\documentclass[11pt,twoside]{article}\makeatletter

\IfFileExists{xcolor.sty}%
  {\RequirePackage{xcolor}}%
  {\RequirePackage{color}}
\usepackage{colortbl}
\usepackage{wrapfig}
\usepackage{ifxetex}
\ifxetex
  \usepackage{fontspec}
  \usepackage{xunicode}
  \catcode`⃥=\active \def⃥{\textbackslash}
  \catcode`❴=\active \def❴{\{}
  \catcode`❵=\active \def❵{\}}
  \def\textJapanese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK JP}}
  \def\textChinese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK SC}}
  \def\textKorean{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK KR}}
  \setmonofont{DejaVu Sans Mono}
  
\else
  \IfFileExists{utf8x.def}%
   {\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc}
      \PrerenderUnicode{–}
    }%
   {\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}}
  \usepackage[english]{babel}
  \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
  \usepackage{float}
  \usepackage[]{ucs}
  \uc@dclc{8421}{default}{\textbackslash }
  \uc@dclc{10100}{default}{\{}
  \uc@dclc{10101}{default}{\}}
  \uc@dclc{8491}{default}{\AA{}}
  \uc@dclc{8239}{default}{\,}
  \uc@dclc{20154}{default}{ }
  \uc@dclc{10148}{default}{>}
  \def\textschwa{\rotatebox{-90}{e}}
  \def\textJapanese{}
  \def\textChinese{}
  \IfFileExists{tipa.sty}{\usepackage{tipa}}{}
\fi
\def\exampleFont{\ttfamily\small}
\DeclareTextSymbol{\textpi}{OML}{25}
\usepackage{relsize}
\RequirePackage{array}
\def\@testpach{\@chclass
 \ifnum \@lastchclass=6 \@ne \@chnum \@ne \else
  \ifnum \@lastchclass=7 5 \else
   \ifnum \@lastchclass=8 \tw@ \else
    \ifnum \@lastchclass=9 \thr@@
   \else \z@
   \ifnum \@lastchclass = 10 \else
   \edef\@nextchar{\expandafter\string\@nextchar}%
   \@chnum
   \if \@nextchar c\z@ \else
    \if \@nextchar l\@ne \else
     \if \@nextchar r\tw@ \else
   \z@ \@chclass
   \if\@nextchar |\@ne \else
    \if \@nextchar !6 \else
     \if \@nextchar @7 \else
      \if \@nextchar (8 \else
       \if \@nextchar )9 \else
  10
  \@chnum
  \if \@nextchar m\thr@@\else
   \if \@nextchar p4 \else
    \if \@nextchar b5 \else
   \z@ \@chclass \z@ \@preamerr \z@ \fi \fi \fi \fi
   \fi \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi}
\gdef\arraybackslash{\let\\=\@arraycr}
\def\@textsubscript#1{{\m@th\ensuremath{_{\mbox{\fontsize\sf@size\z@#1}}}}}
\def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}}
\def\abbr{}
\def\corr{}
\def\expan{}
\def\gap{}
\def\orig{}
\def\reg{}
\def\ref{}
\def\sic{}
\def\persName{}\def\name{}
\def\placeName{}
\def\orgName{}
\def\textcal#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Calligraphy}#1}}
\def\textgothic#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Blackletter}#1}}
\def\textlarge#1{{\large #1}}
\def\textoverbar#1{\ensuremath{\overline{#1}}}
\def\textquoted#1{‘#1’}
\def\textsmall#1{{\small #1}}
\def\textsubscript#1{\@textsubscript{\selectfont#1}}
\def\textxi{\ensuremath{\xi}}
\def\titlem{\itshape}
\newenvironment{biblfree}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{bibl}{}{}
\newenvironment{byline}{\vskip6pt\itshape\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont}{\par }
\newenvironment{citbibl}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docAuthor}{\ifvmode\vskip4pt\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont\fi\itshape}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docDate}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docImprint}{\vskip 6pt}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docTitle}{\vskip6pt\bfseries\fontsize{22pt}{25pt}\selectfont}{\par }
\newenvironment{msHead}{\vskip 6pt}{\par}
\newenvironment{msItem}{\vskip 6pt}{\par}
\newenvironment{rubric}{}{}
\newenvironment{titlePart}{}{\par }

\newcolumntype{L}[1]{){\raggedright\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{C}[1]{){\centering\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{R}[1]{){\raggedleft\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{P}[1]{){\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{B}[1]{){\arraybackslash}b{#1}}
\newcolumntype{M}[1]{){\arraybackslash}m{#1}}
\definecolor{label}{gray}{0.75}
\def\unusedattribute#1{\sout{\textcolor{label}{#1}}}
\DeclareRobustCommand*{\xref}{\hyper@normalise\xref@}
\def\xref@#1#2{\hyper@linkurl{#2}{#1}}
\begingroup
\catcode`\_=\active
\gdef_#1{\ensuremath{\sb{\mathrm{#1}}}}
\endgroup
\mathcode`\_=\string"8000
\catcode`\_=12\relax

\usepackage[a4paper,twoside,lmargin=1in,rmargin=1in,tmargin=1in,bmargin=1in,marginparwidth=0.75in]{geometry}
\usepackage{framed}

\definecolor{shadecolor}{gray}{0.95}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}
\usepackage{fancyvrb}
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{marginnote}

\renewcommand{\@cite}[1]{#1}


\renewcommand*{\marginfont}{\itshape\footnotesize}

\def\Gin@extensions{.pdf,.png,.jpg,.mps,.tif}

  \pagestyle{fancy}

\usepackage[pdftitle={A Model for Upgrading Teachers' Competenceon Operating Computer as Assistant of Instruction},
 pdfauthor={}]{hyperref}
\hyperbaseurl{}

	 \paperwidth210mm
	 \paperheight297mm
              
\def\@pnumwidth{1.55em}
\def\@tocrmarg {2.55em}
\def\@dotsep{4.5}
\setcounter{tocdepth}{3}
\clubpenalty=8000
\emergencystretch 3em
\hbadness=4000
\hyphenpenalty=400
\pretolerance=750
\tolerance=2000
\vbadness=4000
\widowpenalty=10000

\renewcommand\section{\@startsection {section}{1}{\z@}%
     {-1.75ex \@plus -0.5ex \@minus -.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\Large\bfseries}}
\renewcommand\subsection{\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\z@}%
     {-1.75ex\@plus -0.5ex \@minus- .2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\Large}}
\renewcommand\subsubsection{\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\z@}%
     {-1.5ex\@plus -0.35ex \@minus -.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\large}}
\renewcommand\paragraph{\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\z@}%
     {-1ex \@plus-0.35ex \@minus -0.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\normalsize}}
\renewcommand\subparagraph{\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\parindent}%
     {1.5ex \@plus1ex \@minus .2ex}%
     {-1em}%
     {\reset@font\normalsize\bfseries}}


\def\l@section#1#2{\addpenalty{\@secpenalty} \addvspace{1.0em plus 1pt}
 \@tempdima 1.5em \begingroup
 \parindent \z@ \rightskip \@pnumwidth 
 \parfillskip -\@pnumwidth 
 \bfseries \leavevmode #1\hfil \hbox to\@pnumwidth{\hss #2}\par
 \endgroup}
\def\l@subsection{\@dottedtocline{2}{1.5em}{2.3em}}
\def\l@subsubsection{\@dottedtocline{3}{3.8em}{3.2em}}
\def\l@paragraph{\@dottedtocline{4}{7.0em}{4.1em}}
\def\l@subparagraph{\@dottedtocline{5}{10em}{5em}}
\@ifundefined{c@section}{\newcounter{section}}{}
\@ifundefined{c@chapter}{\newcounter{chapter}}{}
\newif\if@mainmatter 
\@mainmattertrue
\def\chaptername{Chapter}
\def\frontmatter{%
  \pagenumbering{roman}
  \def\thechapter{\@roman\c@chapter}
  \def\theHchapter{\roman{chapter}}
  \def\thesection{\@roman\c@section}
  \def\theHsection{\roman{section}}
  \def\@chapapp{}%
}
\def\mainmatter{%
  \cleardoublepage
  \def\thechapter{\@arabic\c@chapter}
  \setcounter{chapter}{0}
  \setcounter{section}{0}
  \pagenumbering{arabic}
  \setcounter{secnumdepth}{6}
  \def\@chapapp{\chaptername}%
  \def\theHchapter{\arabic{chapter}}
  \def\thesection{\@arabic\c@section}
  \def\theHsection{\arabic{section}}
}
\def\backmatter{%
  \cleardoublepage
  \setcounter{chapter}{0}
  \setcounter{section}{0}
  \setcounter{secnumdepth}{2}
  \def\@chapapp{\appendixname}%
  \def\thechapter{\@Alph\c@chapter}
  \def\theHchapter{\Alph{chapter}}
  \appendix
}
\newenvironment{bibitemlist}[1]{%
   \list{\@biblabel{\@arabic\c@enumiv}}%
       {\settowidth\labelwidth{\@biblabel{#1}}%
        \leftmargin\labelwidth
        \advance\leftmargin\labelsep
        \@openbib@code
        \usecounter{enumiv}%
        \let\p@enumiv\@empty
        \renewcommand\theenumiv{\@arabic\c@enumiv}%
	}%
  \sloppy
  \clubpenalty4000
  \@clubpenalty \clubpenalty
  \widowpenalty4000%
  \sfcode`\.\@m}%
  {\def\@noitemerr
    {\@latex@warning{Empty `bibitemlist' environment}}%
    \endlist}

