strategy for poverty reduction is to promote the productive use of farm inputs. This can be done by creating opportunities for raising agricultural productivity among small and marginalized farmers. Microcredit is particularly relevant to increasing productivity of rural economy, especially agricultural productivity in such an environment where economic growth is occurring, microcredit also has the capacity to transmit the benefits of growth more rapidly and more equitably through the informal sector. It is well documented that for many small scale farmers, lack of access to financial services is a critical constraint for the establishment or expansion of viable agricultural enterprises. Microcredit may enable small and marginalized farmers to purchase the inputs they need to increase their productivity, as well as financing a range of activities adding value to agricultural output. However, much remains to be done, to integrate microcredit institutions fully into the mainstream of rural financial systems and for commercial banks to recognize their full potential (Nosiru et al. 2010). Rural financial market facilities the economic growth and rural poverty reduction through smooth financial intermediation. Financial intermediary's help to mobilize funds, channel them from surplus units to the deficit units create money and smoother the payment system. The efficient provision of loans, deposits, payments, and insurance service encourages rural entrepreneurship and help to rural economy to grow. Presence of financial services helps to rural economy to grow and reduce the poverty. Access to working capital can substantially accelerate the adaptation of modern agricultural technologies and production and thereby improving the ability of the rural sector to meet then subsistence need of the poor. It also helps to produce the surplus in primary and intermediary products required for urban consumption, export, and avoid environmental degradation (World Bank, 2003). Access to finance is a crucial issue in the productivity of agriculture in Bangladesh. If the farmers in Bangladesh are categorized based on land ownership, then we will find that most of the farmers are either marginal farmer or land less farmers producing crop by taking land lease from the affluent people. So, sometimes it is extremely difficult for the marginal farmers to get access to credit as the credits are not collateral free. The lack of deposit facilities force households to rely on inefficient and costly alternatives. The lack of access to medium-and long-term finance inhibits investment by a majority of small and marginal agricultural households in Bangladesh. This inadequate fund of marginal farmers has negative impact on the agricultural productivity of the whole country. In addition capitalists groups are reluctant to invest on agriculture as return from investing is double/triple in other sectors compared to agriculture. Micro credit has been successful in reaching the rural poor with credit for self-employment, supporting women's empowerment and significantly contributing to poverty alleviation. Nevertheless, micro credit has only had a marginal impact in the agriculture sector as microfinance institutions (MFIs), to a great extent, limit their lending to those possessing less than half an acre of land (the functionally landless). Poor farmers' access to agricultural credit remains very limited. They are usually missed by regular credit facilities. As a result marginal and small farmers are frequently termed as "missing middle" (Raman et al. 1995). Micro Finance Institution loans are used for agricultural production, trading, processing and transport, resulting in an increase in the use of agricultural inputs and increased output of agricultural production. This leads to enhanced employment opportunities in these sectors for the wider community and reduction in the prices of such products due to increased supply. They also state that trading activities financed by MFIs can help to establish new marketing links and increase the income of traders, and this can lead to reduced migration due to increased employment opportunities and increased income (Zohir et al. 2004). The initiative primarily aimed at developing the socioeconomic condition of poor rural areas of Balochistan. Later in 1991, it was transformed into a company limited and a non-profit organization named as "Balochistan Rural Support Programme" under the new organizational and administrative structures. Prosperous Balochistan where people especially the poor and women are provided with equal livelihood opportunities are not socially and economically excluded. To harness potential of the rural poor to help themselves, assume control of local development and improve their standard of living. consumer finance companies can offer a wide range of financial products. In between stand financial Nongovernment Organizations (NGOs), self-help groups, small cooperatives and credit unions. Formal services such as microfinance cannot replace loans from friends, relatives, friends, and moneylenders but they do complement them and enable the liquidity constrained rural population to access a wider range of financial services. Microfinance emerged as a noble substitute for informal credit and is considered to be a powerful instrument for poverty alleviation among people who are economically active but financially constrained (Murdoch et al. 2002). In order to improve farmers' conditions, there is a need to improve the agricultural production of their farms. Increase in agricultural production will enhance the demand for inputs but the majority of farmers lack financial resources for adopting agricultural innovations. Rural credit in the form of loans, cash or commodity is the only alternative left for the farmers' improvement purpose. Different institutions are providing credit for agriculture. These institutions are commercial banks, provincial co-operative banks, other provincial cooperative societies, central co-operative banks, agricultural co-operative societies, Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited (ZTBL), Khushali Bank, governmental organizations and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) like Aga Khan Rural Support Program(AKRSP), National Rural Support Program(NRSP) and Punjab Rural Support Program(PRSP) (Jaffar et al. 2006). Microfinance (MF) has become a buzzword among the development practioners. The term 'microfinance' means providing very poor families with very small loans (microcredit) to help them engage in productive activities or develops their tiny businesses (The Microfinance Gateway, 2008). According to the Consultative Group to Assist the Poor (CGAP), microfinance is the supply of loans, savings and other basic financial services to the poor, including working capital loans, consumer credit, pensions, insurance and money transfer services. Similarly, Hossain (2002) defines MF as, the practice of offering small, collateral free loans to members of cooperatives who otherwise would not have access to the capital necessary to begin small business or other income generating activities. The term 'microfinance' is often used in a much narrower sense, referring principally to microcredit delivered through NGOs for tiny informal business of micro-entrepreneurs (Christen et al. 2003). # Objectives The general objective of this study was: 1. To investigate the impact of BRSP micro credit scheme on agricultural development. 