The Influence of Location and Gender on the Level of Total Quality Management

Table of contents

1. Introduction

QM is a management philosophy, first developed by Edwards Deming after World War II to maintain, develop, and improve the quality of companies' products [1]. In fact, TQM is a comprehensive management model. It is a set of practices that focus on continuous improvement, fulfilling the customers' needs, and reducing rework. It also emphasis on increasing involvement of employees and more teamwork, process redesign, competitive benchmarking, constant measurement of the outcomes, long-range thinking, team-based problem solving, and closer ties with the suppliers [2]. TQM principles can be applied to every organization, such as buisinesses, service organizations, universities, and schools [3]. As the world is presently going through dramatic changes and education is considered the dominant competitive change instrument, so TQM could be a reasonable approach for developing education. The question is what can TQM contribute to education? The literature review of TQM in education shows that many researchers such as Comer and Gates [4], Burke [5], and Pal and Dhodiya [6] confirmed that the use of TQM in education has been encouraged. Sallis [7] found that if an education organization employed TQM, mistakes will be diminished with various systems and procedures, and good group work will be practiced through careful and attentive scheduling.

In education, some factors such as the budget reduction, the low level of the graduates' knowledge and skills have led to the need for society and governments to embark on extensive reconstruction or improvement of the education systems [8]. The Iranian education system is not an exception to these changes. Education experts have always been looking for techniques or strategies to improve the quality of education and keep up with the world standards [9]. They have been trying to increase the quality of education with improving students' knowledge, continual school improvement efforts, and school benchmarking. In this way TQM came to the Iranian education system [10]. Education system of Iran has applied some of TQM principles, including attention to new teaching skills (problem solving and brainstorming), pre-service training for teachers, emphasizing in-service training of the teachers and principals, using class size with the world standards, conducting correct evaluation methods, applying team and group work in classes, improving teachers' knowledge and motivation, and organizing parental associations [10]. Manochehrizadeh [11] in her research showed that there are four principles of TQM implemented in Iranian schools which are included continuous improvement, team work, continuous training, and customer satisfaction. She claimed that in schools where TQM was implemented, it resulted in students' satisfaction. Kamali [10] believed that while some or all of the above principles have been applied in different educational areas in Iran, the effect of the implementation has not been clarified.

Even though the education system in Iran is centralized, which means all of the administration, resources and direction is determined by the Ministry of Education (MOE). It is obvious that all provinces and cities did not get same resources and facilities, for example deprived areas still receive less resources and facilities compared to developed or developing There are many initiatives to improve the education system [9] which include the implementation of TQM in secondary schools, but in Lorestan province (research population), TQM has not resulted in improvements to as high a level as expected [12]. Therefore this study tries to determine the level of TQM implementation in schools in Lorestan province and investigate the significant difference between the level of TQM according to school location and gender of participants. Based on the purpose of this study, four hypotheses have been addressed as follows:

Hypothesis one: there is no significant difference in the level of TQM based on a principal's school location.

Hypothesis two: there is no significant difference in the level of TQM based on a teacher's school location.

Hypothesis three: there is no significant difference in the level of TQM based on a principal's gender.

Hypothesis four: there is no significant difference between the level of TQM and a teacher's gender.

2. II.

3. Methodologhy

Based on studies by Shyi-Huey [13] and Rampa [14], location is one of the demographic variables that has effected on TQM. This study was carried out in Lorestan province, one of the most deprived areas, in Iran. The Lorestan province has 10 cities located in two parts (east and west), and each part has five cities (total 10 cities). Some of the cities in this province are developing cities, and some of them are deprived. To determine the effect of location on the level of TQM, the researchers selected one developing and one deprived city in west part (namely: Khoramabad and Kohdasht) and one developing and one deprived city in east (namely: Borojerd and Azna) by simple random sampling, thus four cities in all.

The populations of this study were 1560 educators (teachers + principals) from 206 secondary schools. By using Cochran (1977) formula, the sample size was 320 educators.

To select 320 educators, at least 8 educators (1560÷206) had to be contacted from each secondary school. Therefore, a total of 40 secondary schools (320÷8) were selected from the four cities. Since each school has one principal; therefore the sample size included 40 principals and 280 teachers. Based on this calculation, simple random sampling used to select teachers in each school. For this purpose, a list of teachers in each selected school was obtained and 7 teachers were randomly selected.