\def\tableofcontents{\section*{\contentsname}\@starttoc{toc}}
\parskip0pt
\parindent1em
\def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}}
\newenvironment{reflist}{%
  \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{}
  {%
   \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}%
   \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}%
   \def\makelabel##1{\itshape ##1}}%
  }
  {\end{list}\end{raggedright}}
\newenvironment{sansreflist}{%
  \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{}
  {%
   \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}%
   \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}%
   \def\makelabel##1{\upshape ##1}}%
  }
  {\end{list}\end{raggedright}}
\newenvironment{specHead}[2]%
 {\vspace{20pt}\hrule\vspace{10pt}%
  \phantomsection\label{#1}\markright{#2}%

  \pdfbookmark[2]{#2}{#1}%
  \hspace{-0.75in}{\bfseries\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont#2}%
  }{}
      \def\TheFullDate{2014-01-15 (revised: 15 January 2014)}
\def\TheID{\makeatother }
\def\TheDate{2014-01-15}
\title{A Model for Upgrading Teachers' Competenceon Operating Computer as Assistant of Instruction}
\author{}\makeatletter 
\makeatletter
\newcommand*{\cleartoleftpage}{%
  \clearpage
    \if@twoside
    \ifodd\c@page
      \hbox{}\newpage
      \if@twocolumn
        \hbox{}\newpage
      \fi
    \fi
  \fi
}
\makeatother
\makeatletter
\thispagestyle{empty}
\markright{\@title}\markboth{\@title}{\@author}
\renewcommand\small{\@setfontsize\small{9pt}{11pt}\abovedisplayskip 8.5\p@ plus3\p@ minus4\p@
\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip
\abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus2\p@
\belowdisplayshortskip 4\p@ plus2\p@ minus2\p@
\def\@listi{\leftmargin\leftmargini
               \topsep 2\p@ plus1\p@ minus1\p@
               \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@
               \itemsep 1pt}
}
\makeatother
\fvset{frame=single,numberblanklines=false,xleftmargin=5mm,xrightmargin=5mm}
\fancyhf{} 
\setlength{\headheight}{14pt}
\fancyhead[LE]{\bfseries\leftmark} 
\fancyhead[RO]{\bfseries\rightmark} 
\fancyfoot[RO]{}
\fancyfoot[CO]{\thepage}
\fancyfoot[LO]{\TheID}
\fancyfoot[LE]{}
\fancyfoot[CE]{\thepage}
\fancyfoot[RE]{\TheID}
\hypersetup{citebordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,linkbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,urlbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,bookmarksnumbered=true}
\fancypagestyle{plain}{\fancyhead{}\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}}

\date{}
\usepackage{authblk}

\providecommand{\keywords}[1]
{
\footnotesize
  \textbf{\textit{Index terms---}} #1
}

\usepackage{graphicx,xcolor}
\definecolor{GJBlue}{HTML}{273B81}
\definecolor{GJLightBlue}{HTML}{0A9DD9}
\definecolor{GJMediumGrey}{HTML}{6D6E70}
\definecolor{GJLightGrey}{HTML}{929497} 

\renewenvironment{abstract}{%
   \setlength{\parindent}{0pt}\raggedright
   \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}}
   \vskip16pt
   \textcolor{GJBlue}{\large\bfseries\abstractname\space}
}{%   
   \vskip8pt
   \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}}
   \vskip16pt
}

\usepackage[absolute,overlay]{textpos}

\makeatother 
      \usepackage{lineno}
      \linenumbers
      
\begin{document}

             \author[1]{Muhammad  Kristiawan}

             \affil[1]{  State University of Padang}

\renewcommand\Authands{ and }

\date{\small \em Received: 10 December 2013 Accepted: 4 January 2014 Published: 15 January 2014}

\maketitle


\begin{abstract}
        


This research based on a preliminary study that the quality of teachers in Indonesia nowadays not much different from 2007. The teachers did not apply ideal teaching strategy, they did not realize the change of school based curriculum into curriculum 2013. The result of preliminary observation revealed that the teachers could not operate computer as well, the national result of teachers' competency test on August and October in 2012 was lowand also UNESCO (2011)  stated that ICT in education policies have to tackle teacher competencies, learning materials, ICT equipment, student and teacher's motivation.This study was aimed at implementing A Model for Upgrading Teacher's Competence on Operating Computer as Assistant of Instruction. This study related to recent research at Saudi Arabia, Turkey, India, United State of America, Iran, Kenya and Tanzania that the computer assisted instruction as a supplementary instructional strategy in effective teaching, it includes providing teachers with professional development, and in order to successfully implement ICT in educational practice.A Research and Development (R&D) approach was conducted in this study. Ninety four (94) secondary school teachers were selected as sample by using purposive technique from five hundred fifty (550) populations that were used as pilot test to determine the effect of this model toward the teachers' competence on operating computer.

\end{abstract}


\keywords{model, teacher's competence, operating  computer, instruction.}

\begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1cm,1cm) % {block width} (coords) 
\textcolor{GJBlue}{\LARGE Global Journals \LaTeX\ JournalKaleidoscope\texttrademark}
\end{textblock*}

\begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1.4cm,1.5cm) % {block width} (coords) 
\textcolor{GJBlue}{\footnotesize \\ Artificial Intelligence formulated this projection for compatibility purposes from the original article published at Global Journals. However, this technology is currently in beta. \emph{Therefore, kindly ignore odd layouts, missed formulae, text, tables, or figures.}}
\end{textblock*}