2. To study the role of micro credit in increasing agricultural production in the study area. 3. To examine the appropriate utilization of micro credit. II. # Materials and Methods This chapter includes information regarding methods and techniques used to conduct this study. The chapter discusses the details about the study design and how it was carried out. The present research study was all the agricultural credit borrowers of district Mastung who received micro-credit from BRSP for agricultural purpose only. # a) Population Balochistan Rural Support Program (BRSP) is working in the Mastung district consists of three tehsils ? Dasht ? Kardigap ? Mastung The targeted population of this study consisted of the micro-credit borrowers of tehsils Mastung, Dasht and Kardigap who borrowed loan from BRSP for agricultural purpose from January 2010 to April 2014. There were total 60 agricultural credit borrowers in the above mentioned Tehsils, who borrowed loan from BRSP for their agricultural purpose in the above said period. The population of the study was homogenous as all of them borrowed loan from BRSP only for agriculture purpose. Majority of the population were having poor economic conditions. Population of the present study had also the similar characteristics of belonging to rural background, low level of education and agricultural occupation. # b) Sample The present study aimed to be conducted in district Mustang. Therefore to get a representative sample, the researcher applied stratified simple random sampling technique to collect the data from Tehsil Mastung, Dasht and Kardigap. This technique was followed to ensure equal participation of all the strata of the population. # c) Sample Size It was a survey study and stratified simple random sampling technique was considered suitable to make the sample size representative and for the better generalization of the sample results over the population. According to Gay (2010) that the bigger is the population then smaller will be the sample. The population of the study was 60 respondents therefore the respondents were considered appropriate for representation of the sample. There were 20 microcredit borrowers in Tehsils Mustung who borrowed loan form BRSP for agricultural purpose. In Dasht from 20 respondents were selected in the sampling frame. While The researcher used survey method to carry out this research study. Keeping in mind the sample size and scope of the present study the survey method was best to be used to collect data from the large pool of cases. # e) Type of Study There are two types of studies qualitative and quantitative studies. The Present study is quantitative in nature. This study is conducted by using the quantitative methods and procedures. The study focused on investigating the core research question and verification of proposed hypothesis. As the quantitative research is based on specific to general approach, so this study also aimed to examine the specific objectives and then generalizing the results over the population through making inferences from the sample. Therefore survey was conducted to measure the impact of BRSP Microcredit scheme on the agricultural development. # f) Tool for Data Collection A close ended structured questionnaire was developed to collect data from the respondents. # g) Interview Questionnaire Close ended structured questionnaire is a quantitative tool of data collection, which was advocated by Emile Durkheim (1858 -1917). It is mostly used in survey method to collect data from large number of cases. It is a positivist research method. It includes the low level of involvement of the researcher and high level of involvement of the respondents. A close ended questionnaire is a series of questions asked to individuals to obtain statistically useful information about a given topic. With proper formulation and responsibly administered, structured questionnaires become a useful tool to collect data by which statements can be made about specific groups or people or whole population. So a close ended structured questionnaire was developed for the data collection of the present study. The researcher conducted face to face interviews with each respondent to fill up the questionnaires. It increases not only the accuracy of given information but also assures the high response rate. # h) Aspects Related to Contents ? The wording of questions was easy and to the point so that the respondent could easily understand the questions and answer them in a better way. ? Close ended questions were asked so that the respondents do not lose focus of the topic. ? Simple language was used so that respondents could understand and answer the questions to meet the objectives of the study. # i) Aspects Related to Lay out The questionnaire was divided into following parts 1. Includes the general profile of the respondents 2. Measures agricultural development 3. Measures the economic impact of micro-credit on the borrowers 4. Includes collecting information regarding impact of micro-credit on living standard of the borrowers 5. Includes information about procedures and process of BRSP micro-credit program. # j) Pre Testing and Validity of the Questionnaire Pre testing is a method to check whether the tool for data collection is reliable and validate to meet the research's objectives. It is applied on the smaller unit of the sample. Prior to conducting the actual field work and data collection the instrument of data collection was tested to check the accuracy and how well the instrument is measuring the objectives of the research. The pre-testing was done on 05 respondents of the sample. General discussion