Graphical illustrations were used to further explain the interaction effect. The study revealed that the students in the experimental group (Computer Simulations) instructional strategies had a higher mean in both the achievement and acquisition of practical skills than their counterparts did in the control group (Conventional) instructional strategy. Attitude had no significant main effect however; there were significant interaction effect of treatment and attitude on the Senior Secondary Students' achievement in Physics practical. Hence, this study suggested the need for physics teachers to lay less emphasis on Conventional laboratory method, which was expository in nature. Keywords: computer simulations, practical skills, practical achievement, learning. # I. Background to the Study hysics is the backbone of technological innovations. It has empowered the new millennium students' acquisition of relevant skills such as Collaborative Learning Skills. Therefore, every child should be given the opportunity to acquire at least the basic knowledge and the concept of Physics as a science subject (Adeyemo, 2011). Physics, being a science subject, constitutes two aspects: the theoretical aspect and the practical aspect. Besides, practical work plays a positive role in science teaching and learning by making it comparatively easier to understand; and can strengthen students' content knowledge (Banu, 2011) (Abimbola, 1994;Aladejana & Aderibigbe, 2007) or delay in the conduct of practical activities until the final external examinations are near (Abakpa, Achor & Odoh, 2016;Akinbobola, 2015;Babajide, 2010 ;Stephen & Mboto, 2010). This delay might enable students to follow the instructions given in practical Physics question paper finishing one-step after another; however, it is not necessary that they develop deeper understanding of the experiment (Logar & Savec, 2011). Another reason might be teachers' demonstration, which makes students passive (Omorogbe & Celistine, 2013) or lack of functional Physics laboratory and inadequate equipment for practical Physics in most Nigerian secondary schools (Adegoke & Chukwunenye, 2013). In addition to all other reasons, the fact that the students were taught with conventional methods instead of using laboratoryassisted instructional strategies (Abungu, Okere & Wachanga, 2014) could also contribute to the list of reasons. That is, students are not exposed to efficient pedagogies and presenting of information to learners (Buabeng, Ossei-Anto & Ampiah, 2014). Physics, as a practically-oriented subject, requires continuous demonstrations with laboratory activities to explain some seemingly abstract concepts and to instill appropriate scientific skills needed for higher study and, consequently, technological advancement of the nation (Tamunoiyowuna & James, 2016). In order to tackle the problems highlighted so far, the study integrated practical instructional strategies with Computer Simulations against the conventional method of teaching Practical Physics in the laboratory. During the practical Physics sessions, the teacher demonstrates the experiment using Computer Simulation in the experimental group. The strategies would help the students to acquire more content knowledge and better knowledge retention as against the conventional method of demonstration. Computer Simulations: are done by the use of the computer to predict the outcome of a real life situation by using a model of that situation. Simulations allow students to model the process of developing hypothesis, changing variables and observing the results, accumulating the data, resetting the value of variables, then running the simulation to test the hypothesis (Nesbit-Hawes, 2005). Moreover, simulation speeds up teachers' educational potential and students' learning thereby allowing students to learn by discovery methods (Hughes & Overton, 2009;Hursen & Asiksoy, 2015). Hursen and Asiksoy (2015) and Taskin and Kandermir (2010) in their studies found out that students who were taught using simulations were more successful than the students who were taught by the traditional approach in Physics. Besides, there is evidence that Simulations had shown a greater impact on students' achievement in other science subjects. Huppert, Lomask and Lazarowitz (2002) investigated the impact of a Biology simulation on high school students' academic achievement and the findings indicate that the achievement of students using the simulation was higher than those not using the simulation. Plass, Milne, Homer, Schwartz, Hayward, Jordan, Verkuilen, Ng, Wang and Barrientos (2012) investigated the use of a sequence of simulations for Chemistry learning and their findings, supported the effectiveness of simulations as a teaching tool in a classroom context. # Conventional Laboratory Method: The Conventional Laboratory Method which is teacher centered is also expository in nature (Pyatt &Sims, 2007). The learner has to follow the teacher's instructions or the