# Introduction The Nigerian State's view of the Niger Delta conflict seemed underpinned by the greed thesis, as; coercion has been the trademark policy under all successive regimes. Only President Yar'Adua attempted albeit feebly to end the conflict with amnesty declaration on June 25. 2009. But this was after massive air, land and sea attacks on Gbaramatu Axis (suspected militants haven) that killed 2000 persons but failed to stem insecurity. The amnesty was indeed, induced by militants' shut-in of a million barrels of oil daily due to attacks on oil facilities; pipelines, flow stations, platforms, drilling rigs and kidnapping of oil workers. The paper therefore examines the Niger Delta conflicts and in particular, the natural resource conflict nexus within the context of the greed model. It poses the question; Is the greed model (lootable) oil resource adequate and proper in explaining insecurity in the Niger Delta? II. # Conceptual Framework Historical institutionalism or path Dependency explains conflicts in terms of historical events and choices that induce decisions in the present political situation of a state. It stresses that past political events largely inhibit the future in a state (Mahoney, 2000:510). It involves processes that are highly sensitive to events that take place in the early stages of an overall historical sequence (of a country) and "? self reinforcing processes in institutions that make institutional structures, and hence their policies, hard to change once the pattern has been accepted" (Peters et al., 2005(Peters et al., :1276)). By showing that political developments are linked to institutional changes "and conceiving political choices as periodic interruptions in path-dependent policies, historical institutionalism tends to identify the chosen policy options as the logical, and generally the ince the 1990s, African states have been dogged by insecurity from violent intra-state conflicts that nearly turned several states, Nigeria inclusive into failed states. These conflicts involved states well endowed with natural resources. Various studies posit a close linkage between natural resources and conflict, with oil at the apex (Khan, 1994;Karl, 1997;Coronil, 1997). The economics of civil war (Collier 1999) gave fillip to the natural resource conflict nexus. Thus Mbembe (2001:280) asserted that "Regions at the epicentre of oil production are bisected by repeated conflicts". The theory gives detailed illumination on conflicts in natural resources endowed states. It explains conflicts notably in Africa in terms of economic driven rebellion, due to natural resources profusion. The greed theory premises onset of violent conflicts on greed and not grievance (Collier and Hoeffler, 2000;.In other words, greed defined in terms of opportunity cost of a rebellion provides explanation for the conflicts in natural resource endowed African states instead of grievance related issues; political marginalisation, exclusion and neglect. That is, the only interest of rebel leaders is the looting of resources for personal enrichment. Hence, Collier, (1999) asserted that the real cause of most rebellions is not the loud discourse of grievance, but the silent voice of greed. Other writers (Mwanasali 2000;Berdal and Malone 2000;Fearon and Laitin, 2003) also share this view. Resort to most rational ? choice at any given time" (Peters et al., 2005(Peters et al., :1277)). Indeed, this theory implies that a minor or fleeting action or a seemingly trivial lead for public policy can have important and irreversible influences and/or constraints on the institution of a state (Liebowitz and Margolis, 1995). Institutions are thus, socially constructed in the sense that they embody shared cultural values ("shared cognitions", "interpretive frames") of the way things work (Meyer and Rowan, 1991;Scott, 1995:33;Zucker, 1983:5). Hence, some analysts opine that certain organisations come and go, but emergent institutional forms will be "isomorphic" with (i.e. compatible with, resembling, and similar in logic to) existing ones because political actors extract causal designations from the world around them and these cause-and-effect understandings inform their approaches to new problems (DiMaggio and Powell, 1991:11;Dobbin, 1994). Thus, even when policy makers set out to redesign institutions, they are guarded in what they can devise by embedded, cultural constraints. These constraints may be formal or informal, but deal with structures and institutions that set precedents which affect political and economic decisions in the future. They are referred to as historical accidents that impact actual political developments within a political terrain since the start of a particular path in a specified type of socio-political situation which is called a "critical juncture" may be small events capable of great after effects. For instance, from the mid 1940s, Nigeria practiced fiscal federalism with revenue allocation based on the principle of derivation. But as oil became the main revenue earner, the derivation principle was switched for landmass and population; parameters acutely lacking in the Niger Delta. This denied the region the benefits of rapid development through oil resources (Emuedo and Ebohon, 2009b). The Niger Delta was thus, fiscally deprived, while the other region (ethnic majorities) continued to enjoy benefits of increased revenues. As such, despite the over $600 billion revenues earned from oil (Watts, 2008) the region remain deeply impoverished. Historical institutionalists argue therefore, that timing and sequence of a specific event or processes matter a great deal (Gerschenkron, 1962;Kurth, 