\let\tabcellsep& 	 	 		 
\section[{Introduction}]{Introduction}\par
his research started from a preliminary study that the quality of teachers in Indonesia nowadays not much different from 2007 before there was a teachers' certification (Media Indonesia, November17 th , 2012). According to World Bank (2013: 73) teacher's certification"?shows no significant impact on learning outcomes". While the budgetary costs for this program was not less (Media Indonesia, November21 st , 2012). The World Bank's conclusion was obtained after researching since 2009 in 240 public primary schools and120 secondary school in Indonesia, involving 39.531 students. Test resulted between students were taught teachers certified and not certified for Mathematics, Indonesian, English, and Natural Science were compared. As a result, there is no influence of the teachers' certification program toward students' learning outcomes, both in primary and secondary schools (World Bank, 2013: 71-72). Jalal (2012) at the World Innovation Summit for Education (WISE) in Doha, Qatar, on November 15 th , 2012 also described "the certification did not change the quality of learning in the classroom. Teachers' mastery of subject and the pedagogy was weak".\par
Professor of Education of New Zealand, John Hattie did a meta-analysis of more than 800 factors that affect the quality of education, the results were related to the teacher. "The quality of teachers had value doubled impact than the curriculum" (Media Indonesia, April 8th, 2013).There had been many studies which stated that the quality of teachers is low and needs to be improved, but the classical learning approach his still well-liked by teachers as efficient in the use of time, in addition, it is also economical and practical in delivering learning content. Teachers argued that the classical learning approach will easily control the speed of teaching so it is easy to determine when the completion of the delivery of the entire contents of the lesson. However, admittedly not always learning with classical learning approach can take place properly. According to  {\ref Wena, (2009: 202)} negative symptoms often complained by the teacher that"?the students became quickly bored and dis not pay attention to the material".\par
Istiqomah \& Sulton (2013: 2) stated that "?the low quality of teachers was seen from the results of the implementation of the Teachers' Competency Test (UKG) obtained results were quite alarming. Average grades UKG nationally was 44". 
\section[{Table 1: Budget for Teachers' Certification}]{Table 1: Budget for Teachers' Certification}\par
The findings revealed that a model was considered valid, practical and effective. This conclusion is relevance to both teachers and the educational policy in Indonesia. This research implies needs to be consideration not just of how to bolt and weld computer science into the curriculum, but also how to ensure that teachers remain equipped to teach pupils fundamental ICT skills. According to Istiqomah \& Sulton (2013:2) "the low grade UKG teachers was influenced by many factors. Among these factors was the lack of teachers in pedagogy and less familiar for teachers to operate a computer". It was also indicated that "the training of teachers that had been done showed some weaknesses still occurred" as expressed by Kompas, December 29 th , 2012. 
\section[{Score of Teachers}]{Score of Teachers}\par
Based on several empirical studies, the drawbacks of computer use as assistant of instruction is considered one for the appropriate solution. Utilization of computers in instruction brings change tradition. Utilization of computers in the instructional system can be self-regulated learning (instructor independent) or also combined with the directly instructional process (face-to-face in the classroom) that rely on the presence of the teacher.\par
According to  {\ref Wena (2009: 202}) "instructional model/instructional resources related to ICT and now becomes the attention of the world is a computer assisted instructional model and learning through electronic media (e-learning) based web-based learning (WBL)". This is in line with the changes in the School Based Curriculum (KTSP) to Curriculum 2013. Where elements of the curriculum changes for secondary school is directed to "ICT becomes a learning tool (integrated) in all subjects, or do not stand alone" (Public Test Materials Curriculum 2013 Kemendikbud, November29 th , 2012).\par
From the preliminary observations made by researcher at the Secondary School teachers which consisted of \hyperref[b23]{24}     This research is also related to the late finding in Iran which was written by Karami, Karami \& Attaran (2013) concluded that"?trainee teachers who integrate problem based learning with ICT in solving a problem may develop more professional content knowledge and teaching skill". This research is related to the finding in Tanzania which was released by \hyperref[b41]{Ndibalema (2014)} concluded that "?low familiarity with ICT use as a pedagogical tool among teachers was found to be a problem. The use of ICT as a pedagogical tool in Tanzania seems to be a critical situation among teachers". Next, this research is also related to the research in Kenya which was produced by \hyperref[b43]{Nyambane \& Nzuki (2014)} that"?integrating technology into classroom practices is one of the challenges the 21 st century teachers face. Professional development, accessibility of ICT resources influence teachers' adoption and integration of technologies into their classrooms".\par
This research is presented because the computer will give new power in improving teachers' competence and students' motivation. This reason asks the education to utilize computer as assistant of instruction. Today's development issue about computer was written by \hyperref[b10]{Bennet (2012)} that computer assisted instruction "?includes providing teachers with professional development, encouraging interaction, providing students with suitable technology, and selecting students with skills to work indepently". Next, Voogt, Knezek, Cox, Knezek \& Brummelhuis (2013) also stated on their finding that seventy international policy makers, reseachers and practitioners of education "?developed a Call to Action, where policy, research, and leadership need to join forces in order to successfully implement ICT in educational practice".\par
Beechler \& Williams (2012) supports this research where he found computer in United State of America"?assist ESL students learn basic sight words is effective and enhances motivation". \hyperref[b54]{Siddiqui \& Khatoon (2013)} also supports this research where he found computer assisted instruction India "?was more effective in enhancing the students' achievement in Physical Science than traditional instruction". Next, Premalatha (2012) stated on his finding that computer assisted instruction "?providing learners with conducive environment at school and home by motivating them to involve in studies and making learning interesting". Then, this research is related to the recent ICT policy on education based on UNESCO (2011: 1) ICT on education is to upgrade"?teacher competencies, learning materials, ICT equipment, student and teacher motivation". UNESCO (2011: 3) concluded that the framework of continuing teachers development in using ICT for"1) enabling students to use ICT; 2) enabling students to apply their knowledge to real-world problems; and 3) enabling students create the new knowledge required for more harmonious".\par
The exploring; assosiating; and communicating". Each phases which is related to ICT, the teacher should show the video or picture where is obtained through You tube; Adobe Photoshop and Macromedia Flash. Then, the teacher should ask the students to submit an assignment through Email and they calculate the scores by using Microsoft Excel. The model on this research is related to the finding in Ghana which was written by Amenyedzi, Lartey \& Dzomeku (2012), he found that internet and computer "?helped students to achieve new things such as finishing assignments, solving problems, learning history of other countries, improving typing skills, and chatting with friends". According to Amenyedzi, Lartey \& Dzomeku (2012) "teachers used the internet as an innovative way of improving teaching and learning, used the Internet for e-mail and browsing and computer and Internet usage as supplementary educational material to enhance quality education". This research is supported by the research of Microsoft Word in Iran which was released by Kazem, Bafghi \& Allami (2011) that Computer Assisted Instruction based Microsoft Word "?caused a statistically significant scores of the experimental and improved their language proficiency, this new method is much more effective compared to the traditional lecturing method". Then, this research is related to the finding of Microsoft Word in United State of America which was released by Stock meyer (2009) that the programs of Microsoft Word"?have made it almost as easy to assess the readability of a document as it is to check its spelling". Next, this research is related to the finding of Microsoft Word in Irak which was produced by Sarsoh, Hashem \& Hendi (2012) concluded that"?to hide the secret message in original text, and retrieve the original text after the determination of hidden data obtained results between the original text and the text contains the hidden data shows that the two texts are virtually identical".\par
The next finding related to this research was Microsoft Excel in Dallas which was written by Elliot, Hynan, Reisch \& Smith (2006) stated that Microsoft Excel "?will save researchers' time and money and result in a data set better suited to answer research questions". The next relevant research was Microsoft Power Point in United State of America which was released by \hyperref[b5]{Bartsch \& Cobern (2003)} stated that slide Power point "?can be beneficial, but material that is not pertinent to the presentation can be harmful to students' learning". The next research related to this research is Adobe Photo shop which was produced by Wexler (2012) that Adobe Photoshop "?extended adds the highest quality imaging toolset and broadest range of digital imaging cap abilities". Next, this research is related to the finding of Macromedia Flash which was produced by \hyperref[b60]{Sutopo (2011)} that Macromedia Flash "?with Action Script, which classify into design factor, multimedia factor, and programming factor, succeeds in generating algorithm visualization".\par