were done with the respondents in pre testing phase to make the questionnaire more reliable and valid according the objectives of the study. Further minor changes were made after consultation with the supervisor, District Manager, BRSP and with seniors in the field of research under consideration. A large number of studies regarding the subject matter have been read by the researcher to construct the validated questionnaire. Through the information collected after pre-testing the questionnaire regarding times of getting loan, utilization of amount, methods adopted for crop production and agricultural production were modified in and finalized for the actual study and data collection. The district manager BRSP also helped in the modification of questionnaire and those suggestions were incorporated in finalizing the questionnaire. # k) Data Collection and Field Experiences The data was collected in one month. The researcher first contacted the District Manager, BRSP for the field work and data collection. Before starting the data collection in field; permission was taken from the District Manager, BRSP. He was also briefed regarding the research project. The District Manager appointed social organizers of each Tehsil for the assistance of researcher in the data collection. The researcher personally went to the each respondent and filled up the questionnaire through face to face interviews with them. In the first place the informed consent was taken from the respondents. Secondly they were briefed about the purpose and objective of the research. Thirdly they were given full choice not to answer any question. The researcher faced many issues during the data collection process. Firstly the population was quite scattered and study was aimed at the district level so it was quite hectic and time taking process. Secondly at times respondents were not available on the site so the researcher had to contact them again. Thirdly it was quite difficult to get information from the female respondents. They were quite hesitant and reluctant. researcher had to explain them the questions in detail. It was also observed that they were little bit unhappy due to low amount of loan offered. The inhabitants of the study area were belonging to the rural areas with low socioeconomic conditions. The majority of the people were involved in the agricultural activities. In many villages of the area women were participating in the agricultural activities. # Global Journal of Human Social Science # l) Method of Data Analysis Data was analyzed by using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 17.0. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were used to examine the relationship between the dependent and independent variables. In the first place the impact of micro-credit on agricultural production, economic status and living standard of the borrowers was described by using graphs and frequency tables with their interpretation. Secondly Chi square test was applied to test the association among the variables and to make inferences form the sample. The first section of the analysis includes interpretation of the frequency tables and graphs. The second section includes the results and interpretation of the chi square test. # III. # Results Analysis and interpretation of data are the most important step in scientific research. Without these steps generalization and prediction cannot be achieved which is the target of scientific research. Generalization and conclusion are drawn on the basis of characteristics and attitudes of the respondents. Table-4 it is clear that majority of the respondents 70.00 percent were married, 22 percent were single and 8 percent were widow/widower in district Mastung Balochistan . Table-6 shows that majority of the respondents 68.33 percent had agriculture as source of their family income followed by labour 15.00 percent, business 8.33 percent, private job 5.00 percent and government job 3.33 percent. Table-11 it is clear that majority of the respondents 40.00% were 25000, 16.66% were 40000.00, 20.00% were 50000.00, 13.33% were 60000.00 and 10.00% were above 80000.00 rupees amount loans. shows that respondents were inquired about the procedure of getting loan in which majority of the respondents i.e. 56.66% responded that it was easy to great extent. 36.66% responded that it was easy to some extent and 6.66% responded that it was say not at all. # a) Sex of respondents # e) Housing conditions of respondents # g) Source of information BRSP # l) Purpose of Loan by the respondents # t) Behaviors of BRSP Staff with the Respondents Table 20 : Percentage distribution of respondent's satisfaction regarding behavior of BRSP staff during getting microcredit facility Table-20 shows that 66.66% respondents responded that the behavior of the BRSP staff was satisfactory to great extents. 26.66% respondents said that the BRSP staff behavior was satisfactory to some extent and 6.66% say not at all. Due to polite behavior of the staff it was easy for the respondents to negotiate and discuss with them regarding loan procedures. # u) Mode of Receiving the Loan Amount If respondents receive loan amount in lump sum mode it becomes more helpful for them rather than receiving the amount in installments. # Table 21 : Percentage distribution regarding respondents' mode of receiving the amount Table-21 shows that all the respondents i.e. 100% received lump sum amount for agricultural purpose, which shows that the BRSP gives the agricultural loan in lump sum form to make the procedure easy, flexible and more convenient for the borrowers. # v) Procedure of Repayment by the Respondents Respondents were repaying the loan amount by two methods to the BRSP which were biannually and monthly. Table 22 : Percentage distribution of respondents regarding procedure of repayment Table-22 indicates the procedure of returning credit amount to the BRSP, which shows that 70.00% respondents were returning the credit amount biannually and 30.00% respondents were returning the credit amount monthly. It shows that the trend of returning amount was seasonally. # w) Mode of Micro-credit Repayment There are lots of micro-credit schemes running for improving the economic status of borrowers. Microcredit repayment is a good indicator to measure the economic condition of borrowers. Inferential analysis allows making broader statements about the relationships between data. # a) Hypothesis No. 1 Ho: There is no association between Micro Credit and Agricultural development H1: There is association between Micro