The instrument used in the study was the 4 point Likert's scale questionnaire which was prepared by Rampa [14]. He granted permission to the researchers in this study to use his instrument. This questionnaire has two parts. The first part is biography data. The second part is about the implementation of TQM principles. The Cronbach's alpha value was 0.86 and this showed that the questionnaire has a quite satisfactory reliability [15].

4. III.

5. Results and Discussion

6. a) Demographic findings

As it shown in Table I, the responding sample consists of 280 (87.5 percent) teachers and 40 (12.5%) principals. Table 2 shows that for principals and teachers, 52.5% of respondents are females and 47.5% are male. The Influence of Location and Gender on the Level of Total Quality Management Table 3 presents the information on principals' gender. Out of 40 respondents, 21 (52.5%) were female principals and 19 (47.5%) were male principals. The distribution of principals' gender according to city were: 10 (25%) female and 10 (25%) male principals from Khoramabad, 3 (7.5%) female and 2 (5%) male principals from Kohdasht, 6 (15%) female and 6 (15%) male principals from Borojerd, and 2 (5%) female and 1 (2.5%) male principals from Azna.

Table 4 presents the information on teachers' male teachers from Borojerd, and 14 (5%) female and 7 (2.5%) male teachers from Azna. Overall, the result in Table 5 shows that, based on principals' perception, the level of TQM principles application is high in their schools. There is a similarity between the finding of this study and that described by Thummatassananon [16] who reported that the level of TQM was high in Sakon Nakhon (Thailand) based on administrators' opinions. In Iran, Jahanian [17] reported that the level of TQM, based on principals' views, was high in Tehran school. Likewise, the level of TQM was also reported high Kohkiloyeh and Boyer Ahmad province by Bagheri [18]. However, in the city of Marvdasht, in Iran Salehi, Gheltash, and Ebrahimi [19], found that the level of TQM was medium.

the Level of TQM, based on teachers' perceptions, is high (mean=3.08; SD=.72). The highest level of TQM was Borojerd (mean=3.13; SD=.71). The second city with a high score of TQM was Khoramabad (mean=3.12; SD=.67). The third city with a high score of TQM level was Azna (mean=3.11; SD=.71), but the level of TQM in Kohdasht was medium (mean=2.97; SD=.83). Overall, the result in Table 6 shows that the level of TQM is high in Lorestan province. The finding is consistent with a recent study by Thummatassananon [16] in Sakon Nakhon (Thailand), who reported high level of TQM according to teachers' opinions. The pervious study by Toremen, Karakus, and Yasan [20] in Malatya, (Turkey), also supported the current findings. In the study by Ibrahim [21] reported high level of TQM among teachers in Malaysia (Kedah).

On the contrary, the level of TQM in Iran as reported by teaches in Tehran (the Capital of Iran) was medium [17]. Similarly the level of TQM in Marvdasht city, Iran as studied by Salehi, Gheltash, and Ebrahimi [19] was reported at medium level.

7. c) Hypotheses Testing

Ho 1 : There is no significant difference in the level of

8. TQM based on principals' schools location

To test this hypothesis, the researchers applied Kruskal-Wallis H test, because of the homogeneity of variance assumption which was not met (Sig. p=.002). This data means that principals of different location have rated the TQM level similarly. This also means that the principal's school location does not influence their opinion on the level of TQM.

The results of this study do not agree with the findings of Shyi-Huey [13], who reported that there was a significant difference between the level of TQM and principals' location. As can be seen from Table 3 and Table 4, the Table 6 shows that the overall mean score of Table 7 shows that there is no significant To test this hypothesis, the researchers applied one-way ANOVA analysis. level of TQM is significantly higher in the city of 1. There is no significant difference in the level of TQM based on a principal's school location. 2. There is a significant difference in the level of TQM based on a teacher's school location.

It can be concluded that a principal's location had no significant effect on level of TQM, but location had significant effect on TQM level based on teachers' opinions.