procedure given. The outcome is predetermined by the teacher and may be already known to the learner. This method does not promote the development of students' thinking skills: its 'cookbook' nature emphasizes the mechanical following of stipulated procedures that include collection of data in order to verify or demonstrate principles described in textbooks. Alongside the different practical instructional strategies, the study also investigated the moderating effects of Attitude on the two dependant measures (achievement and acquisition of practical skills). Attitudes are general dispositions that stand behind people's evaluations and emotions (Zeidan & Jayosi, 2015). Musasia, Abacha and Biyoyo (2012) in their study proved that, the girls who carried out practical investigations had developed better attitudes because of practical based instruction in Physics. Kaya and Boyuk (2011) in their findings stated that Physics lessons being held in the classroom on the sole theoretical basis is one of the factors that influence attitude of the students toward these lessons in a negative manner. Ye?ilyurt (2004) in his study developed an attitude questionnaire and applied to identify student teachers' interests and attitudes for basic Physics laboratory. The outcome of the study was that students were successful in undertaking basic Physics laboratory experiments, but they exhibited unfavorable attitudes towards laboratory experiments. The teaching of Practical Physics is the backbone of Physics as a science subject. This is because practical work assists in arousing and sustaining the students' interest as well as cultivating scientific attitude to Physics and its related phenomena (Musasia, Abacha & Biyoyo, 2012; Ojediran, Oludipe & Ehindero, 2014). Besides, for a Physics student to be successful, the student needs to perform very well in the practical aspect as much as the theoretical aspect (Godwin, Adrian & Johnbull, 2015). If this is the case, there is an urgent need to tackle the present precarious performance situation regarding the decline in students' achievement in WAEC Practical Physics examination (Akani, 2015). In the aforementioned exam, the WAEC Chief Examiners Report of 2013, 2014 and 2015 averred that several factors were attributed to the students' poor achievement in practical Physics, one of such is the tediousness of conventional strategy of demonstration of Physics experiment, as this strategy makes lab exercises not necessarily contribute to the enhancement of practical abilities or content knowledge, rather it leads to just "task completion" or "manipulating equipment" (Haagen-Schuetzenhoefer, 2012). This calls for Computer Simulations that will help the students to be suitably prepared for West African Senior Secondary School Certificate Practical Examination to improve their achievement in practical Physics as well as acquire practical skills. The following null hypotheses were tested in the study: H 02 : There is no significant main effect of attitude on students' (a) achievement in practical Physics (b) acquisition of skills in practical Physics. H 03 : There are no significant interaction effects of treatment and attitude on students' (a) achievements in practical Physics (b) acquisition of skills in practical Physics. III. # Methodology This study adopted a non-randomized pre-test, post-test control group of quasi-experimental research design using a 3 * 2 * 2 factorial representation. The independent variables of this study are the different laboratory instructional strategies: Simulation strategy and Conventional method. The Moderator variables that intervene with independent variable are Attitude at two levels (positive and negative).These variables are dependent on the dependent variable, which are the Achievement scores and acquisition of Practical skills. Lagos is a cosmopolitan city; a former capital of Nigeria that is divided into six education districts. The study was conducted in Educational district III of Lagos State. The Educational district III covers four (4) zones namely Epe, Eti-Osa, Ibeju-Lekki and Lagos Island. The population of this study comprised of all the public co-educational Senior Secondary schools in six educational districts of Lagos state. Senior Secondary Class II (SSII) students of the participating schools were used for the study. This is because the bulk of the Physics content is covered in SS2, thereby making the class more attractive to research. The sample used for the study consisted of 219 Senior Secondary Two (SSII) students who offer Physics from six co-educational schools in Educational district III. Multistage sampling method was adopted for this study. First simple random sampling was used to select Educational District III out of six educational districts because all Educational districts have schools following NERDC curriculum. Out of the four Zones in Educational District III, two zones, that is, zone two (Eti-Osa) and zone four (Lagos Island) were