\documentclass[11pt,twoside]{article}\makeatletter

\IfFileExists{xcolor.sty}%
  {\RequirePackage{xcolor}}%
  {\RequirePackage{color}}
\usepackage{colortbl}
\usepackage{wrapfig}
\usepackage{ifxetex}
\ifxetex
  \usepackage{fontspec}
  \usepackage{xunicode}
  \catcode`⃥=\active \def⃥{\textbackslash}
  \catcode`❴=\active \def❴{\{}
  \catcode`❵=\active \def❵{\}}
  \def\textJapanese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK JP}}
  \def\textChinese{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK SC}}
  \def\textKorean{\fontspec{Noto Sans CJK KR}}
  \setmonofont{DejaVu Sans Mono}
  
\else
  \IfFileExists{utf8x.def}%
   {\usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc}
      \PrerenderUnicode{–}
    }%
   {\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}}
  \usepackage[english]{babel}
  \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
  \usepackage{float}
  \usepackage[]{ucs}
  \uc@dclc{8421}{default}{\textbackslash }
  \uc@dclc{10100}{default}{\{}
  \uc@dclc{10101}{default}{\}}
  \uc@dclc{8491}{default}{\AA{}}
  \uc@dclc{8239}{default}{\,}
  \uc@dclc{20154}{default}{ }
  \uc@dclc{10148}{default}{>}
  \def\textschwa{\rotatebox{-90}{e}}
  \def\textJapanese{}
  \def\textChinese{}
  \IfFileExists{tipa.sty}{\usepackage{tipa}}{}
\fi
\def\exampleFont{\ttfamily\small}
\DeclareTextSymbol{\textpi}{OML}{25}
\usepackage{relsize}
\RequirePackage{array}
\def\@testpach{\@chclass
 \ifnum \@lastchclass=6 \@ne \@chnum \@ne \else
  \ifnum \@lastchclass=7 5 \else
   \ifnum \@lastchclass=8 \tw@ \else
    \ifnum \@lastchclass=9 \thr@@
   \else \z@
   \ifnum \@lastchclass = 10 \else
   \edef\@nextchar{\expandafter\string\@nextchar}%
   \@chnum
   \if \@nextchar c\z@ \else
    \if \@nextchar l\@ne \else
     \if \@nextchar r\tw@ \else
   \z@ \@chclass
   \if\@nextchar |\@ne \else
    \if \@nextchar !6 \else
     \if \@nextchar @7 \else
      \if \@nextchar (8 \else
       \if \@nextchar )9 \else
  10
  \@chnum
  \if \@nextchar m\thr@@\else
   \if \@nextchar p4 \else
    \if \@nextchar b5 \else
   \z@ \@chclass \z@ \@preamerr \z@ \fi \fi \fi \fi
   \fi \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi  \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi \fi}
\gdef\arraybackslash{\let\\=\@arraycr}
\def\@textsubscript#1{{\m@th\ensuremath{_{\mbox{\fontsize\sf@size\z@#1}}}}}
\def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}}
\def\abbr{}
\def\corr{}
\def\expan{}
\def\gap{}
\def\orig{}
\def\reg{}
\def\ref{}
\def\sic{}
\def\persName{}\def\name{}
\def\placeName{}
\def\orgName{}
\def\textcal#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Calligraphy}#1}}
\def\textgothic#1{{\fontspec{Lucida Blackletter}#1}}
\def\textlarge#1{{\large #1}}
\def\textoverbar#1{\ensuremath{\overline{#1}}}
\def\textquoted#1{‘#1’}
\def\textsmall#1{{\small #1}}
\def\textsubscript#1{\@textsubscript{\selectfont#1}}
\def\textxi{\ensuremath{\xi}}
\def\titlem{\itshape}
\newenvironment{biblfree}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{bibl}{}{}
\newenvironment{byline}{\vskip6pt\itshape\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont}{\par }
\newenvironment{citbibl}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docAuthor}{\ifvmode\vskip4pt\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont\fi\itshape}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docDate}{}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docImprint}{\vskip 6pt}{\ifvmode\par\fi }
\newenvironment{docTitle}{\vskip6pt\bfseries\fontsize{22pt}{25pt}\selectfont}{\par }
\newenvironment{msHead}{\vskip 6pt}{\par}
\newenvironment{msItem}{\vskip 6pt}{\par}
\newenvironment{rubric}{}{}
\newenvironment{titlePart}{}{\par }

\newcolumntype{L}[1]{){\raggedright\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{C}[1]{){\centering\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{R}[1]{){\raggedleft\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{P}[1]{){\arraybackslash}p{#1}}
\newcolumntype{B}[1]{){\arraybackslash}b{#1}}
\newcolumntype{M}[1]{){\arraybackslash}m{#1}}
\definecolor{label}{gray}{0.75}
\def\unusedattribute#1{\sout{\textcolor{label}{#1}}}
\DeclareRobustCommand*{\xref}{\hyper@normalise\xref@}
\def\xref@#1#2{\hyper@linkurl{#2}{#1}}
\begingroup
\catcode`\_=\active
\gdef_#1{\ensuremath{\sb{\mathrm{#1}}}}
\endgroup
\mathcode`\_=\string"8000
\catcode`\_=12\relax

\usepackage[a4paper,twoside,lmargin=1in,rmargin=1in,tmargin=1in,bmargin=1in,marginparwidth=0.75in]{geometry}
\usepackage{framed}

\definecolor{shadecolor}{gray}{0.95}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}
\usepackage{fancyvrb}
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{marginnote}

\renewcommand{\@cite}[1]{#1}


\renewcommand*{\marginfont}{\itshape\footnotesize}

\def\Gin@extensions{.pdf,.png,.jpg,.mps,.tif}

  \pagestyle{fancy}

\usepackage[pdftitle={Landscape Dynamics in Relation to Slope and Elevation in Garo Hills of Meghalaya, India using Geospatial Technology},
 pdfauthor={}]{hyperref}
\hyperbaseurl{}