Ho 3 : There is no significant difference in the level of TQM based on a principal's gender According Test of homogeneity of variances, the significant value for Levene test for principals is 0.002<0.05, thus based on this score, the homogeneity of variance assumption was not met. Therefore, instead of independent sample t-test, Mann-Whitny test was conducted to investigate the significant difference in the level of TQM based on principals' gender. On the other hand, independent sample t-test was conducted to investigate the significant difference in the level of TQM based on a teacher's gender. .138 a significant difference in TQM's level based on principal's gender (Sig. p =0.128>0.05). It can be concluded that a principal's gender had no significant effect on the level of TQM. The findings of this study are supported by Shyi-Huey [13], who reported that there was no significant difference in all TQM factors based on an administrator's gender. In the same vein, Aksu [22] found that there was no significant difference in level of TQM based on an administrator's gender. Ho 4 : There is no significant difference in the level of TQM based on a teacher's gender

To test this hypothesis, the researchers applied an independent sample t-test to compare the level of TQM between female and male teachers. The Influence of Location and Gender on the Level of Total Quality Management Table 8 illustrates that there is a significant

As shown in Table 9 a teacher's view that the

The result from Table 10 shows that there is no

The result from Table 11 has shown that there is Khoramabad that compare to Kohdasht (Sig. P 009).

The results of this analysis can be summarized as follows:

The findings of this study are consistent with the Toremen, Karakus, and Yasan [20] study. They concluded that there was no significant difference in the level of TQM between male and female teachers. Thakkar, Deshmukh, and Shastree [23] reported that there was no significant difference between male and female teachers in the level of perception of TQM level in education.

On the contrary, other studies have indicated that there was a significant difference in the level of TQM in secondary school teachers based a teacher's gender in Mysore (India) [24]. The mean score of female teachers were higher than the male teachers. They also believe that female teachers are more honest and dedicated to their work.

9. IV. Discussion and Recommendations

The findings of this study show that a principal's school location had no significant effect on level of TQM, but location is one of the demographic variables which have effect on level of TQM based on teacher perceptions. As mentioned earlier, teachers in Khoramabad rated the level of TQM in their school (Mean=3.12) significantly higher compared to Kohdasht teachers (Mean=2.97). As Khoramabad is both the capital and the largest city of the Lorestan province, so the schools located in this city have more facilities and resources than schools in other cities in the province. While Kohdasht is one of the deprived cities in the Lorestan province; therefore, their schools have fewer resources and facilities compared to schools in Khoramabad. For this reason, the level of TQM in Khoramabad is higher and significantly different from that in Kohdasht. The result of this study has revealed that gender does not have any influential effect on the level of TQM implementation for principals and teachers. The outcomes of the present study made information available to the Ministry of Education in Iran, education administrators, policy makers, principals, and teachers to develop the level of TQM, with emphasis on students' satisfaction. In the case of Iran, it is recommended that the Ministry of Education be the driving force to establish a TQM department within the ministry headquarters. This department could study the current situation and develop a policy that ensures quality in schools and initiate new approaches as appropriate to tackle the situation. They can organize workshops and seminars on a regular basis, both centrally and regionally, to help educators develop their skills and knowledge about TQM. School principals and teachers should try to strengthen and stay at a high level for TQM. They should adapt themselves with new skills and make changes.

V.

10. Conclusion

TQM was originally designed for industry. However, many researchers and educators believe that TQM can be applied to education systems and schools [25][26][27]. The principles of TQM could be applied as a tool for boosting the student's moral, raising productivity, saving time, empowering people at all levels, and providing higher quality services to customers [27]. This research paper tries to determine the significant difference in the level of TQM based on location and gender among principals and teachers in the province of Lorestan, Iran. As the general findings, the level of TQM was high based on principals and teachers opinion.

Based on results, there is no significant difference in TQM's level based on a principal's and a teacher's gender. Additionally, there is no significant difference in the level of TQM based on a principal's location. But there is a significant difference in the level of TQM based on a teacher's location. Teachers in the deprived city of Kohdasht rated the level of TQM as significantly lower the teacher in the more affluent city of Khoramabad. It can be concluded that a principal's and a teacher's gender, and also principal's location had no significant effect on level of TQM. The finding of this study also confirmed that the idea suggesting that the level of TQM is difference between male and female principals and teachers is not true.