randomly selected. From each zone, two schools were purposively selected. The selection is motivated by decision to choose such type of schools that have qualified Physics teachers with equipped laboratories, presenting students for WAEC examination, ready to assist the researcher in carrying out the treatment and have generator installed for power supply or constant power supply during teaching hours. Simple random sampling technique was used to assign the selected schools to various strategies (balloting) as the selected schools satisfy the requirements by the researcher. In experimental group, SS group had 116 students and the control group that is CM strategy had 103 students. Four research instruments were used in this study for data collection: Instructional procedural steps (Lesson plans), Practical Physics Achievement Test (PPAT), Practical Skills Rating Scale (PSRS) and Students' Attitude Inventory Scale (SAIS).Practical Physics Achievement Test (PPAT) was adapted from WAEC Practical Physics examination which was used to measure the students' achievement and their acquisition of higher order Practical skills. The reliability coefficient of the PPAT items was determined using Kuder and Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20) as 0.71. Practical Skills Rating Scale (PSRS) adapted from Babajide (2010) was revalidated by the researcher and the reliability coefficient for each of the skills determined using the Scott Pi statistical tool was-Manipulative skills=0.81, Measurement skills=0.79, Observation skills=0.72, Mathematical Skills=0.76, Drawing Skills = 0.71, Graphing Skills=1.0 and Inferring and Generalization skills= 0.83.The reliability coefficient of Students' Attitude Inventory Scale (SAIS) determined by the researcher using Cronbach's Alpha was 0.76. # IV. # Development of Instructional Strategies Package The instructional strategies package contains Simulations and Video footages of practical works in the contents of the curriculum that includes Hooke's law, Lenses and Ohm's law. The researcher prepared the Computer Simulation instructional strategy package as follows-Simulations for Hookes law experiment was adapted from Physics Educational Technology (PhET) which was developed by the Physics Education Research (PER) group of University of Colorado while Simulations for Lenses and Ohms law experiments were extracted from Board works IGCSE Triple Science software. Then the simulations were copied into CDs. The simulations were performed using the CD, a computer and projector by the teacher in front of the students. H 01 : There is no significant main effect of treatment (Computer simulation strategy) on students' (a) achievement in practical Physics (b) acquisition of skills in practical Physics. V. # Data Analysis and Presentation of Results # Research Question 1(a): To what extent does the treatment (Computer simulation strategy) affect students' achievement in Practical Physics? 4.6 shows that overall mean score of 81.37and standard deviation as 6.67 for positive attitude and while negative attitude has mean score of 77.29 and standard deviation as 9.17. Overall, there is a considerable difference between the mean scores of positive and negative attitude; this means there is interaction effect between treatment and attitude on students' acquisition of practical skills. # Hypothesis Testing H 01 (a): There is no significant main effect of treatment on Students' Achievements in Practical Physics. Figure1 shows that there is no significant difference in attitude when SS method is used, but comparatively when CM is used, there is a slight significant difference in their attitude, that is more of positive attitude than negative attitude. # H 03 (b): There are no significant interaction effects of treatment and attitude on students' acquisition of practical skills. Table 4.9 showed that two-way interaction effect of treatment and attitude is not significan [F (2, 219) =2.225; P < 0.05], it then means that the treatment does not depend on attitude to be effective. Hence, H 05 (b) was accepted. VI. # Discussion of Findings The findings of the study in table 4.1 and 4.2 show significant main effects of treatment on students' achievements and acquisition of practical skills in Practical Physics. The result of the findings in Table 4.7 and 4.9 showed that out of the two strategies, Computer Simulation had greater effect on both achievement and acquisition of Practical skills in Practical Physics. This is because Simulation creates game like environment and with animations, it helps the students to visualize abstract helping interactive and reflective. Simulations help the learners to demonstrate a clear understanding of the concept by giving the learner opportunity to repeat the entire process. The findings of this study are consistent with other previous findings which shows that simulated instructional approach fostered higher achievement than the conventional approach (Huppert, Mengistu & Kahsay, 