	 \paperwidth210mm
	 \paperheight297mm
              
\def\@pnumwidth{1.55em}
\def\@tocrmarg {2.55em}
\def\@dotsep{4.5}
\setcounter{tocdepth}{3}
\clubpenalty=8000
\emergencystretch 3em
\hbadness=4000
\hyphenpenalty=400
\pretolerance=750
\tolerance=2000
\vbadness=4000
\widowpenalty=10000

\renewcommand\section{\@startsection {section}{1}{\z@}%
     {-1.75ex \@plus -0.5ex \@minus -.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\Large\bfseries}}
\renewcommand\subsection{\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\z@}%
     {-1.75ex\@plus -0.5ex \@minus- .2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\Large}}
\renewcommand\subsubsection{\@startsection{subsubsection}{3}{\z@}%
     {-1.5ex\@plus -0.35ex \@minus -.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\large}}
\renewcommand\paragraph{\@startsection{paragraph}{4}{\z@}%
     {-1ex \@plus-0.35ex \@minus -0.2ex}%
     {0.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
     {\reset@font\normalsize}}
\renewcommand\subparagraph{\@startsection{subparagraph}{5}{\parindent}%
     {1.5ex \@plus1ex \@minus .2ex}%
     {-1em}%
     {\reset@font\normalsize\bfseries}}


\def\l@section#1#2{\addpenalty{\@secpenalty} \addvspace{1.0em plus 1pt}
 \@tempdima 1.5em \begingroup
 \parindent \z@ \rightskip \@pnumwidth 
 \parfillskip -\@pnumwidth 
 \bfseries \leavevmode #1\hfil \hbox to\@pnumwidth{\hss #2}\par
 \endgroup}
\def\l@subsection{\@dottedtocline{2}{1.5em}{2.3em}}
\def\l@subsubsection{\@dottedtocline{3}{3.8em}{3.2em}}
\def\l@paragraph{\@dottedtocline{4}{7.0em}{4.1em}}
\def\l@subparagraph{\@dottedtocline{5}{10em}{5em}}
\@ifundefined{c@section}{\newcounter{section}}{}
\@ifundefined{c@chapter}{\newcounter{chapter}}{}
\newif\if@mainmatter 
\@mainmattertrue
\def\chaptername{Chapter}
\def\frontmatter{%
  \pagenumbering{roman}
  \def\thechapter{\@roman\c@chapter}
  \def\theHchapter{\roman{chapter}}
  \def\thesection{\@roman\c@section}
  \def\theHsection{\roman{section}}
  \def\@chapapp{}%
}
\def\mainmatter{%
  \cleardoublepage
  \def\thechapter{\@arabic\c@chapter}
  \setcounter{chapter}{0}
  \setcounter{section}{0}
  \pagenumbering{arabic}
  \setcounter{secnumdepth}{6}
  \def\@chapapp{\chaptername}%
  \def\theHchapter{\arabic{chapter}}
  \def\thesection{\@arabic\c@section}
  \def\theHsection{\arabic{section}}
}
\def\backmatter{%
  \cleardoublepage
  \setcounter{chapter}{0}
  \setcounter{section}{0}
  \setcounter{secnumdepth}{2}
  \def\@chapapp{\appendixname}%
  \def\thechapter{\@Alph\c@chapter}
  \def\theHchapter{\Alph{chapter}}
  \appendix
}
\newenvironment{bibitemlist}[1]{%
   \list{\@biblabel{\@arabic\c@enumiv}}%
       {\settowidth\labelwidth{\@biblabel{#1}}%
        \leftmargin\labelwidth
        \advance\leftmargin\labelsep
        \@openbib@code
        \usecounter{enumiv}%
        \let\p@enumiv\@empty
        \renewcommand\theenumiv{\@arabic\c@enumiv}%
	}%
  \sloppy
  \clubpenalty4000
  \@clubpenalty \clubpenalty
  \widowpenalty4000%
  \sfcode`\.\@m}%
  {\def\@noitemerr
    {\@latex@warning{Empty `bibitemlist' environment}}%
    \endlist}

\def\tableofcontents{\section*{\contentsname}\@starttoc{toc}}
\parskip0pt
\parindent1em
\def\Panel#1#2#3#4{\multicolumn{#3}{){\columncolor{#2}}#4}{#1}}
\newenvironment{reflist}{%
  \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{}
  {%
   \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}%
   \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}%
   \def\makelabel##1{\itshape ##1}}%
  }
  {\end{list}\end{raggedright}}
\newenvironment{sansreflist}{%
  \begin{raggedright}\begin{list}{}
  {%
   \setlength{\topsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\rightmargin}{0.25in}%
   \setlength{\itemindent}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}%
   \setlength{\parsep}{2pt}%
   \def\makelabel##1{\upshape ##1}}%
  }
  {\end{list}\end{raggedright}}
\newenvironment{specHead}[2]%
 {\vspace{20pt}\hrule\vspace{10pt}%
  \phantomsection\label{#1}\markright{#2}%