Figure 1. Ho 2 :
2There is no significant difference in the level of TQM based on a teacher's school locationThe Influence of Location and Gender on the Level of Total Quality Management
Figure 2. Table 1 :
1
Position Frequency Percentage
Principal 40 12.5
Teachers 280 87.5
Total 320 100
Figure 3. Table 2 :
2
Principal Teacher
N % N %
Female 21 52.5 147 52.5
Male 19 47.5 133 47.5
Total 40 100 280 100
Figure 4. Table 3 :
3
and location
City Female Male Total
No % No % No %
Khoramabad 10 25 10 25 20 50
Kohdasht 3 7.5 2 5 5 12.5
Borojerd 6 15 6 15 12 30
Azna 2 5 1 2.5 3 7.5
Total 21 52.5 19 47.5 40 100
gender. Out of 280 respondents, 147 (52.5%) were
female teaches and 133 (47.5%) were male teachers.
The distribution of teachers gender by city were: 70
(25%) female and 70 (25%) male teachers from
Khoramabad, 21 (7.5%) female and 14 (5%) male
teachers from Kohdasht, 42 (15%) female and 42 (15%)
Note: -© 2014 Global Journals Inc. (US)
Figure 5. Table 4 :
4
and location
City Female Male Total
No % No % No %
Khoramabad 70 25 70 25 140 50
Kohdasht 21 7.5 14 5 35 12.
5
Borojerd 42 15 42 15 84 30
Azna 14 5 7 2.5 21 7.5
Total 147 52.5 133 47.5 280 100
percentage of distribution of principals and teachers by
gender and location, are the same.
b) Level of TQM
Figure 6. Table 5
5
Figure 7. Table 5 :
5
level of TQM
Principal Mean SD Level Rank
Khoramabad 3.30 .57 High 1
Kohdasht 2.98 1.12 Medium 3
Borojerd 3.26 .60 High 2
Azna 2.94 .33 Medium 4
Overall 3.12 .65 High
Note: Low (1.00< M ?2.00), Medium (2.01 <M ?3.00),
High (3.01 <M ?4.00)
Figure 8. Table 6 :
6
of TQM
Teacher Mean SD Level Rank
Khoramabad 3.12 .67 High 2
Kohdasht 2.97 .83 Medium 4
Borojerd 3.13 .71 High 1
Azna 3.11 .71 High 3
Overall 3.08 .72 High
Note: Low (1.00< M ?2.00), Medium (2.01 <M
?3.00), High (3.01 <M ?4.00)
Figure 9. Table 7 :
7
mean score of TQM level between different cities
(principals' opinion)
Principal Chi-Squqre 5.78
df 3
Asymp. Sig. 0.12
difference in the mean score of TQM level between
different cities based on a principal's opinion (p >0.05).
Figure 10. Table 8 :
8
mean score of TQM level between different cities
(teachers' opinion)
df Mean F Sig.
Square
Teachers Between 3 0.55 2.77 0.04
Groups
Within 276 0.20
Groups
Total 279
difference in the mean score of TQM level in different
cities based on teachers' opinions (F =2.77, Sig. p
=0.04).
Figure 11. Table 9 :
9
(I) City (J) City Mean Sig.
Differenc
e (I-J)
Khoramabad Kohdasht .223* .009
Borojerd .094 .130
Azna .144 .169
Kohdasht Khoramaba -.223* .009
d
Borojerd -.129 .153
Azna -.078 .526
Borojerd Khoramaba -.094 .130
d
Kohdasht .129 .153
Azna .050 .644
Azna Khoramaba -.144 .169
d
Kohdasht .078 .526
Borojerd -.050 .644
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05
level.
Figure 12. Table 10 :
10
principals' gender
TQM
Mann-Whitney U 144.500
Wilcoxon W 375.500
Z -1.523
Asvmp. Sig. (2-tailed) .128
Exact Sig. [2*(1-tailed Sig.)]
Figure 13. Table 11
11
: t-test for TQM level based on teachers'
gender
t-test for Equality of Means
t df Sig. (2- Mean
tailed) Difference
Equal -.97 278 .33 -.05
variances
assumed
Equal -.97 277.38 .32 -.05
variances not
assumed
no significant difference in TQM's level based on
teacher's gender (t (278) = -0.97, p=0.33>0.05). This
data means that a teacher's gender had no significant
effect on the level of TQM.

