseries \leavevmode #1\hfil \hbox to\@pnumwidth{\hss #2}\par
 \endgroup}
\def\l@subsection{\@dottedtocline{2}{1.5em}{2.3em}}
\def\l@subsubsection{\@dottedtocline{3}{3.8em}{3.2em}}
\def\l@paragraph{\@dottedtocline{4}{7.0em}{4.1em}}
\def\l@subparagraph{\@dottedtocline{5}{10em}{5em}}
\@ifundefined{c@section}{\newcounter{section}}{}
\@ifundefined{c@chapter}{\newcounter{chapter}}{}
\newif\if@mainmatter 
\@mainmattertrue
\def\chaptername{Chapter}
\def\frontmatter{%
  \pagenumbering{roman}
  \def\thechapter{\@roman\c@chapter}
  \def\theHchapter{\roman{chapter}}
  \def\thesection{\@roman\c@section}
  \def\theHsection{\roman{section}}
  \def\@chapapp{}%
}
\def\mainmatter{%
  \cleardoublepage
  \def\thechapter{\@arabic\c@chapter}
  \setcounter{chapter}{0}
  \setcounter{section}{0}
  \pagenumbering{arabic}
  \setcounter{secnumdepth}{6}
  \def\@chapapp{\chaptername}%
  \def\theHchapter{\arabic{chapter}}
  \def\thesection{\@arabic\c@section}
  \def\theHsection{\arabic{section}}
}
\def\backmatter{%
  \cleardoublepage
  \setcounter{chapter}{0}
  \setcounter{section}{0}
  \setcounter{secnumdepth}{2}
  \def\@chapapp{\appendixname}%
  \def\thechapter{\@Alph\c@chapter}
  \def\theHchapter{\Alph{chapter}}
  \appendix
}
\newenvironment{bibitemlist}[1]{%
   \list{\@biblabel{\@arabic\c@enumiv}}%
       {\settowidth\labelwidth{\@biblabel{#1}}%
        \leftmargin\labelwidth
        \advance\leftmargin\labelsep
        \@openbib@code
        \usecounter{enumiv}%
        \let\p@enumiv\@empty
        \renewcommand\theenumiv{\@arabic\c@enumiv}%
	}%
  \sloppy
  \clubpenalty4000
  \@clubpenalty \clubpenalty
  \widowpenalty4000%
  \sfcode`\.\@m}%
  {\def\@noitemerr
    {\@latex@warning{Empty `bibitemlist' environment}}%
    \endlist}

\def\tableofcontents{\section*{\contentsname}\@starttoc{toc}}
\parskip0pt
\parindent1em
\def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}}
\newenvironment{reflist}{%
  \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{}
  {%
   \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}%
   \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}%
   \def\makelabel##1{\itshape ##1}}%
  }
  {\end{list}\end{raggedright}}
\newenvironment{sansreflist}{%
  \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{}
  {%
   \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}%
   \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}%
   \def\makelabel##1{\upshape ##1}}%
  }
  {\end{list}\end{raggedright}}
\newenvironment{specHead}[2]%
 {\vspace{20pt}\hrule\vspace{10pt}%
  \phantomsection\label{#1}\markright{#2}%

  \pdfbookmark[2]{#2}{#1}%
  \hspace{-0.75in}{\bfseries\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont#2}%
  }{}
      \def\TheFullDate{2015-03-15 (revised: 15 March 2015)}
\def\TheID{\makeatother }
\def\TheDate{2015-03-15}
\title{Marital Dissatisfaction, Coping Mechanisms, and the Likelihood of Divorce among Selected Districts of Jimma Zone, South Western Ethiopia}
\author{}\makeatletter 
\makeatletter
\newcommand*{\cleartoleftpage}{%
  \clearpage
    \if@twoside
    \ifodd\c@page
      \hbox{}\newpage
      \if@twocolumn
        \hbox{}\newpage
      \fi
    \fi
  \fi
}
\makeatother
\makeatletter
\thispagestyle{empty}
\markright{\@title}\markboth{\@title}{\@author}
\renewcommand\small{\@setfontsize\small{9pt}{11pt}\abovedisplayskip 8.5\p@ plus3\p@ minus4\p@
\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip
\abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus2\p@
\belowdisplayshortskip 4\p@ plus2\p@ minus2\p@
\def\@listi{\leftmargin\leftmargini
               \topsep 2\p@ plus1\p@ minus1\p@
               \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@
               \itemsep 1pt}
}
\makeatother
\fvset{frame=single,numberblanklines=false,xleftmargin=5mm,xrightmargin=5mm}
\fancyhf{} 
\setlength{\headheight}{14pt}
\fancyhead[LE]{\bfseries\leftmark} 
\fancyhead[RO]{\bfseries\rightmark} 
\fancyfoot[RO]{}
\fancyfoot[CO]{\thepage}
\fancyfoot[LO]{\TheID}
\fancyfoot[LE]{}
\fancyfoot[CE]{\thepage}
\fancyfoot[RE]{\TheID}
\hypersetup{citebordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,linkbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,urlbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,bookmarksnumbered=true}
\fancypagestyle{plain}{\fancyhead{}\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}}