The next finding related to this study was Quiz Creator released by Rochmah (2013)"there is a system of evaluation of the effectiveness ratio test electronic form using Wonder share quiz creator and paper test in terms of student achievement test on the material word processing application". Then, this research is related to the finding of Email in United State of America which was written by \hyperref[b37]{Meho (2006)} stated that email"?can be in many cases a viable alternative to face-to-face and telephone interviewing". The next relevant finding was email in India which was produced by Ban day (2011) there needs"?a major educational campaign to aware e-mail users about e-mail security issues and train them in use of security protocols and procedures".\par
The next relevant study is Blogin Germany which was produced by Schmidt, Wilbers \& Paetzolt (2006) a software Blog is "?would not only reach a refined understanding of this relatively new phenomenon, but also contribute to a better understanding of computer-mediated communication and interaction in general". Then, this study is related to the finding Blogin Australia which was written by Hook way (2008) that Blog since 1999 "?have become a significant feature of online culture and a new addition to the qualitative researcher's toolkit and some of the practical, theoretical and methodological". The next relevant study was You tube in Florida which was released by \hyperref[b35]{Chenail (2008)} that You tube offers"?video clips introducing basic qualitative research concepts, sharing qualitative data from interviews and field observations, and presenting completed research studies". The next relevant finding was Face book in Malaysia which was written by Esteves (2012) stated that Face book"?proved to be an effective tool in enhancing the delivery of a distance education course. It was effective for teaching and enriching practical skills courses delivered online".\par
The use of computers in education and learning can be used to help learning more effective. Computer plays a major role in learning, because the Computer enable to assist educators in facilitating learning, even to motivate and accelerate students' learning. However there was a research related to computer assisted instruction in Nigeria produced by \hyperref[b26]{Imhanlahimi \& Imhanlahimi (2008)}   From all the data either observation and interview can be concluded that Secondary School Teachers of Padang did not utilize the computer as assistant of instruction. The score from observation was 40. 53, it indicated that the competence of teachers to utilize the computer as assistant of instruction was poor. It showed that a product was needed to be presented to overcome the weaknesses of teachers in the use of Furthermore, the schools already had a Computer Laboratory; and teachers also had a laptop. This was consistent when applying a model in the form of webbased learning.\par
The last, researcher conducted Theory Analysis associated with CAI (Computer Assisted Instruction). CAI is the use of a computer directly to the students about the content of the lesson, provides training and testing the students' progress. CAI is the use of computer as a tool in education and teaching. CAI helps students understand the material and can repeat the material over and over until the students master the materials. According to  {\ref Bright (1983: 144-152)}, when compared to traditional teaching approaches, CAI is very effective and efficient. The students will learn faster, master the subject matter more and remember more of what they have learned.\par
In a meta an alysisKulik and Kulik (1991: 75-94) the results of research on the effectiveness of CAI for 25 years, concluded that: 1) students learn more materials from the computer; 2) students remember what they have learned through CAI longer; 3) students need a little time; 4) students feel more comfortable in the classroom; and 5) students have a positive attitude toward computer. \hyperref[b16]{Criswell (1989)} defines CAI (Computer Assisted Instruction) means deliver instructional materials to actively engage learners and to allow feedback.\par
In the design phase, the researcher made a frame building concept a model in the form of webbased learning. The design was made in accordance with the results of the need analysis conducted on the sample. The design here described an overview of the work flow system. The picture was stratified, the upper level was log in and the lowest level there was the level of achievement of the respondents.\par
This model is also called the layered models. In  {\ref this}  Then the application will read the database to determine if the username and password that is entered is valid or not. If invalid, then the member will be asked again to enter the username and password correctly; 3. If valid, then the member will go to the member page which displays a list of video tutorials that can be done; 4. Then the member chooses to carry out the first video tutorials, and filling pretest questions are provided; 5. If the level of achievement of the respondent in accordance with the standards set value, then the passed member can continue to work on the next video;\par
6. If it does not pass, then the member will be required to watch the video tutorials to further advance work on the posttest; 7. If the results of posttest achievement level does not meet the standards set value, then the member is asked to watch back the video tutorial; and 8. If the level of achievement of the respondents are in accordance with the standards set value, means the member is passed and can work on the next tutorial.\par
In the development phase, researcher developed a model based design had been prepared and the focus was on the presentation of the materials. Then the model was given to the validator to be validated and tested in a focus group discussion The final conclusion of the validation revealed that model can be used with the revision, it got 83.20 (very good). Validation results were then tested and refined on focus group discussions which were held on 29 November 2013. Results of the focus group discussion stated that a model was very good.\par
In the implementation phase, researcher with schools prepared teachers in the study sample, computer experts, instructional media (computer / laptop and LCD) and set up a study room. Furthermore, researcher tested the effectiveness and practicalities of the model.\par
The results of t-test analysis from per secondary school and per subject teachers explained that tcoun t on a model was greater than ttable  {\ref (39,310> 2,000}) and the value of the P value was very small with acquisition values Sig. (,000) <? (0,05). It was concluded that the model was effective for Secondary Schools of Padang. Furthermore, in the implementation phase, the researcher also distributed questionnaires about the practicality of a model and the result revealed that the model was practical. It was seen from 80,9\% respondents stated that the model ease them and motivate the to operate computer as assistant of instruction.\par
In the evaluation phase, researcher conducted an evaluation of the learning process, which was carried out to look at the harmony of the implementation of the model with the design created. Then the results of the evaluation conducted by the posttest to see the level of achievement of the respondents from the pretest and after the training by using model was given.\par
The results of the evaluation process of the entire secondary schools concluded that the model was implemented in accordance with the design. The results of the evaluation on the overall results indicated that a model influential and meaningful, because there was an increase in the value of the respondents before and after the training was done both persecondary schools and per subjects. The interesting thing was it turned out the teachers' evaluation of BAM better results compared with the Mathematics. This happened because the level of willingness BAM to learn more than in the Mathematics teacher.\par
The evaluation answered the research which were done by Sujianto, Mukhadis \& Isnandar (2012). The finding concluded that continuing professional development on teacher's certified of vocational school Malang Raya "?still poor because the score was 61,Volume XIV Issue V Version I 50 ( G )\par
99\% (the teachers could not operate computer as assistant of instruction)".\par
IV. 
\section[{Discussion}]{Discussion}\par
The findings revealed that a model was valid, practical and effective. The findings of the research related to the continuing professional development. The findings were supported by the research in United State of America which was written by \hyperref[b71]{Wallace (2004)}, he developed a frame work for teachers on teaching by using internet, He stated that "teachers are not well prepared to teach with the Internet, and its use is limited in scope and substance, the result of framework was effective". However the research in Greece which was produced by Vernadakis, Zetou, Antoniou \& Kioumourtzoglou (2002) concluded that "there were no significant difference between Traditional Instruction and Computer Assisted Instruction, using Multimedia Technology as a teaching aid is as effective at teaching skills as the traditional method".\par
The findings of this research were supported by the research in Texas which was written by Galvis, Ishee \& Schultz (2011), they concluded that "there were significant difference between instruction by using Computer Assisted Instruction and Traditional Classroom Lecture. CAI spent time 46\% faster than TCL". The findings were also supported by the research which was done by \hyperref[b67]{Tsai (2001)}, he concluded" both constructivist-oriented learning theory and Internetbased instruction are relatively new approaches in teaching science. The integration of these two approaches is expected to produce better learning outcomes for students". The findings on this research were related to the finding in Tennessee which was released by \hyperref[b64]{Thompson \& McNutt (2009)} that Microsoft PowerPoint "?showed effective presentation and make effective use of visuals". The next relevant study related to this research was the finding in Canada which was produced by Schein, Wilson \& Keelan (2010), they found"?an abundance of both informal health conversations related to public health issues and organized health-related activities on leading social media platforms such as YouTube, Twitter, and Face book".\par
The next relevant study related to this research was the finding in Indonesia which was done by Surjono (1999) that "there were researches showed the use of computer on instruction did not maximum". The next relevant study related to this research was written by \hyperref[b17]{Davidson \& Santorelli (2010)}, they found "the effect technology toward education had become research subject for years". The findings on this research were also supported by the research which was produced by Mbarika, Payton, Kvasny \& Amadi (2007), they concluded that" women in Sub-Saharan Africa historically as a farmer. Nowadays, it goes to change as well as the growth of ICT on education".\par