Appendix A

  1. , Quality Assurance in Education 2006. 14 (4) p. .
  2. , Quarterly Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration 2009. 1 (2) .
  3. What Is the Main Problem Facing to Public Education System in Your Community?. A Kamali . Quarterly Journal of Education 2009. 25 (3) .
  4. Preparing for Implementation of TQM in Headquarter in Lorestan Province, in Education, A Mirderikvand . 2007. Azad Islamic University: Tehran
  5. A n Integrated Model of TQM and GE-Six Sigma. C C Yang . International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage 2005. 1 (1) p. .
  6. Introduction to Research in Education, D Ary , L C Jacobs , A Razavieh . 2009. California: Wadsworth Publishing Co. (8th ed.)
  7. Total Quality Management in Education, E Sallis . 2002. London: Cogan Page. (3rd ed.)
  8. Total quality management practices in Turkish primary schools. Quality Assurance in Education, F Toremen , M Karakus , T Yasan . 2009. 17 p. .
  9. An Investigation between Existing of Educational Administrators and TQM Principles in Kohkiloyeh and Boyer Ahmad province, Iran, G Bagheri . 2005. Tehran. Tarbiat Moallem University (Kharazmi University (Master Thesis)
  10. Total Quality Management (TQM) in Education-Perception of Secondary School Teachers, H M Pour , K Yeshodhara . 2007. Mysore; India.
  11. Leave no Child Behind: Preparing Today's Youth for Tomorrow's World, J P Comer , H L Gates . 2004. New Haven. Yale Univ Pr
  12. Total quality management (TQM) in self-financed technical institutions: A quality function deployment (QFD) and force field analysis approach. Quality Assurance in Education, J Thakkar , S Deshmukh , A Shastree . 2006. 14 p. .
  13. Total Quality Management in Education with Information Technology. K Pal , M J Dhodiya . International Journal of Educational Administration 2011. 3 (1) p. .
  14. Impact of TQM on Company's Performance. Kumar . International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 2009. 26 (1) p. .
  15. Applying TQM Philosophy to the Teaching and Learning Process, in Learning for an Unknown Future. L F Tong , Y B Han . 26th HERDSA Annual References Références Referencias Conference, (Christchurch, New Zealand; New Zealand
    ) 2003. p. 397.
  16. TQM readiness level perceived by the administrators working for the central organization of the Ministry of National Education in Turkey. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, M B Aksu . 2003. 14 p. .
  17. Applying Total Quality Management in Academics, Quality Guide to the Non-formal and Informal learning Processes. M Dheeraj . SEEQUEL 2004.
  18. Ministry of Education of the I.R. of Iran, National Report on Development of Education in the I.R. of Iran with an Emphasis on Inclusive Education a way to Future, 2008. Bureau of International Scientific Cooperation.
  19. Educator Attitudes towards the Appropriateness of Total Quality Management: A Survey of Elementary and middle School Administrators and Faculty, M K Cunningham . 2007. Capella University
  20. An investigation into the Relationship between Readiness to Perform TQM. M Salehi , A Gheltash , S Ebrahimi . Organizational Culture and Marvdasht School Principals' Effectiveness
  21. TQM-based Selfassessment in the Education Sector, Experiences from a Swedish Upper Secondary School Project, M Svensson , B Klefsjo .
  22. Total quality management in secondary schools in Kenya: extent of practice. Quality Assurance in Education, M W Ngware , D K Wamukuru , S O Odebero . 2006. 14 p. .
  23. of Total Quality Management (TQM) in Schools: A Comparative Study, 2000. Universiti Utara Malaysia
  24. A Study of Relationship between TQM and Effectiveness of Secondary School Principles of Tehran. R Jahanian . Quarterly Journal of Education Leadership & Administration 2010. 4 (3) .
  25. The Relationship between Total Quality Management and School Improvement, S H Rampa . 2004. University of Pretoria: South Africa
  26. Factors Influencing the Total Quality Management (TQM) Behaviors of Lab School under the Office of Sakon Nakhon Educational Service Area. S Thummatassananon . European Journal of Social Sciences 2012. 27 (3) p. .
  27. Improvement of school performance: Implementing Total Quality Management and learning organization in selected technological universities, Technological Colleges, and Colleges for professional training in Taiwan, W U Shyi-Huey . 2004. Taiwan; Louisville, Kenturkey.
  28. Organization change: Theory and practice, W W Burke . 2010. Sage Publications, Inc. (3rd ed)
Date: 2014 2014-01-15