\date{}
\usepackage{authblk}

\providecommand{\keywords}[1]
{
\footnotesize
  \textbf{\textit{Index terms---}} #1
}

\usepackage{graphicx,xcolor}
\definecolor{GJBlue}{HTML}{273B81}
\definecolor{GJLightBlue}{HTML}{0A9DD9}
\definecolor{GJMediumGrey}{HTML}{6D6E70}
\definecolor{GJLightGrey}{HTML}{929497} 

\renewenvironment{abstract}{%
   \setlength{\parindent}{0pt}\raggedright
   \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}}
   \vskip16pt
   \textcolor{GJBlue}{\large\bfseries\abstractname\space}
}{%   
   \vskip8pt
   \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}}
   \vskip16pt
}

\usepackage[absolute,overlay]{textpos}

\makeatother 
      \usepackage{lineno}
      \linenumbers
      
\begin{document}

             \author[1]{Addisu  Tegegne}

             \author[2]{Asabneh  Molla}

             \author[3]{Dereje  Wonde}

             \affil[1]{  Jimma University}

\renewcommand\Authands{ and }

\date{\small \em Received: 10 February 2015 Accepted: 2 March 2015 Published: 15 March 2015}

\maketitle


\begin{abstract}
        


Marital satisfaction is a mental state that portrays the person?s perceived benefits and costs in ones marital relationship and has been an important area of inquiry and intervention for many researchers and practitioners. The primary quest of this empirical endeavor is determining the level of marital dissatisfaction, the coping mechanisms and its relationship with divorce in the study area. To address the desired objectives, 240 married couples were surveyed and the ENRICH Marital Satisfaction Scale to measure marital satisfaction was used as a major instrument. Key informant interview was used to collect qualitative data. Both descriptive and inferential statistics was used to analysis the quantitative data. Results indicated sizable numbers of couples are dissatisfied in their marital relationship in one way or another. In addition, it?s understood that marital dissatisfaction is a necessary but not sufficient condition for the occurrence of divorce. Though couples try to negotiate among themselves to settle their marital discontent, the majority preferred the advisory of elders. Diverting the adverse effects of polygamous marriage, teaching and devising various family planning programs and introducing family and marriage counsellors in the area are highly recommended.

\end{abstract}


\keywords{marital dissatisfaction, coping mechanisms, divorce, jimma zone, Ethiopia.}

\begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1cm,1cm) % {block width} (coords) 
\textcolor{GJBlue}{\LARGE Global Journals \LaTeX\ JournalKaleidoscope\texttrademark}
\end{textblock*}

\begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1.4cm,1.5cm) % {block width} (coords) 
\textcolor{GJBlue}{\footnotesize \\ Artificial Intelligence formulated this projection for compatibility purposes from the original article published at Global Journals. However, this technology is currently in beta. \emph{Therefore, kindly ignore odd layouts, missed formulae, text, tables, or figures.}}
\end{textblock*}