2015). This study proved that SS method enhances students' acquisition of skills in practical Physics while Kaheru (2014) conducted a study where no significant effect was found in the acquisition of the skill when computer simulations were used. Table 4.3 and 4.4 shows that attitude may influence on students achievements and acquisition of Practical Skills in Practical Physics. However, Table 4.7 and 4.9 using ANCOVA revealed that there is no significant main effect attitude on students' achievement and acquisition of skills in Practical Physics. Hence, the results revealed in Table 4.5 and 4.6 were due to chance factor. Furthermore, ANCOVA Table 4.7 established that there is interaction effect of attitude and treatment on student's achievements while Table 4.9 showed that there is no interaction effect of attitude and treatment on students 'acquisition of practical skills in practical Physics. VII. # Conclusion This study has concluded that Computer Simulation strategy proved superior to conventional strategy in enhancing the students' achievement in practical Physics and acquisition of skills in practical Physics. It has shown that there is no main effect of attitude while there is interaction effect of treatment and attitude on students' achievement in Practical Physics. # VIII. # Recommendations Based on the findings, the following recommendations were forwarded ![Effects of Computer Simulations on Senior Secondary School Students' Achievements in Practical Physics in Educational District III, Lagos State, NigeriaHence, this study investigated the effects of Computer Simulation strategies on students' achievement and acquisition of skills in practical Physics.II. Statement of the Problem a) Research Questions The following research questions guided the study -1. To what extent does the treatment (Computer simulation strategy) affect students' (a) achievement in practical Physics (b) acquisition of skills in practical Physics? 2. To what extent does attitude affects students' (a) achievement in practical Physics (b) acquisition of skills in practical Physics? 3. What is the interaction effect between treatment and attitude on students' (a) achievement in practical Physics (b) acquisition of skills in practical Physics? b) Research Hypotheses](image-2.png "-") Table 1.1: Mean and standard deviation scores ofstudents' achievement in WAEC Practical PhysicsexaminationYearMean (out of 50)Standard Deviation2006249.5420072610.0020082311.4920092110.692010239.9020112410.582012309.952013248.8920142410.002015249.59Source: http://waeconline.org.ng/elearning/Physics/physmainhtmlStudents' weaknesses in Practical aspect mightbe due to inadequate integration of laboratory activitieswith theory classes 41Research Question 1(b): To what extent does thetreatment (Computer simulation and strategy) affectstudents' acquisition of skills in Practical Physics? 42mean and the conventional method has theleast.Research Question 2 (a): To what extent does attitudeaffects students' achievements in Practical Physics? 43AttitudeNPre-test Mean Std.Dev Mean Std.Dev Post-testMean Diff.Positive198 1.46.93285.81 11.7284.35Negative21 1.43.92675.62 13.6574.19Table 4.3 shows that positive attitude obtainedTherefore, attitude has influence on achievement ina mean difference score of 84.35 while the negativepractical Physics.attitude had a mean difference score of 74.19. It is evident that there is a considerable mean difference shown in positive and negative attitude of students.Research Question 3(b): To what extent does attitude affects students' acquisition of practical skills? 44Physics According to AttitudeAttitudeNPre-test Mean Std.Dev Mean Std.Dev Mean Diff. Post-testPositive292 8.24.60681.37 6.6773.13Negative 238.14.65577.29 9.1769.15 4Research Question 4(a): What is the interaction effectbetween treatment and attitude on students'achievements in Practical Physics? 45TreatmentAttitu deMeanNStd. DeviationNegative96.6052.608SSPositiv e94.771114.300Total94.841164.250Negative69.06167.344CMPositiv e74.39877.457Total73.561037.654Negative75.622113.647TotalPositiv e85.8119811.721Total84.8421912.259Table 4.5 shows that overall mean score ofinteraction effect between treatment and attitude on85.81 and standard deviation as 11.72 for positivestudents' achievements in Practical Physics.attitude and while negative attitude has mean score of 75.62 and standard deviation as 13.65. Overall, there is a considerable difference between the mean scores of positive and negative attitude; this means there isResearch Question 5(b): What is the interaction effect between treatment and attitude on students' acquisition of practical skills? 46TreatmentAttitu deMeanNStd. DeviationNegative87.6053.435SSPositiv e85.411113.584Total85.501163.591Negative74.06167.903CMPositiv e76.23876.130Total75.891036.441Negative77.29219.171TotalPositiv e81.371986.665Total80.982197.022Table 47Year 2018Volume XVIII Issue VIII Version IG )(Global Journal of Human Social Science -*Significant at P < 0.05. 