Credit and Agricultural development Level of Significance Alpha: (?) = .05 b) Chi-Square Test Chi square test was used to confirm the association between micro credit and agricultural development in which micro credit was used as an independent variable and the increased agricultural production, purpose fulfillment & perception about role of micro credit in agricultural development as dependent variables. # Null hypothesis was assumed as Ho: There is no association between Micro Credit and Agricultural development. While alternative hypothesis was assumed as H1: There is association between Micro Credit and Agricultural development. Chi square test was applied to test the above stated hypothesis and for checking the association between the variables. The level of significance for the calculated was (?) = .05. Table-25 shows that there was a significant relationship between the two variables (Chi square value = 15.07, df =4, p=.001which is < .05). As the level of significance for the calculated value is less than .05, so the alternative hypothesis H1 i.e. there is association between micro credit and agricultural development is accepted. Hence the null Hypothesis Ho i.e. there is no association between micro Credit and Agricultural Development is rejected. # c) Hypothesis No. 2 Ho: There is no association between Micro Credit and improvement in the economic status of the borrowers H1: There is association between Micro Credit and improvement in the economic status of the borrowers Level of Significance Alpha: (?) = .05 # d) Chi-Square Test Chi square test was carried out to determine the association between micro credits as an independent variable on the seasonal income as a response variable. Null hypothesis was assumed as Ho: There is no association between Micro Credit and improvement in the economic status of the borrowers. While alternative hypothesis was assumed as, H1: There is association between Micro Credit and improvement in the economic status of the borrowers. Table-26 shows that there was a significant relationship between the two variables (Chi square value =32.22, df =4, p=.000 which is < .05). As the level of significance for the calculated value is less than .05, so the alternative hypothesis H1 i.e. there is association between micro credit and economic status of the borrowers is accepted. Hence the null Hypothesis Ho i.e. there is no association between micro Credit and Improvement in the economic status of the borrowers is rejected. Chi square test was carried out to verify the relationship between micro credit and living standard of the respondents in which micro credit was used as an independent variable and household living standard, food quality, health practices, and education expenditure as dependent variables. The third Null hypothesis for the present study was assumed as Ho: There is no association between Micro Credit and improvement in the living standard of the borrowers. While alternative hypothesis was assumed as, H1: There is association between MC and improvement in the living standard of the borrowers. Chi square test was applied to test the above stated hypothesis and for checking the association between the two variables. The level of significance for the calculated was (?) = .05. Table-27 shows that there was a significant relationship between the two variables (Chi square value =28.96, df =4, p=000 which is < .05). As the level of significance for the calculated value is less than .05, so the alternative hypothesis H1 i.e. there is association between micro credit and living standard of the borrowers is accepted. Hence the null Hypothesis Ho i.e. there is no association between micro Credit and improvement in the living standard of the borrowers is rejected. The above results show that the BRSP micro credit scheme had positive impact on agricultural development. It is clear from the results that the micro credit scheme significantly increased the agricultural production of the respondents and which substantively increased their seasonal income. Improvement in the economic status of the borrowers made substantial improvement in the living standard of the micro-credit borrowers. V. # Discussion The main objective of the present study was to see the impact of micro-credit on agricultural development. It was assumed that micro-credit has positive impact on the agricultural development in district Mastung Balochistan. In Bangladesh, formal financial institutions like government and private commercial banks, Stateowned agricultural or rural development bank ( for example, BRDP in Bangladesh), savings and loan cooperatives, microfinance banks, leasing, housing and consumer finance companies can offer a wide range of financial products. In between stand financial Nongovernment Organizations (NGOs), self-help groups, small cooperatives and credit unions. Formal services such as microfinance cannot replace loans from friends, relatives, friends, and moneylenders but they do complement them and enable the liquidity constrained rural population to access a wider range of financial services. Microfinance emerged as a noble substitute for informal credit and is considered to be a powerful instrument for poverty alleviation among people who are economically active but financially constrained (Murdoch et al. 2002). The general objective of the present study was the role of micro-credit on agricultural development in district Mastung Balochistan. The targeted population of the current study consisted of Tehsil Dasht, Kardigap and Mastung. There were total 60 agricultural credit borrowers in the above mentioned Thesils who borrowed loan from BRSP. A close ended structured questionnaire was formulated to collect data from the respondents. Data was collected through face to face interviews with the respondents. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyse the data. Chi Square test was used to measure association of the variables in SPSS. The results of the present study can be summarized as: It is clear that majority of the respondents 90 percent of the sample were male and 10 percent were females in district Mastung Balochistan. The respondents 63.33 percent belonged to the age group of 25 -50 years and 20.00 percent to more than 50 years where as 16.66 percent respondents were less than 25 years of age .The respondents 43.33% farmers were illiterate, while about 17.00% farmers were Primary level of education, 23.00% were middle, 15.66% matriculation and 1.66% bachelor/master education . 