\let\tabcellsep& 	 	 		 
\section[{Introduction}]{Introduction}\par
arriage is a socially authorized long-standing mating arrangement that typically involves economic, social, and reproductive cooperation between the partners. Although the norms that preside over the choice of a spouse and the surrounding marriage ceremonies show discrepancy from culture to culture, the institution of marriage is found in all known human societies \hyperref[b16]{(Ponzetti 2003)}. Traditionally, choices and decisions about the sexual aspects of married life including when and how to initiate sexual activity, the amount and type of sex, the timing and number of children, and the use of contraception were considered as the exclusive province of the male partner \hyperref[b16]{(Ponzetti 2003)}.Ernest Burger, a prominent sociologist wrote, in 1953, "urbanization, greater mobilization, individualization, increased secularization, emancipation of women had transformed the family from an institution based on law and custom, to one based on companionship and love" \hyperref[b8]{(Furstenberg 1996}:35 as cited in Mathews NY). Thus, these social changes like cohabitation increased the probability of dissatisfaction over marriage and divorce \hyperref[b20]{(Ubesekera and Luo 2008)}.\par
Marital (dis)satisfaction has continued to be an extensively researched topic on various forms of investigation on family life and marriage  {\ref (Zianah et}   \hyperref[b17]{Schoen et al. (2002)}, marital satisfaction is a global evaluation of the state of one's marriage and a reflection of marital happiness and functioning. Fowers (1998) stated that marital satisfaction has for many become a yardstick to measure the success and stability of a marriage and by extension, personal fulfilment and wellbeing. The ideal of marital satisfaction is so strong that many spouses deceive themselves about the extent to which their marriage meets their particular criterion for satisfaction. Spouses engage in positive illusions about marriage by dramatically underestimating their chances of divorce and making unreasonably positive statements about their spouses. These illusions seem to help spouses to believe that their marriage approaches the ideal ones to which they aspire (Fowers 1998:521). However, this also complicates the task of researchers who are attempting to investigate marital satisfaction. The complex and diverse nature of marital satisfaction allows us to study only a fraction of the available variables related to this subject.\par
It is important to recognize that most research on marital satisfaction and other types of sexuality has been conducted with participants from industrialized western societies. Very little data are available about the marital satisfaction and sexuality of men and women in non-Western societies. There is no exception for Ethiopia and little has been done in Ethiopia and specifically in Jimma zone and one of the aim of this research is to fill the scanty of literature. Most of the time researchers give priority and attention to the issue of divorce, its cause and effect and leave untouched that of the nexus between marital dissatisfaction \& divorce and the coping mechanisms that couples employ when they get dissatisfied in their marital endeavour. Thus, ultimately, the study sought to answer questions like; what looks like the level of marital dissatisfaction in the study area? Does marital dissatisfaction ultimately brings the rampancy of divorce? What are the coping strategies couples employ to cope up with marital dissatisfaction?\par
This study will provide multifaceted advantages for different groups. It will deliver concrete information concerning level of marital (dis)satisfaction, its relationship with divorce, and the multifarious coping strategies spouses deploy to handle their marital dissatisfaction. It also helps policy makers to get insightful and phenomenal ideas concerning the issue of marital dissatisfaction for further intervention. Besides, the study will also serve as a base line for further investigation. 
\section[{II.}]{II.} 
\section[{Methods}]{Methods}\par
A cross sectional survey research design supplemented with other qualitative research methods was employed to accomplish the study. The researchers employed both qualitative and quantitative research approaches to conduct this study. The qualitative research was used to understand the meaning spouses attach to their marriage, their experiences of marital dissatisfaction and coping mechanisms that couples use. The quantitative research was employed to determine the level of marital dissatisfaction, and reaction to marital dissatisfaction and coping strategies employed by the respondents.\par
Survey questionnaire was used to collect from spouses regarding their perception and level of marital satisfaction, reaction and coping strategies of marital dissatisfaction. The researchers adapted ENRICH marital satisfaction scale to assess the level of marital satisfaction of respondents. The scale has 10 marital satisfaction items representing the diverse areas of marital relationship which includes personality issues, communication, conflict resolution, financial management, leisure activities, sexual relationship, children and parenting, family and friends, equalitarian roles and religious orientation.\par
The researchers conducted key informant interview with elders, personalities working in justice office, workers of women and children's affairs office. From these concerned bodies a more detailed data was obtained to supplement the quantitative data. The primary data necessary for the study was collected by employing data collection techniques like questionnaire and interview guide. The secondary data was gathered from documents of various sources which already exist. The study area of the research was delimited to Jimma zone of Oromiya regional state. This area is selected because of vicinity advantage for the researchers and also absence of such an adequate study on the topic in this area was the enigma behind selecting Jimma zone (Zone is the third layer in administrative structure of Ethiopia) as the study setting. The researchers employed both probability and non-probability sampling techniques to select samples. From probability sampling technique, multistage cluster sampling was used. Four Weredas (the second lowest administrative structure in Ethiopia), (Jimma town \&Agaro town as