48EstimatesTreatmentMeanStd. Error95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound Upper BoundSS95.801 a1.37593.09298.511CM71.656 a.81870.04373.268It is evident from Table 4.8 that students whoThe order of magnitude of the Physics achievementwere subjected to SS method obtained the highestscores of the group is represented as SS>CM.Year 2018 Volume XVIII Issue VIII Version I ( G )achievement score (M=95.801) while the CM method obtained the lowest achievement score (M=71.656). Summary of 3 X 2X 2 *Significant at P < 0.05 H 01 (b): There is no significant main effect of treatment on of practical skills. The table 4.9 shows significant main effects of treatment on students' acquisition of practical skills in Physics, [F (2,219) =63.049; P < 0.05]. Furthermore, that the acquisition of practical skills in Practical Physics was associated with the instructional strategy used by teacher. Furthermore, Estimated Marginal Means (TableGlobal Journal of Human Social Science -the greater eta value of 0.228 signifies the main effect of treatment. Hence, H 01 (b) was not accepted. This implies Table4.10: Estimated Marginal Means of students' acquisition of skills in Practical Physics by Treatment 4.10) of the output gives the adjusted means (controlling for the covariate 'pre-test ') for each treatment group. Estimates Treatment Mean Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound Upper Bound 86.275 a 1.174 8 3.960 88.590 75.319 a .702 73.935 76.702 H 02 (b): There is no significant main effect of attitude on students' acquisition of practical skills. Table 4.9 shows there is no significant main effects of attitude on students' acquisition of skill in Practical Physics [F (1, 219) = 63.049; P > 0.05]. Hence, H 03 (b) was accepted.H 03 (a): There are no significant interaction effects oftreatment and attitude on students' achievements inPractical Physics.Table 4.7 showed that two-way interaction effectof treatment and attitude has effect on achievements inPractical Physics [F (2, 219) =5.235; P < 0.05]. In otherwords, treatment with attitude is dependant. Hence, H 03(a) was not accepted. 49Sourceof Squares Type III SumdfMean SquareFSig.Squared Partial EtaCorrected Model5186.328 a41296.58249.872.000.482Intercep t5853.29015853.290225.143.000.513Pretest acqu isition skills64.698164.6982.489.116.011TR EATMENT1639.14611639.14663.049.000*.228Attitud e.0421.042.002.968.000TR EATMENT * Attitude57.839157.8392.225.137.010Error5563.59921425.998Total1446961.000219SSCMIt is evident from Table 4.10 that students whowere subjected to SS method obtained the highestacquisition of practical skills score (M=86.275 while theCLM method obtained the lowest acquisition of practicalskills score (M=75.319).This explains why SS was moreeffective than CM. The order of magnitude of thePhysics acquisition of practical skills scores of the groupis represented as SS>CM.H 02 (a): There is no significant main effect of attitude onstudents' achievements in Practical Physics.Table 4.7 reveals that there is no significantmain effect of attitude on students' achievements inPractical Physics, [F (1, 219) = 1.124; P > 0.05]. Hence,H 03 (a) was accepted. © 2018 Global Journals * Effect of Laboratory Strategy on Senior Secondary Students' Achievement in Biology VOAbakpa EEAchor COOdoh Journal of the International Centre for Science, Humanities and Education Research 2 2 2016 * A critical appraisal of the role of laboratory practical work in science teaching in Nigeria IOAbimbola Journal of Curriculum and Instruction 4 1&2 1994 * References Références Referencias in Educational District III Lagos State, Nigeria * Effect of Science Process Skills Teaching Strategy on Boys and Girls' Achievement in Chemistry in Nyando District HEAbungu MIOkere SWWachanga Kenya. Journal of Education and Practice 5 15 2014 * Improving Students' Learning Outcomes In Practical Physics, Which Is Better? Computer Simulated Experiment or Hands-On Experiment? BAAdegoke NChukwunenye IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education 2 6 2013 * The effect of teachers' students' perception of Physics classroom learning environment on their academic achievement in Senior Secondary School Physics SAAdeyemo International Journal of Educational Research and Technology 2 1 2011 * Laboratory teaching: Implication on Students' achievement in Chemistry in Secondary OAkani Schools in Ebonyi Journal of Education and Practice 6 30 2015 * Evaluating Science Laboratory classroom learning environment in Osun State of Nigeria for National development AOAkinbobola An International Peer-reviewed Journal 9 2015 * Science Laboratory environment and academic performance FAladejana OAderibigbe Journal of Science Education and Technology 16 6 2007 * Generative and Predict-Observe-Explain instructional strategies as determinant of Secondary School Student achievement and Practical skills in Physics V F TBabajide 2010 Nigeria University of Ibadan Ph.D thesis * The role of practical work