  \pdfbookmark[2]{#2}{#1}%
  \hspace{-0.75in}{\bfseries\fontsize{16pt}{18pt}\selectfont#2}%
  }{}
      \def\TheFullDate{2013-01-15 (revised: 15 January 2013)}
\def\TheID{\makeatother }
\def\TheDate{2013-01-15}
\title{Landscape Dynamics in Relation to Slope and Elevation in Garo Hills of Meghalaya, India using Geospatial Technology}
\author{}\makeatletter 
\makeatletter
\newcommand*{\cleartoleftpage}{%
  \clearpage
    \if@twoside
    \ifodd\c@page
      \hbox{}\newpage
      \if@twocolumn
        \hbox{}\newpage
      \fi
    \fi
  \fi
}
\makeatother
\makeatletter
\thispagestyle{empty}
\markright{\@title}\markboth{\@title}{\@author}
\renewcommand\small{\@setfontsize\small{9pt}{11pt}\abovedisplayskip 8.5\p@ plus3\p@ minus4\p@
\belowdisplayskip \abovedisplayskip
\abovedisplayshortskip \z@ plus2\p@
\belowdisplayshortskip 4\p@ plus2\p@ minus2\p@
\def\@listi{\leftmargin\leftmargini
               \topsep 2\p@ plus1\p@ minus1\p@
               \parsep 2\p@ plus\p@ minus\p@
               \itemsep 1pt}
}
\makeatother
\fvset{frame=single,numberblanklines=false,xleftmargin=5mm,xrightmargin=5mm}
\fancyhf{} 
\setlength{\headheight}{14pt}
\fancyhead[LE]{\bfseries\leftmark} 
\fancyhead[RO]{\bfseries\rightmark} 
\fancyfoot[RO]{}
\fancyfoot[CO]{\thepage}
\fancyfoot[LO]{\TheID}
\fancyfoot[LE]{}
\fancyfoot[CE]{\thepage}
\fancyfoot[RE]{\TheID}
\hypersetup{citebordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,linkbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,urlbordercolor=0.75 0.75 0.75,bookmarksnumbered=true}
\fancypagestyle{plain}{\fancyhead{}\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}}

\date{}
\usepackage{authblk}

\providecommand{\keywords}[1]
{
\footnotesize
  \textbf{\textit{Index terms---}} #1
}

\usepackage{graphicx,xcolor}
\definecolor{GJBlue}{HTML}{273B81}
\definecolor{GJLightBlue}{HTML}{0A9DD9}
\definecolor{GJMediumGrey}{HTML}{6D6E70}
\definecolor{GJLightGrey}{HTML}{929497} 

\renewenvironment{abstract}{%
   \setlength{\parindent}{0pt}\raggedright
   \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}}
   \vskip16pt
   \textcolor{GJBlue}{\large\bfseries\abstractname\space}
}{%   
   \vskip8pt
   \textcolor{GJMediumGrey}{\rule{\textwidth}{2pt}}
   \vskip16pt
}

\usepackage[absolute,overlay]{textpos}

\makeatother 
      \usepackage{lineno}
      \linenumbers
      
\begin{document}

             \author[1]{kiranmay sarma  }

             \affil[1]{  GGS Idraprastha University}

\renewcommand\Authands{ and }

\date{\small \em Received: 10 December 2012 Accepted: 31 December 2012 Published: 15 January 2013}

\maketitle


\begin{abstract}
        


Garo hills region of northeast India is severely affected by sheet erosion mainly because of the age old tradition of shifting cultivation in the fragile hill slopes aided by other anthropogenic activities. Slope and elevation are important parameters that provide varieties of topographical feature for ecological patches. Vegetation is one of the major factors controlling soil erosion, while most soil erosion occurrences are due to the removal of vegetation and topsoil. Change matrix result indicates dynamic character of landscape.The present study is conducted to examine the landscape dynamics to relate vegetation cover with slope and elevation in three Garo hills districts of Meghalaya using temporal remote sensing data of 2001 and 2010. It is revealed that there is decrease in open forest during the study period while areas under dense forest and non-forest increased. This increased forest areas are confined in the high slopes which are inaccessible.

\end{abstract}


\keywords{change matrix, GIS, jhum, northeast india, remote sensing.}

\begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1cm,1cm) % {block width} (coords) 
\textcolor{GJBlue}{\LARGE Global Journals \LaTeX\ JournalKaleidoscope\texttrademark}
\end{textblock*}

\begin{textblock*}{18cm}(1.4cm,1.5cm) % {block width} (coords) 
\textcolor{GJBlue}{\footnotesize \\ Artificial Intelligence formulated this projection for compatibility purposes from the original article published at Global Journals. However, this technology is currently in beta. \emph{Therefore, kindly ignore odd layouts, missed formulae, text, tables, or figures.}}
\end{textblock*}