Urban district and Dedo \& Omo Nada as rural district) were randomly selected from Jimma zone and then one Kebele (the lowest administrative structure in Ethiopia) was included in each Wereda. A total of 240 married couples were surveyed from four Kebeles namely Awitu Mendera, Sito, Nada Sekota, and Agaro 03. The detail for survey participants is discussed in the subsequent table. With regard to qualitative participants, key informants were selected purposively. Accordingly, four expertise in women and children affairs, four prosecutors, and three elderly were included in the study. Descriptive and inferential statistics was used to analyse the quantitative data. To this end, frequency distribution, percentage, mean, ANOVA, T-test, chi square test were used. The qualitative data was analysed thematically and was concurrently integrated with the quantitative one. The reliability and validity of the instrument was checked appropriately. In relation to reliability, the instrument was pretested with 15 married spouses and the internal consistency was checked through Cronbach alpha. With the pre test, some items were rejected while other items were reshuffled.\par
The researchers maintained and observed all ethical aspects of doing research. In conducting this study, ethical considerations like securing informed consent, keeping the privacy and confidentiality of the participants, full right to withdraw at any time; to change ideas or to edit recorded materials, careful recruitment of enumerators; provision of training for data collectors regarding the objectives of the study, ethical procedures \& how to interview and all administrative ethical procedures were followed. 
\section[{III.}]{III.} 
\section[{Results}]{Results}\par
This part of the article presents the findings and discussion of the study. The data was collected from 240 survey participants and key informants from Wereda Justice Office, women and children affairs, and elderly people. To make clear for readers, the finding part of the paper is presented in line with the research questions posed at the very on-set of the study. Moreover, an attempt was made to relate and compare the findings with the already existing empirical endeavours. 
\section[{a) Socio-demographic characteristics of study participants}]{a) Socio-demographic characteristics of study participants}\par
Table \hyperref[tab_2]{2} below depicts the socio-demographic profiles of survey participants. About 52.1\% of the survey participants were female while 47.9\% of them were males. In relation to the age distribution of respondents, 24.2\%, 38.8\%, 22.9\%, 12.9\%, and 1.3\% of the participants were under the age range of 20-30, 31-40, 41-50, 51-60 and 61-70 respectively. In addition, the age of the participants of the study ranges from 20 to 67 with the mean of 39.49 and standard deviation 9.956. The table also indicates the religious affiliation of respondents. Accordingly, 78.2\% of the respondents were Muslims, 13.9\% were orthodox Christians, 5.8 were Protestants, and 2.5 were Catholics. From this we can witness that Islam as a religion is the most common and widely followed religion in the study area. The employment status of respondents in table 1 below portrays 31.2\%, 17.9\%, 13.2\%, 12.8\%, 11.1\%, 9.8\%, and 3.8\% were farmers, housewives, self-employed, GO/NGO/Private sector employed, daily labourer, engaged in different activities (petty trade, animal breeding, etc.), and unemployed respectively. In relation to participants' formal educational level, the majority (35\%) of them can't read and write. 22.7\%, 21.3\%, 10.8\%, and 9.2\% have primary education can read and write, tertiary school and above, and the remaining have the chance to join secondary schools. Further, table below vividly indicates 52.9\% of them are living in rural setting while 47.1\% of them are urbanite. With respect to the qualitative aspect of the study, different offices working on the issue under scrutiny and key personalities were considered in this particular study. Accordingly, four key informants from women and children affairs, four key informants injustice office, and four elderly were included in the study. 
\section[{b) Level of Marital Satisfaction}]{b) Level of Marital Satisfaction}\par
To determine/measure the level of marital satisfaction of respondents, a Likert scale was prepared; having a couple of questions (10 items with a possible minimum score of 10 and a maximum of 40) within it and to rate their own marital satisfaction and dissatisfaction. The validity and reliability of the questionnaire was duly checked. The following table is all about this issue.  Assessing marital satisfaction in research is often done through self-report surveys, in which participants respond to a variety of questions assessing their satisfaction with different facets of their marriage. The concept of marital satisfaction is not necessarily gauged by assessing a lack of dissatisfaction in the relationship; factors that lead to marital distress are not necessarily the inverse of factors that promote satisfying relationships. Factors that promote healthy relationships and are present in satisfying, long-term marriages are important to consider, as well. Thus, thorough measures of marital satisfaction assess qualities that contribute negatively, as well as uniquely positively, to the marriage (Stone and Shackelford, 2007). In this particular study, with 10 items of Likert scale, the level of marital satisfaction of respondents was evaluated. Subsequently, the mean level of marital satisfaction was 25.58 with standard deviation of 4.4 and range of 29. Respondents were also asked to rate their own marital satisfaction. The result shows that 28\% of them have high satisfaction in their marital relationship. The majority, 57.6\% of them, have moderate satisfaction in their marital engagement and the remaining 13.8\% have low satisfaction.\par