1979;Shefter, 1977;Ertman, 1997). Thus, in the state of socio-economic underdevelopment, crisis of poverty has kept the Niger Delta besieged with insecurity. # III. Oil, the State and the Niger Delta The Niger Delta as historically defined is the area bound by the Benin River in the West, Imo River in the East, Aboh in the North and in the South, Palm Point at Akassa (Dike, 1956;Willinks et al., 1958;Akinyele, 1998). Based on this definition, the Niger Delta is today comprised of Bayelsa, Delta and Rivers States 1 . The total land area is 25,640 km 2 ; Low land Area 7,400km 2 , Fresh Water Swamp 11,700 km 2 , Salt Water Swamp 5,400 km 2 and Sand Barrier Islands 1,140 km 2 respectively (Ashton-Jones, 1998). Since the 1980s, oil has accounted for over 80% of state revenues, 90% of foreign exchange earnings and about 96% of export revenues (Ohiorhenan, 1984;Ikein, 1990;ICG 2006b;UNSD, 2009). Nigeria has 36.2 billion barrels in proven oil reserves as of January 2007 (RWI, 2010) and produces about 2.45 million barrels daily. But Guichaoua (2009) opined that were the Niger Delta more secured production would increase by between 100,000 and 500,000 barrels daily. The region also has an estimated 159 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of natural gas reserves (NNPC, 2009) but RWI (2010) but the figure at 182 Tcf. The Niger Delta is the twelfth richest area in hydrocarbon resources in the world (Klett et al., 1997). However, oil activities are major sources of pollution that cause severe damages to the environment (Okpokwasili, 1996;Snape et al., 2001;Liu and Wirtz, 2005). This has been worsened by the oil companies' impunity of operations (Brooks, 1994); oil activities in the Niger Delta involved incessant oil spillages. For instance Shell's oil operations in Nigeria accounts for mere 14% of its production worldwide but account for over 40% of its oil spillages globally (Gilbert, 2010). DPR (Department of Petroleum Resources) reported that from 1976 to 2005 over 4 million barrels of oil was spilled into the environment in over 9,000 incidents (Egberongbe et al., 2006; Emuedo, 2010). Some researchers have dismissed these figures, averring that actual figures are three times higher (Grevy, 1995;Banfield, 1998;Nassiter, 2010). Also, over 74% of gas (Watts 2001) or about 56.6 million cubic metres (Gerth and Labaton, 2004) is flared daily in the region. This constitutes the largest single source of global warming worldwide (Hunt, 2000). The flares generate temperatures of between 1,300 o C to 1,400 o C, produces cocktail of toxins; CO 2 , VOC, CO, NOx and particulates round the clock and emit 34 million tons of CO 2 and 12 million tons of methane annually (Ake, 1996;Shelby, 1996:28;World Bank, 1995. Thus, the World Wildlife Fund in 2006, dubbed the Niger Delta the most polluted place on earth (Watts, 2008). Impacts of oil pollution and gas flares have resulted in adverse physical deterioration of the region's environment (Moffat and Linden, 1995), crippled agricultural practices (Ibeanu, 1997) and accelerated depletion of the mangrove forests (FAO, 2005:50). Specifically, oil impacted areas remain unsuitable for agricultural practices for decades (Ekekwe, 1983) due to soil degradation. Inoni et al. (2006) reported that oil spill of about 10% reduces crops yield by about 1.5% and farmer's income by over 5%. Oil pollution of water bodies have also, led to bio-accumulation of heavy metals to toxic levels by most fish species (Benson et al., 2007; Nubi, et al., 2011), acute decline in fish stocks and extinction of certain flora and fauna (Omoweh 1978; Emuedo 2010). Studies show that poor water quality affects species composition, assemblages and distribution of plankton (Boney, 1983), benthos (Dance, and Hynes 1980) and fish (Kutty, 1987). Additionally, heat from gas flares kills vegetation, impacts plants growth and crop yields (Mba 2000:223; UNDP 2006:186). For instance, drastic reduction has been reported in yields of sweet potato Udoinyang (2005) and cassava/yam (Odjugo 2007). Indeed Salau (1993) and Adeyomo, (2002) reported that crops yield reduced by 10% at a distance of 1000 metres, 45% at a distance of 600 metres and 100% at a distance of 200 metres from gas flare sites. Odjugo (2010) also, reported yield reduction of 85.7%, at 500m, 82.1%, at 1 km 75%, at 2km, and 32%, at 5 km from flare sites of seed vegetable; melon. The effects of these have constricted traditional means of livelihoods; exposing the Niger Delta people to extreme poverty vulnerabilities. Thus, despite its oil, the Niger Delta is Africa's epicentre of the poorest (Time 2006:20). It is in the light of the foregoing that the greed thesis is examined within the context of the Niger Delta. # IV. The Greed Versus Grievance Model Over the past ten years various studies have been carried out on the causes of civil war, with the works of Paul Collier and Anke Hoeffler (see Collier and Hoeffler, 1998;2002a;2002b;Collier, 1999;2000a;2000b) being the most influential. Their works stirred myriads of inquiries into the relationship between natural resource endowment and the onset of civil war (Ross, 2004). The media such as The Financial Times, The Washington Post, The New York Times and The Economist, widely reported their findings (Fearon, 2005). They have been cited profusely in governmental and international reports on security and stability, including the reports of the Commission for Africa, the British Prime Minister's Strategy Unit 2 , and the United Nations Secretary-General's High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change 3 . This view argues that two major factors are responsible for violent conflicts