The next relevant study related to this research was the finding in London, South Africa and Asia which was released by Carmichael \& Honour (2002), concluded that "open source must become an alternative for commercial organization and the product in education". The findings in this paper were also supported by a study in Turkey which was written by \hyperref[b8]{Basturk (2005)}that the "participants' learning capacity of the introductory statistics could be improved successfully when CAI used as a supplement to regular lecture in teaching introductory statistics course". The findings of the research in this paper were also supported by research in Caroline which was conducted by Jeffs, Evmenova, Warren \& Rider (2005), the study revealed that computer assisted instruction is "effective complement to other activities associated with the first grade curriculum (spelling and decoding) and has potential to enhance students' reading and writing skills".\par
The findings of the research in this paper were further supported by the research in Malaysia and Iran which was produced by Yunus\&Salehi (2012) that the group on Face book "?improved the teaching writing, it needs to carry out this study as it provides a platform to discover pedagogical implications that would benefit the Y-generation in terms of improving their writing skills". The findings in this paper were also related to the research in Turkey which was released by Acikalin (2010), he concluded that computer is "a powerful research tool which facilitates students' work and makes the work faster and easier for the students. Microsoft Power Point, Word, and Excel were the most common use of computer-supported instruction in the classrooms". The Joint Information System Committee (JISC) (2004) in London also concluded that "e-Learning improved the learning experience. It has the potential to transform the way we teach and learn across the board. It can raise standards, and widen participation in lifelong learning".\par
The findings in this paper then supported by the finding in Malaysia which was written by Noordin, Ahmad \& Hooi (2011) that "a multimedia courseware using 3-Dimensional (3D) model for teaching a mathematical topic on Lines and Planes in 3-Dimensions showed significant improvement in attention, response and recall of the content". The findings in this paper were also supported by a study in Canbera, Australia and Cambridge which was released by \hyperref[b15]{Craswell, Hawking \& Robertson (2001)}, they concluded Website "?opens a rich new area for effectiveness improvement, where traditional methods fail". The findings in this paper were also related to the finding in United State of America which was produced by \hyperref[b19]{Dunmire (2010)} that the educators"?must factor into the adoption analysis, the ease of use of the technology.\par
The findings of this research were then supported by the research in Pakistan which was released by Kausar, Choudhry\&Gujjar (2008),they found that Computer-Assisted Instruction"?as an effective teaching method should be applied to improve teaching quality and by using CAI it will be possible to eliminate lingual, regional and ethical biases between teacher and student". The findings of the research were also related to the research in Lincoln which was produced by Scheckelhoff, Swarlis \& Murakami (2010) that the teenagers must be prepared to love tekhnologywhen"1) they have regular and predictable access to technology, 2) there is social connectedness with technology, 3) spatial ability is developed beginning in their early years of education, and 4) they have skill".\par
The next relevant study was in South Africa which was written by \hyperref[b1]{Alant \& Dada (2005)}, they found that "students felt they gained greatly from the course and that the web-based teaching methodology facilitated their learning in various ways". Next, the findings were related to the research in South Africa which was produced by \hyperref[b22]{Fresen \& Boyd (2005)}, they found that web based learning"?used in conjunction with measurements to inform the cycle of continuous improvement and to provide management information". The last, the findings were relevant with the research in New York which was launched by The Association of Business Information \& Media Companies (2013) that "while digital marketing tools abound, email remains one of the most prominent, effective and personal marketing platforms we have for reaching our customers".\par
V. 
\section[{Conclusion}]{Conclusion}\par
This study concluded that (1) Secondary School teachers of Padang were not utilizing the computer as assistant of instruction. The score from observation was 40.53, it indicated that the competence of teachers to utilize the computer as assistant of instruction was poor;\par
(2) the results of the development concluded that a model was valid, practical and effective. The validation score was 83.20 (very good). The model was practical, it was seen from 80, 9\% respondents stated that the model ease them and motivate the to operate computer as assistant of instruction. The was also effective, it was seen from the results of t-test analysis from per secondary school and per subject teachers explained that tcount on a model was greater than ttable (39,310> 2,000)and the value of the P value was very small with acquisition values Sig. (,000) <? (0,05).\par
Volume XIV Issue V Version I \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{}\includegraphics[]{image-2.png}
\caption{\label{fig_0}Findingsa)}\end{figure}
   \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.6034999999999999\textwidth}P{0.09066666666666667\textwidth}P{0.09916666666666667\textwidth}P{0.056666666666666664\textwidth}}
\multicolumn{3}{l}{Score of Teachers' Competency Test}\tabcellsep \\
Level\tabcellsep Highest\tabcellsep Lowest\tabcellsep Average\\
\tabcellsep Score\tabcellsep Score\tabcellsep \\
Kindergarten\tabcellsep 80\tabcellsep 1.0\tabcellsep 44\\
Elementary School\tabcellsep 83\tabcellsep 1.0\tabcellsep 40\\
High School\tabcellsep 78\tabcellsep 1.0\tabcellsep 36\\
Secondary School\tabcellsep 88\tabcellsep 1.0\tabcellsep 51\\
(Subject: Mathematics)\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Secondary School\tabcellsep 92.86\tabcellsep 7.14\tabcellsep 45\\
(Subject: English)\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Secondary School\tabcellsep 86.67\tabcellsep 13.33\tabcellsep 6\\
(Subject: Sport)\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Secondary School\tabcellsep 88\tabcellsep 2.0\tabcellsep 51\\
(Subject: BAM)\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_1}}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{3} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.5125310173697271\textwidth}P{0.26997518610421833\textwidth}P{0.06749379652605458\textwidth}}
\multicolumn{2}{l}{Assistant of Instruction}\tabcellsep \\
School\tabcellsep Score\tabcellsep Criteria\\
Secondary School 1\tabcellsep 70,00\tabcellsep Good\\
Secondary School 8\tabcellsep 56,25\tabcellsep Fair\\
Secondary School 31\tabcellsep 49,38\tabcellsep Fair\\
Secondary School 34\tabcellsep 49,38\tabcellsep Fair\\
Secondary School 17\tabcellsep 36,25\tabcellsep Poor\\
Secondary School 33\tabcellsep 32,19\tabcellsep Poor\\
From the observation that the average ability of\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{the computer as assistant of instruction was poor. The}\\
teachers of Public Secondary School 1 Padang in using\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{result is explained on the table below.}\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_3}Table 3 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{4} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.22224770642201833\textwidth}P{0.46788990825688076\textwidth}P{0.0896788990825688\textwidth}P{0.07018348623853211\textwidth}}
Year 2014\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
44\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Volume XIV Issue V Version I\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
G )\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
(\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Global Journal of Human Social Science -\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{No. Teachers' Competence}\tabcellsep Achievement\tabcellsep Criteria\\
1\tabcellsep Utilize computer as assistant of instruction\tabcellsep 43.33\tabcellsep Fair\\
2\tabcellsep RunsoftwarePowerPoint\tabcellsep 45.83\tabcellsep Fair\\
3\tabcellsep Use LCD in instruction\tabcellsep 42.50\tabcellsep Fair\\
4\tabcellsep RunMicrosoftExcelto calculate students' score\tabcellsep 59.17\tabcellsep Fair\\
5\tabcellsep UseEmailto collect students' assignment\tabcellsep 31,67\tabcellsep Poor\\
6\tabcellsep Make animation to produce an instruction fun\tabcellsep 44.17\tabcellsep Fair\\
7\tabcellsep Publish materials on line\tabcellsep 34.17\tabcellsep Poor\end{longtable} \par
  {\small\itshape [Note: © 2014 Global Journals Inc. (US) A Model for Upgrading Teachers' Competence on Operating Computer as Assistant of Instruction]} 
\caption{\label{tab_4}Table 4 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{2} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.85\textwidth}}
teachers' continuous training and the use of modern\\
technology devices do not only help boost country's\\
manpower but also invigorate the country's economy to\\
compete well in this challenging world of the\\
globalization". Then, this research is related to the\\
finding in Turkey which was produced by Basoz \&\\
Cubukcu (2014) that recently the computer assisted\\
instruction"?has come to the forefront of language\\
learning and teaching". Next, this research is related to\\
the lately finding in India which was released by\\
Chaudari (2013) that the computer assisted\\
instruction"?a supplementary instructional strategy in\\
effective teaching".\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_5}Table 2 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{} \par 
\begin{longtable}{}
\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_6}}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.6832585644371941\textwidth}P{0.16674143556280585\textwidth}}
\tabcellsep room. Implementation of this model used quasi-\\
\tabcellsep experimental design that used pretest and test the\\
\tabcellsep ability of the end (posttest) to determine the mean\\