Various literature stipulate that some marital couples who faced marital dissatisfaction has a tendency to wish if they hadn't married. Subsequently, in the case of this study the majority 35.8\% and 34.2\% of married couples said that they have rarely and never wish if they hadn't married respectively. In the contrary, 12.1\% of them frequently wish if they hadn't married whereas 17.9\% of them replied they occasionally wish if they hadn't engaged in marital relationship. One way ANOVA result also depict the existence of a statistically significant difference in marital satisfaction among the respondents who occasionally, frequently, rarely and never feel if they hadn't married (F=64.941 and alpha=0.000). The post hoc test too shows the difference is significant between each group. For more information, it is better to look the subsequent table. Knowing the intention of married couples concerning their decision if their current relationship is over is one way of checking their marital dis/satisfaction. Accordingly, as clearly manifested on the table below, 40\% of the surveyed responded that they are not interested to marry at all; 35\% would marry the same person; and the remaining 24.6\% would marry a different person. This clearly stipulates the majority of the participants (about 65\%) are not pleased with their current marital relationship.  
\section[{c) Marital dissatisfaction and Divorce}]{c) Marital dissatisfaction and Divorce}\par
Some literatures support the argument that marital dissatisfaction may end up with divorce. In this regard, as shown on the upcoming table, 53.3\% of the participants replied high level of marital dissatisfaction potentially lead to divorce and the remaining 46.7\% were skeptical with the notion that marital dissatisfaction leads to divorce. Similarly, an elderly from Dedo Wereda stated that marital dissatisfaction rarely leads to divorce. In parental arranged and religious marriage, spouses are tied together till to their life span except especial cases are happened. They stay together in all ups and downs of life and during both happiness and sadness. Unlike the above contradicting evidences, qualitative evidences underscored the prevalence of probabilities in which marital dissatisfaction leads to end up ones marital relationship. In this respect, most informants indicated that marital dissatisfaction may provoke continuous spouse violence/abuse, absence of love, sexual incompatibility, physical injury, unable to fulfil basic necessities and expected roles to play, inability to resolve their disagreement through council of elders and ultimately these factors may lead the couples to fall in conflict and finally lead them to dissolution of their marriage. An informant in Agaro Justice Office detailed the way on how marital dissatisfaction leads to divorce as follows:\par
Divorce stems from marital dissatisfaction. If there is no love among couples with respect to sex interest, economy, health, and social status of husband, there is high probability of divorce. In addition, if there is always disagreement between spouses, they may go to court and end up in marital dissolution. However, all disputes doesn't necessary leads to divorce. Couples, in the study area, manage their marital dissatisfaction by deploying various mechanisms. presenting to elders (Jaarsummaa) is the major way of addressing their marital dissatisfaction in which 33.6\% of the respondents use it followed by negotiating each other (23.6\%). 15.3\%, 14.1\%, 7.1\%, and 6.2\% attempted to manage their marital unhappiness through informing to families/relatives/friends, present to court, presenting to kebele shengo/women affairs and discussing neighborhood respectively. 
\section[{Coping strategies of couples for marital dissatisfaction Common types of coping Mechanisms}]{Coping strategies of couples for marital dissatisfaction Common types of coping Mechanisms}\par
The qualitative wing of the study has also revealed the same. One of the key informant Dedo Wereda justice office stated that:\par
In most cases couples resolve their marital dissatisfaction with mutual discussion. This is because couples want to sustain their life by looking their children and they do not want to exposé their issues to other person. Hence, although disagreement is normal between couples, they compromise their disputes and lead their life in normal way. However, there are situations in which couples expose their issues (disputes) to council elders. 
\section[{d) The role of elders in managing Marital Dissatisfaction}]{d) The role of elders in managing Marital Dissatisfaction}\par
As it is understood from the qualitative data, from key informants, elders, all most anywhere, are popular and knowledgeable people in society. They give decision by looking who is most affected, who should be compensated, who should be punished, what is the cause of the problem, how couples bind together and sustain their life, providing counseling and making couples understood the adverse implication of divorce Through these, elders mostly capitalize a conducive social environment among couples. In the case of resolving marital dissatisfaction among couples elders arbitrate dissatisfied couples, strengthen the bonds of couples and reunify if couples are separated. An elder in Omo Nada clearly stipulates the role of elders in managing marital discontent as follows:\par
?besides, elder's creates positive image in the minds of both husband and wife. They influence them to forget their past grievances (disputes).\par
Elders are considered as influential mediators. Hence, disrespecting elders implies disrespecting father \& may expose one to curse as a result of disobedience. Therefore, their attitude and opinions are respected. In general, they have a power to influence and convince the disputing couples in terminating their dissatisfaction.\par
The other key informant in Jimma Zone court also reveals the same with different words. He stated that:\par
?elders have a great role in resolving disputes among couples through early intervention. That means before couple appeal their causes to the court office. Additionally, they also play a role after the couple appeals their case to the courts. For instance, after application, court gives three months for the disputing couples which are known as cooling period. In this period, elders see the grievance between couple, and then they discuss the root causes of disputes. And create mutual agreement between them (couples). This in turn provide a way for re-solving the disputes of couples. However, it has its own weakness in that elders pressurize women to accept their discussion in favor of men. In this case, there is a sort bias towards men.\par
From the data we can witness that elders are doing a pivotal role in handling marital dissatisfaction and restore it in to normal conditions. But, most of the key informants stated that elders are always in favor of the husband. Wives are expected to get silent with the decisions of elders and act accordingly though the decision is quite inconsistent to them/wives.\par