in natural resource endowed states: grievance over political marginalisation and exploitation and the quest for economic gains in the event of natural resource wealth (greed). The latter, which is purely economic-driven, has immense capacity to increase the propensity of conflicts and wars since the wealth accruable through these resources creates incentives for different groups to vie for state control to enhance its quest for control of the country's wealth (Welsh, 1996:485;Young, 1982:170). Defining greed in terms of "?ability to finance rebellion ?" and grievance in terms of ethnic and religious divisions, political repression and inequality ?". Collier and Hoeffler (2002b:1), sets a paradigm for discourse into the dynamics of violent intra-state conflicts especially in natural resource endowed African states. They opined that wars or civil conflicts have the propensity of occurring "? if the incentive for rebellion is sufficiently large relative to the costs" (Collier and Hoeffler, 1998:563). The pivot of rebellion based on this view is drive towards state capture or secession -"? the incentive for rebellion is the product of the probability of victory and its consequences." (Collier and Hoeffler, 1998: 564). They also stated that primary commodities dependent states seem to have lower conflict risk since rentier states are able to deploy accruable wealth for internal security and repression of all opposition as well as insurgency (Collier and Hoeffler, 2002a;2002b). In the "economic causes of civil war", they concluded that; "The effect of natural resource endowment is nonmonotonic. Initially, increased natural resources increase the risk of war. ? However, at a higher level, natural resources start to reduce the risk of war. We interpret this as being due to the enhanced financial capacity of the government, and hence its ability to defend itself through military expenditure, gradually coming to dominate ?" (Collier and Hoeffler, 1998: 571) It would seem therefore, that natural resources endowment creates both incentives as well as risks of civil wars as happened in Congo DR, Angola, Liberia and Sierra Leone. Thus, they insisted that conflictsespecially those that are resource-related are better explained by the greed model that focuses on the sources of finance of civil war (Collier and Hoeffler, 2002a;2002b). They contended that though grievance may account for certain conflicts, the economic prospects for rebellion propels groups more easily towards violent conflicts. They therefore asserted that: ? social fractionalisation, measured as religious and ethnic diversity, lowers the risk of conflicts. Typically rebel organisations recruit their members from similar backgrounds and diversity may make it more difficult to generate a large rebel force and to maintain cohesion during war." (Collier and Hoeffler, 2002b: 1). Two basic notions are disenable; (i) since insurgency is less about grievance than greed, rebellion is more of organised crime, (ii) government and rebels are two separate discrete entities. Thus, by examining conflicts from this greed model, it becomes logical to understand mobilisation along rebellious lines as it would be easier to mobilise people when the state is relatively weak; when the opportunity cost for rebellion is lower than having peaceful negotiations; and above all when funds are really available (through several sources; extortion, looting and funding from the Diaspora) to acquire arms and personnel in the quest for state capture or economic power. They averred that it is difficult to mobilise enough rebellious forces against the state based on ethnic grievances. They opined that grievances based on ethnic hatred, political repression, exclusion and marginalisation implying ethnic diversity, diverse opinion, motives and political affinity within the polity, which is antithetical for cohesion against the state. Thus, it is obvious that violent conflicts can be explained more explicitly in terms of the economic drives that motivate groups to engage in violent acts. However, some writers have criticised the greed model on methodological grounds (Boschini et al., 2004;Hegre and Sambanis, 2006;Murshed and Tadjoeddin, 2007). The next section discusses the main tenets of the greed thesis within the context of the Niger Delta conflicts. # V. The Greed Model and Conflicts in the Niger Delta As earlier mentioned, the greed model has underpinned explanations for conflicts in resource endowed African states. However, the greed model seems limited in explaining the Niger Delta conflicts. For instance, inherent in the greed model is the notion that insurgents are motivated by greed, not grievance. That is, the focus of insurgents is on secession from, or, to gain control of the state for predation purposes. This does not seem to be so in the Niger Delta, as secession has never been part of the people's demand at any fora. Rather, they have only demand for restructuring of the Nigerian federation to reflect fiscal federalism as was applicable from 1953 to 1967. There is no evidence whatsoever, suggesting militants' attempt at state capture in their activities. In the absence of any secessionist attempt, or state capture, the greed factor, as the premise of insecurity becomes weakened substantially. Another notion of the greed thesis is the separateness of rebels and government; i.e, government and rebels are two separate discrete entities. Again, this on close scrutiny appears not true for the Niger Delta. Politicians recruited and armed the earliest militias as political thugs to deliver votes in the 2003 elections. Thus, the militants got their start through support (finance and arms) from politicians, who makeup the government. Therefore, the idea, of an impermeable membrane separating two discrete entities; government and rebels not only becomes porous but actually breaks down. Additionally, huge caches of arms used by militias were overtly or covertly acquired from the Nigerian military (Watts, 2008). Even the economic argument; predation appears rather weak in the Niger Delta. Looting of natural resource (oil in this case), is a key argument of the greed model. Thus, militias' involvement in oil theft seems to justify greed as the cause of insecurity. However, oil theft in the region involves not only militias but it is organised through a network involving senior officials of state, armed forces and politicians. Indeed, oil theft is an endemic practice long known in the military era (Asuni, 2009b). Turner (1976) painted how Nigeria's rentier economy widened opportunities for parallel economies to develop around oil in which state officials and clients are deeply ingrained. With the advent of democracy in 1999, the state itself appear to "capture" rebellion and transformed it in its own likeness; a mirror at one end of a continuum not far removed from the official and unofficial economy of oil-related pillage, which is political practice in Nigeria (Nwajiaku-Dahou, 2012). For instance, two naval officers, Rear Admirals Francis Agbiti and Samuel Kolawole were dishonourably discharged from service for illegally setting free a ship, MT African Pride, arrested on October 8, 2003 for stealing over 11,000 metric tons of crude oil (Omonobi and Abdulah, 2005). Thus, militias' engagement in oil theft is not enough to denominate greed as motivating the conflicts. Many writers' have attributed insecurity in the Niger Delta to greed because they misconstrued activities of armed gangs (pseudo-militias) in the region before the onset of insurgency as those of militias. In discussing the Niger Delta conflicts, a dichotomy must be made between the era of pseudo-militias (2001-2004) and real militancy (2005-2009) 4 . This dichotomy would show that militias paid little attention to oil theft. For example, (CC, 2009:159) shows that oil theft averaged 400,000 barrels daily between 2001 and 2005 (armed gangs era) but plunged to about 110,000 barrels between 2006 and 2009 (militias era). Between 2001 and 2005 the pseudomilitias either escorted oil bunkering vessels for their patrons, or engaged in oil bunkering for themselves. This was what led to the fight (war of the creeks) between Asari Dokubo and Ateke Tom in 2004. The fight was over sphere of influence (governable space) for oil bunkering activities for themselves, after Dokubo became estranged with erstwhile godfather Governor Peter Odili of Rivers State. Even if the armed gangs are equated to militias, their involvement in oil theft would also not justify the greed label. For, as, Agbonifo (2007) stated, resort by militants to economic predation to sustain the conflict does not diminish issues that ignited the conflict. Indeed, what the actions of the militias have brought to the fore is that violent conflicts could contain elements of greed and frustration (Arnson, 2005). The reason is that a political conflict could mutate into a situation were short term economic benefits assume primacy; in violent conflicts, greed and grievance may coexist (Arnson and Zartman, 2005). The question then is would insurgency have arisen had the benefits of oil accrued to Niger Delta, as the ethnic majority regions with agriculture? What Factors Underpinned the Niger Delta Conflicts Kapucinski (1982:34-35) noted that "Oil creates the illusion of a completely changed life, life without work ? life of ease, wealth, fortune, power". The advent of oil in the Niger Delta brought expectation of rapid socio-economic development. The expectation was not unfounded. Before the advent of oil, revenue sharing was based on the principle of derivation. From 1946-1967, each region received minimum 50% of the revenues it generated. As a result, the regions of the tripartite major ethnicities enjoyed rapid socio-economic development. The North established Arewa house, Ahmadu Bello University, Kaduna Polytechnic, Durba Hotel, Bank of the North and New Nigerian Newspaper; the East set-up University of Nigeria Nsukka, United Bank for Africa, Commerce Bank, the Presidential Hotel chain and Premier Brewery; while the West set-up University of Ife, Ibadan Polytechnic, Cocoa House, Western House, industrial estates, Housing estates at Apapa, Ikeja (Lagos), Bodija (Ibadan), National Bank and African first Television station (Emuedo and Idahosa, 2005). Lacking in resources, the Niger Delta was utterly undeveloped; Willink et al. (1958) described the region as "poor, backward, neglected". The Niger Delta's impoverish state compared to others led to Isaac Boro's 12-day revolution in 1966. But in 1967 when oil revenues surpassed agriculture, the derivation principle was replaced with landmass and population; two parameters acutely lacking in the Niger Delta. As Fashina, (1998:109) opined, abnegation of the derivation principle was determined by primordial interests of the different factions of the ethnic majorities based on their political power. For the switch guaranteed increased revenues to regions of the major ethnicities but denied the Niger Delta benefits that the major ethnicities enjoyed from agriculture (Emuedo and Ebohon, 2009b). As a result, after over 40 years of oil, the Niger Delta remained "poor, backward, neglected", as oil failed to improve the region. Hence, Lubeck et al. (2007) asserted that the Niger Delta is archetypal case of the "paradox