in teaching and learning Physics at Secondary level in Bangladesh SBanu 2011 University of Canterbury Master's thesis * An investigation into Physics teaching in Senior High Schools IBuabeng TAOssei-Anto JGAmpiah 10.5430/wje.v4n5p40 World Journal of Education 4 5 40 2014 * Effects of learning support in simulation -based Physics learning KChang YChen HLin YSung 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.01.007 Computers & Education 51 2008 * Effect of Simulation on students' achievement in Senior Secondary School Chemistry in Enugu East Local Government Area of Enugu State FOEzeudu OPEzinwanne Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice 4 19 2013 * The impact of Physics laboratory on students offering Physics in Ethiope West Local Government Area of Delta state OGodwin OAdrian EJohnbull 10.5897/EPR2014.1943 Educational Research and Reviews 10 7 2015 * Improving the quality of Lab reports by using them as Lab instructions. The Physics Teacher CHaagen-Schuetzenhoefer 2012 50 430 * Key aspects of learning and teaching in experimental sciences IHughes TOverton A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Enhancing Academic Practice HFry SKetteridge &sMarshall 2009 Third edition * Computer simulations in the high school: Students' cognitive stages, science process skills and academic achievement in microbiology JHuppert SMLomask RLazarowitz 10.1080/09500690110049150 Universal Journal of Educational Research 4 1 2002. 2016 * The effect of simulation methods in teaching Physics on students' academic success CHursen GAsiksoy 10.18844/wjet.v7i1.26 World Journal on Educational Technology 7 1 2015 * The use of computer simulations for cognitive load change and acquisition of knowledge and skills in geometrical optics (Doctoral dissertation SJ MKaheru 2014 Pretoria University of South Africa * Attitude towards Physics lessons and physical experiments of the High school students HKaya UBoyuk European Journal of Physics Education 2 1 2011 * Students'Hands-on Experimental Work vs Lecture Demonstration in Teaching Elementary School Chemistry ALogar VFSavec Acta Chimica Slovenica 58 2011 * The effect of computer simulation used as a teaching aid in students' understanding in learning the concepts of electric fields and electric forces AMengistu GKahsay Latin American Journal of Physics Education 9 2 2015 * Effect of practical work in Physics on girls' performance, attitude change and skills acquisition in the form two-form three secondary schools' transition in Kenya AMMusasia OAAbacha MEBiyoyo International Journal of Humanities and Social Science 2 23 2012 * Higher order thinking skills in a Science Classroom Computer Simulation PJNesbit-Hawes 2005 Queensland University of Technology, Australia Master's thesis * Impact of Laboratory-based instructional intervention on the learning outcomes of low performing senior secondary students in IAOjediran DIOludipe OJEhindero Physics. Creative Education 5 2014 * The challenge of effective science teaching in EOmorogbe EJCelestine doi:10.5901/ ajis.2013.v2n7p181 Nigerian Secondary Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 2 7 2013 * Interactive simulations. University of Colorado at Boulder Phet 2013. January 5 * Investigating the effectiveness of computer simulations for chemistry learning JLPlass CMilne BDHomer RNSchwartz EOHayward TJordan JVerkuilen YNg JBarrientos 10.1002/tea.21008 Journal of Research in Science Teaching 49 2012 * Learner performance and attitudes in traditional versus simulated laboratory experiences KPyatt Sims Proceedings ascilite RJAtkinson CMc SK ABeath & CSoong Cheers asciliteSingapore 2007. 2007 ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning * The Effects of Integrating Laboratory Work with Theory on Academic Achievement in Secondary School Physics UStephen FA ZMboto African Research Review 4 4 2010 * Effect of Video-Taped instruction on senior secondary students' performance in Physics Practical STamunoiyowuna JRJames doi: 10.11648/ j.sjedu. 20160406.11 Science Journal of Education 4 6 2016 * The affect of computer supported simulation applications on the academic achievements and attainments of the seventh grade students on teaching of science NTaskin BKandemir Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 9 2010 * Retrieved from Chief Examiner's Annual Report 2015 The West African Examination Council * Effects of Instructional Simulation on Secondary School Students' Achievement in Biology JCUmoke CCNwafor Journal of Education and Practice 5 19 2014 * Student teachers' attitudes about basic Physics Laboratory MYe?ilyurt The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 3 4 2004 * Science Process Skills and Attitudes toward Science among Palestinian Secondary School Students AHZeidan MRJayosi World Journal of Education 5 1 2015 * Volume XVIII Issue VIII Version I * Global Journal of Human Social Science -Effects of Computer Simulations on Senior Secondary School Students' Achievements in Practical