Couples also resolve their marital dissatisfaction with open discussion with their marital partner. From the key informants it was understood that couples settle their marital unhappiness by discussing to gather rather than through 3 rd parties because they do not want to expose their secret and do not want to intervention of other people. An Elder in Omo Nada Wereda stated that "couples resolve their disputes in open way without disclosing it to other entity because they do not want to apart from each other and do not expose their children as well as themselves to different problems."\par
A prosecutor in Dedo Wereda Court office also underscored the same. He stated that:\par
In most cases couples resolve their marital dissatisfaction with mutual discussion. This because, couples want to sustain their life by looking their children and they do not want to exposé their issues to other person. Hence, although disagreement is normal between couples, they compromise their disputes and lead their life in normal way. However there are a situation in which couples expose their issues (disputes) to council elders.\par
Unlike others a key informant in Agaro Justice Office underscored the absence of open discussion among couples. In his own words "?couples don't openly discuss and give solutions for their problems.\par
Had couples have open discussions, case would never come to court and divorce could reduce. But in contrary, it is increasing and implies the existence of communication gap among couples." Moreover, it was understood that minor conflict could only be resolved through discussing to gather. 
\section[{IV.}]{IV.} 
\section[{Conclusion and Implications of the Study a) Conclusion}]{Conclusion and Implications of the Study a) Conclusion}\par
Based on major findings of the study, the following concluding remarks were drawn.\par
? The study indicated that it is only 28\% of the surveyed participants who are endowed with high marital satisfaction. Form this it could be easily grasped that significant portions of couples experienced a sort of dissatisfaction and hesitation (something remains) in their marital relationship.\par
? The thesis that marital dissatisfaction will lead to divorce is still indefinite as per the evidences of this study. There are situations at which marital discontent compel couples to resort marital dissolution while not in other contexts.\par
? Couples who are discontented in their marital relationship use outlets like negotiating each other, interference of family members or beloved ones, presenting their issues e to elders, Kebele Shengo or women affairs, and finally to court.\par
? From literatures it was understood social workers, psychologists and family and marriage counsellors execute varied social services and assistance to improve the social and psychological functioning of families and marital partners. Many social workers are working in family consulting centers and social work clinics to help family members understand their relationships and roles in the family. Social workers work with the family to establish a healthy family dynamics, communication, and behavior patterns among family members \hyperref[b0]{(Rostami 2013)}. In this study, such functions and outlets for couples failed to exist. 
\section[{b) Implications of the Study and Recommended Actions}]{b) Implications of the Study and Recommended Actions}\par
? This study has proven the absence of family and marriage counselors and no one resort to get service from these professionals. The call for marriage and family therapist is a timely issue and professional in the area has to be produced to grapple the emerging challenges of the family institution.\par
? An ongoing awareness creation on the significance and pertinence of love based marriage has to be made in the area.\par
? Religious heterogamy is one of the scenario which is experienced in urban settings. A detailed qualitative inquiry need to be done concerning the patterns and marital satisfaction of such marriage typology.\par
V.\begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{}\includegraphics[]{image-2.png}
\caption{\label{fig_0}}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{} \par 
\begin{longtable}{}
\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_0}}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{1} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.1795031055900621\textwidth}P{0.24285714285714283\textwidth}P{0.16894409937888197\textwidth}P{0.1108695652173913\textwidth}P{0.14782608695652172\textwidth}}
District\tabcellsep Kebele\tabcellsep Households\tabcellsep Sample\tabcellsep percent\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep size\tabcellsep size\tabcellsep \\
Jimma\tabcellsep Awitu\tabcellsep 1300\tabcellsep 52\tabcellsep 21.7\\
\tabcellsep Mendera\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Agaro\tabcellsep Agaro 03\tabcellsep 1371\tabcellsep 61\tabcellsep 25.4\\
\tabcellsep (Tigi)\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Dedo\tabcellsep Sito\tabcellsep 731\tabcellsep 70\tabcellsep 29.2\\
Omon\tabcellsep Neda\tabcellsep 550\tabcellsep 57\tabcellsep 23.8\\
ada\tabcellsep Sekote\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Total\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 3952\tabcellsep 240\tabcellsep 100.0\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_1}Table 1 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{2} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.06658986175115207\textwidth}P{0.17430875576036867\textwidth}P{0.065610599078341\textwidth}P{0.0832373271889401\textwidth}P{0.07148617511520737\textwidth}P{0.00881336405529954\textwidth}P{0.24089861751152072\textwidth}P{0.05288018433179723\textwidth}P{0.08617511520737327\textwidth}}
\multicolumn{2}{l}{Characteristics Response}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Frequency \%}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{characteristics Response}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Frequency \%}\\
Sex\tabcellsep Male Female Total 20-30\tabcellsep 115 125 240 58\tabcellsep 47.9 52.1 100 24.2\tabcellsep Place of\tabcellsep Residence\tabcellsep Rural Urban Missing Total\tabcellsep 126 112 2 240\tabcellsep 52.5 46.7 0.8 100\\