of oil"; vast oil resources only beget deep catholic poverty. This geo-political contradiction of poverty amidst oil wealth gave rise to frustration and angst in the region. As Dollard et al. (1939:1) has noted "Aggression is always a consequence of frustration". They opined that "Aggression always presupposes the existence of frustration" and also, "frustration always leads to aggression" Dollard et al. (1939:7). In other words when an individual, a group or groups are prevented from reaching their goals they get frustrated and often, this results in aggression (Barker et al., 1941). Aggression it is stated results, from feelings of the people that their progress is being deliberately blocked by others to hurt them, hence they view it as personal attack (Averill, 1982(Averill, , 1983;;Weiner, 1985;Dodge, 1986). According to Berkowitz (1969Berkowitz ( , 1978) ) frustration has been constantly fingered as precursor of aggression. Closely linked with the frustration-aggression model is the concept of "relative deprivation", which states that often, people perceive themselves deprived, relative to others (Barker et al., 1941). In the opinion of Stewart (2000) this happens when conditions improve for one group but not for another and the deprived group deem this unjust. Relative deprivation as Gurr (1970) noted, is the variance between what people think they deserve, and what they are getting. Often, this gives rise to group identity. The potential for collective violence is strongly tied to the intensity and scope of relative deprivation among group members Gurr (1970:24). Thus, group and identity are vital for grievance (Akerlof and Kranton, 2000), without these, organised large-scale violence, is unfeasible, even if conflict is underpinned largely by greed (Olson, 1965). Ronnfeldt (1977) outlined fourfold sense in which the term relative deprivation can be understood; comparison with a situation in the past, to other social groups, to what the actors feel they expect or to a mix of the preceding three. The last point may provide the key to understanding the transformation of erstwhile peaceful conflicts to violent forms, in the Niger Delta. The Niger Delta people are unable to see the benefits of oil, as agriculture had done to other regions in the past, a change in the country's historical path. Arising from the foregoing, it is argued that conflict in Niger Delta is intertwined with the denial of the ontological needs of the people, exacerbated by bad governance. As Lowenthal, (1986:250) opined, "The Niger Delta conflict transcends the conception of conflict simply as the fear of the past lived in the present; it is an engrained and habitual awareness of deprivation". That is, having experienced abject neglect for years, the Niger Delta people need no re-enactment to retrigger their unassuaged history injuries and injustices. It should be noted that when dialogue and constitutional means of seeking redress are anathema, violent forms of expression become inevitable. The Niger Delta suffered exploitation under colonialism; this has remained unchanged in post colonial Nigeria. The Nigerian state is perceived in Niger Delta, since independence as, hostage to the tripartite majority ethnic groups. This has deepened the injunction between state policies and the needs of the ethnic majorities, except where such needs coincide with the clannish and primordial interest of the ethnic majorities; often, they do not. Hence, the Niger Delta has remained epicentre of ethnic minority rights protests as under colonialism. Azar (1990:7) has noted that "A single communal group or a coalition of a few communal groups that are unresponsive to the needs of other groups in the society ... strains the social fabric and eventually breeds fragmentation and protracted conflicts. Strident call for fiscal federalism as was the case prior to until 1967 was goaded by the asymmetry of development between the Niger Delta and non-oil producing areas. Palpably pervasive poverty has remained the hall mark of years of oil exploitation in the region. This mirror of neglect gives fillip to Azar's notion of protracted social conflict and diminishes Colliers subordination of grievance to greed. The history of exploitation of Niger Delta shows that the people are justified to be aggrieved, thus, weakening the greed factor in explaining the Niger Delta conflicts. Buzan (1991:19) identified five areas of threat to human security; military, political, economic, social and environmental. The Niger Delta conflict fits this classification. It includes crises of confidence owing to protracted failure of the state to deliver good governance; dissatisfaction with the current revenue allocation regime, leading to demands for resource control; pervasive poverty occasioned by oil-activities; polluted environment; threats to personal and communal security; disregard for minority rights; alienation; denial of access to economic opportunities and exclusion from main stream politics. Thus, Watts (2008) noted that the Niger Delta conflicts are expression of long and deeper geography of exclusion and alienation by which the region came to suffer all the social and environmental harms of oil activities and yet receive in return, very little of the oil revenues. In other words, the conflicts are reactions to the contrived inequality, hindering the region from development and ignored by the state. Denial of opportunities to reduce inequalities is in particular, potent force of grievance. Sociologists have indeed suggested that conflict is quite often, a smoke from the fire of unjust state policies and the political process (Keane, 1998;Churchill, 