\let\tabcellsep& 	 	 		 
\section[{Introduction}]{Introduction}\par
andscape dynamic is concerned with the effect of spatial heterogeneity on ecological process. The physical environment including climate, geology, topography, plant succession, species extinction and evolution is often regarded as one of the most important factors controlling this heterogeneity of the landscape in mountain areas. Disturbances like shifting cultivation, landslide, floods, deforestation, urbanization, forest fire, and the ecosystem modification are responsible for landscape dynamics \hyperref[b26]{(Zimmermann \& Eggenberg, 1990)}. Land use/ coverstudy shows present as well as past conditions of the earth surface and it is a central component and strategy for managing natural resources and monitoring environmental changes  {\ref (Yadavet al., 2012a)}. Landscape ecology is the study of patterns and structures across temporal and spatial scales. Spatial patterns observed in landscape result from complex interactions between biotic and abiotic processes and disturbances that occur within environment (Turner et  al., 2001). As changes occur in the landscape, the overall structure and composition of ecological community is affected, hence the importance of the study related to landscape is increasing for maintainingthe ecological diversity. Among different environmental factors that produce landscape patches slope and elevation are important parameters that provide varieties of topographical features \hyperref[b14]{(Sarma and Barik, 2010)}. The study of the slope is important not only it provides the variety of topographical features but also provides evidence for the interpretation of complex form of the existing landscape and reflects the evolutionary history of the landform \hyperref[b3]{(Fairbridge, 1968)}. Elevation pattern of landscape have been responsible for many factors like climate, isolation, species-area effects, historic events and biomass productivity of landscape patches \hyperref[b5]{(ICIMOD, 2000 and} {\ref Acharyaet al., 2011)}.Vegetation is one of the major factors controlling soil erosion, while most soil erosion occurrences are due to removal of vegetation and topsoil (Bochet and   Fayos, 2004 and Yadavet al., 2012b). The shifting cultivation accounts for 60 percent global forest loss each year (Leleet al., 2008) and in northeast India annual forest loss is about 10,000 sq.kmdue to this unhealthy practice. The total area affected by shifting cultivation (locally known as jhum) in northeast is estimated to be 44,000 sq.km \hyperref[b18]{(Singh, 1990)}. The jhum cycle in northeast has been decreased from 20 to 30 years in the past to about 5 years (Toky and  {\ref Ramakrishnan, 1981)}and in many areas even up to 3-5 years \hyperref[b12]{(Sarma, 2010a)}. Vegetation and land characteristics of Garo hills of Meghalaya, northeast India are heavily influenced by jhum activities (Figure \hyperref[fig_1]{1} Remote sensing and geographical information system (GIS) coupled with computer programs allow to use landscape ecological principle for biodiversity characterization more efficiently  {\ref (Yadavet al., 2013)}. This technology has improved the efficiency of land use/ cover mapping and change detection with respect to slope and elevation pattern at landscape level. Digital Elevation Model (DEM) is a potential tool for terrain analysis at the varied spatial and temporal scales. The objectives of the present study include generation of slope and elevation maps of Garo hills districts of Meghalaya, preparation of land use/ cover maps for two different decades and to examine the dynamic relationships of slope and elevation with land use/ cover using temporal remote sensing data.  
\section[{Study Area}]{Study Area}\par
The Garo Hills of Meghalaya consist of three districts viz., East Garo Hills, West Garo Hills and South Garo Hills (Figure \hyperref[fig_2]{2}). The districts are bordered in the north and west by Assam state, south by Bangladesh and east by West Khasi Hills district of the state. The districts are highly dissected with irregular terrain. The highest point of Garo hills is theNokrek peak with an altitude of 1,412m above msl. The total area of Garo Hills districts is 8,167 sq. km, which is 36.4 percent of the total area of the state \hyperref[b13]{(Sarma, 2010b)}. The soil of the districts is red loam and is poor in silica but rich in clay forming materials. The soil is generally loamy but often found clay to sandy loam. The surface horizon which is about 30 cm thick has colours ranging from reddish brown to dark reddish brown. The soils are rich in organic matter and nitrogen but deficient in phosphorous and potassium and they are acidic in reaction \hyperref[b15]{(Sarma and Barik 2012)}  
\section[{Materials and Methods}]{Materials and Methods}\par
For landscape dynamic study temporal remote sensing imagery of 2001 and 2010 were utilized while for generating digital elevation model 2001 base year was considered (Table \hyperref[tab_0]{1}). The satellite images with bands \hyperref[b6]{(7)} were stacked to prepare an FCC of bands 3(Red), 2(Green) and 1(Blue). The relevant topographic maps and image were geometrically rectified in 1:50,000 scale using geographic projection system UTM; speroid and datum used were WGS 84 with UTM zone 45N. The GIS and image processing software used are ArcGIS 10, Erdas Imagine 2011 and Quantum GIS 1.6. The paradigm for the study is described in Figure \hyperref[fig_3]{3}. Field verification was carried out during 1 st February to 11 th April 2012. Accuracy assessment of the classification schema is given in Table \hyperref[tab_1]{2}.   