70.00 percent were married, 22 percent were single and 8 percent were widow/widower .58 percent of the sample respondents had Pacca houses as against 17 percent who had mixed devilling. About 25 percent of the respondent had Kacha houses. 68.33 percent had agriculture as source of their family income followed by labour 15.00 percent, business 8.33 percent, private job 5.00 percent and government job 3.33 percent. 66.66 percent respondents received information about BRSP credit programme from the Friends / Relatives, 16.66 received information from Newspapers/ Media and16.66 BRSP staffs .46.66 percent 46.66% were owner ship, 30.00% were tenant farmers and 23.33% were owner cum tenant respondents. 36.66% were less 5 acres, 30.00% were 5-8 acres, 16.66% were 8-10 acres and 16.66% were above 10 acres farm size respondents. 86.66 percent had availed the loan facility only for once and that too for the first time. 11.66 percent had availed this facility twice and only 11.66 percent of them took loan three times. The respondents 40.00% were 25000, 16.66% were 40000.00, 20.00% were 50000.00, 13.33% were 60000.00 and 10.00% were above 80000.00 rupees amount loans. 30.00% were get for seed, 23.33% were Pesticide, 26.66% were Fertilizer and 16.66% were Others purposes. 93.33% respondents believe that micro-credit is the reason for increased agriculture production. 6.66% respondents think that micro-credit has no effect on the agricultural production. 76.66% said that micro-credit plays a positive role in agricultural development to great extent , while 13.33% respondents described that it play role to some extent, only 10.00% respondents said that micro-credit has no role in agricultural development. 81.66% respondents have improvement in their household living standards due to the microcredit facility and 18.33% respondents said that micro-credit has no improvement in HH living standard.81.66% of the respondents and 18.33% respondents said that micro-credit has no improvement in food/diet standard.83.33 % of the respondents and 16.66% respondents said that micro-credit has no change health status.75.00% respondents improved the educational status of their children due to increase in the income, while 25.00% respondents have no improvement in their children's education. 56.66% responded that it was easy to great extent. 36.66% responded that it was easy to some extent and 6.66% responded that it was say not at all.66.66% respondents responded that the behavior of the BRSP staff was satisfactory to great extents. 26.66% respondents said that the BRSP staff behavior was satisfactory to some extent and 6.66% say not at all.100% received lump sum amount for agricultural purpose.70.00% respondents were returning the credit amount biannually and 30.00% respondents were returning the credit amount monthly .61.66% of the respondents repaying of microcredit was easy and they were repaying the microcredit easily. For 38.33% respondents the repayment of microcredit was not easy.100.00% respondent's perception regarding loan amount was that it should be increased for the betterment of farmers and for more productive results in agricultural development. # VI. # Conclusion and Suggestions The core objective of the present research was to examine and assess the role of micro-credit on agricultural development. The study concluded that micro-credit play vital role in the development of agricultural sector. From the study it was concluded that microcredit have positive impact in the agriculture field, economic status, household living standards of the farmers. Microcredit for agricultural purpose provides financial support to the farmers for enhancement of agricultural production which led them towards the increase in seasonal income also. The study concluded that agricultural loan has positive impact on the agriculture production therefore the respondents were tending towards getting the loan facility. Credit investments in the agriculture sector enhance the crop production and seasonal income. Majority of the respondents were belonging to low socio-economic status therefore greater part of the respondents got loan amount many times for agriculture purpose. The study concluded that micro-credit has positive impact on the agricultural development but there is always need for improvement in any program. With reference to the results of the study and keeping in mind the field observations following recommendations have been made to make the micro-credit program more productive for the agricultural micro-credit borrowers. ? Amount of loan for agriculture purpose may be increased for making the agricultural field more productive for the credit borrowers. ? Modern facilities for agriculture processes ought to be given in the form of machinery at reasonable prices to make more production at economic rates. ? Common understanding about the BRSP'S objectives remains poor programme objectives should be discussed in community organization meetings frequently. ? Community organization leaders should be more active in solving the common community problems. ? Community organization leaders should be given more monetary incentives for managing community organizations. ? It was seen during the survey that loaness were not properly trained in the business against which the loan was sanctioned. ? It should be made compulsory for the MCOs to provide them guidance at their doorstep. ? BRSP should arrange a benevolent fund so that in case of any natural cal mill, if a person is unable to repay some of his instalments, his remaining instalments may be repaid from that fund. ? If a person is unable to repay his instalments because of sudden house hold needs, he should be given some relaxation period so that his feelings about BRSP. ? Agricultural loan facility may be expanded to the rural areas where credit facility is not available. ? Interest rate must be at the lowest level for making the scheme more productive and beneficial for the credit borrowers. ? There should be proper monitoring and evaluation of the respondents after getting loan. # Global Journal of Human Social Science ![e) Hypothesis No. 3Ho: There is no association between Micro Credit and improvement in the living standard of the borrowers H1: There is association between Micro Credit and improvement in the living standard of the borrowers Level of Significance Alpha: (?) = .05Volume XV Issue V Version I Global Journal of Human Social Science © 2015 Global Journals Inc. (US)](image-2.png "") 1SexFrequencyPercentageMale5490.00Female0610.00Total60100.00Table-1 it is clear that majority of therespondents 90 percent of