Age\tabcellsep 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70\tabcellsep 93 55 31 3\tabcellsep 38.8 22.9 12.9 1.3\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Wereda}\tabcellsep Jimma Agaro Dedo Omonada\tabcellsep 52 61 70 57\tabcellsep 21.7 25.4 29.2 23.8\\
\tabcellsep Total\tabcellsep 240\tabcellsep 100\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Total\tabcellsep 240\tabcellsep 100.0\\
Religious Affiliation\tabcellsep Orthodox Muslim Protestant Catholic Missing\tabcellsep 33 186 13 6 2\tabcellsep 13.8 77.5 5.4 2.5 0.8\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Educational status}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{can't read and write can read and write primary school secondary school 22 85 51 54 and above tertiary school 26}\tabcellsep 35.4 22.1 22.5 9.2 10.8\\
\tabcellsep Total\tabcellsep 240\tabcellsep 100\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Total\tabcellsep 238\tabcellsep 99.2\\
\tabcellsep self-employed\tabcellsep 31\tabcellsep 12.9\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Missing\tabcellsep 2\tabcellsep 0.8\\
Employment status\tabcellsep Go/Ngo/Private sector employed Daily labourer Unemployed Housewife\tabcellsep 30 26 9 42\tabcellsep 12.5 10.8 3.8 17.5\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Employment status}\tabcellsep Farming Other trade, from others, etc.) (petty support Total Missing\tabcellsep 73 23 234 6\tabcellsep 30.4 9.6 97.5 2.5\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_2}Table 2 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{3} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.1460122699386503\textwidth}P{0.11993865030674845\textwidth}P{0.010429447852760737\textwidth}P{0.010429447852760737\textwidth}P{0.04693251533742331\textwidth}P{0.21901840490797547\textwidth}P{0.1303680981595092\textwidth}P{0.1668711656441718\textwidth}}
level of marital\tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{Range Minimum Maximum}\tabcellsep Mean\tabcellsep Self-rate\tabcellsep Frequency\tabcellsep Percent\\
satisfaction\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep high\tabcellsep 62\tabcellsep 25.8\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep moderate\tabcellsep 125\tabcellsep 52.1\\
\tabcellsep 25\tabcellsep 15\tabcellsep 40\tabcellsep 25.58\tabcellsep Low Total\tabcellsep 30 217\tabcellsep 12.5 90.4\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Missing\tabcellsep 23\tabcellsep 9.6\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Total\tabcellsep 240\tabcellsep 100.0\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_3}Table 3 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{4} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.38915662650602406\textwidth}P{0.10240963855421686\textwidth}P{0.1177710843373494\textwidth}P{0.19457831325301203\textwidth}P{0.04608433734939759\textwidth}}
Do you ever wish if\tabcellsep Frequency\tabcellsep \%\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{ANOVA (within \& Between groups)}\\
you hadn't married?\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep F\tabcellsep Sig.\\
Frequently\tabcellsep 29\tabcellsep 12.1\tabcellsep 64941\tabcellsep 0.000\\
Occasionally\tabcellsep 43\tabcellsep 17.9\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Rarely\tabcellsep 86\tabcellsep 35.8\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Never\tabcellsep 82\tabcellsep 34.2\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Total\tabcellsep 240\tabcellsep 100.0\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_4}Table 4 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{5} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.6336363636363637\textwidth}P{0.09272727272727271\textwidth}P{0.12363636363636363\textwidth}}
If you had your life to live over, do you\tabcellsep Frequency\tabcellsep Percent\\
think you would?\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
marry the same person\tabcellsep 84\tabcellsep 35.0\\
marry a different person\tabcellsep 59\tabcellsep 24.6\\
not marry at all\tabcellsep 97\tabcellsep 40.4\\
Total\tabcellsep 240\tabcellsep 100.0\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_5}Table 5 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{6} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.5436046511627907\textwidth}P{0.17790697674418604\textwidth}P{0.12848837209302325\textwidth}}
Does marital dissatisfaction leads to\tabcellsep Frequency\tabcellsep \%\\
divorce?\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Yes\tabcellsep 128\tabcellsep 53.3\\
No\tabcellsep 112\tabcellsep 46.7\\
Total\tabcellsep 240\tabcellsep 100\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_6}Table 6 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{8} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.5596418732782369\textwidth}P{0.06322314049586777\textwidth}P{0.10068870523415978\textwidth}P{0.12644628099173555\textwidth}}
Coping strategies\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Responses}\tabcellsep \% of Cases\\
\tabcellsep N\tabcellsep \%\tabcellsep \\
Negotiating each other\tabcellsep 122\tabcellsep 23.6\%\tabcellsep 50.8\%\\
Presenting our issue to elders\tabcellsep 175\tabcellsep 33.8\%\tabcellsep 72.9\%\\
Presenting our issue to kebele shengo/women affairs\tabcellsep 37\tabcellsep 7.1\%\tabcellsep 15.4\%\\
By informing to family/relatives/friends\tabcellsep 79\tabcellsep 15.3\%\tabcellsep 32.9\%\\
Present to court\tabcellsep 73\tabcellsep 14.1\%\tabcellsep 30.4\%\\
Discussing with neighbourhood\tabcellsep 32\tabcellsep 6.2\%\tabcellsep 13.3\%\\
Total\tabcellsep 518\tabcellsep 100.0\%\tabcellsep 215.8\%\\
***multiple response analysis\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_7}Table 8 :}\end{figure}
 		 		\backmatter   			 
\subsection[{Acknowledgments}]{Acknowledgments}\par
The researchers would like to thank Jimma University for its financial support to the realization of the study which this article is drawn. Special thanks to data collectors and informants. 			  			  				\begin{bibitemlist}{1}
\bibitem[Mathews]{b12}\label{b12} 	 		\textit{A Study of Factors Contributing to Marital Satisfaction},  		 			Mathews 		.  		 		 			University Of Zululand 		 	 	 (A Masters Thesis) 