\section[{Results}]{Results}\par
Four land use/cover classes viz., dense forest (more than 40\% canopy cover), open forest (10\% to 40\% canopy cover),non-forest (less than 10\%) and current jhumhave been delineated for the study area  {\ref (FSI, 2005)}. For slope three categories of high (above 14 degree), moderate (6 to 14 degree) and low (below 6 degree) are considered. Accordingly for elevation high (above 900 m), moderate (300 to 900 m) and low (below 300 m) categories are fixed.\par
It is found that in both the years the area under open forest (6,365 sq.km and 4,307 sq.km) has the maximum coverage which is followed by non-forest area (2,155 sq.km and 2,846 sq.km). There is a decrease of 2,058 sq.km open forest during the period while areas under non-forest increased by 1,591 sq.km. The area of dense forest increased in the decade(218 sq.km). This may be due to the efforts put by government and other organizations who are working for the regeneration of the natural forests of Garo hills. This increase is found mostly in the areas under moderate and high slope areas. Loss of open forest areas is found in all the slope categories where maximum loss found in low slope category. Similar trend is followed by non-forest areas. The high slope areas are also utilized for shifting cultivation which is vulnerable in terms of sheet erosion. In fact the areas under shifting cultivation in the high slope areas increased during the decade in considerable proportion (      
\section[{Discussions}]{Discussions}\par
Based on Landsat TM (2001) and Landsat ETM+ (2010) data fourbroad types of land use/ cover were observed for the two different years in Garo hills. Classifications of these satellite imagery show that dense forest is confined mostly to the inaccessible area whereas other three types fall mainly in the moderate and low slope and elevation. The primary forest of the districts have been destroyed to a great extent by age old tradition of shifting agriculture which is extensively practiced in the hilly regions of the northeast India \hyperref[b8]{(Ramakrishnan, 1992;} {\ref Yadavet al., 2012)}. This activity has led to the development of a variety of successional plant communities ranging from open forest to recently abandoned shifting cultivation fields \hyperref[b7]{(Prabhu, 2004}). In the present study, the proportion of open forestand nonforests increased with the decrease in slope. These areas represent a mosaic of degraded landscape owing to the gentle slope of the area. This finding is similar to that of \hyperref[b21]{Susana \& Mario (2000)} who reported that deforestation may be widespread in areas where slopes are relatively gentle. There is general trend for mountain ecology that with increasing altitude there exists good ecological conditions \hyperref[b4]{(Hamilton et al. 1999}). This criterion is fulfilling in the present study. The findings of the present research reflect the similar results of Ramesh et al. (1997) who stressed that deforestation process characterized by removal of the smallest and most accessible forest patches, followed by other developmental and livelihood activities. The present study is supported by Sarma and Barik (2010) who revealed that even vulnerable slopes are not spared from shifting cultivation consequences of which could be devastating. Semwalet al. (2004) revealed that deforestation may be widespread in an area where slope is relatively mild in nature. Balaguruet al. (2003)   established while relating vegetation with slope angles of Shervayan hills of Eastern Ghats that number of species increases with increasing degree of slopes. Their finding is very much supportive to the present research. Whereas, \hyperref[b19]{Smith et al. (2005)} while studying relationships between geomorphology and tree density revealed all type of trees in all slope categories but density was high in the stable landforms despite slope variations. 
\section[{VI.}]{VI.} 
\section[{Conclusions}]{Conclusions}\par
Garo hills districts support animpressive forest cover which is mainly concentrated in inaccessible areas and theseshould be conserved for biodiversity. It was observed in this study that the remote forest areas are also slowly encroached by the local people for shifting cultivation, mining and other activities. The districts have witnessed the conversion of forests to other non-forest areas during the last decade. This alteration needs to be checked immediately. After shifting cultivation the fallowland should be allowed to regenerate at least 15-20 years before another cycle. The short cycle not only effects soil fertility but also exposes the top soil for erosion. Further, the conversion of forest areas into other land use should be be undertaken to prevent the area from further deterioration is to educate the people and make them aware of the consequences of the effect of deforestation, mining and shifting cultivation.Landscape dynamics study is important to understand and assess the changes in natural resources due to various natural and anthropogenic reasons. The findings of the present study could be useful for management authority for making strategies for management of natural resources and monitoring its changes in due course of time. Temporal remote sensing data with detailed field observation could be an authentic tool for studying the landscape dynamics in any part of the globe which are environmentally fragile.  