the sample were male and10 percent were females in district Mastung Balochistan.b) Age of respondents 2AgeFrequencyPercentage< 25 years1016.6625-50 years3863.33>50 years1220.00Total60100.00 -c) Education level of respondents 3Education levelFrequencyPercentageIlliterate2643.00Primary1517.00Middle8223.33Matriculation1015.00Collage/University011.66Total60100.00Table-3 it is clear that majority of therespondents 43.33% farmers were illiterate, while about17.00% farmers were Primary level of education, 23.00%were middle, 15.66% matriculation and 1.66%bachelor/master education .d) Marital status of respondents 4Marital statusFrequencyPercentageSingle1321.67Married4270.00Widow /widower0508.33Total60100.00 5HousingFrequencyPercentageconditionsPacca3558.33Kacha1525.00Mixed1016.66Total60100.00Table-5 it is clear that majority of therespondents 58 percent of the sample respondents hadPacca houses as against 17 percent who had mixeddevilling. About 25 percent of the respondent had Kachahouses.f) Occupation of the Respondents 6OccupationFrequencyPercentageAgriculture4168.33 7Source of Information FrequencyPercentageNewspapers/Media1016.66Friends / Relatives4066.66BRSP staffsl016.66Total60100.00 -h) Agriculture Land Tenure Status of the Respondents 8Agriculture LandFrequencyPercentageTenureOwner2846.66Tenant1830.00Owner cum Tenant1423.33Total60100.00Table-8 it is clears that majority of therespondents 46.66 percent 46.66% were owner ship,30.00% were tenant farmers and 23.33% were ownercum tenant respondents.i) Farm Size of the Respondents 9Agricultural FarmFrequencyPercentageSizeLess 5 acres2236.665-8 acres1830.008-10 acres1016.66Above 10 acres1016.66Total60100.00 -j) Times of Received the Amount 10Times of ReceivedFrequencyPercentageAmountOnce5286.66Twice0711.66Thrice0111.66Total60100.00 11Received LoanFrequencyPercentageAmount Rs.Rs.25000.002440.00Rs.40000.001016.66Rs. 50000.001220.00Rs.60000.00813.33Rs.80000.000610.00Total60100.00 12Purpose ofFrequencyPercentageGetting LoanFor Seed2230.00For Pesticide1223.33For Fertilizer1626.66Others1016.66Total60100.00Table-12 it is clear that majority of therespondents 30.00% were get for seed, 23.33% werePesticide, 26.66% were Fertilizer and 16.66% wereOthers purposes. 13Table -13 shows the perception of respondentswith regard to micro-credit as a source of increasedagricultural production. It describes those 93.33%respondents believe that micro-credit is the reason forincreased agriculture production. 6.66% respondentsthink that micro-credit has no effect on the agriculturalproduction.n) Positive Role of Micro-credit in AgriculturalDevelopment 14Table-14 shows that majority of the respondentsi.e. 76.66% said that micro-credit plays a positive rolein agricultural development to great extent , while13.33% respondents described that it play role to someextent, only 10.00% respondents said that micro-credithas no role in agricultural development.o) Improvement in House Hold Living Standard of theRespondents 15distribution regardingchange/improvement in HH living standard ofthe respondents due to micro creditTable-15 shows that majority 81.66%respondents have improvement in their household livingstandards due to the microcredit facility and 18.33%respondents said that micro-credit has no improvementin HH living standard. 16Table-16showsthattherewaschange/improvement in food/diet patterns of aconsiderable majority 81.66% of the respondents and18.33% respondents said that micro-credit has noimprovement in food/diet standard. Better financialposition made them able to have better diet forthemselves and for their family members.q) Change/improvement in Health Status of theRespondent 17Table-17showsthattherewaschange/improvement in health status of a considerablemajority 83.33 % of the respondents and 16.66%respondents said that micro-credit has no changehealth status. Therefore they became able to spendmore money to maintain their health and get access tothe health facilities.r) Change/improvement in Children Education of theRespondents 18Table-18 shows that 75.00% respondentsimproved the educational status of their children due toincrease in the income, while 25.00% respondents haveno improvement in their children's education.© 2015 Global Journals Inc. (US) - 19 - 23Table-23 indicates that for majority 61.66% ofthe respondents repaying of microcredit was easy andthey were repaying the microcredit easily. For 38.33%respondents the repayment of microcredit was not easy.x) Respondents opinion regarding increasing the Loanfor Agriculture Purpose 24Table-24 indicates that for majority 100.00%respondent's perception regarding loan amount wasthat it should be increased for the betterment of farmersand for more productive results in agriculturaldevelopment.IV.Inferential AnalysisInferentialanalysisdealwithdrawingconclusions, causes and effects and in some cases,making predictions about the properties of a populationbased on information obtained from a sample.© 2015 Global Journals Inc. (US) 25ValueDfAsymp. Sig. (2-sided)Pearson Chi-Square15.069a4.005Likelihood Ratio13.0534.011Linear-by-Linear Association10.6371.001No. of Valid Cases60 26ValueDfAsymp. Sig. (2-sided)Pearson Chi-Square15.069a4.005Likelihood Ratio13.0534.011Linear-by-Linear Association10.6371.001No. of Valid Cases60 27ValueDfAsymp. Sig. (2-sided)Pearson Chi-Square15.069a4.005Likelihood Ratio13.0534.011Linear-by-Linear Association10.6371.001No. of Valid Cases60 Global Journal of Human Social Science© 2015 Global Journals Inc. (US) © 2015 Global Journals Inc. (US) - * Microfinance Route to Income Generation and Poverty Reduction: Evidence from District Faisalabad, Pakistan FAbbas MNaeem Sarwar SajidHussain 2005. 1813 2235/2005/01-2-144-147 Journal of agriculture & social sciences * Impact of micro-credit on poverty alleviation and agricultural production -A case study of NRSP, D.G. Khan region [Pakistan]) SAAdil HBadar Journal of Agricultural Research . v 41 3-4 2003 * Utilizing micro-credit for sustainable agricultural rural development MuradAli TabindaQaiser 2011. 1st February 2012 * The Impact of Microfinance on Poor Women: A case study of Dedebit Credit and Saving Institution (DECSI) in the Eastern Zone of Tigray AregawiDesta Tesfay 2003 Addis Ababa University: School of Graduate Studies, Regional and Local Development Studies Unpublished Thesis * Role of micro finance in alleviating rural poverty: A Case Study of Khushhali Bank Programin Rahim Yar Khan-Pakistan SAhmad MSNaveed AGhafoor Int. J. Agric. Biol 6 2004. 