\bibitem[Clements and Swensen ()]{b4}\label{b4} 	 		‘Commitment to one's spouse as a Predictor of marital quality among older couples’.  		 			R Clements 		,  		 			C H Swensen 		.  	 	 		\textit{Current Psychology}  		2000. 19  (2)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Zianah (2012)]{b23}\label{b23} 	 		\textit{Effects of Demographic Variables on Marital Satisfaction},  		 			Zianah 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/-ass.v8n9p46.accessedon}{10.5539/-ass.v8n9p46.accessedon}.  		 doi:10.- 5539/ass.v8n9p46.  		 \url{http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/-ass.v8n9p46.accessedon}  		2012. june July 16. 2012. August 20. 2013.  	 	 (University of Kebangsaan Malaysia) 
\bibitem[Fower and Olson ()]{b7}\label{b7} 	 		‘ENRICH Marital Satisfaction Scale: A brief research and clinical tool’.  		 			B J Fower 		,  		 			D H Olson 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.7.2.176}{10.1037/0893-3200.7.2.176}.  		 \url{http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.7.2.176}  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Family Psychology}  		1993. 7  (2)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Bagwell ()]{b1}\label{b1} 	 		‘Factors Influencing Marital Satisfaction with a Specific Focus on Depression’.  		 			Elizabeth K Bagwell 		.  	 	 		\textit{Senior Honors Theses},  				2006.  	 
\bibitem[Faulkner ()]{b6}\label{b6} 	 		\textit{Gender-Related Influences on Marital Satisfaction and Marital Conflict over Time for Husbands and Wives},  		 			R Faulkner 		.  		2002. Athens, Georgia. Dissertation.  		 			University of Georgia 		 	 
\bibitem[Nelson ()]{b13}\label{b13} 	 		\textit{Housing Factors Associated with Marital Satisfaction},  		 			Samantha J Nelson 		.  		 \url{http://digital-commons.usu.edu/etd/960}  		2011.  	 	 (All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. Paper 960) 
\bibitem[Ponzetti and James ()]{b16}\label{b16} 	 		\textit{International encyclopedia of marriage and family},  		 			J Ponzetti 		,  		 			James 		.  		2003. 3.  		 			University of British Columbia. Macmillan reference USA 		 	 
\bibitem[Orthner et al. ()]{b14}\label{b14} 	 		‘Leisure and family over the life cycle’.  		 			D Orthner 		,  		 			L Barnett-Morris 		,  		 			J Mancini 		.  	 	 		\textit{Handbook of Developmental Family Psychology and Psychopathology},  				 			L L'abate 		 (ed.)  		 (New York)  		1993. Wiley. p. .  	 
\bibitem[Guo and Huang ()]{b9}\label{b9} 	 		‘Marital and sexual satisfaction in Chinese families: Exploring the Moderating Effects’.  		 			B Guo 		,  		 			J Huang 		.  		 \xref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/-00926230590475224}{10.1080/-00926230590475224}.  		 \url{http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/-00926230590475224}  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy}  		2005. 31  (1)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Rostami ()]{b0}\label{b0} 	 		\textit{Marital satisfaction in relation to social support, coping, and quality of life in medical},  		 			Arian Rostami 		.  		2013. Tehran, Iran.  	 
\bibitem[Ubesekera ()]{b20}\label{b20} 	 		\textit{Marriage and Family Life Satisfaction: A Literature Review},  		 			Luo Ubesekera 		.  		2008. 8.  		 			Sabaramuwa University Journal. Sri Lanka 		 	 
\bibitem[Spanier ()]{b18}\label{b18} 	 		‘Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads’.  		 			G B Spanier 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Marriage and the Family}  		1976. 38 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Bradbury et al. ()]{b2}\label{b2} 	 		\textit{Nature and Determinants of Marital Satisfaction: A Decade in Review. Journal of family and marriage 964-980},  		 			T Bradbury 		,  		 			S Fincham 		,  		 			F Beach 		.  		2000. Los Angeles USA.  	 
\bibitem[Bradbury et al. ()]{b3}\label{b3} 	 		‘Research on the Nature and Determinants of Marital Satisfaction: A Decade in Review’.  		 			T N Bradbury 		,  		 			F D Fincham 		,  		 			S R H Beach 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Marriage \& the Family}  		2000. 62  (4)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Young et al. ()]{b21}\label{b21} 	 		‘Sexual satisfaction among married women’.  		 			M Young 		,  		 			G Denny 		,  		 			T Young 		,  		 			R Luquis 		.  	 	 		\textit{American Journal of Health Studies}  		2000. 16  (2)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Locke and Wallace ()]{b11}\label{b11} 	 		‘Short marital adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity’.  		 			H J Locke 		,  		 			K M Wallace 		.  	 	 		\textit{Marriage and Family Living}  		1959. 21 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Parson and Bales ()]{b15}\label{b15} 	 		\textit{The free press: a division of Macmillan publishing co.lnc},  		 			T Parson 		,  		 			R Bales 		.  		1955. New York.  	 	 (Family, socialization and Interaction Process) 
\bibitem[Furstenberg ()]{b8}\label{b8} 	 		‘The future of marriage’.  		 			Furstenberg 		.  	 	 		\textit{American demographics}  		1996.  		 			University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia 		 	 
\bibitem[Zabriskie and Mccormick ()]{b22}\label{b22} 	 		‘The influences of family leisure patterns on perceptions of family functioning’.  		 			R Zabriskie 		,  		 			B Mccormick 		.  	 	 		\textit{Family Relations}  		2001. 50 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Laurenceau et al. ()]{b10}\label{b10} 	 		‘The interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage: A daily-diary and multilevel modeling approach’.  		 			J P Laurenceau 		,  		 			L F Barrett 		,  		 			M J Rovine 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Family Psychology}  		2005.  	 
\bibitem[Schoen et al. ()]{b17}\label{b17} 	 		‘Women employment, marital happiness and divorce’.  		 			R Schoen 		,  		 			N M Astone 		,  		 			K Rothert 		,  		 			N J Standish 		,  		 			Y J Kim 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Social Forces}  		2002. Oxford university press. 81.  	 
\bibitem[Dempsey ()]{b5}\label{b5} 	 		‘Women's perceptions of fairness and the persistence of an unequal division of housework’.  		 			K Dempsey 		.  	 	 		\textit{Family Matters}  		1997.  (58)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Stevens et al. ()]{b19}\label{b19} 	 		‘Working Hard and Hardly Working: Domestic Labour and marital Satisfaction among Dual-Earner Couples’.  		 			D Stevens 		,  		 			G Kiger 		,  		 			P J Riley 		.  	 	 		\textit{Joumal of Marriage \& the Family}  		2001. 63  (2)  p. .  	 
\end{bibitemlist}
 			 		 	 
\end{document}