\section[{Global Journal of Human Social Science}]{Global Journal of Human Social Science}\begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{}\includegraphics[]{image-2.png}
\caption{\label{fig_0}}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{1}\includegraphics[]{image-3.png}
\caption{\label{fig_1}Figure 1 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{2}\includegraphics[]{image-4.png}
\caption{\label{fig_2}Figure 2 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{3}\includegraphics[]{image-5.png}
\caption{\label{fig_3}Figure 3 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{6}\includegraphics[]{image-6.png}
\caption{\label{fig_4}Figure 6 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{}\includegraphics[]{image-7.png}
\caption{\label{fig_6}Volume}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{}\includegraphics[]{image-8.png}
\caption{\label{figure8}}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{}\includegraphics[]{image-9.png}
\caption{\label{figure9}}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{}\includegraphics[]{image-10.png}
\caption{\label{figure10}}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{}\includegraphics[]{image-11.png}
\caption{\label{figure11}}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{1} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.2353305785123967\textwidth}P{0.3371900826446281\textwidth}P{0.2774793388429752\textwidth}}
\tabcellsep study\tabcellsep \\
Path \& Row\tabcellsep Data Type\tabcellsep Date Production\\
138\& 42\tabcellsep Landsat TM\tabcellsep 15-12-2001\\
137\& 42\tabcellsep Landsat TM\tabcellsep 21-11-2001\\
137\& 43\tabcellsep Landsat TM\tabcellsep 26-12-2001\\
138 \&42\tabcellsep Landsat ETM+\tabcellsep 06-02-2010\\
137 \&42\tabcellsep Landsat ETM+\tabcellsep 30-01-2010\\
137 \&42\tabcellsep Landsat ETM+\tabcellsep 30-01-2010\\
137 \&42\tabcellsep LiDAR STRM\tabcellsep 2001\\
\tabcellsep (DEMs)\tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_0}Table 1 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{2} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.09026548672566372\textwidth}P{0.44380530973451326\textwidth}P{0.2407079646017699\textwidth}P{0.07522123893805309\textwidth}}
\tabcellsep classification\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Year\tabcellsep Overall classification accuracy\tabcellsep Overall kappa statistics\tabcellsep D D D D )\\
2001\tabcellsep 85.94\%\tabcellsep 0.77\tabcellsep (\\
2010\tabcellsep 92.19\%\tabcellsep 0.85\tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_1}Table 2 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{3} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.24309999999999998\textwidth}P{0.255\textwidth}P{0.1955\textwidth}P{0.15639999999999998\textwidth}}
\multicolumn{2}{l}{Data acquirement}\tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Collection of field data}\\
DEMs data (LIDAR)\tabcellsep Landsat TM for 2001and ETM+ for 2010/ geo-referenced\tabcellsep Collection of GCPs of different Lu/Lc classes\tabcellsep Identification of drivers of deforestation\\
\tabcellsep Layer stacking\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep Subset of the\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Current jhum in\\
Subset of the study\tabcellsep study Area\tabcellsep \tabcellsep different slope and\\
Area\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep elevation\\
\tabcellsep Supervised\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep classification\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
Slope and elevation\tabcellsep Land use/ cover map for 2001 and 2010\tabcellsep Field verifications of different Lu/Lc classes\tabcellsep \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{Change matrix with respect to}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{slope and elevation}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep Results\\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{during 2001 and 2010}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \end{longtable} \par
  {\small\itshape [Note: Bcategories.]} 
\caption{\label{tab_2}Table 3 )}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{3} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.15353403141361255\textwidth}P{0.08010471204188481\textwidth}P{0.1268324607329843\textwidth}P{0.08232984293193718\textwidth}P{0.057853403141361254\textwidth}P{0.08232984293193718\textwidth}P{0.12905759162303665\textwidth}P{0.08010471204188481\textwidth}P{0.057853403141361254\textwidth}}
Land\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{2}{l}{Slope Year 2001}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \tabcellsep Slope Year 2010\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \\
use/cover class\tabcellsep Area in km 2 in low\tabcellsep Area in km 2 in moderate\tabcellsep Area in km 2 in high\tabcellsep Total\tabcellsep Area in km 2 in low\tabcellsep Area in km 2 in moderate\tabcellsep Area in km 2 in high\tabcellsep Total\\
Dense forest\tabcellsep 35\tabcellsep 162\tabcellsep 178\tabcellsep 375\tabcellsep 18\tabcellsep 247\tabcellsep 328\tabcellsep 593\\
Open forest\tabcellsep 1,697\tabcellsep 3,403\tabcellsep 1,265\tabcellsep 6,365\tabcellsep 897\tabcellsep 2,576\tabcellsep 834\tabcellsep 4,307\\
Current jhum\tabcellsep 67\tabcellsep 86\tabcellsep 19\tabcellsep 172\tabcellsep 107\tabcellsep 268\tabcellsep 46\tabcellsep 421\\