\tabcellsep score performance (gain score) of learning\\
\tabcellsep outcomes by using A Model for Ugrading Teacher's\\
\tabcellsep Competence on Operating Computer as Assistant\\
\tabcellsep of Instruction.\\
\tabcellsep 5. Evaluation, in this phase the researcher conducted\\
\tabcellsep an evaluation of the model. Evaluation was done in\\
\tabcellsep each phases to see the relation between the design\\
\tabcellsep and analysis, design and development and the\\
\tabcellsep development and the application. Evaluation was\\
\tabcellsep done to tell what was happening and what had\\
\tabcellsep happened. Evaluation was done twice, there were\\
\tabcellsep formative evaluation and summative evaluation.\\
\tabcellsep stated that "?expository method of According to Laws, Harper and Marcus (2011:\\
46\tabcellsep 205)"a formative evaluation helps you to form the instruction was superior to computer assisted learning strategy in teaching biology". Through learning and project by giving ongoing feedback as the process\\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{training by using A Model for Ugrading Teacher's Competence on Operating Computer as Assistant of Instruction by accessing www.kristiawan-edu.comexpected instructional materials presented by the teacher in the future become more interesting and motivating the students and enable to solve the problems that researcher described above. II. Research Design This study was Research and Development. According to Gay, Mills and Airasian (2009: 18) and Gay, Mills \& Airasian (2011: 17-18)R \& D on education is "the process of researching consumer needs and then developing products to fulfill those needs. It is not to formulate or test theory but to develop effective products for use in schools". According to Borg \& Gall (1989: 782) and Plomp (2013: 13) R \& D is "a process used to develop and validate educational products (development studies and validation studies)". Plomp (2013: 13) explained "development studies aimed at design principles, and validation studies aimed at theory development and validation". The product was meant by Borg \& Gall (1989: 782)and Gay, Mills \& Airasian (2011: 18) is "?not only textbooks, instructional films, and computer software, but also method of teaching, and programs, the products are field tested and revised until a prespecified level of effectiveness is achieved". According to Trian to (2010: 206) R \& D is "the steps to develop new product". According to Plomp (2013: 11) Educational Design Research means "a research design appropriate to develop research-based solutions to complex unfold", and summative evaluation was posttest to see the effect of A Model for Ugrading Teacher's Competence on Operating Computer as Assistant of Instruction toward teachers' competence on operating computer. The population in this study consisted of 550teachers from Mathematics, English, Budaya Alam Minangkabau (BAM) and Sport. The population was taken from the teachers who teach the subject related to National Examination (UN) and did not teach in the National Examination (UN). The samples used in this study as a source of data were drawn from the best criteria (Accreditation A); medium criteria (Accreditation B); and ordinary criteria(Accreditation C) . The samples in this study were teachers of Mathematics, English, BAM and Sport Secondary School 1, 08, 31, 34, 17 and 33 in Padang which consists of 94 teachers. The research instruments used for data collection were interview, observation, questionnaires, tests, and documentation. Test instrument in this study was achievement test. The test was used to see before and after applying a model. Before the tests used by researcher, firstly it was tested on Public Secondary School 2, 7, 13, 25, 15 and 26 in order to analyze the level of difficulty; distinguishing; validity and reliability. problems in educational Volume XIV Issue V Version I ( G ) Competence on Operating Computer as Assistant of Instruction in the form of web-based learning. The design was made in accordance with the results of need analysis conducted on the sample. 3. Development, in this phase the researcher developed A Model for Ugrading Teacher's Competence on Operating Computer as Assistant of Instruction based on a design that has been developed and the focus is on the presentation of the material. Then, the model was given to the validator for validation. The model that has been validated by a validator then tested and refined at the Focus Group Discussion. Assistant of Instruction that had been validated and tested at the Focus Group Discussion then applied in the learning process on operating computers to improve the teachers' competence at Public Secondary School 1, 8, 31, 34, 17 and 33 Padang in order to determine the practicalities and effectiveness of its implementation. According 4. Implementation, in this phase A Model for Ugrading Teacher's Competence on Operating Computer as III.}\\
Sugiyono (2012: 417-418) effectiveness testing is\tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par
  {\small\itshape [Note: done "to see the state based on before-after study". Before carrying out this activity, researcher prepared teachers (students in the sample), computer's experts, Instructional media and set up a study]} 
\caption{\label{tab_7}}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{1} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.41794019933554816\textwidth}P{0.02682724252491694\textwidth}P{0.06212624584717608\textwidth}P{0.048006644518272426\textwidth}P{0.14401993355481726\textwidth}P{0.1510797342192691\textwidth}}
\tabcellsep No.\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{School Secondary}\tabcellsep Percentage Needs\tabcellsep Criteria\\
\tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 1\tabcellsep 85.36\%\tabcellsep Very Need\\
\tabcellsep 2\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 8\tabcellsep 83.93\%\tabcellsep Very Need\\
\tabcellsep 3\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 31\tabcellsep 94.17\%\tabcellsep Very Need\\
\tabcellsep 4\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 34\tabcellsep 96.76\%\tabcellsep Very Need\\
\tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 17\tabcellsep 94.61\%\tabcellsep Very Need\\
\tabcellsep 6\tabcellsep \tabcellsep 33\tabcellsep 91.55\%\tabcellsep Very Need\\
\multicolumn{5}{l}{Tabel 2 : Summary of Teachers' Responses Per Subjects toward Model}\\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{No.}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Teachers' Subject}\tabcellsep Percentage Needs\tabcellsep Criteria\\
1\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Mathematics}\tabcellsep 90.02\%\tabcellsep Very Need\\
2\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep English\tabcellsep 92.75\%\tabcellsep Very Need\\
3\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep BAM\tabcellsep 91.42\%\tabcellsep Very Need\\
4\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Sport\tabcellsep 90.02\%\tabcellsep Very Need\\
Furthermore,\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{researcher}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{conducted}\tabcellsep a\\
\multicolumn{5}{l}{Contextual Analysis where the model was applied. The}\\
\multicolumn{5}{l}{model applied in Public Secondary School 1, 8, 31, 34,}\\
\multicolumn{5}{l}{17 and 33 of which were already using the Wireless}\\
\multicolumn{5}{l}{Local Area Network (WLAN) or Wi-Fi (Wireless Fidelity).}\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_8}Table 1 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.1641851106639839\textwidth}P{0.043896713615023474\textwidth}P{0.5216297786720322\textwidth}P{0.11344735077129442\textwidth}P{0.006841046277665996\textwidth}}
\multicolumn{3}{l}{2007; Microsoft Power point 2007; Adobe Photoshop}\tabcellsep Blogging; Face book; and You tube Downloading.\\
\multicolumn{3}{l}{CS 3; Macromedia Flash 8; Quiz Creator; Email;}\\
\multicolumn{4}{l}{1 1. 2 Microsoft Word 2007 Microsoft Excel 2007 1. 3 Microsoft 1. Teachers are able to access Microsoft Powerpoint 2007;}\\
\tabcellsep Powerpoint 2007\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{2. Teachers are able to usethe toolbar on Microsoft Powerpoint 2007; and}\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{3. Teachers are able to create slide for presentation related to the example given.}\\
4\tabcellsep Adobe Photoshop\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{1. Teachers are able to access Adobe Photoshop;}\\
\tabcellsep CS 3\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{2. Teachers are able to create picture and wallpaper on the new blank; and}\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{3. Teachers are able to give the effect on}\tabcellsep the picture.\\
5\tabcellsep Macromedia Flash\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{1. Teachers are able to access Macromedia Flash 8;}\\
\tabcellsep 8\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{2. Teachers are able to use the toolbar on Macromedia Flash 8; and}\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{3. Teachers are able to create a simple animation.}\\
\multicolumn{4}{l}{6 1. 8 Quiz Creator Blogging 1. Teachers are able to access Blogger;}\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{2. Teachers are able to enroll for making personal blog; and}\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{3. Teachers are able to post materials on blog.}\\
9\tabcellsep Facebook\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{1. Teachers are able to access Facebook;}\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{2. Teachers are able to enroll and create an account on Facebook; and}\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{3. Teachers are able to create group for instruction.}\\
10\tabcellsep Youtube\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{1. Teachers are able to accessYoutube;}\\
\tabcellsep Downloading\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{2. Teachers are able to use the navigation on youtube; and}\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{3. Teachers are able to searchinstructional video and download it.}\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep . A\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep model developed in accordance with the design\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep principles of competence expected in the materials were\\
\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep designed such Microsoft Word 2007; Microsoft Excel\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_9}}\end{figure}