2005). Some analysts hold the view that violence is often, the only "political resource", available for those at the periphery of the political arena, to influence policy (Lipsky, 1970;McCarthy and Zald, 1977). In the opinion of El-Kenz, (1996:51-52) violence is the mode of response to the problems that state institutions are unable to solve because violence often, yields concessions from states (Piven and Cloward, 1977;Button, 1978). This is indeed true for the Niger Delta because the increase in derivation revenue from a crippling low of 1.5% in the 1980s to 3% % in the 1990s and to 13% in 2001 arose from the spread of violent protests in the region (Fubara, 2002:25). Thus, for Gurr (1991) violence is the only means for poor, deprived and marginalised people to redefine the process perpetuating their conditions. He stated further that "The greater the inequalities the more likely disadvantaged groups are to take collective action; particularly if the inequalities are reinforced by legal barriers established by dominant groups" (Gurr, 1991:181). For the Niger Delta, this is essentially true as Van Dessel (1995:29) observed, "Too many promises and disappointments in the past have exhausted the patience of the people". The violent conflicts that have characterised the Niger Delta are therefore, expressions of economic and political disparities (Welch, 1995). # VII. # Concluding Remarks The Niger Delta conflicts no doubt, may have had its fair share of predation; exemplified by the unholy mix sometimes of insurgency and criminality as evidenced by the involvement of armed groups in oil theft and hostage taking. However, with regards to the Niger Delta, the greed model provides no politics and no history and hence a very simplified version of events in the region. As a result, the Niger Delta conflicts appear to suffer disconnect from the greed thesis of conflicts. This is because in looking at oil-related conflicts in the region from the perspective of ordinary men and women in the oil host communities, the point is made that under certain conditions; such as conditions of large-scale and prolonged social justice deficits as in the Niger Delta, violent conflicts may help to define for the "deprived" region and for the Nigerian state, a more socially sensitive development and democratisation trajectory. This is the point that exponent of the greed model basically misses or indeed obscured. It is therefore argued that grievance due to frustration appears to be most suited for an appropriate interpretation of events in the Niger Delta. Protest strategies may be mere rational efforts by people poorly positioned to make claims on the state using conventional means. Thus, jettisoning of "Gandhian" tactics to embrace AK47 is the response to the state's insensitivity to the region's plight. Thus, as Okonta (2006) asserted behind the insecurity in the Niger Delta, is a political subject forced to resort to violence to restore his rights and dignity as a citizen. 1 * The Oil Industry Extra-Ministerial Institutions and Sustainable Agricultural Development: A Case Study of Okrika L AMAdeyemo 2002 * Nigeria Journal of Oil and Politics 2 1 Rivers State * Review of High states and Stake holders: Oil Conflicts and Security in Nigeria by Kenneth Omeje JAgbonifo Development and Change 38 5 2007 * Shelling Nigeria Ablaze CAke 1996. January 29 Tell (Lagos * Economics and Identity GAkerlof REKranton Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 3 2000 * Institutional Approach to the Environmental Problems of the Niger Delta RTAkinyele Current issues in Nigerian Environment Osuntokun, A 1998 Davidson press * Rethinking the Economics of War: The Intersection of Need, Creed, and Greed CIArnson Arson, J. C. and Zarman, I. W 2005 Woodrow Wilson Centre Press Washington D C Political Economy of War Situating the Debate * The Human Ecosystems of the Niger Delta Ashton-Jones N Ibadan; Krat books Ltd 1998 * Understanding the armed groups of the Niger Delta. Working paper JBAsuni 2009b Council on Foreign Relations New York * Resource Abundance and Economic Development RMAuty 2001 Oxford University Press New York * Anger and aggression: An essay on emotion JRAverill 1982 Springer-Verlag New York * Studies on anger and aggression: Implications for theories of emotion JRAverill 1983 * American Psychologist 38 * The management of protracted social conflict: Theory and cases EEAzar 1990 Dartmouth (Aldershot, Hampshire, England and Brookfield, Vt., USA * Studies in topological and vector psychology: No.2. Experiments on regression and frustration RGBarker TDembo KLewin 1941 Iowa City: Iowa University * The corporate responsibility debate JBanfield 1998. Nov African Business * Mercury accumulation in fishes from tropical aquatic ecosystems in the Niger Delta NUBenson JPEssien ABWilliams DEBassey Nigerian Current Science 92 6 2007 * Creed and Grievance; Economic Agenda in Civil Wars MBerdal DMalone Ottawa: International Development Research Centre 2000 * Roots of aggression: A re-examination of the frustrationaggression hypothesis LBerkowitz L. Berkowitz 1969 Atherton Press New York The frustration-aggression hypothesis revisited * Whatever happened to the frustration-aggression hypothesis? LBerkowitz American Behavioral Scientist 21 1978 * ADBoney Phytoplankton. Edward Arnold 1983 * Resource Curse or Not? A Question of Appropriability ADBoschini JPeterson JRoine 2004 Stockholm; Mimeo Stockholm University * Slick Alliance-Shell's Nigerian Fields Produce Few Benefits for Region's Villages. The Wall Street Journal GBrooks 1994. May * Black Violence JWButton 1978 Princeton Univ. Press Princeton, NJ * New Patterns of Global Security in the Twenty first Century BBuzan International Affairs 67 3 1991 * Press Release' WChurchill 2005. January 31. February 28, 2005 * Greed and Grievance: Economic Agendas in Civil Wars PCollier Berdal, M. and D.M. Malone 1999 Lynne Rienner Publishers Boulder Doing Well out of War * On economic causes of civil war PCollier AHoeffler Oxford Economic Papers 50 1998 * Greed and Grievance in Civil Wars .. . . . . 