Non-forest\tabcellsep 913\tabcellsep 306\tabcellsep 36\tabcellsep 1,255\tabcellsep 1,690\tabcellsep 866\tabcellsep 290\tabcellsep 2,846\\
Total\tabcellsep 2,712\tabcellsep 3,957\tabcellsep 1,498\tabcellsep 8,167\tabcellsep 2,712\tabcellsep 3,957\tabcellsep 1,498\tabcellsep 8,167\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_3}Table 3 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{4} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.15194300518134715\textwidth}P{0.12772020725388603\textwidth}P{0.09248704663212434\textwidth}P{0.07046632124352331\textwidth}P{0.057253886010362694\textwidth}P{0.12772020725388603\textwidth}P{0.09468911917098445\textwidth}P{0.07046632124352331\textwidth}P{0.057253886010362694\textwidth}}
Land\tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{Elevation Year 2001}\tabcellsep \tabcellsep \multicolumn{3}{l}{Elevation Year 2010}\tabcellsep \\
use/cover class\tabcellsep Area in km 2 in low\tabcellsep Area in km 2 in moderate\tabcellsep Area in km 2 in high\tabcellsep Total\tabcellsep Area in km 2 in low\tabcellsep Area in km 2 in moderate\tabcellsep Area in km 2 in high\tabcellsep Total\\
Dense Forest\tabcellsep 88\tabcellsep 163\tabcellsep 124\tabcellsep 375\tabcellsep 98\tabcellsep 365\tabcellsep 130\tabcellsep 593\\
Open Forest\tabcellsep 4,146\tabcellsep 2,197\tabcellsep 22\tabcellsep 6,365\tabcellsep 2,534\tabcellsep 1,762\tabcellsep 11\tabcellsep 4,307\\
Current Jhum\tabcellsep 107\tabcellsep 48\tabcellsep 17\tabcellsep 172\tabcellsep 174\tabcellsep 209\tabcellsep 38\tabcellsep 421\\
Non-Forest\tabcellsep 1,040\tabcellsep 173\tabcellsep 42\tabcellsep 1,255\tabcellsep 2,575\tabcellsep 245\tabcellsep 26\tabcellsep 2,846\\
Total\tabcellsep 5,381\tabcellsep 2,581\tabcellsep 205\tabcellsep 8,167\tabcellsep 5,381\tabcellsep 2,581\tabcellsep 205\tabcellsep 8,167\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_4}Table 4 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{5} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.3206140350877193\textwidth}P{0.06524122807017543\textwidth}P{0.08760964912280701\textwidth}P{0.07456140350877193\textwidth}P{0.08574561403508771\textwidth}P{0.06896929824561404\textwidth}P{0.08574561403508771\textwidth}P{0.061513157894736846\textwidth}}
\tabcellsep Area in\tabcellsep Area\tabcellsep Area in\tabcellsep Area in\tabcellsep Area in\tabcellsep Area\tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep km 2\tabcellsep in \%\tabcellsep km 2\tabcellsep \%\tabcellsep km 2\tabcellsep in \%\tabcellsep \\
Dense to open forest\tabcellsep 43\tabcellsep 1.59\tabcellsep 34\tabcellsep 0.86\tabcellsep 43\tabcellsep 2.87\tabcellsep 120\\
Open forest to dense forest\tabcellsep 22\tabcellsep 0.81\tabcellsep 124\tabcellsep 3.13\tabcellsep 139\tabcellsep 9.28\tabcellsep 285\\
Open forest to current jhum\tabcellsep 90\tabcellsep 3.32\tabcellsep 208\tabcellsep 5.26\tabcellsep 65\tabcellsep 4.34\tabcellsep 363\\
Open forest to non-forest\tabcellsep 902\tabcellsep 33.26\tabcellsep 746\tabcellsep 18.85\tabcellsep 195\tabcellsep 13.02\tabcellsep 1,843\\
Current jhum to open forest\tabcellsep 14\tabcellsep 0.52\tabcellsep 152\tabcellsep 3.84\tabcellsep 13\tabcellsep 0.87\tabcellsep 179\\
Non-forest to open forest\tabcellsep 67\tabcellsep 2.475\tabcellsep 217\tabcellsep 5.48\tabcellsep 22\tabcellsep 1.47\tabcellsep 306\\
No changes\tabcellsep 1,519\tabcellsep 56.01\tabcellsep 2,400\tabcellsep 60.65\tabcellsep 1,003\tabcellsep 66.96\tabcellsep 4,922\\
Others\tabcellsep 55\tabcellsep 2.03\tabcellsep 76\tabcellsep 1.92\tabcellsep 18\tabcellsep 1.20\tabcellsep 149\\
Total\tabcellsep 2712\tabcellsep 100\tabcellsep 3,957\tabcellsep 100\tabcellsep 1,498\tabcellsep 100\tabcellsep 8,167\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_5}Table 5 :}\end{figure}
 \begin{figure}[htbp]
\noindent\textbf{6} \par 
\begin{longtable}{P{0.3263392857142857\textwidth}P{0.0796875\textwidth}P{0.08727678571428571\textwidth}P{0.0720982142857143\textwidth}P{0.08537946428571429\textwidth}P{0.05122767857142857\textwidth}P{0.08537946428571429\textwidth}P{0.06261160714285714\textwidth}}
\tabcellsep Area in\tabcellsep Area\tabcellsep Area in\tabcellsep Area\tabcellsep Area in\tabcellsep Area\tabcellsep \\
\tabcellsep km 2\tabcellsep in \%\tabcellsep km 2\tabcellsep in \%\tabcellsep km 2\tabcellsep in \%\tabcellsep \\
Dense to open forest\tabcellsep 14\tabcellsep 0.26\tabcellsep 97\tabcellsep 3.76\tabcellsep 9\tabcellsep 4.39\tabcellsep 120\\
Open forest to dense forest\tabcellsep 87\tabcellsep 1.62\tabcellsep 183\tabcellsep 7.09\tabcellsep 15\tabcellsep 7.32\tabcellsep 285\\
Open forest to current jhum\tabcellsep 154\tabcellsep 2.86\tabcellsep 191\tabcellsep 7.40\tabcellsep 18\tabcellsep 8.78\tabcellsep 363\\
Open forest to non-forest\tabcellsep 1,637\tabcellsep 30.42\tabcellsep 195\tabcellsep 7.56\tabcellsep 11\tabcellsep 5.37\tabcellsep 1,843\\
Current jhum to open forest\tabcellsep 108\tabcellsep 2.00\tabcellsep 64\tabcellsep 2.48\tabcellsep 7\tabcellsep 3.41\tabcellsep 179\\
Non-forest to open forest\tabcellsep 275\tabcellsep 5.12\tabcellsep 26\tabcellsep 1.00\tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep 2.44\tabcellsep 306\\
No changes\tabcellsep 2,996\tabcellsep 55.68\tabcellsep 1,791\tabcellsep 69.39\tabcellsep 135\tabcellsep 65.85\tabcellsep 4,922\\
Others\tabcellsep 110\tabcellsep 2.04\tabcellsep 34\tabcellsep 1.32\tabcellsep 5\tabcellsep 2.44\tabcellsep 149\\
Total\tabcellsep 5,381\tabcellsep 100\tabcellsep 2,581\tabcellsep 100\tabcellsep 205\tabcellsep 100\tabcellsep 8,167\end{longtable} \par
 