 			\footnote{© 2014 Global Journals Inc. (US)} 		 		\backmatter  			 \par
Volume XIV Issue V Version I			 			  				\begin{bibitemlist}{1}
\bibitem[Num]{b30}\label{b30} 	 		\textit{},  		 			Num 		.  		1.  	 
\bibitem[Sujianto and Mukhadis ()]{b57}\label{b57} 	 		\textit{},  		 			Sujianto 		,  		 			Mukhadis 		.  	 	 		\textit{Amat. \& Isnandar}  		2012.  	 
\bibitem[ Teachers' Competency Test (UKG) ()]{b61}\label{b61} 	 		\textit{},  		 \url{http//:ukg.kemendikbud.go.id/}  	 	 		\textit{Teachers' Competency Test (UKG)}  		2012.  	 
\bibitem[
			April
		 ()]{b7}\label{b7} 	 		\textit{},  		 			April 		.  		2014.  	 
\bibitem[____________ (ed.) (2012)]{b39}\label{b39} 	 		\textit{},  		 			\textunderscore \textunderscore \textunderscore \textunderscore \textunderscore \textunderscore \textunderscore \textunderscore \textunderscore \textunderscore \textunderscore \textunderscore  		.  		Usman Karso (ed.)  		November 17 th , 2012.  	 
\bibitem[Kompas]{b32}\label{b32} 	 		\textit{29 th Desember 2012.The Weaknesses of Teachers' Training},  		 			Kompas 		.  		 	 
\bibitem[Wexler ()]{b73}\label{b73} 	 		\textit{A Blog on the Biological Images Analysis and Photoshop CS3 Extended Features and Their Applications},  		 			Eric J Wexler 		.  		 \url{www.ericjwexler.blogspot.com/}  		2012.  	 
\bibitem[Galvis et al. (2011)]{b23}\label{b23} 	 		‘A Comparison of Computer-Assisted Instruction and Traditional Classroom Lecture to Introduce the Occupational Adaptation Theory’.  		 			Agie Tatiana Galvis 		,  		 			Jimmy H Ishee 		,  		 			Sally Schultz 		.  		 \url{http://ijahp.nova.edu}  	 	 		\textit{The Internet Journal of Allied Health Science and Practice}  		2011. July 2011. 9  (3) .  	 
\bibitem[Wallace and Mccrory ()]{b71}\label{b71} 	 		‘A Framework for Understanding Teaching with the Internet’.  		 			Raven Wallace 		,  		 			Mccrory 		.  	 	 		\textit{American Educational Research Journal}  		2004. 2004. 41  (2)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Advanced Study in Education (2013)]{b14}\label{b14} 	 		\textit{Advanced Study in Education},  		January 2013. Vadodara, India. 2.  		 			The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda 		 	 
\bibitem[Jeffs et al. ()]{b29}\label{b29} 	 		‘An Action Research Study of Computer Assisted Instruction Within the First Grade Classroom’.  		 			Tara Jeffs 		,  		 			Anna Evmenova 		,  		 			Sandra Hopengardner Warren 		,  		 			Robin L Rider 		.  	 	 		\textit{Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits. Fall}  		2006. 2006.  	 
\bibitem[Sarsoh et al. ()]{b50}\label{b50} 	 		‘An Effective Method for Hidding Data in Microsoft Word Documents’.  		 			Jassam T Sarsoh 		,  		 			Hashem 		,  		 			. M Kadhem 		,  		 			Hendi 		,  		 			I Hayder 		.  	 	 		\textit{Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology Network}  		2012. 2012. 12.  	 	 (Web \& Security. Issue 12 Version 1.0 Year) 
\bibitem[Premalatha (2012)]{b45}\label{b45} 	 		‘An Empirical Study on the Attitude of High School Students Towards Computer-Assisted Instruction with Respect to their Study Practices’.  		 			U M Premalatha 		.  	 	 		\textit{The IUP Journal of Soft Skills}  		2012. June 2012. VI  (2)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Imhanlahimi and &imhanlahimi ()]{b26}\label{b26} 	 		‘An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Computer Assisted Learning Strategy and Expository Method of Teaching Biology: A Case Study of Lumen Christi International High School’.  		 			E O Imhanlahimi 		,  		 			R E \&imhanlahimi 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal Social Science}  		2008. 16  (3)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Trianto ()]{b66}\label{b66} 	 		\textit{An Introduction to Educational Research of Teachers},  		 			Trianto 		.  		2010. Jakarta.  		 			Kencana Prenada Media group 		 	 
\bibitem[Bandung: Alfabeta ()]{b56}\label{b56} 	 		 			R \& D Bandung: Alfabeta 		.  		\textit{Educational Research Methodology Quantitative, Qualitative, and},  				2012.  	 
\bibitem[Fresen and Boyd ()]{b22}\label{b22} 	 		‘Caught in The Web of Quality’.  		 			Jill W Fresen 		,  		 			Lesley G Boyd 		.  	 	 		\textit{International Journal of Educational Development}  		2005. 2005. 25 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Chaudhari et al. ()]{b13}\label{b13} 	 		‘Computer Assisted Instruction (CAI): Development of Instructional Strategy for Biology Teaching’.  		 			Pinkal Chaudhari 		,  		 			Ugc-Jrf 		,  		 			Centre 		,  		 			Patrick Carmichael 		,  		 			Leslie Honour 		.  		 \url{www.elsevier.com/locate/ijedudev}  	 	 		\textit{International Journal of Educational Development}  		2013. 2002. 2002. 22 p. .  	 	 (Open Source as Appropriate Technology For Global Education) 
\bibitem[Beechler and Williams ()]{b9}\label{b9} 	 		‘Computer Assisted Instruction and Elementary ESL Students in Sight Word Recognition’.  		 			Susan Beechler 		,  		 			Sherie Williams 		.  	 	 		\textit{International Journal of Business and Social Science}  		2012. 3  (4) .  	 
\bibitem[Continuing Professioanl Development for Teachers' Certified Vocational School of Technology Journal of Technology and Vocation (2012)]{b58}\label{b58} 	 		‘Continuing Professioanl Development for Teachers' Certified Vocational School of Technology’.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Technology and Vocation}  		February 2012. 35  (1)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Surjono and Dwi ()]{b59}\label{b59} 	 		\textit{Developing CAI Mutimedia Program to Electronics Theory Instruction},  		 			Herman Surjono 		,  		 			Dwi 		.  		1999.  	 	 (Research Project Higher Education Department) 
\bibitem[Meho ()]{b37}\label{b37} 	 		‘E-Mail Interviewing in Qualitative Research: A Methodological Discussion’.  		 			Lokman I Meho 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology}  		2006. 2006. 57  (10)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Plomp (ed.) ()]{b44}\label{b44} 	 		\textit{Educational Design Research Part A: An Introduction},  		 			Tjeerd Plomp 		.  		T. Plomp \& Nieveen (ed.)  		2013. Enschede, the Netherlands: SLO.  	 	 (Educational Design Research: An Introduction) 
\bibitem[Gay et al. ()]{b24}\label{b24} 	 		\textit{Educational Research Competencies for Analysis and Applications},  		 			L R Gay 		,  		 			Mills 		,  		 			E Geoffrey 		,  		 			Peter \&airasian 		.  		2009. Columbus: Pearson Education, Inc.  	 
\bibitem[Borg and Gall ()]{b11}\label{b11} 	 		\textit{Educational Research: An Introduction Fifth Edition},  		 			Walter Borg 		,  		 			R Gall 		,  		 			Meredith 		,  		 			D 		.  		1989. New York: Longman Inc.  	 
\bibitem[Effective Practice with e-Learning A Good Practice Guide in Designing for Learning The Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) ()]{b63}\label{b63} 	 		‘Effective Practice with e-Learning A Good Practice Guide in Designing for Learning’.  	 	 		\textit{The Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC)},  				 (Beacon House Queens Road Bristol)  		2004. 8 p. 1Q.  		 			JISC Development Group University of Bristol 2nd Floor 		 	 
\bibitem[Craswell et al. (2001)]{b15}\label{b15} 	 		‘Effective Site Finding using Link Anchor Information’.  		 			Nick Craswell 		,  		 			David Hawking 		,  		 			Stephen Robertson 		.  	 	 		\textit{SIGIR'01},  				 (New Orleans, Louisiana, USA)  		2001. September 9-12, 2001.  	 
\bibitem[Banday and Tariq (2011)]{b4}\label{b4} 	 		‘Effectiveness and Limitations of E-Mail Security Protocols’.  		 			M Banday 		,  		 			Tariq 		.  	 	 		\textit{International Journal of Distributed and Parallel Systems (IJDPS)}  		2011. May 2011. 2  (3) .  	 
\bibitem[Kulik et al. ()]{b33}\label{b33} 	 		‘Effectiveness of Computer Based Instruction: An Update Analysis’.  		 			J Kulik 		,  		 			Chen \&kulik 		,  		 			Lin 		.  	 	 		\textit{Computer in Human Behavior}  		1991. 7 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Bartsch and Cobern ()]{b5}\label{b5} 	 		‘Effectiveness of PowerPoint Presentations in Lectures’.  		 			Robert A Bartsch 		,  		 			Kristi M Cobern 		.  	 	 		\textit{Computers \& Education}  		2003. 2003. 41 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Rochmah ()]{b49}\label{b49} 	 		‘Effectiveness Ratio System Implementation Evaluation of Electronic Test Using Wondershare Quiz Creator and Paper Test Results of Student Learning on Word Processing Application Materials in MAN 1 Yogyakarta’.  		 			Eliya Rochmah 		.  	 	 		\textit{Jurnal Pendidikan TeknikInformatika}  		2013. 2013. 3  (3) .  	 
\bibitem[Email Effectiveness A Benchmark Survey on Best Business-to-Business Trade Industry Practices The Association of Business Information & Media Companies (2013)]{b62}\label{b62} 	 		‘Email Effectiveness A Benchmark Survey on Best Business-to-Business Trade Industry Practices’.  	 	 		\textit{The Association of Business Information \& Media Companies},  				2013. May 2013.  	 	 (ABM Audience Development Committee) 
\bibitem[Acikalin (2010)]{b0}\label{b0} 	 		\textit{Exemplary Social Studies Teachers Use of Computer-Supported Instruction in the Classroom},  		 			Mehmet Acikalin 		.  		2010. October 2010. 9.  	 	 (TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology) 
\bibitem[Bright ()]{b12}\label{b12} 	 		‘Explaining the Efficiency of Computer Assisted Instruction’.  		 			G W Bright 		.  	 	 		\textit{AEDS Journal}  		1983. 16 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Esteves (2012)]{b21}\label{b21} 	 		‘Exploring Facebook to Enhace Learning and Student Engagement: A Case from the University of Philiphines (UP) Open University’.  		 			Katherine K Esteves 		.  	 	 		\textit{Malaysian Journal of Distance Education}  		 1511-6433.  		2012. June 2012. 14  (1) .  	 
\bibitem[Nyambane and Nzuki (2014)]{b43}\label{b43} 	 		‘Factors Influencing ICT Integration in Teaching-A literature Review’.  		 			Cyprian Nyambane 		,  		 			David Nzuki 		.  	 	 		\textit{International Journal of Education and Research}  		2014. March 2014. 2  (3) .  	 
\bibitem[Scheckelh Off et al. ()]{b51}\label{b51} 	 		‘Girls \& Technology: Strategies for Success’.  		 			Terrie Hale Scheckelh Off 		,  		 			Linda Jacobs Swarlis 		,  		 			Christine Murakami 		.  	 	 		\textit{Technology Connection}  		2010.  	 	 (Journal) 
\bibitem[____________ ()]{b25}\label{b25} 	 		\textit{Governmental Rule Number 19 in 2005 Revised by Governmental Rule Number 32 in 2013 about National Education Standard 28},  		 			\textunderscore \textunderscore \textunderscore \textunderscore \textunderscore \textunderscore \textunderscore \textunderscore \textunderscore \textunderscore \textunderscore \textunderscore  		.  		2011. 2008. Columbus; Hookway, Nicholas; Los Angeles, London, New Delhi; Singapore: SAGE Publications. 8 p. .  	 	 (Entering the Blogosphere': Some Strategies for Using Blogs in Social Research) 