2000 The World Bank Washington, D.C. Policy Research Paper no. 2355 * On the Incidence of Civil War in Africa . . . . . 29. .......... Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 1 2002. 2004 Oxford Economic Papers * The Magical State FCoronil 1997 University of Chicago Press Chicago * Some effects of agricultural land use on stream insect communities KWDance HB NHynes Environmental Pollution 22 1980 * Trade and Politics in the Niger Delta KDike 1830-1885. 1956 Claredon Press Oxford * Introduction PDimaggio WPowell The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis WWPowell PDimaggio Chicago Univ. Chicago Press 1991 * Frustration and Aggression JDollard LDoob NMiller OMowrer RSears 1939 Yale University Press New Haven, CT * Social information-processing variables in the development of aggression and altruism in children KADodge Altruism and aggression: Biological and social origins CZahn-Waxler EMCummings &RIannoti Cambridge, England Cambridge University Press 1986 * Oil Spill Disaster Monitoring Along Nigerian Coastline. TS 16 -Disaster Preparedness and Management FEgberongbe PNwilo OBadejo 2006 Munich Germany * Youth and Violence AEl-Kenz Africa Now: People Politics and Institutions Stephen Ellis; Portsmouth (N.H) 1996 * Colonial Relations, Elite Exceptionalism and the Problems of Integration in Nigeria COEmuedo SAIdahosa Tropical Focus 6 2005 * State and Elite "Exceptionalism"; The Political Sociology of Reverse Agenda COEmuedo SIEbohon International Journal of Communication 10 2009b. December * Politics of Conflict Oilification and Petro-Violence in the Niger Delta COEmuedo Global Journal of Social Science 9 1 2010 * TErtman Birth of the Leviathan: Building States and Regimes in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge and New York Cambridge University Press 1997 * National Programme to Combat Desertification Food and Agricultural Organisation 2005 University Press * Reflections on the National Question OFashina Ken Saro-Wiwa and the Crisis of the Nigerian State. CDHR OOlorode WRaji TOgunye TOladunjoy Lagos 1998 * Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war JDFearon DDLaitin American Political Science Review 97 1 2003 * The Niger Delta Development Commission: Towards a Development Blueprint BAFubara P I Ozo-Eson and U Ukiwo 2002 Centre for Advanced Social Sciences Port Harcourt The Politics of the Niger Delta * Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective AGerschenkron 1962 Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA * Shell withheld reserves data aid Nigeria JGerth LLabaton New York Times 2004. March 19 * Youth Militancy, Amnesty and Security in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria LDGilbert V. Ojakorotu and L.D. Gilbert 2010 Checkmating the Resurgence of Oil Violence in the Niger Delta of Nigeria * The Niger Delta in Nigeria: A Pollution Assessment Study PGrevy 1995 World Bank Washington D.C * Oil and Political Violence in Nigeria YGuichaoua Governance of Oil in Africa: Unfinished Business. The Institut Français des Relations Internationales (IFRI) Lesourne WCRamsay 2009 Research Centre * Why Men Rebel TRGurr 1970 Princeton University Press Princeton * Theories of Political Violence and Revolution in the Third World TGurr Conflict Resolution in Africa FMDeng WZartman Washington DC The Brooklings Institute 1991 * TGylfason Scottish Journal of Political Economy 48 5 2001 Nature, Power, and Growth * Sensitivity Analysis of the Empirical Literature on Civil War Onset HHegre NSambanis Journal of Conflict Resolution 4 50 2006 * The politics of bones. Saturday Night THunt 2000. June 24 * The Impact of Oil on a Developing Country AIkein 1990 Praeger New York * Nigeria: Want in the Midst of Plenty ICG Africa Report 113 2006b. July Number * Environmental Challenges of the Niger Delta TTIsoun Challenges of the PIOzo-Eson UUkiwo Niger Delta, CASS, Port Harcourt 2001 * Temporal Pattern in Macrobenthic Communities of the Hawksbury Estuary ARJones New South Wales, Australian .Journal of Marsh and Freshwater Residue 38 1987 * The Shah of Shahs RKapucinski New Yorker 1982 Harper * The Paradox of Plenty TKarl 1997 University of California Press Berkeley * JKeane Civil Society: Old Images, New Visions Cambridge Polity Press 1998 * Nigeria: The Political Economy of Oil SAKhan 1994 Oxford University Press London * Ranking of the world's oil and gas provinces by known petroleum volumes TRKlett TSAhlbrandt JWSchmoker JLDolton -97-463 Geological Survey Open-file Report U.S 1997 * Political Consequences of the Product Cycle JKurth International Organization 33 1979 * Site selection for aquaculture: Chemical features of water. Working Paper African Regional Aquaculture Centre MNKutty 1987 53 Port Harcourt * Does mother nature corrupt CLeite JWeidmann IMF Working Paper Washington DC IMF 1999 * Path Dependence, Lock-in, and History SJLiebowitz SEMargolis Journal of Law, Economics and Organisation 11 1 1995 * Protest in City Politics M¬Lipsky Rand-Mcnally 1970 Chicago, IL * Sequential negotiation in multiagent systems of oils, spill response decision-making XLiu KWWirtz 2005 * Baseline Marine Pollution Bulletin 50 * DLowenthal The Past is a Foreign Country Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1986 * MPLubeck