2001 * The role of agricultural credit in the growth of livestock sector: A case study of Faisalabad NAbedullah MKhalid SKouser Pakistan Veterinary Journal 29 2 2009 * Socioeconomic determinants of cocoyam production among small holder farmers in Ekiti state TAAmusa AAEnete UEOkon Nigeria. International Journal of Agricultural Economics & Rural Development 4 2 2011 * Fighting poverty with microcredit: experience in Bangladesh Alam 1988 Oxford University Press UK * Balochistan Board of Investment, Government of the Balochistan BBI 2013 * Balochistan Rural Support Programme BRSP.org.pk. Retrieved 2013. 9 August 2013 BRSP * A study in agricultural backwardness under semi-feudalism ABhaduri The Economic Journal 83 1 1973 * A cooperative credit society's impact on credit demand in agricultural production ABhulmall Economic Affairs (Calcutta) 45 2000. 2005 Micro Credit and Women's Empowerment. World Pr out Assembly * Performance of Micro-Finance Providers in Karnataka IBBhuvan 2007 Dharwad University of Agricultural Sciences Unpublished Thesis * Microfinance: A Comprehensive Review of the Existing Literature JamesCBrau GaryMWoller Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance and Business Ventures 9 1 2004. 2004 * Group Lending: Learning from The International Experience. Urban and Regional Planning Economic Development Handbook Christen EDelgado 2005 University of Michigan. Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning * Effects of short term credit advanced by ZTBL for enhancement of crop productivity and income of growers MFayaz DJan AUJan BHussain Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science 1 4 2000 * Impact of microfinance on smallholder farm productivity in Tanzania: The case of Iramba district FGirabi AE GMwakaje Asian Economic and Financial Review 3 2 2013 * Initiated with the support of GTZ BrspGtz PPinewsagency.com. Retrieved 9 August 2013 * Agriculture: Economic Survey of Pakistan Ministry of Food and Agriculture Government of Pakistan, Islamabad 2013. 2013 * Balochistan Development Statistics, Government of the Balochistan Government Of Balochistan 2013 Quetta * Economic Survey of Pakistan 2002-03, Finance Division, Islamabad. 23. Government of Punjab Government Of Pakistan 2003. 2002 Lahore Punjab Development Statistics, Bureau of Statistics, Government of the Punjab * Accrss to microcredit and its impact on farm profit among rural farmers in dryland of Sudan Gay Global Advanced Research Journal 2 3 2010 * Bangladesh Economic Review, Economic Adviser's Wing, Finance Division, Ministry of Finance Gob 2010 Government of Peoples Republic of Bangladesh * GrameenBank Website 11th February 2012 * Grameen Bank Wikipedia Article. Retrieved Ageba 11th February 2012. 1989 * Does Micro credit Programs in Bangladesh Increase Household ability to Deal with Economic Hardships Hossain SeerajulHoque 2002 * The Impact of Microfinance on Decision-Making Agency: Evidence from South India NathalieHolvoet Development and Change 36 1 2005 * Microfinance, efficiency and agricultural production in Bangladesh. (Unpublished master's thesis) KM ZIslam Agricultural Economics Unit 2011 Department of Economics and Management, University of Helsinki * Technical, economic and allocative efficiency of microfinance borrowers and non-borrowers: evidence from peasant farming in Bangladesh ZIslam SBäckman JSumelius European Journal of Social Sciences 18 3 36 2011 * The Impact of New Credit and Savings Opportunities for Women Ifad Pakistan Rome, Italy * Impact assessment of microcredit programme of PRSP on crop productivity MSJaved SHassan SAAdil ASAhmad MW AChattah ZNawaz Pakistan Journat of Agrcultural. Science 43 2006 * An Evaluation of Micro Credit Schemes of Small and Medium Enterprise Development Authority (SMEDA) SSJaffar KJaved TELodhi J. Anim. Pl. Sci 16 3-4 2006. 2006 * Raising farm productivity through agricultural credit (A Case Study of Zarai Tarraqiati Bank of Pakistan Limited) NJehanzeb Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 24 4 2008. 2008 * KoomsaKebede Agricultural Credit Analysis. National Agricultural Policy Workshop 1995 * The Impact of Micro Credit on Livestock Enterprise Development in District Abbottabad (A Case of SRSP Micro Credit Programme) NaushadKhan Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 23 4 2007. 2007 * Review of past literature on agriculture credit in rural area of Pakistan NKhan MMShafi MShah ZIslam MArif RJaved NShah Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 27 1 2011 * Fighting poverty with microcredit: experience in Bangladesh SRKhandker 1998 Oxford University Press UK * Review of Past Literature on Agriculture Credit in Rural Area of Pakistan NaushadKhan Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 27 1 2011. 2011 * The Impact of Microfinance. Retrieved on ShahidKhandker HassanZaman 2011. 12th February 2012 * The Impact of Microfinance on Rural Poor Households' Income And Vulnerability To Poverty: Case Study Of Makueni District JoyMKiiru 2007 Kenya University of Bonn Unpublished PhD thesis * Impact of UNDP microfinance programme on poverty Alleviation among farmers in selected local government areas of Kaduna State TMKudi Nigeria. International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology 1 6 2009 * Utilization of Micro-credit by the Female Community : A case study of Azad Jammu and Kashmir (Pakistan) ETLodhi ALuqman AJaved MAsif International Journal of Agriculture 2006. 2006/08 * Microcredits and Agricultural Productivity in Ogun State MarcusOmobolanle Nosiru Nigeria. WJAS World J. Agric. Sci 6 3 2010. 2010 * Tackling the Down Side: Social Capital, Women"s Empowerment and Micro-Finance in Cameroon LMayoux Development and Change 32 3 2001 * Simulating the impact of Policy upon Chronic and Transitory Poverty in Rural Pakistan NeilMcculloch BBaulch Journal of Development Studies 36 6 2009 * Does Microfinance Really Help the Poor? NewEvidence from Flagships Programmes in Bangladesh JMorduch Dept. Of Economics and HIID 2002 Harvard University and Hoover Institution, Stanford University * Role of Punjab Rural Support Programme in increasing economic status and poverty alleviation efforts in rural Faisalabad ZManzoor SAkhtar Journal of Agriculture & Social Sciences 2006. 1813-2235/2006/02-2-110-111 * Economic Impact of Micro Finance on Borrowers: Evidence from Punjab RizwanMushtaq 10.2139/ssrn.1898376 Pakistan. Available at 2011 * Differential access and the rural credit market in pakistan: Some recent evidence SJMalik MMushtaq MGill The Pakistan Development Review 28 4 1989 * Microcredit and crop agriculture: New approachs, technologies and other innovation to address food insecurity among the poor CMiller 2011. 