\bibitem[Alant and Dada ()]{b1}\label{b1} 	 		‘Group Learning on the Web’.  		 			E Alant 		,  		 			S Dada 		.  	 	 		\textit{International Journal of Educational Development}  		2005. 2005. 25 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Wena ()]{b72}\label{b72} 	 		\textit{Innovative Contemporer of Learning Strategy},  		 			Made Wena 		.  		2009. Jakarta: BumiAksara.  	 
\bibitem[Karami et al. ()]{b31}\label{b31} 	 		\textit{Integrating Problem-Based},  		 			Mehdi Karami 		,  		 			Karami 		,  		 			Zohreh 		,  		 			Mohammad \&attaran 		.  		2013.  	 
\bibitem[Mbarika et al. ()]{b36}\label{b36} 	 		‘It Education and Workforce Participation: A New Era for Women in Kenya?’.  		 			Victor W A Mbarika 		,  		 			Fay Cobb Payton 		,  		 			Kvasny 		,  		 			Atieno Lynette 		.  	 	 		\textit{The Information Society}  		2007. 2007. 23 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Schein et al. ()]{b52}\label{b52} 	 		\textit{Literature Review on Effectiveness of the Use of Social Media A Report for Peel Public Health. Canada: Centre for Innovation in Complex Care \& School of Public Health},  		 			Rebecca Schein 		,  		 			Wilson 		,  		 			Jennifer Kumanan. \&keelan 		.  		2012. University of Toronto, Ontario.  	 
\bibitem[Dunmire ()]{b19}\label{b19} 	 		\textit{Master Teacher Program, A 2-Year Faculty Professional Development Program Conducted by the Center for Teaching Excellence},  		 			Ryan E Dunmire 		.  		2010. 2010. United States Military Academy, West Point, NY.  	 	 (The Use of Instructional Technology in the Classroom: Selection and Effectiveness) 
\bibitem[Thompson and Mcnutt ()]{b64}\label{b64} 	 		\textit{Powerful \& Effective Presentations: How to Avoid Death by},  		 			Duren Thompson 		,  		 			Bill Mcnutt 		.  		2009.  	 
\bibitem[Powerpoint]{b65}\label{b65} 	 		 			Powerpoint 		.  		 TN 37996-4135.  		\textit{Center for Literacy Studies},  				 		 			University of Tennessee 312 UT Conference Center Bldg Knoxville 		 	 
\bibitem[Elliott et al. (2006)]{b20}\label{b20} 	 		‘Preparing Data for Analysis Using Microsoft Excel’.  		 			Alan C Elliott 		,  		 			Linda S Hynan 		,  		 			Joan S Reisch 		,  		 			Janet P Smith 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Investigative Medicine}  		2006. September 2006. 54  (6) .  	 
\bibitem[Public Socialization Materials of Curriculum 2013 Education and Culture Ministry (2012)]{b46}\label{b46} 	 		\textit{Public Socialization Materials of Curriculum 2013 Education and Culture Ministry},  		November 29 th , 2012.  	 
\bibitem[Regulation Number 14 in 2005 about Teacher and Lecturer]{b48}\label{b48} 	 		\textit{Regulation Number 14 in 2005 about Teacher and Lecturer},  				 	 
\bibitem[Regulation Number 20 in 2003 about National Education System]{b47}\label{b47} 	 		\textit{Regulation Number 20 in 2003 about National Education System},  		 	 
\bibitem[Laws et al. ()]{b34}\label{b34} 	 		\textit{Research for Development A Practical Guide},  		 			Sophie Laws 		,  		 			Caroline \& Marcus Harper 		,  		 			Rachel 		.  		2011. London: Sage Publication.  	 
\bibitem[Criswell ()]{b16}\label{b16} 	 		‘Rethinking Microcomputer as a Part of Teacher Education’.  		 			J R Criswell 		.  	 	 		\textit{Educational Technology}  		1989. 29  (11)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Sutopo (2011)]{b60}\label{b60} 	 		‘Selection Sorting Algorithm Visualization Using Flash’.  		 			Hadi Sutopo 		.  	 	 		\textit{The International Journal of Multimedia \& Its Applications (IJMA)}  		2011. February 2011. 3  (1) .  	 
\bibitem[Spending More or Spending Better: Improving Education Financing in Indonesia ()]{b74}\label{b74} 	 		\textit{Spending More or Spending Better: Improving Education Financing in Indonesia},  		2013. Jakarta: World Bank Office Jakarta.  	 
\bibitem[Noordin et al. (2011)]{b42}\label{b42} 	 		‘Study of Effectiveness and Usability of Multimedia Courseware Integrated with 3-Dimensional Model as a Teaching Aid’.  		 			Syazwan Noordin 		,  		 			Wan Fatimah Ahmad 		,  		 			Wan 		,  		 			Yew Hooi 		,  		 			Kwang 		.  	 	 		\textit{International Journal of Computer Applications}  		2011. February 2011. 16  (4)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Successful Teachers' Competence Test Istiqomah & Sulton ()]{b27}\label{b27} 	 		‘Successful Teachers' Competence Test’.  	 	 		\textit{Istiqomah \& Sulton}  		2013. Dunia Cerdas.  	 
\bibitem[Talk Show of Education by Kreshna Aditya Media Indonesia. April8 th ()]{b38}\label{b38} 	 		‘Talk Show of Education by Kreshna Aditya’.  	 	 		\textit{Media Indonesia. April8 th},  				2013.  	 
\bibitem[Ndibalema (2014)]{b41}\label{b41} 	 		‘Teachers' Attitudes towards the Use of Information Communication Technology (ICT) as a Pedagogical Tool in Secondary Schools in Tanzania: The Case of Kondoa District’.  		 			Placidius Ndibalema 		.  	 	 		\textit{International Journal of Education and Research}  		2014. February 2014. 2  (2) .  	 
\bibitem[Al-Madani et al. (2014)]{b2}\label{b2} 	 		‘Teachers' Professional Development on ICT Use: A Saudi Sustainable Development Model’.  		 			Mohammed Al-Madani 		,  		 			Ibrahim Allaafiajiy 		,  		 			Ali 		.  	 	 		\textit{Proceeding of the 2nd International Conference on Social Sciences Research ICSSR 2014},  				 			Worldconferences,  			Net 		 (ed.)  		 (eeding of the 2nd International Conference on Social Sciences Research ICSSR 2014Kota Kinabalu, Sabah)  		2014. June 2014.  	 
\bibitem[Siddiqui and Khatoon Tahira ()]{b54}\label{b54} 	 		‘Teaching Physical Science: Should We Implement Teacher-Centered CAI or Student-Centered CAI At Secondary School Level in India?’.  		 			Uzma Siddiqui 		,  		 			Khatoon Tahira 		.  	 	 		\textit{European Scientific Journal}  		 1857 -7881.  		2013. 9  (10) .  	 
\bibitem[Bennet (2012)]{b10}\label{b10} 	 		\textit{The Effect of Computer Assissted Instruction on Rural Algebra Students. Northern Michigan Unversity},  		 			Susan M Bennet 		.  		2012. July 29. 2012.  	 
\bibitem[Vernadakis et al. ()]{b69}\label{b69} 	 		‘The Effectiveness of Computer Assisted Instruction on Teaching the Skill of Setting in Volleyball’.  		 			N Vernadakis 		,  		 			E Zetou 		,  		 			P Antoniou 		,  		 			E \&kioumourtzoglou 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Human Movement Studies}  		2002. 2002. 43 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Basoz and &cubukcu ()]{b6}\label{b6} 	 		‘The Effectiveness of Computer Assisted Instruction on Vocabulary Achievement’.  		 			Tutku Basoz 		,  		 			Feryal \&cubukcu 		.  	 	 		\textit{Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE)}  		2014. 4  (1)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Basturk ()]{b8}\label{b8} 	 		‘The Effectiveness of Computer-Assisted Instruction in Teaching Introductory Statistics’.  		 			Ramazan Basturk 		.  	 	 		\textit{Educational Technology \& Society}  		2005. 8  (2)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Yunus et al. ()]{b75}\label{b75} 	 		‘The Effectiveness of Face book Groups on Teaching and Improving Writing: Students' Perceptions’.  		 			Melor Yunus 		,  		 			Md 		,  		 			Salehi 		,  		 			Hadi 		.  	 	 		\textit{International Journal of Education and Information Technologies Issue}  		2012. 2012. 1.  	 
\bibitem[Davidson and Santorelli ()]{b17}\label{b17} 	 		\textit{The Impact of Broadband on Education A Study Commissioned by the U.S Chamber of Commerce},  		 			Charles M Davidson 		,  		 			Michael J Santorelli 		.  		2010.  	 	 (Research Report Commissioned by the U.S Chamber of Commerce) 
\bibitem[Tsai ()]{b67}\label{b67} 	 		‘The Interpretation Construction Design Model for Teaching Science and Its Applications to Internet-Based Instruction in Taiwan’.  		 			Chin-Chung Tsai 		.  		 \url{www.elsevier.com/locate/ijedudev}  	 	 		\textit{International Journal of Educational Development}  		2001. 2001. 21 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Dick et al. ()]{b18}\label{b18} 	 		\textit{The Systematic Design of Instruction},  		 			Walter Dick 		,  		 			Lou Carey 		,  		 			O Carey 		,  		 			James 		.  		2001. United States: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc.  	 
\bibitem[Amenyedzi et al. ()]{b3}\label{b3} 	 		‘The Use of Computers and Internet as Supplementary Source of Educational Material: A Case Study of the Senior High Schools in the Tema Metropolis in Ghana’.  		 			Frank W K Amenyedzi 		,  		 			Mary N Lartey 		,  		 			Dzomeku 		,  		 			M Beloved 		.  	 	 		\textit{Contemporary Educational Technology}  		2011. 2011. 2  (2)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Voogt et al. (2013)]{b70}\label{b70} 	 		‘Under Which Conditions Does ICT Have a Positive Effect on Teaching and Learning? A Call to Action’.  		 			J Voogt 		,  		 			G Knezek 		,  		 			M Cox 		,  		 			D Knezek 		,  		 			A Brummelhuis 		,  		 			Ten 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Computer Assissted Learning Special Issue: Knowledge Transformation, Design and Technology}  		2013. February 2013. 29.  	 	 (Issue 1 Pages 4-14) 
\bibitem[United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) ()]{b68}\label{b68} 	 		\textit{United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)},  		2011. France: UNESCO.  	 	 (UNESCO ICT Competency Framework for Teachers) 
\bibitem[____________ (2012)]{b40}\label{b40} 	 		‘Unsuccessful Teachers' Certification’.  		 			\textunderscore \textunderscore \textunderscore \textunderscore \textunderscore \textunderscore \textunderscore \textunderscore \textunderscore \textunderscore \textunderscore \textunderscore  		.  	 	 		By Syarief Oebaidillah  		November 21 st , 2012.  	 
\bibitem[Schmidt et al. ()]{b53}\label{b53} 	 		‘Use of and Satisfaction With Blogging Software Empirical Findings For The German-Speaking Blogosphere’.  		 			Jan Schmidt 		,  		 			Martin Wilbers 		,  		 			Matthias \&paetzolt 		.  	 	 		\textit{Research Centre New Communication Media Working Paper},  				2006. p. .  	 
\bibitem[Stockmeyer and Otto (2009)]{b55}\label{b55} 	 		\textit{Using Microsoft Word's Readability Program},  		 			Norman Stockmeyer 		,  		 			Otto 		.  		2009. January 2009.  	 
\bibitem[Jalal (2012)]{b28}\label{b28} 	 		\textit{World Innovation Summit for Education (WISE), at Doha, Qatar, 15 th},  		 			Fasli Jalal 		.  		2012. November 2012.  	 
\bibitem[Chenail ()]{b35}\label{b35} 	 		‘YouTube as a Qualitative Research Asset: Reviewing User Generated Videos as Learning Resources’.  		 			Ronald J Chenail 		.  		 \url{http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/WQR/youtube.pdf}  	 	 		\textit{The Weekly Qualitative Report}  		2008. 1  (4)  p. 24.  	 
\end{bibitemlist}
 			 		 	 
\end{document}