MJWatts LLipschutz Convergent Interest: U.S. Energy Security and the "Securing 2007. February of Nigerian Democracy" International Policy Report: A Publication of the Centre for International Policy * Path Dependence in Historical Sociology JamesMahoney Theory and Society 29 4 2000 * Resource Curse or Debt Overhang? OManzano RRigobon National Bureau of Economic Research 8390 2001 Working Paper * AMbembe On the Postcolony California University of California Press 2001 * Resource mobilisation and social movements: a partial theory JMccarthy MNZald 1977 * American Journal of Sociology 82 * Institutionalised organisations: formal structure as myth and ceremony JWMeyer BRowan Powell, W.W. and DiMaggio, P. 1991 * The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: Univ Chicago Press * A Framework for PMickwitz Evaluating Environmental Policy Instruments Evaluation 9 4 2003 * Perception and Reality: Assessing Priority for the Sustainable Development in the Niger Delta DMoffat OLinden Ambio: A journal of Human Environment 24 1995 * Reappraising the Greed and Grievance Explanations for Violent Internal Conflict SMMurshed MZTadjoeddin MICROCON Research Working Paper 2 2007 MICROCON * The view from below MMwanasali Greed and Grievance: Economic Agenda in Civil Wars Boulder, M. Berdal and DMMalone 2000 * Far from Gulf, a spill scourge five decades old ANassiter New York Times 2010. June 16. 2010 * Development of Nigeria's Oil Industry 2009. October 23. 2009 Nigerian National Petroleum Company (NNPC) * Inter-annual trends of heavy metals in marine resources from the Nigerian territorial waters OANubi LOOyediran ATNubi African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 5 2 2011 * The political economy of oil and 'rebellion' in Nigeria's Niger Delta KNwajiaku-Dahou Review of African Political Economy 39 2012 * The impact of natural gas flaring on micro climate on yield of Egusi melon (Citrullus lanatus) in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria. Centre for Population and Development (CPED) PA OOdjugo Policy Paper Series 2 2010 * The Political Economy of Military rule in Nigeria JF EOhiorhenan Review of Radical Political Economy 16 1984 * Behind the Mask: Explaining the Emergence of the MEND Militia in Nigeria's Oil Bearing Niger Delta IOkonta 2006 Pambazuka news * Microbial degradation of petroleum by brackish water isolates in Nigeria Wetlands GCOkpokwasili The Nigerian man and the Biosphere. (M.AB-5) National Committee TV IAkpata AOkoli 1996 * The Logic of Collective Action MOlson 1965 Harvard University Press Cambridge MA * Petrobusiness and Security Threats in the Niger Delta KOmeje Current Sociology 54 3 2006 * The Politics of Path Dependency: Political Conflicts in Historical Institutionalism BGPeters JPierre DKing S The Journal of Politics 67 4 2005 * Poor People's Movements FPiven RACloward 1977 New York; Vintage * Review Essay: Three Generations of Environment and Security Research CFRonnfeldt Journal of Peace Research 34 4 1997 * How Do Natural Resources Influence Civil War? Evidence from Thirteen Cases MRoss International Organization 58 1 2004 * Oil Snapshot and Country Overview 2010 RWI (Revenue Watch Institute * Development Discussion Paper No. 517a, Harvard Institute for International Development JDSachs AMWarner Nature Resource Intensity and Economic Growth Jorg Mayer, Brian Chambers, and Ayisha Farooq 98 1997. 1999 Edward Elgar Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth. in Development Policies in Natural Resource Economies * The curse of natural resources European Economic Review 45 2001 * Institutions and Organizations WRScott 1995 Sage Thousand Oaks, CA * Party and Patronage MShefter Politics and Society 7 1977 * Nigeria, Shell under fire BShelby 1996. Feb World Press Review * ,IN Snape MJRiddle JSStark CMCole CKKing SDuquesne DBGore 2001 * Management and remediation of contaminated sites at Casey Station Antarctica. Polar Record 37 * Crisis Prevention: Tackling Horizontal Inequalities FStewart Oxford Development Studies 28 3 2000 * Special Report: Nigeria Time Magazine 2006. May 22 * The effect of gas flaring on sweet potato production in the Niger Delta GUUdoinyang Nigeria. Journal of Ecosystem 10 2 2005 * United Nations Development Programme Undp 2006 Abuja, Nigeria Niger Delta Human Development Report * United Nations United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD) 2009 * The Environmental Situation in the Niger Delta JPVan Dessel 1995. February Nigeria Internal position paper prepared for Green Peace Netherlands * Imperial Oil: The Anatomy of a Nigerian Oil Insurgency. Niger Delta Economies of Violence Working paper MWatts 2008 Institute of International Studies, University of California, Berkeley * The Ogoni and Selfdetermination: Increasing Violence in Nigeria WelchEJr Journal of Modern African Studies 33 4 1995 * Ethnicity in sub-Saharan Africa DWelsh International Affairs 3 72 1996 * An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion BWeiner Psychological Review 92 1985 * Nigeria: Report of the Commission appointed to enquire into the fears of Minorities and the Means of Allaying Them. Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for the Colonies by Command of Her Majesty HWillink GHadow PMason JBShearer 1958. July 34 London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office P * Defining an Environmental Development Strategy for the Niger Delta WorldBank 1995 World Bank * Nationalizing the third-World State: Categorical Imperative or MISSION Impossible? CYoung Polity 15 2 1982 * Organizations as institutions LGZucker Research in the Sociology of Organizations SBBacharach Greenwich, CT JAI 1983