2011 * Global Microcredit Summit Valladolid, Spain * Poverty and Rural Credit: The Case of Pakistan SJMalik HinaNazli 1999 PIDE Publication * Challenge to the orthodoxy concerning micro finance and poverty reduction Miah AnnaMarr Micro Finance Journal 5 2 2006 * JonathanMorduch Does Microfinance really help the poor? New Evidence from Flagship Programs in Bangladesh 1998. August 2005 20 * Micro enterprise finance: Is there a conflict between growth and poverty alleviation? World Development PaulMosely HulmeDavid 1998 26 * Analysis of the effects of microfinance on poverty reduction JMorduch BHaley 2002 New York NYU Wagner Working Paper * An investigation into effectiveness of micro-credit programme of AKRSP: A case study of three villages of sub-division Hunza of district Gilgit WMuhammad 2003 Bangladesh Agriculture University Unpublished master's thesis * Microcredits and agricultural productivity in Ogun State MONosiru Nigeria. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 6 3 2010 * Impact assessment of microcredit programme of PRSP on crop productivity Nazli MKShah Pakistan Journat of Agrcultural. Science 43 2006 * Econometric analysis of credit and farm resource technical efficiences' determinants in Cassava farms in Kogi State AOOnoja MIbrahim AAchike A diagnostic and stochastic frontier approach Nigeria 2009 * The effect of rural non-farm sector: A case study of Suma Rural Bank in the Jaman District AOsei-Mensah SAdams Journal of Business and Enterprise Development 2009 * Household and Intra-household Impact of the Grameen Bank and Similar Targeted Credit Programs in Bangladesh MarkPitt ShahidurRKhandker 1996 Washington, D.C * Role of Micro-credit in Economic Revival and Poverty Alleviation May 21, 2001 Business and Finance Review. The Daily "The News * What can Microfinance contribute to Agriculture in Developing Countries? MRoux Proceedings from the International conference from the International conferenceParis 2008 * Microfinance and Poverty Alleviation: Case studies from Asia and the Pacific JoeRemenyi BenjaminQuinones 2000 79 New York * The Microfinance Revolution: Sustainable Finance for the Poor SRobinsons 2001 Washington D.C * Micro-credit initiatives for equitable and sustainable development: Who pays? World development ARahman 1999 27 * Rethinking rural poverty: Bangladesh as a case study HZRahman MHossain 1995 Sage Publications India Pvt Ltd * The Impact of agricultural credit on agricultural productivity in Dera Ismail Khan (District) Khyber Pakhtonkhawa Pakistan MASaleem FAli-Jan European Journal of Business and Management 3 2011 * Impact of agricultural credit on farm productivity and income of farmers in mountainous agriculture in northern Pakistan: A case study of selected villages in district Chitral MKShah HKhan Jehanzeb ZKhan Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 24 4 2008 * Dynamics of institutional agricultural credit and growth in Punjab: contribution and demand-supply gap RSidhu KVatta AKaur Agricultural Economics Research Review 21 2008 * Access to microfinance: Does it matter for profit efficiency among small scale rice farmers in Bangladesh? JSumelius KIslam TSipilainen European Association of Agricultural Economists 2008 * Microfinance in Rural Argentina MarkSchreiner 2011 Center for Social Development Washington University of St. Louis * Impact of Micro Finance on Empowerment of Rural Women -A Case Study of Dairy Enterprise in the Tank Management Project Area of North Karnataka KSuresh The University of Agricultural Sciences Dharwad 2008 Unpublished Thesis * Impact of Agricultural Credit on Farm Productivity and Income of Farmers in mountainous agriculture in northern Pakistan MKShah 2008 * Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 24 4 * Legal and Regulatory Framework for Microfinance Institutions Prepared for International Microfinance conference: I\Microfinance in Pakistan: Innovating and Mainstreaming Islamabad 2004 State Bank of Pakistan * Serving the needs of the poor: The private education sector in developing countries. Can the Market Save Our Schools? JTooley 2000 * Women and Labour Market Changes in the Global Economy ZTzannatos 1998 World Bank Washington * Rural financial services and effects of microfinance on agricultural productivity and on poverty STenaw KM ZIslam 2009 28 University of Helsinki Department of Economics and Management Discussion Papers series * Agriculture for Development. (United Nations Organization) United Nations World Development Report 2008 * The Performance of Self-Help Groups in Punjab: A Study of Hoshiarpur District KVatta PSingh Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics 56 3 452 2001 * Expanding impact: innovations in cost-effectively integrating microfinance with education in health CVelasco SChiba 2004 Pro Mujer Bolivia * Impact of microcredit on agricultural farm performance and food security in Bangladesh MAWadud 2013 Dhaka, Bangladesh Working paper, paper no. 14, Institute of Microfinance (InM * Pakistan Rural Finance for Growth and Poverty Alleviation 2003 61 Washington D.C. USA World Bank * Analysis of issue on micro credit: The case of two villages in Punjab. The Pakistan development Review, Part II SWaheed 2001. winter 2001 * Who Needs Credit? Poverty and Finance in Bangladesh GWood ISharif 1997 Zed Books. London * Examining the impact of micro insurance services increasing income or reducing poverty? GWright Small Enterprise Development 10 1 1999 * Unpublished thesis) Faculty of the Agriculture, Department of Rural Development and Agricultural Extension, School of Graduate Studies SisayYehuala HARAMAYA UNIVERSITY 2008 Determinants of Smallholder Farmers Access to Formal Credit: The Case of Metema Woreda * KebedeYaron Koomsa Agricultural Credit Analysis. National Agricultural Policy Workshop 1997 * Assessing the Impact of Micro-credit on Poverty and Vulnerability in Bangladesh HassanZaman Policy Research Working Paper 1999 The World Bank Development Economics * The Triangle of Microfinance -Financial Sustainability, Outreach, and Impact MZeller RichardLMeyer 2002 Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore and London Published for the International Food Policy Research Institute, the * Microfinance Services for rural agriculture in Pakistan and Bangladesh MalikZia Uddin Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences 2011 Unpublished Master Thesis * Wider impacts of microfinance institutions: issues and concepts SZohir IMatin Journal of international development 16 2004