\caption{\label{tab_6}Table 6 :}\end{figure}
 			\footnote{© 2013 Global Journals Inc. (US)2 20} 			\footnote{© 2013 Global Journals Inc. (US)} 			\footnote{© 2013 Global Journals Inc. (US)properlyplanned. The most important step that needs to Year} 		 		\backmatter  			 			 			  				\begin{bibitemlist}{1}
\bibitem[Ecotropics]{b20}\label{b20} 	 		\textit{},  		 			Ecotropics 		.  		18 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Meghalaya and India]{b24}\label{b24} 	 		\textit{},  		 			North-East Meghalaya 		,  		 			India 		.  	 	 		\textit{Journal of Biodiversity Management \& Forestry}  		1  (1)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Singh et al. ()]{b17}\label{b17} 	 		\textit{},  		 			B Singh 		,  		 			S J Phukan 		,  		 			B K Sinha 		,  		 			V N Singh 		,  		 			S K Borthakur 		.  	 	 		\textit{Int. J. Conserv. Sci}  		2011. 2  (1)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Sarma et al. ()]{b13}\label{b13} 	 		‘A brief profile of Meghalaya’.  		 			K Sarma 		,  		 			R Kaul 		,  		 			S K Tiwari 		,  		 			S Kyarong 		,  		 			R Dutta 		,  		 			V Menon 		.  	 	 		\textit{Canopies and Corridors: Conserving the forest of Garo Hills with Elephant and Gibbon as Flagships},  				 (Delhi)  		2010b. p. .  	 	 (Wildlife Trust of India) 
\bibitem[Ramesh et al. ()]{b9}\label{b9} 	 		‘A vegetation based approach to biodiversity gap analysis in the Agastyamalai region’.  		 			B R Ramesh 		,  		 			S Menon 		,  		 			K S Bawa 		.  	 	 		\textit{India. Ambio}  		1997. 26  (8)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Lele et al. ()]{b6}\label{b6} 	 		‘Assessing forest fragmentation in northeastern region (NER) of India using landscape matrices’.  		 			N Lele 		,  		 			P K Joshi 		,  		 			S P Agrawal 		.  	 	 		\textit{Ecological Indicators}  		2008. 8 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Sarma and Barik ()]{b15}\label{b15} 	 		‘Coal mining impact on soil of Nokrek Biosphere Reserve’.  		 			K Sarma 		,  		 			S K Barik 		.  	 	 		\textit{Meghalaya. Indian Journal of Environmental Protection}  		2012. 32  (2)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Sarma et al. (ed.) ()]{b10}\label{b10} 	 		\textit{Development and Environment: Development of Geoenergy Resources and its Impact on Environment and Man of Northeast India},  		 			K Sarma 		,  		 			S K Barik 		,  		 			R K Rai 		.  		Hussain, Z. and Barik, S.K. (ed.)  		2004. New Delhi: Regency Publications. p. .  	 	 (Impact of coal mining on the Nokrek Biosphere Reserve of Meghalaya) 
\bibitem[Acharya et al. ()]{b0}\label{b0} 	 		‘Distribution pattern of trees along an elevation gradient of Eastern Himalaya’.  		 			K B Acharya 		,  		 			J N Sanders 		,  		 			L Vijayan 		,  		 			B Chettri 		.  	 	 		\textit{India. ActaOecologica}  		2011. 37 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Zimmermann and Eggenberg ()]{b26}\label{b26} 	 		‘Ecologieet Bioge´ographie alpines: comparison of vegetation and geomorphology: problems and approach’.  		 			N Zimmermann 		,  		 			S Eggenberg 		.  	 	 		\textit{Rev. Valdo?taine Hist. Nat. Supple´ment}  		1990. 48 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Bochet and Garc?´a-Fayos ()]{b2}\label{b2} 	 		‘Factors controlling vegetation establishment and water erosion on motorway slopes in Valencia’.  		 			E Bochet 		,  		 			P Garc?´a-Fayos 		.  	 	 		\textit{Spain. Restoration Ecology}  		2004. 12 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Hamilton et al. (ed.) ()]{b4}\label{b4} 	 		\textit{Forêtsetsilviculture en montagne},  		 			L S Hamilton 		,  		 			D A Gilmour 		,  		 			D S Cassels 		.  		Ives, J.D. and Les, M.D.L.M (ed.)  		1999. Grenoble. France. p. .  	 
\bibitem[Sarma and Barik ()]{b14}\label{b14} 	 		‘Geomorphological risk and conservation imperatives in Nokrek Biosphere Reserve’.  		 			K Sarma 		,  		 			S K Barik 		.  	 	 		\textit{Meghalaya Using Geoinformatics. NeBIO}  		2010. 1  (2)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Smith et al. ()]{b19}\label{b19} 	 		\textit{Geomorphology, soil texture and tree density in a seasonal Savanna in eastern Venezuela},  		 			S Smith 		,  		 			J F Silva 		,  		 			M R Fariñas 		.  		2005.  	 
\bibitem[Sarma et al. (ed.) ()]{b11}\label{b11} 	 		\textit{Impact of coal mining on vegetation of Nokrek Biosphere Reserve},  		 			K Sarma 		,  		 			S K Barik 		,  		 			R K Rai 		.  		Singh O.P. (ed.)  		2005. New Delhi: Regency Publications. p. .  	 	 (Mining Environment Problems \& Remedies) 
\bibitem[Prabhu ()]{b7}\label{b7} 	 		\textit{Impact of human activities on plant biodiversity of Nokrek biosphere reserve ofMeghalaya},  		 			S D Prabhu 		.  		2004.  		 			North Eastern Hill University. Shillong. India 		 	 	 (Ph.D thesis) 
\bibitem[Yadav et al. ()]{b23}\label{b23} 	 		\textit{Impact of Slash-And-Burn Agriculture on Forest Ecosystem in Garo Hills Landscape of},  		 			P K Yadav 		,  		 			M Kapoor 		,  		 			K Sarma 		.  		2012.  	 
\bibitem[Icimod ()]{b5}\label{b5} 	 		‘Land policies, land management and land degradation in the’.  		 			Icimod 		.  	 	 		\textit{Hindu Kush Himalayas. Nepal Study Report.Kathmandu. Nepal}  		2000.  	 
\bibitem[Susana and Mario ()]{b21}\label{b21} 	 		\textit{Land use and deforestation in the highlands of Chiapas},  		 			O Susana 		,  		 			G Mario 		.  		2000. Maxico.  	 
\bibitem[Yadav et al. ()]{b27}\label{b27} 	 		‘Land use land cover mapping, change detection and conflict analysis of Nagzira-Navegaon corridor, Central India using Geospatial technology’.  		 			P K Yadav 		,  		 			M Kapoor 		,  		 			K Sarma 		.  	 	 		\textit{International Journal of Remote Sensing and GIS}  		2012b. 1  (2)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Turner et al. ()]{b22}\label{b22} 	 		\textit{Landscape ecology in theory and practice, pattern and process},  		 			M Turner 		,  		 			R Gardner 		,  		 			R O'neill 		.  		2001. New York: Springer-Valeg.  	 
\bibitem[Semwal et al. ()]{b16}\label{b16} 	 		‘Patterns and ecological implications of agricultural land-use changes: a case study from Central Himalaya’.  		 			R L Semwal 		,  		 			S Nautiyal 		,  		 			K K Sen 		,  		 			U Rana 		,  		 			R K Maikhuri 		,  		 			K S Rao 		,  		 			K G Saxena 		.  	 	 		\textit{India. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ}  		2004. 102 p. .  	 
\bibitem[Ramakrishnan ()]{b8}\label{b8} 	 		\textit{Shifting agriculture and sustainable development: an interdisciplinary study from northeastern India. UNESCO-MAB Series},  		 			P S Ramakrishnan 		.  		1992. Paris; Carnforth, Lancs, U.K: Parthenon Publication. 424.  	 
\bibitem[Sarma ()]{b12}\label{b12} 	 		‘Shifting cultivation: the sole livelihood of the people of Garo Hills’.  		 			K Sarma 		.  	 	 		\textit{Meghlaya. Ecotone}  		2010a. 2  (2)  p. .  	 
\bibitem[Singh ()]{b18}\label{b18} 	 		‘Soil and water conservation in India’.  		 			G Singh 		.  	 	 		\textit{Proceedings of Symposium on Water Erosion, Settlement and Resource Conservation},  				 (Symposium on Water Erosion, Settlement and Resource ConservationRI. CSWCTR. Dehradun)  		1990.  	 
\bibitem[Fairbridge ()]{b3}\label{b3} 	 		\textit{The encyclopedia of geomorphology. Encyclopedia of earth science series},  		 			R W Fairbridge 		.  		1968. New York: Reinhold Book Corporation. 3 p. 1295.  	 
\bibitem[Yadav et al. ()]{b25}\label{b25} 	 		‘The review of biodiversity and conservation study in India using geospatial technology’.  		 			P K Yadav 		,  		 			K Sarma 		,  		 			S Dookia 		.  	 	 		\textit{International Journal of Remote Sensing and GIS}  		2013. 2  (1) .  	 
\bibitem[Balaguru et al. ()]{b1}\label{b1} 	 		‘Vegetation mapping and slope characteristics in Shervaryan Hills, Eastern Ghats using remote sensing and GIS’.  		 			B Balaguru 		,  		 			S J Britto 		,  		 			N Nagamurugan 		,  		 			D Natarajan 		,  		 			S Soosairaj 		,  		 			S Ravipaul 		,  		 			D I Arockiasamy 		.  	 	 		\textit{Current Science}  		2003. 85  (5)  p. .  	 
\end{bibitemlist}
 			 		 	 
\end{document}
